Aggregation-induced emission effect on turn-off fluorescent switching of a photochromic diarylethene

  1. 1 ORCID Logo ,
  2. 1 ORCID Logo ,
  3. 1 ORCID Logo ,
  4. 1 ORCID Logo ,
  5. 1 ,
  6. 2 ORCID Logo ,
  7. 3 ORCID Logo ,
  8. 4 ORCID Logo ,
  9. 4,5 ORCID Logo ,
  10. 4 ORCID Logo and
  11. 1,4 ORCID Logo
1Department of Materials Chemistry, Ryukoku University, Seta, Otsu, Shiga 520-2194, Japan
2Department of Materials and Environmental Science, the University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Komaba, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8505, Japan
3Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5198 Japan
  1. Corresponding author email
This article is part of the thematic issue "Molecular switches".
Guest Editor: W. Szymanski
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 2204–2212. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.15.217
Received 10 Jul 2019, Accepted 02 Sep 2019, Published 20 Sep 2019
A non-peer-reviewed version of this article has been posted as a preprint https://doi.org/10.3762/bxiv.2019.66.v1
Full Research Paper
cc by logo
PDF
Album
Supp Info
Cite

Abstract

Background: Diarylethenes are well-known photochromic compounds, which undergo cyclization and cycloreversion reactions between open- and closed-ring isomers. Recently, diarylethene derivatives with photoswitchable fluorescent properties were prepared. They are applicable for fluorescence imaging including bio-imaging. On the other hand, a new system called “excited state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT)” is reported. In the system, absorption and emission bands are largely separated due to the proton transfer, hence it showed strong fluorescence even in the crystalline state. We aimed to construct the photochromic system incorporating the ESIPT mechanism.

Results: A diarylethene incorporating a fluorescent moiety that exhibit ESIPT behavior was prepared. The ESIPT is one of the examples which express the mechanisms of aggregation-induced emission (AIE). This compound emits orange fluorescence with a large Stokes shift derived from ESIPT in aprotic solvents such as THF or hexane, while it exhibits only a photochromic reaction in protic solvents such as methanol. In addition, it shows turn-off type fluorescence switching in an aprotic solvent and in crystals. The fluorescence is quenched as the content of closed-ring isomers increases upon UV light irradiation.

Conclusions: A diarylethene containing an ESIPT functional group was prepared. It showed fluorescent turn-off behavior during photochromism in aprotic solvents as well as in crystalline state upon UV light irradiation. Furthermore, it showed AIE in THF/water mixtures with blue-shift of the emission.

Keywords: AIE; diarylethene; ESIPT fluorescent switching; turn-off fluorescence

Introduction

Diarylethenes are well-known photochromic molecules and are widely applied to molecular switches and systems [1,2]. Recently, the photo-switching of fluorescence signals by using diarylethene switches has attracted much attention because of the potential in various optoelectronic applications [3]. For example, fluorescence switching for molecular level recording [4], multiple-fluorescence for logic circuits [5] as well as biological applications [6] and super-resolution microscopy for bio-imaging [7,8]. The fluorescence switching in solid state is attracting much attention from both scientific and technological points of view, such as sensors, electroluminescent displays, memory devices [9].

On the other hand, molecular aggregation also affects the intensity of fluorescence [10,11]. Some material shows fluorescence by aggregation (aggregation-induced emission (AIE)), while the others decay the fluorescence by aggregation (aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ)). The luminogenic materials with AIE have attracted much interest since Tang et al. reported the AIE concept [12]. The introduction of photo-switching ability in the system will be interesting for creating new AIE systems. In addition, organic photochromic crystals are inherently capable of photo-reversible luminescence switching because the electronic structures of photochromic molecules reversibly change upon photoisomerization [13,14]. However, such a fluorescent system in condensed phase emits fluorescence often absorbed in adjacent molecules, therefore a large Stokes shift is indispensable for such a system.

