Logo Beilstein Institut

Recent advances in metathesis-derived polymers containing transition metals in the side chain

  1. 1 ,
  2. 1 ,
  3. 2 ,
  4. 3 and
  5. 4
1Institute of Organic Chemistry, Romanian Academy, 202B Spl. Independentei, POBox 35-108, Bucharest 060023, Romania
2Petru Poni Institute of Macromolecular Chemistry, Romanian Academy, Iasi, Romania
3Macromolecular Chemistry and Organic Catalysis, Institute of Chemistry (B6a), University of Liège, Sart Tilman, Liège 4000, Belgium
  1. Corresponding author email
This article is part of the Thematic Series "Progress in metathesis chemistry II".
Guest Editor: K. Grela
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2747–2762. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.11.296
Received 03 Aug 2015, Accepted 30 Nov 2015, Published 28 Dec 2015
Review
cc by logo
PDF
Album
Cite

Abstract

This account critically surveys the field of side-chain transition metal-containing polymers as prepared by controlled living ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) of the respective metal-incorporating monomers. Ferrocene- and other metallocene-modified polymers, macromolecules including metal-carbonyl complexes, polymers tethering early or late transition metal complexes, etc. are herein discussed. Recent advances in the design and syntheses reported mainly during the last three years are highlighted, with special emphasis on new trends for superior applications of these hybrid materials.

Keywords: advanced materials; metallopolymers; metathesis; ROMP; transition metals

Introduction

The fast growing interest in metal-containing polymers (metallopolymers) as advanced hybrid materials spurred prolific research in the worldwide organometallic and polymer scientific communities [1-4]. The variety of metals and the diversity of organic polymers allow tailoring metallopolymers so as to reach the desired physical and chemical properties suitable for progressive applications [5-7]. These functional hybrid materials are highly appreciated for their superior behaviour in catalysis, optics as well as for their magnetic, mechanical and thermal attributes. Structurally, metallopolymers are endowed with linear, cross-linked, hyperbranched, star or dendritic polymer architectures containing metals ranging from the main groups to transition metals and lanthanides which are embedded into the main chain or appended to the side chains of the polymer [8-11]. This make-up would confer an optimal set of capabilities that recommend them for diverse emerging application areas, e.g., as electro-optical and magnetic devices, for energy storage, nanomaterials, sensing, catalytic and drug-delivery systems [6,12-14].

Numerous synthetic routes have been explored to achieve the synthesis of these targets presently accessible through controlled and living polymerization techniques including controlled radical polymerizations (CRP) such as atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP) and reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization [15,16], living ionic polymerizations, specifically ring-opening polymerization (ROP) [17], as well as migration insertion polymerization (MIP) [18], acyclic diene metathesis polymerization (ADMET) [19,20] and ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) [21-27]. These synthetic strategies ensure metal incorporation from the corresponding metal-containing monomers into the polymer in a precise, predetermined mode. With the advent of new metathesis catalysts endowed with a high activity and chemoselectivity and good tolerance towards many functionalities [28-30], ROMP with Mo and Ru catalysts has become a very practical methodology in organic, polymer and materials chemistry. ROMP is also the method of choice for obtaining new and diverse metallopolymers [31-34].

The present contribution aims to provide an overview of selected developments in metathesis-based synthesis and applications of polymers containing transition metals in the side chain evidencing recent work published since our earlier review on this topic [34]. Metallopolymers are herein classified according to the nature of the transition metal and its binding mode to the organic moiety. Information on the physical characteristics of these materials is also included, with a focus on their present and future practical applications. Taking advantage of the considerable reactivity of ring-strained norbornenes and congeners and of their easy functionalization with many organic and organometallic groups it became possible to synthesize a broad range of polymers and copolymers by ROMP [35,36]. On the other hand it is well-known that ferrocene and numerous transition metal sandwich complexes exhibit great redox stability that allows fine tuning of their properties and applications in electrochemistry, sensing, catalysis, nanomaterials, etc. [37-40]. Not surprisingly, therefore, attention of researchers has turned first on metallopolymers containing ferrocene [33,34,41-43].

Review

Iron-containing polymers

Following the first successful application of Mo–alkylidene catalysts by Schrock and coworkers [42] in ROMP to ferrocene-appended monomers as well as the rapid expansion of Grubbs Ru metathesis catalysts [28-30], a vast number of iron-containing polymers have been synthesized by ROMP up to now [33,34,42,43].

