Logo Beilstein Institut

p-tert-Butylthiacalix[4]arenes functionalized by N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide and N,N-diethylacetamide fragments: synthesis and binding of anionic guests

  1. and
Kazan Federal University, Kremlevskaya, 18, Kazan 420008, Russian Federation
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: P. J. Skabara
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2017, 13, 1940–1949. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.13.188
Received 22 Jun 2017, Accepted 24 Aug 2017, Published 13 Sep 2017
Full Research Paper
cc by logo
PDF
Album
Supp Info
Cite

Abstract

New p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arenes, which are mono-, 1,2-di- and tetrasubstituted at the lower rim containing N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide and N,N-diethylacetamide groups in cone and partial cone conformations have been synthesized. Their complexation ability towards a number of tetrabutylammonium salts n-Bu4NX (X = F−, Cl−, Br−, I−, CH3CO2−, H2PO4−, NO3−) was studied by UV spectroscopy. The effective receptor for the anions studied as well as selective receptors for F−, CH3CO2− and H2PO4− ions, which based on the synthesized thiacalix[4]arenes, have been obtained. It was shown that p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene tetrasubstituted at the lower rim by N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide moieties bonded to the anions studied with association constants within the range of 3.55 × 103–7.94 × 105 M−1. Besides, the binding selectivity for F−, Cl−, CH3CO2−, and H2PO4− anions against other anions was in the range of 4.1–223.9. Substituting one or two fragments in the macrocycle with N,N-diethylacetamide groups significantly reduces the complexation ability of the receptor. In contrast to the 1,3-disubstituted macrocycle containing two N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide moieties, the 1,2-disubstituted thiacalix[4]arene, which contains only one such fragment and a N,N-diethylacetamide moiety, selectively binds F− anions.

Keywords: anion binding; synthesis; thiacalixarenes; UV spectroscopy

Introduction

Anions play a key role in many biochemical processes [1] as substrates and/or cofactors in enzymatic reactions [2], in the environment (phosphate and nitrate in the ponds provoking their eutrophication) [2-4], and in phase-transfer catalysis [5,6]. The dysfunction in the regulation of anions is a cause of many diseases [7-12]. Thus, selective synthetic receptors can be used in medicine as medicinal and diagnostic agents. However, the design and synthesis of the systems for recognizing anions remains one of the important scientific challenges in organic chemistry [13-23]. Anion-receptor biomimetics aimed at developing synthetic analogs of the natural compounds that offer a deeper understanding of a number of biological processes.

The design of anion receptors is quite a challenge for several reasons. The anions are larger in size than cations and therefore have a smaller charge in relation to their radius. It means that the electrostatic interactions for anions binding are weaker than for cations. Anions have various shape and geometry, and the design of receptors that are complementary to a specific type of anion is needed. (Thia)calix[4]arene derivatives are a favorable platform for the design of such structures [24-34]. Due to their macrocyclic nature and the possibility to modify them in three different ways (upper and lower rims and bridge fragments), they show the ability to selectively recognize and bind different types of substrates [35-41].

Previously, our scientific group showed that 2-bromo-N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide is the regioselective alkylating reagent for p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene. In these reactions, derivatives of thiacalix[4]arene variously substituted at the lower rim form 1,2-, 1,3-di- and trisubstituted macrocycles [42], depending on the nature of the alkali metal carbonates and solvent. In this paper, we describe the regioselective synthesis of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene monosubstituted at the lower rim by N,N-diethylacetamide fragment and its further functionalization with the N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide moiety. We also calculated the proposed model of anion binding for the new and previously synthesized thiacalix[4]arenes and compared their complexation properties toward number of singly charged anions (F−, Cl−, Br−, I−, CH3CO2−, H2PO4−, NO3−). The obtained novel synthetic anion receptors hold promise for their potential application in the development of more sophisticated biomimetic materials and diagnostic agents.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene derivatives containing N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide and N,N-diethylacetamide moieties at the lower rim