One of the possible choices to achieve such a large Stokes shift is to introduce the excited-state intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT). The process of ESIPT is a fast process even comparable to the internal conversion [15,16]. This is because the proton transfer occurs through an intramolecular hydrogen bond. This is also an origin of a large Stokes shift (8,000–11,000 cm−1) in the emission from the ESIPT state. Consequently, yellow luminescence was observed by UV-excitation [17,18]. Mutai et al. reported an ESIPT luminescence of an imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine derivative, in which remarkable fluorescence was observed and no overlapping from the absorption band due to the large Stokes shift of the fluorescence [19,20]. Photochromic diarylethene systems with ESIPT moieties are already reported in some research groups [21-23].

Herein, we prepared a diarylethene incorporating the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine moiety with ESIPT ability and reported the fluorescence switching of the system.

Results and Discussion

The diarylethene 1o having an ESIPT moiety was prepared by a coupling reaction of asymmetric diarylethene 3 [24] and 6-bromo-2-(2’-methoxyphenyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine 4 [25] followed by ether cleavage according to Figure 1.

[1860-5397-15-217-1]

Figure 1: Synthetic procedure for a diarylethene (1o).

The photochromic reaction and spectral changes are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The photochromic absorption spectral changes in THF are shown in Figure 3. Upon UV light irradiation of the solution of 1o, the color changed to blue with increasing the absorption band at 587 nm of the closed-ring isomer 1c, then by visible light irradiation the color disappeared and reproducing the absorption spectra at 285 nm of 1o. The cyclization and cycloreversion reactions of 1 were measured in THF and methanol. The results were summarized in Table 1.

[1860-5397-15-217-2]

Figure 2: Photochromic reaction of diarylethene 1o having an ESIPT moiety.

[1860-5397-15-217-3]

Figure 3: Absorption spectral changes of diarylethene 1o having an ESIPT moiety in THF (c = 1.3×10-5 M). Black solid line: 1o, blue solid line: 1c, blue broken line: photostationary state under irradiation with 313 nm light (1o/1c = 4.2: 95.8) (irradiation. for 30 s).

Table 1: Photochromic properties of a diarylethene 1 in methanol and THF.

compounds λmax/nm (ε/104 M−1 cm−1) Φo→c
(313 nm) 		Φc→o
(577 nm)
open-ring isomer closed-ring isomer
1 (in THF) 285 (5.7) 587 (2.1) 0.31 0.0062
1 (in methanol) 283 (5.5) 584 (2.0) 0.34 0.0073

The quantum yields of cyclization and cycloreversion reactions of 1o in THF are obtained to be 0.31 and 6.2 × 10−3, respectively. They are a little bit smaller than those of simple diarylethene switches having thiophene rings as aryl groups [26]. It may be due to the connection with an ESIPT moiety. Only slight changes were observed in absorption spectra as well as photochromic quantum yields in two solvents.

In the protic solvents including methanol, 1o and 1c did not emit fluorescence, while only 1o emitted in aprotic solvent, i.e., in hexane, orange fluorescence with a fluorescence quantum yield (Φf) of 0.027. The fluorescent emission spectra of 1o in several solvents were shown in Figure 4, and λmax of the emission spectra and the fluorescence quantum yields in the solvents are summarized in Table 2. These emission spectra of 1o were largely red-shifted, indicating the ESIPT property. Generally, the fluorescence quantum yields decreased with increasing the permittivity of the solvents. No fluorescence was observed for methanol and acetonitrile solutions, indicating the suppression of ESIPT, because the solvents were used without dehydration.

[1860-5397-15-217-4]

Figure 4: Fluorescent spectra of 1o in several solvents (λex = 370 nm). Hexane (black line), chloroform (red line), dichloromethane (green line), THF (blue line), 2-propanol (pale blue line), methanol (pink line), acetonitrile (orange line). The absorption at the excited wavelength of each solution was adjusted to 0.05. (emission peaks at 740 nm is attributed to the 2nd order diffracted excitation light.)

Table 2: Emission maxima of the fluorescence spectra and the relative fluorescence quantum yields Φf in several solvents.

solution λmaxa / nm Φfa permittivity / F m−1 refractive index [27]
hexane 625 0.027 2.0 1.3727
chloroform 635 0.013 4.8 1.4459
THF 670 0.002 7.5 1.4050
dichloromethane 650 0.006 9.1 1.4242
2-propanol 623 0.004 18 1.3776
methanol – – 33 1.3288
acetonitrile – – 37 1.3442

aλex = 370 nm.