In a compelling work, Astruc et al. [44] reported a biologically relevant type of new homopolymers (e.g., 2, Scheme 1) and block copolymers provided with amidoferrocenyl groups linked through a tetraethylene glycol side chain. These interesting metallopolymers were readily prepared through living ROMP initiated by the Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst which proved quite active and tolerant toward the monomer endowed with multiple functionalities (Scheme 1).

[1860-5397-11-296-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of homopolymers containing ferrocenyl and tetraethylene glycol groups.

By precisely controlling the living polymerization process, they succeeded in varying the number of amidoferrocenyl motifs in the polymers within pre-established limits. Such polymers and block copolymers were used to prepare modified Pt electrodes with high stability and good qualitative sensing of ATP2− anions. It was supposed that the triethylene glycol domains in the block copolymers favor the amidoferrocene–ATP interactions by encapsulation. Astruc assumed that during the recognition process different H-bonding modes arise in the supramolecular polymeric network, i.e., an intramolecular H bonding with the β- and γ-phosphate groups of ATP2− and an intermolecular H bond between the α-phosphate and another amidoferrocenyl group. Redox properties of polycationic copolymers containing the complex [Fe(η5-C5H5)(η6-C6Me6)][PF6] have been recently revealed as potential electron-transfer reagents provided with a high stability [45].

On extending their research to the areas of anion sensing and nanomaterials, the Astruc group accomplished an efficient synthesis, by ROMP with Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst, of redox-robust triazolylbiferrocenyl (trzBiFc) polymers 4 bearing the organometallic group in the side chain (Scheme 2) [46,47].

[1860-5397-11-296-i2]

Scheme 2: Synthesis of redox-robust triazolylbiferrocenyl polymers 4.

Here again, the Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst was very active and highly tolerant towards the biferrocene and triaza functionalities. Noteworthy, the oxidation of the polymer 4 with ferricenium hexafluorophosphate led to a stable biferrocenium polymer while oxidation with Au(III) or Ag(I) allowed the formation of networks with nanosnake morphology, consisting of mixed-valent Fe(II)–Fe(III) polymers that encapsulate metal (Au or Ag) nanoparticles (NPs). These polymers were suitable for obtaining modified Pt electrodes with good sensing affinities for ATP2− and Pd(II) cations. The importance of such results lies in the multi-electron properties of these side-chain BiFc polymers that have not been much studied so far although the outstanding stability of the biferrocenium motifs recommends them for designing new redox reactions, eventually leading to value-added nanomaterials. Along a different line, in a recent, inventive work Astruc and coworkers [48] demonstrated that triazolylbiferrocenyl-containing polymers can effectively stabilize palladium nanoparticles (PdNPs) affording highly active catalysts for Suzuki–Miyaura coupling reactions.

Cobalt-containing polymers

The incorporation of other late transition metals such as cobalt into polymers soon emerged as an efficient and rapid method for the production of nanostructured materials of scientific and practical importance for microelectronics, catalysis, biology and medicine (vide infra). Tang et al. [49] were the first to apply the ROMP strategy to synthesize the well-defined, high molecular weight cobaltocenium-containing polymer 6 (Scheme 3).

[1860-5397-11-296-i3]

Scheme 3: Synthesis of cobaltocenium-containing polymers by ROMP.

Under ambient conditions, the Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst induced polymerization of 5 in a living manner leading to a product with low polydispersity (1.12) and high molecular weight (167,000 g·mol−1). By substituting the PF6− anion with BPh4−, Cl− or an anion exchange resin (chloride-form), the authors demonstrated that the nature of the anion is important for the polymer properties. They found that polymer 6 was soluble in water and various organic solvents when the counteranion was chloride. Subsequently, these authors copolymerized 6 with norbornene-2-carboxylic acid, using Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst, to prepare diblock copolymer 7, in which one block contains cobaltocenium units while the other block comprises an organic chain only [50] (Scheme 4).

[1860-5397-11-296-i4]

Scheme 4: Cobaltocenium-appending copolymers by the ROMP approach (X = PF6, Y = BPh4 or Cl).

By the same technique, polymer 6 was further copolymerized with a cobaltocenium-BPh4 monomer and a cobaltocenium-Cl monomer affording, respectively, the new diblock copolymers 8 (X = PF6, Y = BPh4 or Cl). Self-assembly of these block copolymers into core–shell spherical micelles was successfully conducted and, by UV/ozonolysis or thermal pyrolysis generating antiferromagnetic CoO species, some of these micelles could be converted into inorganic nanoparticles.