The regioselective synthesis of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arenes partially substituted at the lower rim, is an important challenge because it allows the sequential functionalization of the macrocyclic platform with the necessary substituents. It was shown in acetonitrile using the weak base Na2CO3 that p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene 2, 1,3-disubstituted at the lower rim, is formed with a low yield of 50% [42]. We estimated the effect of various reagent ratios for increasing the yield of the major product. The increase of the ratio to 1:4:4 = macrocycle 1/Na2CO3/2-bromo-N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide resulted in an increase of the yield of the 1,3-disubstituted thiacalix[4]arene to 60%. In addition, p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene 3 tetrasubstituted at the lower rim by N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide fragments in cone conformation was obtained with 10% yield (Scheme 1). 1Н, 13С, 2D NOESY NMR, IR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry (MALDI–TOF) confirmed the macrocycle 3 structure. The elemental analysis gives us the composition of 3.

[1860-5397-13-188-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of 1,3-di- and tetrasubstituted thiacalix[4]arenes 2 and 3. Conditions: (i) macrocycle 1 (1 equiv), 2-bromo-N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide (4 equiv), Na2CO3 (4 equiv), CH3CN, reflux.

In contrast to the 1H NMR spectrum of 1,3-disubstituted thiacalix[4]arene 2 [42], the signals of tert-butyl, oxymethylene and aryl protons are observed in the 1H NMR spectrum of tetrasubstituted macrocycle 3 as a single singlet. There are no signals of the hydroxy protons and only one singlet corresponding to amide protons is observed (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S1). This indicates complete substitution of the initial macrocycle 1.

In the MALDI–TOF mass spectrum of the compound 3 (M(C72H72N8O16S4) = 1432.4), a molecular ion peak with Na+ cation (m/z (M + Na+) = 1455.5) was observed (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S4).

p-tert-Butylthiacalix[4]arenes monosubstituted at the lower rim are also valuable precursors for a further functionalization of the macrocycle. However, their preparation is significantly more difficult than the synthesis of 1,3-disubstituted thiacalix[4]arenes. Bulky functional groups able to form hydrogen bonds with free phenolic hydroxy groups and therefore block three residual hydroxy groups are usually applied in the synthesis of the monosubstituted derivatives of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene [43]. For the synthesis of the monosubstituted derivative, the bulky N,N-diethylacetamide group able to participate in the formation of hydrogen bonds was used.

The monosubstituted derivative 4 was obtained by the alkylation of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene (1) with 2-chloro-N,N-diethylacetamide in the presence of K2CO3 or Cs2CO3 (Scheme 2). Using ratio of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene (1): alkylating reagent: Cs2CO3 = 1:2:4, the product 4 was isolated with 20% yield. With K2CO3 (ratio of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene (1)/alkylating reagent/base = 1:8:26) the yield of 4 was 38%. According to 1H NMR spectrum, the remainder represents a mixture of the initial macrocycle and products of partial substitution at the lower rim. Apparently, the decrease in the yield of macrocycle 4 in the case of Cs2CO3 can be associated with the higher reactivity of the cesium phenolate formed in the reaction mixture, which facilitates further alkylation of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene 4.

[1860-5397-13-188-i2]

Scheme 2: Synthesis of monosubstituted thiacalix[4]arene 4. Conditions: (i) macrocycle 1 (1 equiv), 2-chloro-N,N-diethylacetamide (8 or 2 equiv), K2CO3 (26 equiv) or Cs2CO3 (4 equiv), acetone, reflux.

The introduction of the N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide group into the lower rim of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene 4 is also of interest because this fragment contains a polar NH group able to interact with anionic substrates and a chromophore fragment necessary for the spectrophotometric detection of the complex formation. In this regard, the alkylation of monosubstituted derivative 4 with 2-bromo-N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide was further studied in the presence of Na2CO3, K2CO3 and Cs2CO3.