The intensity of the fluorescence decreased gradually upon UV light irradiation accompanied with the formation of 1c, because of excitation energy transfer from the ESIPT moiety to the closed-ring isomer (Figure 5) [4].

[1860-5397-15-217-5]

Figure 5: (a) The energy diagram of the ESIPT process of 1. (b) ESIPT fluorescence quenching upon UV light (λ = 313 nm) irradiation of 1o in THF solution. The fluorescence is quenched by photo-generated closed-ring isomer 1c.

The wavelengths of absorption (Table 3) and fluorescence (Table 4) were obtained computationally by using density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT (TDDFT). The excitation wavelengths as well as the emission wavelength qualitatively agrees with the experimental results. Since compound 1 consists of a diarylethene moiety and an imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine moiety, the characteristic of 1 has the combination of these two moieties. As it is expected, the stable structure of the ESIPT is found computationally only in the excited state. (Hereafter, we denote 1o-NH (1c-NH) as the ESIPT state of 1o (1c) and 1o-OH (1c-OH) as the original structure shown in Figure 2 to emphasize the structural difference.) Unexpectedly, however, the optimized structure at the first excited state, 1o-NH is stable, but 1c-NH is not (the energy difference between 1c-OH and 1c-NH is 11.1 kcal/mol). This is because the first excited state of 1c is mainly localized on the diarylethene moiety. The HOMO orbital of 1o is localized on the imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine moiety whereas the LUMO orbital is manly localized on the diarylethene moiety. Thus, the proton-transfer in the excited state is favorable at the first excited state of 1o.

Table 3: Excitation energies for 1o and 1c in THF.

  excited state excitation energies (λ) oscillator strength
1o 1 3.38 eV (366 nm) 0.2108
  2 3.48 eV (356 nm) 0.2089
1c 1 1.97 eV (630 nm) 0.6744
  2 2.53 eV (490 nm) 0.0308

Table 4: Emission energies for 1o and 1c in THF.

  excited state emission energies (λ) oscillator strength
1o 1 1.69 eV (735 nm) 0.0027
  2 2.31 eV (538 nm) 0.3004
1c 1 1.40 eV (887 nm) 0.5519
  2 2.23 eV (555 nm) 0.0471

To the THF solution of 1o, water was gradually added, and the intensities and color changes of the fluorescence were monitored. By adding 10 vol % water the fluorescence was dramatically reduced. However, by the addition of 80 vol %, color of fluorescence changed to orange and the intensity increased (Figure 6a). In the mixture of 90 vol % water and 10 vol % THF the fluorescence band was blue-shifted, and the color changed to yellow, and the intensity was enhanced (Figure 6b). Such a blue shift of ESIPT fluorescence was already reported and it is ascribed to suppression of the stabilization of the excited zwitterionic species through solvent rearrangement and/or further conformational changes of the substrate [19].

[1860-5397-15-217-6]

Figure 6: (a) Fluorescence photographs of solutions/suspensions of 1o (1.2×10-4 M) in THF/water mixtures with different water contents under UV light (λ = 365 nm) irradiation. (b) The fluorescence spectra of 1o solutions (λex = 370 nm). (c) The fluorescence quenching of THF 100 vol % (water 0 vol %) solution at 670 nm (broken line) and that of THF/water = 10:90 (v/v) at 585 nm (solid line) upon UV irradiation.

The X-ray analysis data of a single crystal of 1o is shown in Figure S1 and Table S1 in Supporting Information File 1. The distance between two reactive carbon atoms in the thiophene rings was obtained to be 3.534 Å, which is less than 4.2 Å. It indicates the molecule is photoreactive in the crystalline state [28].

In the crystalline state, 1o emitted green fluorescence (Φf = 0.031) as shown in Figure 7b. The color is more blue-shifted color compared with the mixed solution (THF/water = 10:90 (v/v)). The fluorescence is also quenched with the formation of 1c upon UV light irradiation, indicating turn-off type fluorescent switch (Figure 6c and Figure 7e) [29,30]. The emission from the aggregates quenched much faster than the solution (Figure 6c) (Supporting Information File 2, Movie 1). This is due to a “giant amplification of fluorescence photoswitching” ascribed by a very efficient intermolecular Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) process between the fluorescent units and the photochromic moieties in their closed form within the aggregated state [29]. The crystal did not show any vapochromism, while a dramatic fluorescent color change from green to pink was observed when chloroform was dropped to the UV light irradiated crystal 1o (Supporting Information File 3, Movie 2).