With the aim at extending the application of metallopolymers as heterogeneous macromolecular catalysts for living radical polymerizations, Tang et al. [51] produced the cobalt-containing polymer 10 by ROMP of the norbornene monomer 9, derivatized with triazolyl and cyclopentadienylcobalt-1,3-cyclopentadiene moieties (Scheme 5).

[1860-5397-11-296-i5]

Scheme 5: Cobalt-containing polymers by click and ROMP approach.

The triazolyl unit was first attached to the η4-cyclopentadiene CpCo(I) complex by click reaction of the corresponding alkyne precursor and then the triazolyl-Co scaffold was incorporated into the norbornene monomer 9 by conventional esterification. It is important to note that the cyclopentadienyl-cobalt-1,3-cyclopentadiene, an isoelectronic 18-electron species to ferrocene and cobaltocenium, was well tolerated by the Grubbs 3rd generation ROMP catalyst. The polymerization of 9 proceeded in a controlled and living manner under ambient conditions. Polymer 10 was successfully employed as an organometallic catalyst in the atom-transfer radical polymerization of methyl methacrylate or styrene to obtain poly(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene devoid of colored traces of catalyst, a very important requirement for special applications, e.g., in dentistry, medical devices, housewares, and food packaging. In another recent study, Tang and coworkers [52] performed a quantitative analysis of counterion exchange in cobaltocene-containing polyelectrolytes that are accessible by an initial ROMP, and subsequently derivatized with cobalt motifs. These results appear to be relevant for self-assembly and drug-delivery systems with this type of polyelectrolytes.

An interesting cobalt-containing diblock copolymer, bearing a dicobalt hexacarbonyl complex coordinated to an alkyne, with a constant block ratio was proposed as a new magnetic material by Tew et al. [53]. Their procedure involved the synthesis of a first block polymer, 12, by ROMP of monomer 11 using Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst. The second block polymer was created by the addition of the cobalt-containing monomer to the reaction mixture containing 12 to continue the ROMP. Diblock copolymer 13, with a defined block ratio, could be obtained by the variation of the polymerization time (Scheme 6).

[1860-5397-11-296-i6]

Scheme 6: Synthesis of new cobalt-integrating block copolymers.

In this process, the ruthenium initiator proved to well tolerate the dicobalt hexacarbonyl complex embedded in the monomer. By controlled heating of the cobalt-containing block copolymers, robust, room temperature ferromagnetic (RTF) materials have been obtained.

By two alternative ROMP protocols, both starting from 5-formyl-2-norbornene (14) and using the Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst, Astruc and coworkers [54] successfully prepared new redox-active cobalticenium-tethered polyelectrolytes of type 17. According to the first protocol, the norbornene monomer containing an enamine-cobalticenium group (16) was first prepared by hydroamination of the ethynyl cobalticenium with n-butylamine-substituted norbornene 15. Next, 16 was polymerized to 17, by ROMP under mild conditions (Scheme 7A). In the second approach, first, the monomer 14 was polymerized to 17a, followed by functionalization of the latter with n-butylamine to yield 17b, and finally this organic polymer hydroaminated the ethynyl cobalticenium to produce 17 (Scheme 7B). Both protocols embody an elegant and original ROMP-based access to cobalticenium-containing polyelectrolytes.

[1860-5397-11-296-i7]

Scheme 7: Two alternative routes for the synthesis of redox-active cobalticenium-tethered polyelectrolytes.

Ruthenium-, iridium-, osmium- and rhodium-containing polymers

ROMP syntheses of homopolymers and block copolymers bearing bipyridine–ruthenium complexes starting from norbornene or oxanorbornene functionalized with Ru complexes have been reported by several authors [55,56]. In these investigations it was revealed that the Ru catalysts are active initiators in producing, in a living polymerization manner, well-defined polymers containing Ru in the side chains. Again, the best results were obtained with the Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst. Along this line, Sleiman et al. [56] prepared an array of oxanorbornene monomers tethered with ruthenium–bipyridine motifs (e.g., 18–20, Scheme 8) and used them to prepare homopolymers (Scheme 9), diblock- (Scheme 10) and triblock copolymers (Scheme 11).

[1860-5397-11-296-i8]

Scheme 8: Oxanorbornene monomers for the synthesis of Ru-containing polymers by ROMP.