It was found that tetrasubstituted p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene 5 is formed with 43% yield in the presence of Na2CO3. Using Cs2CO3, the 1,2-disubstituted thiacalix[4]arene 6 was isolated as partial cone with 42% yield (Scheme 3). In the case of K2CO3, a hardly separable mixture of differently substituted derivatives formed.

[1860-5397-13-188-i3]

Scheme 3: Synthesis of tetra- and 1,2-disubstituted thiacalix[4]arenes 5 and 6, respectively. Conditions: (i) macrocycle 4 (1 equiv), 2-bromo-N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide (6 equiv), Na2CO3 (6 equiv), acetone, reflux; (ii) macrocycle 4 (1 equiv), 2-bromo-N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide (6 equiv), Cs2CO3 (6 equiv), acetone, reflux.

The presence of two singlets (with an integral intensities of 3:1) of proton signals of t-Bu groups, one signal of oxymethylene protons and two singlets of OH groups in the 1H NMR spectrum of 4 confirms the formation of the monosubstituted product in cone conformation (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S5). The absence of signals of OH groups in the 1H NMR spectrum of 5 indicates the complete substitution of the lower rim of initial macrocycle 4 (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S9). Four singlets (with equal integrated intensities) of t-Bu groups in the 1H NMR spectrum show the asymmetric structure of 6 (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S13). Also the presence of two singlets of OH groups and one singlet of NH group in the 1H NMR spectrum of 6 confirms the formation of disubstituted product.

The spatial structure of the compounds 4–6 was studied by 1H-1H NOESY NMR spectroscopy. In the NOESY NMR spectrum of the compound 4 (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S7), the presence of cross peaks due to the dipole–dipole interaction of protons of the oxymethylene group with the hydroxy protons, as well as the cross peaks between the aromatic protons of the macrocycle, confirm that the macrocycle 4 is in the cone conformation. The cross peaks between the protons of substituents and the oxymethylene groups, the cross peaks between the protons of the amide groups and the N,N-diethylacetamide group, and also those between the aromatic protons of the macrocycle in the 2D NOESY NMR spectrum of 5 (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S11) indicate that the macrocycle 5 is in the cone conformation. The presence of cross-peaks between the amide proton and protons of tert-butyl groups, the aromatic protons of the p-nitrophenyl substituent and protons of tert-butyl groups in 2D NOESY NMR spectrum of 1,2-disubstituted compound 6 (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S15), as well as the cross peaks between the aromatic protons of the macrocycle and the oxymethylene protons of N,N-diethylacetamide moiety indicate the presence of substituents on opposite sides of the macrocyclic ring. This fact, as well as the cross-peak due to the dipole–dipole interaction of protons of the hydroxy groups confirms the presence of the macrocycle 6 in the partial cone conformation.

In the IR spectra of the compounds 4 and 6, the absorption bands for the stretching vibrations of the hydroxy groups (ν 3330 and 3745 cm−1, respectively) were observed. However this absorption band is absent in the IR spectra of compounds 3 and 5. It confirms complete substitution of the initial thiacalix[4]arenes. It is obvious that the cone formation of the thiacalix[4]arenes 3 and 5 is stabilized by intramolecular hydrogen bonding observed in the IR spectra. The bands of stretching vibrations for the NH bonds of N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide fragment are observed in the IR spectra of the macrocycles 3 and 5 as a narrow and broadened bands in the region of 3383–3278 cm−1 (see Supporting Information File 1, Table S1). In the IR spectra of the compounds 4, 5 and 6, absorption bands of valence vibrations for the N,N-diethylacetamide group (ν 1658, 1648 and 1665 cm−1, respectively) were observed, which were absent in the IR spectrum of the tetrasubstituted macrocycle 3 (see Supporting Information File 1, Table S1).

