Beilstein Arch. 2021, 202178. https://doi.org/10.3762/bxiv.2021.78.v1
Published 11 Nov 2021
The performance of nanoelectronic and molecular electronic devices relies strongly on the employed functional units and their addressability, which is often a matter of appropriate interfaces and device design. Here, we compare two promising designs to build up solid-state electronic devices utilizing the same functional unit. Optically addressable Ru-terpyridine complexes were incorporated in supramolecular wires or employed as ligands of gold nanoparticles and contacted by nanoelectrodes. The resulting small area nanodevices were thoroughly electrically characterized as a function of temperature and light exposure. Differences in the resulting device conductance could be attributed to the device design and the respective transport mechanism: thermally activated hopping conduction in case of Ru-terpyridine wire devices or sequential tunneling in nanoparticle-based devices. Furthermore, the conductance switching of nanoparticle-based devices upon 530 nm irradiation was attributed to plasmon-induced metal-to-ligand charge-transfer in the Ru-terpyridine complexes used as switching ligands. Finally, our results reveal a superior device performance of nanoparticle-based devices compared to molecular wire devices based on Ru-terpyridine complexes as functional units.
Keywords: Conductance switching; gold nanoparticles; nanoelectronic devices; optical addressing; Ru-terpyridine wires
| Format: PDF | Size: 1.1 MB | Download |
When a peer-reviewed version of this preprint is available, this information will be updated in the information box above. If no peer-reviewed version is available, please cite this preprint using the following information:
Mennicken, M.; Peter, S. K.; Kaulen, C.; Simon, U.; Karthäuser, S. Beilstein Arch. 2021, 202178. doi:10.3762/bxiv.2021.78.v1
Citation data can be downloaded as file using the "Download" button or used for copy/paste from the text window below.
Citation data in RIS format can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and
Zotero.
© 2021 Mennicken et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an open access work under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Please note that the reuse, redistribution and reproduction in particular requires that the author(s) and source are credited and that individual graphics may be subject to special legal provisions.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Archives terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-archives.org/xiv/terms)