[1860-5397-11-296-i9]

Scheme 9: ROMP synthesis of Ru-containing homopolymers.

In an in-depth exploration of the synthesis of diblock copolymers 24, Sleiman developed a step-wise procedure: in the first step, the ruthenium catalyst induced polymerization of the bicyclic monomer 22 to homopolymer 23, followed by polymerization of the additional comonomer 20 at the Ru site of 23 to yield the copolymer 24 (Scheme 10).

[1860-5397-11-296-i10]

Scheme 10: Synthesis of diblock copolymers incorporating ruthenium.

Based on their potential application as tools for biological detection and signal amplification, amphiphilic Ru-modified triblock copolymers have been produced from biocompatible and bioconjugatable oxanorbornene monomers. By extending the above ROMP methodology, Sleiman et al. managed to synthesize the Ru triblock copolymers 25 and 26 (Scheme 11), and examined their self-assembling into micelles in aqueous media to evaluate them as luminescent markers of biological molecules.

[1860-5397-11-296-i11]

Scheme 11: Synthesis of Ru triblock copolymers.

The production of metal-cation-based anion exchange membranes from ROMP polymers was first reported by Tew et al. [57]. The ROMP reaction, induced here by the Grubbs 2nd generation catalyst, implied the copolymerization of a norbornene monomer (27) functionalized with a water-soluble bis(terpyridine)ruthenium(II) complex, with dicyclopentadiene as a cross-linking agent (Scheme 12). In the resulted copolymer 28 each Ru complex is associated with two counteranions (chloride), which represents a novelty versus most cation-based membranes provided with single cation–anion pairs. Cross-linking with dicyclopentadiene ensured a high mechanical stability of the copolymer. The film cast from 28 displayed an anion conductivity and mechanical properties similar to those of the traditional quaternary ammonium-based anion exchange membranes. In addition, the film exhibited high methanol and base tolerance making it suitable for applications in fuel cells and anion-conducting devices.

[1860-5397-11-296-i12]

Scheme 12: Synthesis of cross-linked Ru-containing triblock copolymers.

Owing to their high phosphorescent propensity, complexes based on iridium have been grafted onto polymers for the application as light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [58]. In an earlier research, in order to obtain iridium-containing polymers by the ROMP route, Weck and coworkers [59] polymerized monomers 29 and mer-31, in the presence of Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst, to the fully soluble ROMP homopolymers 30 and mer-32 (Scheme 13).

[1860-5397-11-296-i13]

Scheme 13: Synthesis of Ir-containing homopolymers by ROMP.

Later on, while investigating the self-assembly of transition metal-containing polymers, Sleiman et al. [60] expanded the field by preparing ROMP-able oxanorbornene monomers having iridium and osmium bipyridines attached by an extended organic linker (Scheme 14).

[1860-5397-11-296-i14]

Scheme 14: Monomers for Ir- and Os-containing ROMP polymers.

The triblock copolymers obtained through a sequential ROMP of the corresponding monomers, appended to Ir bipyridine complexes, oligoethylene glycol and biotin entities, have been examined by fluorescence spectroscopy for their self-assembling behavior and biodetection capability (Scheme 15).

[1860-5397-11-296-i15]

Scheme 15: ROMP block copolymers integrating Ir in their side chains.

In a very interesting work, Blechert, Buchmeiser and coworkers [61] copolymerized norborn-5-ene-(N,N-dipyrid-2-yl)carbamide with exo,exo-[2-(3-ethoxycarbonyl-7-oxabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-en-2-carbonyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium iodide to polymer 38, using the Schrock Mo catalyst. By further reaction with [Rh(COD)Cl]2 (COD = cycloocta-1,5-diene), polymer 38 gave the Rh(I)-appended block copolymer 39 (Scheme 16).

[1860-5397-11-296-i16]

Scheme 16: Synthesis of Rh-containing block copolymers.

Remarkably, in water, this Rh-containing block copolymer readily generated micelles and could be thus successfully employed as a Rh-immobilized catalyst for the hydroformylation of 1-octene.

Very recently, Matyjaszewski, Tang and coworkers [62] reported the first synthesis of norbornene monomers substituted with rhodocenium units and their controlled polymerization, by two parallel routes (ROMP and RAFT), to rhodocenium-containing metallopolymers. ROMP of both triazolyl-rhodocenium monomers, 40 and 42, proceeded productively and in a living fashion to yield amphiphilic metallopolymers 41 and 43 (Scheme 17).