[1860-5397-15-217-7]

Figure 7: (a) Crystals of 1o before UV light irradiation, (b) Green fluorescence of 1o observed under UV light (λ = 365 nm) irradiation, (c) Cyclization proceeded to form 1c with suppression of the fluorescence, (d) Fluorescence spectra of 1o in the crystalline state (λex = 370 nm, λmax = 537 nm), (e) The fluorescence quenching of 1o in the crystalline state (λex = 370 nm, λem = 537 nm) upon UV irradiation.

The rate of fluorescence quenching (τ1/2 is less than 0.2 s) in the crystalline state is much faster than those observed in solutions. This is attributed to the degree of condensation which is much higher in the crystalline state. The mechanism of the fast quenching is expected to be related to the amplification of photo-switching of a photochromic organic nanoparticle system as well as the crystalline system reported by Fukaminato and co-workers [29,30]. A detailed study of the amplification will be carried out in the future.

Conclusion

In summary, we prepared a new diarylethene derivative having an ESIPT functional moiety. It shows the pink fluorescence upon UV light irradiation. Prolonged irradiation with UV light, resulted in the suppressed emission accompanied with a proceeding photocyclization reaction. This is turn-off type fluorescence. The fluorescence was also suppressed in protic and polar solvents because of prohibition of the ESIPT. In the THF/water mixed solvents, when the content of water was increased to 10–60 vol %, the fluorescence was quenched; however, strong fluorescence and blue-shift of emission band was observed above 80 vol % of water content. This is attributable to the AIE effect. The effect was much more remarkable in crystalline state. The emission can be switchable by diarylethene moiety. The effect was also observed in the crystal. The crystal of 1o emits green fluorescence, and the emission was also suppressed by forming the closed-ring isomer. The crystal shows pink fluorescence once chloroform droplets were dropped on the crystal. The system will be useful for sensors and color indicators.

Experimental

General: Starting materials were commercially available and were used without further purification. Melting points were determined on a Yanaco MP-500D melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. 1H (400 MHz), 13C (100 MHz) and 19F NMR (376 MHz) spectra were recorded on a JEOL JNM-400 spectrometer at ambient temperature. The splitting patterns are designated as follows: s (singlet); d (doublet); dd (double doublet); t (triplet); q (quartet); m (multiplet) and br (broad). Chemical shifts are denoted in δ (ppm) referenced to the residual protic solvent peaks. Coupling constants J are denoted in Hz. Mass spectra were recorded on a MALDI-Spiral-TOF-MS mass spectrometer with DCTB (10 mg/mL in CHCl3) as a matrix. Absorption and emission spectra were monitored on Hitachi U-4150 spectrophotometer and Hitachi F-7100 fluorescence spectrophotometer, respectively. Fluorescence quantum yields in several solvents were obtained as comparison with that of 9,10-bis(phenylethynyl)anthracene in hexane (Φf = 1.0) [31]. The luminescence quantum yields of crystalline solids were measured using a JASCO ILF-533 integral sphere attached to a JASCO FP-6600 spectrofluorophotometer. The mixture of microcrystalline compounds (2 mg) and powdered sodium chloride (1 g) were put into a 5 mm quartz cell, which was then placed in the integral sphere. The quantum yield was calculated using an installed software. The solid-state absorption spectrum was obtained by Kubelka–Munk conversion of a diffractive reflectance spectrum of the above mixture measured on a JASCO FP-6600 spectrofluorophotometer equipped with ILF-533 integral sphere. KEYENCE VHX-500, VH-S30, VH-Z20 were used to monitor the crystals. For the UV light irradiation, KEYENCE UV-400, UV-50H (λ = 365 nm), Spectronics Corporation Westbury, New York, USA Spectro Line Highest Ultraviolet Intensity Guaranteed (100 V, 40 A, λ = 313 nm) and AS ONE Handy UV Lamp SLUV-4 (λ = 365 nm) were used. For visible light irradiation, a 500W USHIO SX-UI501XQ Xenon lamp attached with Toshiba color filters (Y-48, Y-44, and UV-29) was used.