Complexation properties of the synthesized p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arenes towards some single-charged anions

There are several ways of binding negatively charged substrates. Usually, receptors for anions are charged systems capable of electrostatic interaction with anions [1,44,45] or neutral systems using other types of interactions, such as donor–acceptor interactions, hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic effects, etc. [46-57]. Modified macrocycles with the amide fragments at the lower rim can form complexes with the anions by hydrogen bonds of the amide group with the guest. It was shown that (thia)calix[4]arene derivatives with urea and thiourea fragments at the lower rim can bind anions through hydrogen bonds [49,58-61]. In this regard, it was suggested that the synthesized thiacalix[4]arenes 3, 5 and 6 could be potential receptors for anions because they contain proton donor groups (amide, hydroxy) at the lower rim. Also, the comparison of the complexation properties of early synthesized thiacalix[4]arenes 2, 7–10 (Figure 1) [26,42] with N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide and N,N-diethylacetamide fragments was of interest.

[1860-5397-13-188-1]

Figure 1: Investigated hosts 2, 3, 7–10.

Initially, molecular modeling of the host–guest complexes of the above-mentioned thiacalix[4]arenes 2, 3, 5–10 with a number of single-charged anions (F−, Cl−, Br−, I−, CH3CO2−, H2PO4−, NO3−) was carried out at a semi-empirical level using the quantum-mechanical method, PM3 (HyperChem 7.0). The proposed model for the binding of anions by p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arenes containing proton–donor (amide, hydroxy) groups was studied in order to identify steric and/or electronic hindrances to the complex formation. Review of literature data [62-65] indicate a good agreement between the results of calculations involving the complexes geometry determined by this method and experimental data. The PM3 method is used quite productively for molecular design and modeling of the receptor structures [64,65]. Unfortunately, this calculation method does not provide adequate absolute energy values for the molecules calculated. Therefore, we further discuss the comparative values of the energies of different complexes [66].

As an example, Table 1 shows the difference in the energy gain of the resulting complexes of the macrocycles 3 and 9 with a number of single-charged anions. It can be clearly seen that a linear dependence of the anion size on the energy difference is observed for halide anions. That is, the larger the anion size, the lower the gain in the energy of the complex formed. Thus, the binding efficiency should decrease in the range from the F− ion to the larger I− ion.

Table 1: The difference in the energy gain of the complexes of thiacalix[4]arenes 3 and 9 with a number of anions.

compound ΔE, kcal/mol
  F− Cl− Br− I− H2PO4− CH3CO2− NO3−
3 97.32 70.14 58.38 40.93 40.35 42.90 55.69
9 93.54 64.77 43.98 14.12 26.66 43.49 18.19

The receptor properties of the synthesized compounds 3, 5, 6 toward the tetrabutylammonium salts n-Bu4NX (X = F−, Cl−, Br−, I−, CH3CO2−, H2PO4−, NO3−) were studied by UV spectroscopy for investigation the influence of structural factors (the macrocycle conformation, the number and the nature of the substituents) on the complexation properties of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arenes. In these thiacalix[4]arenes, both proton donating secondary amide (N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide fragment) and hydroxy (phenolic fragments) groups can participate in anion binding.

To determine the possibility of the tetrabutylammonium cation binding by the synthesized thiacalix[4]arenes, solutions of the compounds 3, 5 and 6 in the presence of a 10-fold excess of n-Bu4NX (X = F−, Cl−, Br−, I−, CH3CO2−, H2PO4−, NO3−) were studied in CDCl3 by 1H NMR spectroscopy. In the 1H NMR spectra, the chemical shifts of the n-Bu4N+ protons did not change indicating the absence of interaction between the thiacalix[4]arenes obtained and tetrabutylammonium cation.

The complexation of anions by compounds 3, 5 and 6 was studied in the presence of a 200-fold excess of n-Bu4NX in chloroform. The most significant changes in the absorption spectra of p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arenes in the presence of n-Bu4NX involved the observed bathochromic shift of the absorption band in the 300–370 nm region representing the interaction of the macrocycles studied with n-Bu4NH2PO4 and n-Bu4NF. Besides, changes were observed when the macrocycle 6 interacted with n-Bu4NCH3CO2 and in the case of the compound 3, when n-Bu4NCl, n-Bu4NBr, n-Bu4NI, n-Bu4NCH3CO2, and n-Bu4NNO3 were added.