[1860-5397-11-296-i17]

Scheme 17: Access to rhodocenium-containing metallopolymers by ROMP.

Polymers 41 and 43 have been evaluated for their counterion exchange properties and self-assembling tendency revealing a promising application profile. The point of interest here is that rhodocenium exhibits different chemical and physical properties from cobaltocenium. A novel immobilized Rh catalytic system in which the metal is embedded, by means of the 5,5-dinorimido BINAP ligand, into the polymer, obtained from alternating ROMP of cyclooctene with the Grubbs first generation catalyst, has been disclosed in a patent by Bergens et al. [63]. This catalytic system allowed the intramolecular cycloisomerization of enynes with high yields and turnover numbers.

Copper-containing polymers

A copper(I) complex containing a norbornene substituted with the 2-(pyridin-2-yl)-1H-benzimidazole ligand, 44, developed by Il'icheva et al. [64], came to the attention of the scientific community involved in the area. The complex was used to access Cu-containing homopolymers 45 and copolymers 47 under metathesis polymerization with the Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst (Scheme 18 and Scheme 19). Further variations in the spacer subunit from a norbornene carbazole comonomer 46 enabled fine-tuning of the physical and chemical properties of the copolymer 47.

[1860-5397-11-296-i18]

Scheme 18: Synthesis of homopolymers equipped with Cu coordination centers.

[1860-5397-11-296-i19]

Scheme 19: Synthesis of Cu-containing copolymers (spacer = –(CH2)5–; >C=O).

These materials, in which Cu is tethered to the polymeric backbone by an organic linker, exhibited notable luminescent characteristics. The same research group subsequently introduced other new copper(I) complexes, ligating norbornene-substituted phenanthroline, that were polymerized by ROMP (Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst) to yield copolymers with valuable photo- and electroluminescent properties [65]. This kind of hybrid structure may induce high performance in LED devices.

Early transition metal-containing polymers

In contrast to the numerous polymers including late transition metals discussed so far, only few representatives of early transition metals attached to ROMP polymers have been disclosed recently. Thus, Wang et al. [66] communicated the ROMP synthesis of the first polynorbornene bearing a polyoxometalate (POM) cluster in the side chain (Scheme 20).

[1860-5397-11-296-i20]

Scheme 20: Synthesis of polynorbornene bearing a polyoxometalate (POM) cluster in the side chain.

According to their concept, the norbornene monomer containing a trivanadium-substituted Wells–Dawson-type polyoxotungstate (POM) (48) was polymerized quantitatively to 49 in a living and controlled process under promotion of Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst. It should be remarked that this Grubbs catalyst favored the polymerization under mild reaction conditions and tolerated very well the bulky POM cluster attached to the monomer. The obtained hybrid materials are promising candidates for the production of high-performance catalysts based on poly(polyoxometalate)s.

Lanthanide-containing polymers

Recently, new polynorbornenes of type 53, functionalized with terpyridine and carbazole moieties and integrating a europium complex in the pendant chains, were described by Rozhkov et al. [67]. They were obtained by a metathesis copolymerization with Grubbs 3rd generation catalyst as the key step (Scheme 21).

[1860-5397-11-296-i21]

Scheme 21: Synthesis of Eu-containing copolymers by a ROMP-based route.

In a first approach the copolymer 52 was coordinated with europium thenoyl trifluoroacetonate to yield copolymers 53 with different ratios between the purely organic and europium-containing units. Alternatively, similar coordination copolymers were prepared by copolymerizing the europium complex of the terpyridine monomer 51 with the carbazole-substituted norbornene 50. In solution or in thin film these Eu-containing products exhibited important metal-centered photoluminescence recommending them for novel applications.

Unveiling and rationalizing the interactions between the metal and the organic polymer backbone and/or side chains is crucial for ensuring the desired properties for the hybrid material [68]. Indeed, when appraising luminescence of a series of polynorbornenes attaching various homoleptic bi- or trinuclear lanthanide salen complexes (with La, Nd, Yb, Er, Gd or Tb), Lü et al. [69,70] established that, only in the case of Nd and Yb metallopolymers, the luminescent emissions are strongly retained versus those of the respective monomers in solution.