The Gaussian09 program package [32] was used for geometry optimizations with DFT for ground states and subsequent TDDFT calculations. For the calculation of the fluorescence, the geometry optimizations were performed for the first excited state obtained by TDDFT. The hybrid B3LYP functional [33-35] was adopted to exchange-correlation term of DFT. The gaussian 6-31G(d,p) basis set was adopted to all calculations. As for the solvent effect, polarizable continuum model (PCM) [36] was employed for THF.

X-ray crystallographic analysis for crystal of 1o was carried out at BL40XU beamline of SPring-8. Si(111) channel cut monochromator was used and the wavelength and the size of X-ray beam were 0.81106 Å and 150 × 150 μm (square), respectively. The diffraction data was collected by oscillation method using EIGER detector at 173 K. The data were corrected for absorption effects by multi-scan method with ABSCOR [37]. The structure was solved by the direct method and refined by the full-matrix least-squares method using the SHELX-2014/7 program. The positions of all hydrogen atoms were calculated geometrically and refined by the riding model. The crystallographic data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif (CCDC 1920569).

Synthesis

Diarylethene (2)

To a 50 mL three neck flask containing 1.15 g (2.40 mmol, 1.0 equiv) of 1-(2-methyl-5-phenylthien-3-yl)-2-(5-chloro-2-methylthien-3-yl)perfluorocyclopentene (3) [24] and 15 mL of anhydrous diethyl ether, 2.20 mL (3.52 mmol, 1.5 equiv) of 1.6 N n-BuLi in hexane solution was added followed by stirring for 1 h at −10 °C on ice-salt bath under argon gas atmosphere. Then, 0.96 mL (3.58 mmol, 1.5 equiv) of B(OBu)3 was added and the temperature of the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 1 h. After ascertaining the formation of boronic acid by TLC, 5 mL of H2O was added, and solvent was removed in vacuo. To a 200 mL three necked flask, the boronic acid, 0.90 g (6.51 mmol, 2.7 equiv) of K2CO3, 0.72 g (2.37 mmol, 1.0 equiv) of 6-bromo-2-(2’-methoxyphenyl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine (4) [25], 0.11 g (0.09 mmol, 0.04 equiv) of Pd(PPh3)4(0), and 80 mL of mixture of 1,4-dioxane/H2O (3:1) were added, and refluxed for 16 h. After the reaction was finished, the mixture was cooled down to room temperature. Then the mixture was extracted with 40 mL of diethyl ether for four times. The combined organic layer was washed with 400 mL of water twice and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After filtration, the solvents were removed in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (eluent: hexane and followed by a mixture of hexane and ethyl acetate (98:2)) to obtain 0.42 g of 2 as a pale-blue oil in 26% yield. The oil was purified with GPC followed by silica gel chromatography (eluent: hexane and followed by a mixture of hexane/diethyl ether (7:3) to obtain 0.31 g (0.47 mmol) of 2 as bluish viscous solid in 19% yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ 8.40 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (s, 1H), 8.23 (s, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.41–7.28 (m, 6H), 7.24 (s, 1H), 7.11 (ddd, J = 7.6, 7.4, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 4.01 (s, 3H), 2.00 (s, 6H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ 156.9, 143.7, 142.6, 142.2, 141.5, 141.4, 138.4, 133.4, 129.2, 129.2, 129.2, 129.1, 129.0, 128.9, 128.1, 126.1, 125.9, 125.7, 125.6, 123.9, 123.0, 122.5, 122.2, 121.7, 121.2, 119.4, 117.5, 113.2, 111.0, 55.5, 14.7, 14.77; 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ −113.1 (s, 2F), −113.3 (s, 2F), −135.0 (s, 2F); HRMS (MALDI–TOF) m/z: calcd for C35H24F6N2OS2, 666.1234; found, 666.1229.