In the absorption spectra of the thiacalix[4]arene 5 with n-Bu4NX, the changes are observed only in the interaction with F− and H2PO4− anions. A strong hypochromic effect on the absorption band maximum in both cases and a weak bathochromic shift of the absorption band in the interaction of the macrocycle 5 with F− anions were observed (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S17).

Interaction of thiacalix[4]arene 6 with the F−, CH3CO2−, H2PO4− anions have a complicated character in the spectra. There is a bathochromic shift and a hypochromic effect on the maximum of the absorption band at 305 nm. In addition, a new absorption maximum appears in the region of 335 nm (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S18).

The complexation ability of the compounds 3, 5 and 6 in relation to the anions (F−, Cl−, Br−, I−, СН3СО2−, Н2РО4−, NO3−) was quantitatively evaluated by the stoichiometry and the association constants (Table 2) of the formed complexes. They were determined by the isomolar series method, that all the thiacalix[4]arenes studied form in CHСl3 the 1:1 complexes with selected n-Bu4NX (see Supporting Information File 1, Figure S19). The association constants of the complexes studied were estimated by the dilution method (Figure 2). The appropriate complexation constants (Table 2) were determined by the Benesi–Hildebrand method [67].

Table 2: The logarithms of the association constant (logKass) of the complexes of the synthesized compounds with anions.

compound [H]:[G] logKass
    F− Cl− Br− I− H2PO4− CH3CO2− NO3−
2 1:1 3.67 ± 0.19b –b –b –b 3.41 ± 0.09b 3.50 ± 0.32b –b
3 1:1 5.87 ± 0.23 5.12 ± 0.07 4.51 ± 0.10 3.55 ± 0.13 5.81 ± 0.24 5.90 ± 0.20 3.83 ± 0.12
5 1:1 2.53 ± 0.07 –а –а –а 2.18 ± 0.38 –а –а
6 1:1 4.23 ± 0.17 –а –а –а 2.90 ± 0.31 3.15 ± 0.30 –а
7 1:1 5.25 ± 0.56b –b –b –b 4.93 ± 0.21b 4.85 ± 0.12b –b
8 1:1 3.53 ± 0.44b –b –b –b –b –b –b
9 1:1 3.80 ± 0.32b 3.36 ± 0.18b 2.93 ± 0.04b –b 3.51 ± 0.10b 3.37 ± 0.11b 2.64 ± 0.09b

aNo changes in UV spectra. bThe data from ref. [26].

[1860-5397-13-188-2]

Figure 2: UV absorption spectra of the complexation system obtained by titration of the receptor 6 (c(6) = 2.5 × 10−5 M) and H2PO4− anion (cinitial = 2.5 × 10-5 M, cfinal = 8.75 × 10−3 M) in CHCl3. Inset: titration curve (c(6) = 2.5 × 10−5 M).

Trisubstituted thiacalix[4]arene 8 in cone conformation binds the F− anion with high selectivity against other anions studied. Apparently, the presence of a bulky diethylamide group makes it difficult to bind other anions. However, trisubstituted thiacalix[4]arene 9 in partial cone conformation effectively binds almost all the anions studied except the large I− ion.

Among all the macrocycles studied tetrasubstituted at the lower rim p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene 3 containing four N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide fragments binds anions most effectively. In some cases, the selectivity of the binding of F−, CH3CO2− and H2PO4− anions by the macrocycle 3 with respect to I− and NO3− anions is significant according to Table 3. Replacement of one N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide fragment in the compound 3 by N,N-diethylacetamide group leads to a significant decrease in the complexation ability of the macrocycle 5, while the replacement of two fragments leads to the absence of complexation between the thiacalix[4]arene 10 and the anions studied [26]. Compared to the macrocycle 3, the complexation properties of other thiacalix[4]arenes studied are much worse. However, in some cases (compounds 2, 5, 6, 7, 8) a selectivity of binding to F−, CH3CO2− and H2PO4− anions is observed in the series of the single-charged anions studied.