Conclusion

This review highlights ingenious ways in which a large variety of transition metals could be attached to organic polymer side-chains thus prompting the appearance of extraordinary new physical properties (optical, electrical, conducting, catalytic, magnetic, biological, etc.), most of which were not detained before by either the metal or the organic counterpart. Such distinguishing features recommend these privileged scaffolds as important hybrid materials having a strong impact on a host of current high-tech applications, as fuel cells, light-emitting diodes (LED), magnetic nanomaterials, catalysts, biosensors, for energy generation and storage. The mainstay of the synthesis of these engineered metallopolymers is living ROMP, the key step advantageously executed either with Schrock’s or Grubbs latest generation catalysts, and easier to be precisely controlled versus other techniques used for the preparation of metallopolymers.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge support from the Romanian Academy and Ministry of Education and Research, as well as from Wallonie–Bruxelles International (WBI), the Direction générale des Relations extérieures de la Région wallonne, and the Fonds de la Recherche scientifique. Special thanks are due to the Referees and to the Editors of the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Manners, I. Synthetic Metal Containing Polymers; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004. doi:10.1002/3527601686
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Abd-El-Aziz, A. S.; Manners, I., Eds. Frontiers in Transition Metal Containing Polymers; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, New Jersey, USA, 2007.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Russell, A. D.; Musgrave, R. A.; Stoll, L. K.; Choi, P.; Qiu, H.; Manners, I. J. Organomet. Chem. 2015, 784, 24–30. doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2014.10.038
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Abd-El-Aziz, A. S.; Agatemor, C.; Etkin, N. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 513–559. doi:10.1002/marc.201300826
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Schacher, F. H.; Rupar, P. A.; Manners, I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 7898–7921. doi:10.1002/anie.201200310
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Whittell, G. R.; Hager, M. D.; Schubert, U. S.; Manners, I. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 176–188. doi:10.1038/nmat2966
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  7. Breul, A. M.; Kübel, J.; Häupler, B.; Friebe, C.; Hager, M. D.; Winter, A.; Dietzek, B.; Schubert, U. S. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 747–751. doi:10.1002/marc.201300806
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Cao, K.; Murshid, N.; Wang, X. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2015, 36, 586–596. doi:10.1002/marc.201400563
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Rapakousiou, A.; Djeda, R.; Grillaud, M.; Li, N.; Ruiz, J.; Astruc, D. Organometallics 2014, 33, 6953–6962. doi:10.1021/om501031u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Mavila, S.; Diesendruck, C. E.; Linde, S.; Amir, L.; Shikler, R.; Lemcoff, N. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5767–5770. doi:10.1002/anie.201300362
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Dragutan, V.; Dragutan, I.; Fischer, H. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2008, 18, 18–31. doi:10.1007/s10904-007-9185-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Mavila, S.; Rozenberg, I.; Lemcoff, N. G. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 4196–4203. doi:10.1039/c4sc01231c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Abd-El-Aziz, A. S.; Strohm, E. A. Polymer 2012, 53, 4879–4921. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2012.08.024
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Eloi, J.-C.; Chabanne, L.; Whittell, G. R.; Manners, I. Mater. Today 2008, 11, 28–36. doi:10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70054-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Yan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Qiao, Y.; Ganewatta, M.; Tang, C. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 8816–8823. doi:10.1021/ma402039u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Hadadpour, M.; Gwyther, J.; Manners, I.; Ragogna, P. J. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 3430–3440. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00752
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Baljak, S.; Russell, A. D.; Binding, S. C.; Haddow, M. F.; O’Hare, D.; Manners, I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 5864–5867. doi:10.1021/ja5014745
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Wang, X.; Cao, K.; Liu, Y.; Tsang, B.; Liew, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 3399–3402. doi:10.1021/ja400755e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Ding, L.; Wang, C.; Lin, L.; Zhu, Z. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2015, 216, 761–769. doi:10.1002/macp.201400579
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Bachler, P. R.; Wagener, K. B. Monatsh. Chem. 2015, 146, 1053–1061. doi:10.1007/s00706-015-1479-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Autenrieth, B.; Jeong, H.; Forrest, W. P.; Axtell, J. C.; Ota, A.; Lehr, T.; Buchmeiser, M. R.; Schrock, R. R. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 2480–2492. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00123