Diarylethene (1o)

To 5 mL of dichloromethane anhydrous solution containing 0.21 g (0.31 mmol, 1.0 equiv) of diarylethene 2, 1.5 mL (1.5 mmol, 5.0 equiv) of 1.0 M BBr3 dichloromethane solution was added on dry-ice/methanol bath (−78 °C) under argon gas atmosphere, and stirred overnight at room temperature. After the reaction was finished, saturated sodium bicarbonate aqueous solution was added to stop the reaction. To the mixture, 70 mL of water was added and the mixture was extracted with 30 mL of chloroform for four times. The combined organic layer was washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate aqueous solution and water, successively, then dried over sodium sulfate anhydrous. After the filtration, solvents were removed in vacuo. The residue was purified by silica gel chromatography (eluent: chloroform) to obtain 0.08 g (0.12 mmol) of 1 as colorless prism shaped crystals in 41% yield. mp 215.0–215.8 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ 12.5 (s, 1H), 8.33 (s, 1H), 7.89 (s, 1H), 7.62 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (dd, J = 7.7, 1.5, Hz, 1H), 7.55 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.42 (dd, J = 9.3, 1.7, Hz, 1H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.33-7.23 (m, 4H), 7.05 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 6.90 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 2.02 (s, 3H), 2.00 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ 157.4, 146.3, 142.8, 142.6, 142.1, 141.4, 137.7, 133.4, 130.1, 129.2, 129.2, 128.2, 126.3, 125.9, 125.9, 125.8, 125.8, 124.6, 123.7, 122.5, 121.5, 120.7, 119.2, 117.9, 117.0, 116.1, 107.3, 14.7, 14.7; 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3, ppm) δ −113.1 (s, 2F), −113.3 (s, 2F), −135.0 (s, 2F); HRMS (MALDI–TOF) m/z: calcd for C34H22F6N2OS2, 652.1078; found, 652.1072.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: X-ray analysis data of a single crystal of 1o.
Format: PDF Size: 466.2 KB Download
Supporting Information File 2: Movie 1, quenching rate dependence on the environmental conditions.
Format: MP4 Size: 1.5 MB Download
Supporting Information File 3: Movie 2, fluorescent color change of 1o.
Format: MP4 Size: 4.3 MB Download

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP26107012 in Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Photosynergetics”, the CREST program (JPMJCR17N2) of the Japan Science and Technology Agency. We thank Ms Y. Nishikawa (NAIST) for conducting the mass-spectroscopic measurement. The synchrotron radiation experiments were performed using the BL40XU beamlines of SPring-8 with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI) (Proposal No. 2019A1110).