Table 3: The selectivity of binding to F−, Cl−, H2PO4− and CH3CO2− anions by macrocycle 3 in comparison with Br−, I− and NO3− anions.

  Selectivity = Kguest1/Kguest2 (1)
guest 1 F− Cl− H2PO4− CH3CO2−
guest 2        
Br− 22.91 4.07 19.95 24.55
I− 208.93 37.15 181.97 223.87
NO3− 109.65 19.50 95.50 117.50

It is interesting to note that 1,2-disubstituted p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene 6 in partial cone conformation containing only one amide fragment binds to F−, CH3CO2− and H2PO4− ions. Probably, the aromatic rings of the macrocycle with free phenolic groups are arranged in such a manner that the hydroxy groups are located near the amide thereby forming a cavity complementary to the anions studied. In this case, macrocycle 6 selectively binds to F− anions, in contrast to the 1,3-disubstituted macrocycle 2 containing two proton donor fragments. The selectivity of binding to F− anions compared to H2PO4− and CH3CO2− anions is 21.4 and 12.0, respectively.

The comparison of the experimental data obtained (logarithms of the association constants of the complexes of the studied thiacalix[4]arenes with a series of anions) and the results of quantum mechanical calculations (energy change in the formation of guest–host complexes calculated by the PM3 method) (HyperChem 7.0) was the final stage of the work (Table 4).

Table 4: The logarithms of the association constants (logKass) of the complexes of the thiacalix[4]arenes 2, 3, 5–9 with anions and the energy change in the formation of guest–host complexes calculated by the PM3 method.

Compound 2 3 5 6 7 8 9
F− logKass 3.67 5.87 2.53 4.23 5.25 3.53 3.80
ΔE 86.8 97.3 108.1 81.6 114.0 93.2 93.5
Cl− logKass – 5.12 – – – – 3.36
ΔE – 70.1 – – – – 64.8
Br− logKass – 4.51 – – – – 2.93
ΔE – 58.4 – – – – 44.0
I− logKass – 3.55 – – – – –
ΔE – 40.9 – – – – 14.1
H2PO4− logKass 3.41 5.81 2.18 2.90 4.93 – 3.51
ΔE 40.2 40.4 29.6 31.9 23.9 31.44 26.7
CH3CO2− logKass 3.50 5.90 – 3.15 4.85 – 3.37
ΔE 44.5 42.9 35.8 40.1 27.8 30.0 43.5
NO3− logKass – 3.83 – – – – 2.64
ΔE – 55.7 – – – – 18.2

The results of the semi-empirical modeling are in a good agreement with spectrophotometric titration data in the case of halide ions: the efficiency of the anion binding by thiacalix[4]arenes 3 and 9 decreases in the range from F− ion to the larger I− ion (Table 4). In the case of the macrocycles 3 and 9, the logarithm of the association constant of the resulting complexes increases from the energy gain difference calculated using the semi-empirical PM3 method (Table 4). However, an unambiguous tendency is observed only for spherical substrates (halide ions). But there is no such dependence in the case of tetrahedral H2PO4−, Y-shaped CH3CO2− and NO3− ions.

It is clearly seen from the Table 4 that all the studied thiacalix[4]arenes (2, 3, 5–9) bind F– ions. This agrees well with the quantum mechanical calculations. For all the complexes involving the macrocycles studied with F− ion, a significant energy gain within the range of 82–114 kcal/mol is observed.

The quantum mechanical calculations of the complexes of the thiacalix[4]arenes 2, 3, 6, 7, 9 with CH3CO2− ion are in good agreement with the logarithms of the association constant (Table 4). An increase in the logarithm of the association constant correlates with an increase in the energy change in the formation of the host–guest complexes in the case of the macrocycles 3, 7. For the compounds 2, 6, 9, the efficiency of complexation is close.