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Dragutan, I.; Dragutan, V.; Demonceau, A. Molecules 2015, 20, 17244–17274. doi:10.3390/molecules200917244
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Rosebrugh, L. E.; Marx, V. M.; Keitz, B. K.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10032–10035. doi:10.1021/ja405559y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Elling, B. R.; Xia, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9922–9926. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b05497
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Eissa, A. M.; Khosravi, E. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2015, 216, 964–976. doi:10.1002/macp.201400604
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Dragutan, V.; Dragutan, I.; Dimonie, M. Tuning Product Selectivity in ROMP of Cycloolefins with W-Based Catalytic Systems. In Green Metathesis Chemistry: Great Challenges in Synthesis, Catalysis and Nanotechnology; Dragutan, V.; Demonceau, A.; Dragutan, I.; Finkelshtein, E. S., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2010; pp 383–390. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-3433-5_24
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Gutekunst, W. R.; Hawker, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 8038–8041. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b04940
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Grubbs, R. H.; Wenzel, A. G.; O'Leary, D. J.; Khosravi, E., Eds. Handbook of Metathesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2015.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  29. Grela, K. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, 1089–1090. doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.124
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  30. Levin, E.; Mavila, S.; Eivgi, O.; Tzur, E.; Lemcoff, N. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 12384–12388. doi:10.1002/anie.201500740
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  31. Zeits, P. D.; Fiedler, T.; Gladysz, J. A. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7925–7927. doi:10.1039/C2CC32150E
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Wappel, J.; Grudzień, K.; Barbasiewicz, M.; Michalak, M.; Grela, K.; Slugovc, C. Monatsh. Chem. 2015, 146, 1153–1160. doi:10.1007/s00706-015-1494-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Hardy, C. G.; Zhang, J.; Yan, Y.; Ren, L.; Tang, C. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 1742–1796. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2014.03.002
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  34. Dragutan, I.; Dragutan, V.; Fischer, H. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2008, 18, 311–324. doi:10.1007/s10904-008-9213-0
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  35. Yampolskii, Yu.; Starannikova, L.; Belov, N.; Bermeshev, M.; Gringolts, M.; Finkelshtein, E. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 453, 532–545. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Bang, A.; Mohite, D.; Saeed, A. M.; Leventis, N.; Sotiriou-Leventis, C. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2015, 75, 460–474. doi:10.1007/s10971-015-3718-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Hardy, C. G.; Ren, L.; Ma, S.; Tang, C. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 4373–4375. doi:10.1039/c2cc36756d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Zhou, J.; Whittell, G. R.; Manners, I. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 3529–3543. doi:10.1021/ma500106x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Zha, Y.; Thaker, H. D.; Maddikeri, R. R.; Gido, S. P.; Tuominen, M. T.; Tew, G. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 14534–14541. doi:10.1021/ja305249b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. AL-Badri, Z. M.; Maddikeri, R. R.; Zha, Y.; Thaker, H. D.; Dobriyal, P.; Shunmugam, R.; Russell, T. P.; Tew, G. N. Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 482. doi:10.1038/ncomms1485
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Hardy, C. G.; Ren, L.; Zhang, J.; Tang, C. Isr. J. Chem. 2012, 52, 230–245. doi:10.1002/ijch.201100110
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Albagli, D.; Bazan, G.; Wrighton, M. S.; Schrock, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4150–4158. doi:10.1021/ja00037a017
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  43. Amer, W. A.; Wang, L.; Amin, A. M.; Ma, L.; Yu, H. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2010, 20, 605–615. doi:10.1007/s10904-010-9373-6
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  44. Gu, H.; Rapakousiou, A.; Castel, P.; Guidolin, N.; Pinaud, N.; Ruiz, J.; Astruc, D. Organometallics 2014, 33, 4323–4335. doi:10.1021/om5006897
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Gu, H.; Ciganda, R.; Hernandez, R.; Castel, P.; Zhao, P.; Ruiz, J.; Astruc, D. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 6071–6076. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01603
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Rapakousiou, A.; Deraedt, C.; Gu, G.; Salmon, L.; Belin, C.; Ruiz, J.; Astruc, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 13995–13998. doi:10.1021/ja5079267