References

  1. Feringa, B. L.; Browne, W. R., Eds. Molecular Switches; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH: Weinheim, Germany, 2011. doi:10.1002/9783527634408
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Irie, M.; Fukaminato, T.; Matsuda, K.; Kobatake, S. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 12174–12277. doi:10.1021/cr500249p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Fukaminato, T.; Ishida, S.; Métivier, R. NPG Asia Mater. 2018, 10, 859–881. doi:10.1038/s41427-018-0075-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Irie, M.; Fukaminato, T.; Sasaki, T.; Tamai, N.; Kawai, T. Nature 2002, 420, 759–760. doi:10.1038/420759a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  5. Pu, S.; Ding, H.; Liu, G.; Zheng, C.; Xu, H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 7010–7017. doi:10.1021/jp5001495
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Chen, Y.; Xie, N. J. Mater. Chem. 2005, 15, 3229–3232. doi:10.1039/b506381g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Arai, Y.; Ito, S.; Fujita, H.; Yoneda, Y.; Kaji, T.; Takei, S.; Kashihara, R.; Morimoto, M.; Irie, M.; Miyasaka, H. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 4066–4069. doi:10.1039/c6cc10073b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Kashihara, R.; Morimoto, M.; Ito, S.; Miyasaka, H.; Irie, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 16498–16501. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b10697
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Morimoto, M.; Kashihara, R.; Mutoh, K.; Kobayashi, Y.; Abe, J.; Sotome, H.; Ito, S.; Miyasaka, H.; Irie, M. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 7241–7248. doi:10.1039/c6ce00725b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Mei, J.; Leung, N. L. C.; Kwok, R. T. K.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Tang, B. Z. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11718–11940. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00263
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Hong, Y.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Tang, B. Z. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5361–5388. doi:10.1039/c1cs15113d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Luo, J.; Xie, Z.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Cheng, L.; Tang, B. Z.; Chen, H.; Qiu, C.; Kwok, H. S.; Zhan, X.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, D. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1740–1741. doi:10.1039/b105159h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Fukaminato, T.; Kobatake, S.; Kawai, T.; Irie, M. Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B 2001, 77, 30–35. doi:10.2183/pjab.77.30
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Williams, D. E.; Rietman, J. A.; Maier, J. M.; Tan, R.; Greytak, A. B.; Smith, M. D.; Krause, J. A.; Shustova, N. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 11886–11889. doi:10.1021/ja505589d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Barbatti, M.; Aquino, A. J. A.; Lischka, H.; Schriever, C.; Lochbrunner, S.; Riedle, E. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 1406–1415. doi:10.1039/b814255f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Lochbrunner, S.; Schultz, T.; Schmitt, M.; Shaffer, J. P.; Zgierski, M. Z.; Stolow, A. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 2519–2522. doi:10.1063/1.1345876
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Ormson, S. M.; Brown, R. G. Prog. React. Kinet. 1994, 19, 45–91.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Khan, A. U.; Kasha, M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1983, 80, 1767–1770. doi:10.1073/pnas.80.6.1767
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Mutai, T.; Tomoda, H.; Ohkawa, T.; Yabe, Y.; Araki, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9522–9524. doi:10.1002/anie.200803975
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  20. Shono, H.; Ohkawa, T.; Tomoda, H.; Mutai, T.; Araki, K. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 654–657. doi:10.1021/am200022z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Kim, D.; Kwon, J. E.; Park, S. Y. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2016, 4, 790–797. doi:10.1002/adom.201500699
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Nakahama, T.; Mukaiyama, T.; Kitagawa, D.; Kobatake, S. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2017, 43, 5321–5336. doi:10.1007/s11164-017-2928-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Lim, S.-J.; Seo, J.; Park, S. Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14542–14547. doi:10.1021/ja0637604
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Browne, W. R.; de Jong, J. J. D.; Kudernac, T.; Walko, M.; Lucas, L. N.; Uchida, K.; van Esch, J. H.; Feringa, B. L. Chem. – Eur. J. 2005, 11, 6430–6441. doi:10.1002/chem.200500163
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  25. Mutai, T.; Ohkawa, T.; Shono, H.; Araki, K. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 3599–3606. doi:10.1039/c6tc00376a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  26. Sumi, T.; Takagi, Y.; Yagi, A.; Morimoto, M.; Irie, M. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 3928–3930. doi:10.1039/c4cc00396a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Lide, D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 95th ed.; CRC Press: New York, NY, U.S.A., 2015; 3-1.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Kobatake, S.; Uchida, K.; Tsuchida, E.; Irie, M. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2804–2805. doi:10.1039/b208419h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Su, J.; Fukaminato, T.; Placial, J.-P.; Onodera, T.; Suzuki, R.; Oikawa, H.; Brosseau, A.; Brisset, F.; Pansu, R.; Nakatani, K.; Métivier, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 3662–3666. doi:10.1002/anie.201510600
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  30. Ishida, S.; Kitagawa, D.; Kobatake, S.; Kim, S.; Kurihara, S.; Fukaminato, T. Chem. Commun. 2019, 55, 5681–5684. doi:10.1039/c9cc02441g
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  31. Demeter, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 9985–9993. doi:10.1021/jp507626h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Gaussian 09, Revision C.01; J. Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, U.S.A., 2010.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648–5652. doi:10.1063/1.464913
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Becke, A. D. Phys. Rev. A 1988, 38, 3098–3100. doi:10.1103/physreva.38.3098
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Lee, C.; Yang, W.; Parr, R. G. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785–789. doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999–3094. doi:10.1021/cr9904009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Higashi, T. ABSCOR; Rigaku Corporation: Tokyo, Japan, 1995.
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2019 Kono et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the authors and source are credited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)