Conclusion

New mono-, 1,2-di- and tetrasubstituted at the lower rim p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arenes containing N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide and N,N-diethylacetamide groups in cone and partial cone conformations were synthesized. The calculations of the proposed model for the anion binding by the synthesized thiacalix[4]arenes were carried out using molecular modeling (the quantum mechanical method PM3). Also, their complexation ability toward a number of tetrabutylammonium salts n-Bu4NX (X = F−, Cl−, Br−, I−, CH3CO2−, H2PO4−, NO3−) was studied by UV spectroscopy. Using p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arenes substituted at the lower rim by N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide and N,N-diethylacetamide as an example, the influence of the number and nature of substituents on the complexation properties of the synthetic receptors based on thiacalix[4]arene was demonstrated. The most effective receptor, i.e., p-tert-butylthiacalix[4]arene tetrasubstituted at the lower rim by N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide in cone conformation binds to the anions studied with the association constants in the range of 3.55 × 103–7.94 × 105 M−1, and the selectivity of binding to F−, Cl−, CH3CO2−, H2PO4− anions aginst other anions is in the range of 4.1–223.9. The 1,2-disubstituted thiacalix[4]arene in the partial cone conformation containing only one N-(4’-nitrophenyl)acetamide fragment selectively binds to F− anion in contrast to the 1,3-disubstituted macrocycle containing two such fragments. These novel anion receptors based on the synthesized compounds can be used in the development of systems like an "electronic tongue", biomimetic materials and diagnostic agents.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Additional experimental parameters and results.
Format: PDF Size: 1.5 MB Download

Acknowledgements

This work was financial supported by Russian Science Foundation (grant №16-13-00005).