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Rapakousiou, A.; Deraedt, C.; Irigoyen, J.; Wang, Y.; Pinaud, N.; Salmon, L.; Ruiz, J.; Moya, S.; Astruc, D. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 2284–2299. doi:10.1021/ic5028916
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Deraedt, C.; Rapakousiou, A.; Gu, H.; Salmon, L.; Ruiz, J.; Astruc, D. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2015, 25, 437–446. doi:10.1007/s10904-014-0161-6
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Ren, L.; Zhang, J.; Bai, X.; Hardy, C. G.; Shimizu, K. D.; Tang, C. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 580–583. doi:10.1039/C1SC00783A
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Ren, L.; Zhang, J.; Hardy, C. G.; Ma, S.; Tang, C. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012, 33, 510–516. doi:10.1002/marc.201100732
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Yan, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wilbon, P.; Qiao, Y.; Tang, C. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014, 35, 1840–1845. doi:10.1002/marc.201400365
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Zhang, J.; Pellechia, P. J.; Hayat, J.; Hardy, C. G.; Tang, C. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 1618–1624. doi:10.1021/ma4000013
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Zha, Y.; Maddikeri, R. R.; Gido, S. P.; Tew, G. N. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2013, 23, 89–94. doi:10.1007/s10904-012-9744-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Wang, Y.; Rapakousiou, A.; Astruc, D. Macromolecules 2014, 47, 3767–3774. doi:10.1021/ma5007864
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Hadjichristidis, N.; Pitsikalis, M.; Iatrou, H. Adv. Polym. Sci. 2005, 189, 1–124. doi:10.1007/12_005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Sankaran, N. B.; Rys, A. Z.; Nassif, R.; Nayak, M. K.; Metera, K.; Chen, B.; Bazzi, H. S.; Sleiman, H. F. Macromolecules 2010, 43, 5530–5537. doi:10.1021/ma100234j
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  57. Zha, Y.; Disabb-Miller, M. L.; Johnson, Z. D.; Hickner, M. A.; Tew, G. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 4493–4496. doi:10.1021/ja211365r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Xu, F.; Kim, H. U.; Kim, J.-H.; Jung, B. J.; Grimsdale, A. C.; Hwang, D.-H. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 47, 92–121. doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.01.005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Carlise, J. R.; Wang, X. Y.; Weck, M. Macromolecules 2005, 38, 9000–9008. doi:10.1021/ma0512298
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Metera, K. L.; Hänni, K. D.; Zhou, G.; Nayak, M. K.; Bazzi, H. S.; Juncker, D.; Sleiman, H. F. ACS Macro Lett. 2012, 1, 954–959. doi:10.1021/mz3001644
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Pawar, G. M.; Weckesser, J.; Blechert, S.; Buchmeiser, M. R. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, No. 28. doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.28
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. Yan, Y.; Deaton, T. M.; Zhang, J.; He, H.; Hayat, J.; Pageni, P.; Matyjaszewski, K.; Tang, C. Macromolecules 2015, 48, 1644–1650. doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.5b00471
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Bergens, S. H.; Sullivan, A. D.; Hass, M. Heterogenous rhodium metal catalysts. U.S. Patent 8,962,516 B2, Feb 24, 2015.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Il'icheva, A. I.; Barinova, Yu. P.; Bochkarev, L. N.; Il'ichev, V. A. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2012, 85, 1711–1717. doi:10.1134/S1070427212110146
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  65. Barinova, Yu. P.; Ilicheva, A. I.; Bochkarev, L. N.; Ilichev, V. A.; Kurskii, Yu. A. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2013, 83, 72–79. doi:10.1134/S107036321301012X
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  66. Miao, W.-K.; Yan, Y.-K.; Wang, X.-L.; Xiao, Y.; Ren, L.-J.; Zheng, P.; Wang, C.-H.; Ren, L.-X.; Wang, W. ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 211–215. doi:10.1021/mz5000202
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  67. Rozhkov, A. V.; Bochkarev, L. N.; Basova, G. V.; Abakumov, G. A. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2012, 85, 1930–1938. doi:10.1134/S1070427212120233
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  68. Nguyen, M. T.; Holliday, B. J. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 8610–8613. doi:10.1039/c5cc01719j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  69. Feng, W.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Su, P.; Lü, X.; Song, J.; Fan, D.; Wong, W.-K.; Jones, R. A.; Su, C. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 1489–1499. doi:10.1039/c3tc31814a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  70. Zhang, Z.; Feng, H.; Liu, L.; Yu, C.; Lü, X.; Zhu, X.; Wong, W.-K.; Jones, R. A.; Pan, M.; Su, C. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 6229–6241. doi:10.1039/C5DT00141B
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2015 Dragutan et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities
Journal Logo
Institut Logo
Preprint Logo
Symposia Logo