References

  1. Gale, P. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2001, 213, 79–128. doi:10.1016/S0010-8545(00)00364-7
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  2. Matthews, S. E.; Beer, P. D. Supramol. Chem. 2005, 17, 411–435. doi:10.1080/10610270500127089
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  3. Bregović, V. B.; Basarić, N.; Mlinarić-Majerski, K. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2015, 295, 80–124. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2015.03.011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Warwick, C.; Guerreiro, A.; Soares, A. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013, 41, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2012.07.012
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Scheele, J.; Timmerman, P.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem. Commun. 1998, 2613–2614. doi:10.1039/a806722h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Metz, A. E.; Ramalingam, K.; Kozlowski, M. C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 5180–5184. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.07.058
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Schmidtchen, F. P.; Berger, M. Chem. Rev. 1997, 97, 1609–1646. doi:10.1021/cr9603845
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Scheerder, J.; Engbersen, J. F. J.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas 1996, 115, 307–320. doi:10.1002/recl.19961150602
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Antonisse, M. M. G.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Chem. Commun. 1998, 443–448. doi:10.1039/a707529d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Beer, P. D.; Smith, D. K. Progress in Inorganic Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1997; Vol. 46, pp 1–96. doi:10.1002/9780470166475.ch1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Beer, P. D.; Gale, P. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 486–516. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20010202)40:3<486::AID-ANIE486>3.0.CO;2-P
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Martínez-Máñez, R.; Sancenón, F. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 4419–4476. doi:10.1021/cr010421e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Ryu, H. H.; Lee, Y. J.; Kim, S. E.; Jo, T. G.; Kim, C. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2016, 86, 111–119. doi:10.1007/s10847-016-0646-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Mungalpara, D.; Kelm, H.; Valkonen, A.; Rissanen, K.; Keller, S.; Kubik, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 102–113. doi:10.1039/C6OB02172G
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Mishra, A. K.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Moorthy, J. N. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 2210–2216. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2017.02.052
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Satta, Y.; Nishiyabu, R.; James, T. D.; Kubo, Y. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 2053–2061. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2017.02.050
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Shang, X.; Ren, K.; Li, J.; Li, W.; Fu, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 456, 199–206. doi:10.1016/j.ica.2016.10.046
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Basaran, I.; Wang, X.; Alamgir, A.; Wang, J.; Haque, S. A.; Zhang, Y.; Powell, D. R.; Leszczynski, J.; Hossain, M. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2015, 56, 657–661. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2014.12.015
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Reena, V.; Suganya, S.; Velmathi, S. J. Fluorine Chem. 2013, 153, 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2013.05.010
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Qi, Q.; Lin, R.; Chen, X.; Li, S. Sens. Actuators, B 2016, 222, 551–555. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2015.08.102
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Ünver, H.; Boyacıoğlu, B.; Zeyrek, C. T.; Yıldız, M.; Demir, N.; Yıldırım, N.; Karaosmanoğlu, O.; Sivas, H.; Elmalı, A. J. Mol. Struct. 2016, 1125, 162–176. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2016.06.058
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Barare, B.; Yıldız, M.; Alpaslan, G.; Dilek, N.; Ünver, H.; Tadesse, S.; Aslan, K. Sens. Actuators, B 2015, 215, 52–61. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2015.03.025
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Barare, B.; Yıldız, M.; Ünver, H.; Aslan, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 537–542. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.12.071
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Kumagai, H.; Hasegawa, H.; Miyanari, S.; Sugawa, Y.; Sato, Y.; Hori, T.; Ueda, S.; Kamiyama, H.; Miyano, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3971–3972. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(97)00792-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Iki, N.; Morohashi, N.; Narumi, F.; Fujimoto, T.; Suzuki, T.; Miyano, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 7337–7341. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(99)01503-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Stoikov, I. I.; Yantemirova, A. A.; Nosov, R. V.; Rizvanov, I. K.; Julmetov, A. R.; Klochkov, V. V.; Antipin, I. S.; Konovalov, A. I.; Zharov, I. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011, 9, 3225–3234. doi:10.1039/c0ob01251c
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  27. Stoikov, I. I.; Mostovaya, O. A.; Yakimova, L. S.; Yantemirova, A. A.; Antipin, I. S.; Konovalov, A. I. Mendeleev Commun. 2010, 20, 359–360. doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2010.11.021
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Vavilova, A. A.; Nosov, R. V.; Mostovaya, O. A.; Stoikov, I. I. Macroheterocycles 2016, 9, 294–300. doi:10.6060/mhc160531s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Yamada, M.; Gandhi, M. R.; Kunda, U. M. R.; Hamada, F. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2016, 85, 1–18. doi:10.1007/s10847-016-0616-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Liu, Y.-C.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Tian, H.-W.; Liu, Y.; Guo, D.-S. Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 53–61. doi:10.1039/C5QO00326A
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Vural, U.; Durmaz, M.; Sirit, A. Org. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 730–736. doi:10.1039/C6QO00135A
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Stejskal, F.; Cuřínová, P.; Lhoták, P. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 760–766. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2015.12.037
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Liu, Y.; Sun, J.; Yan, C.-G. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2017, 87, 157–166. doi:10.1007/s10847-016-0687-z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Gharat, P. M.; Joseph, S.; Sundararajan, M.; Choudhury, S. D.; Pal, H. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 11480–11487. doi:10.1039/C6OB02186G
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Stoikov, I. I.; Yantemirova, A. A.; Nosov, R. V.; Julmetov, A. R.; Klochkov, V. V.; Antipin, I. S.; Konovalov, A. I. Mendeleev Commun. 2011, 21, 41–43. doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2011.01.017
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Yakimova, L. S.; Puplampu, J. B.; Vavilova, A. A.; Stoikov, I. I. Polyammonium derivatives of (thia)calix[4]arene: synthesis and interaction with nucleic acids. In Advances in Chemistry Research; Taylor, J. C., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, USA, 2015; Vol. 28, pp 145–169.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Vavilova, A. A.; Nosov, R. V.; Yakimova, L. S.; Antipin, I. S.; Stoikov, I. I. Macroheterocycles 2013, 6, 219–226. doi:10.6060/mhc130748s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Kundrát, O.; Eigner, V.; Cuřínová, P.; Kroupa, J.; Lhoták, P. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 8367–8372. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2011.08.062
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Wang, K.; Cui, J.-H.; Xing, S.-Y.; Dou, H.-X. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 10804–10811. doi:10.1039/C6OB02105K
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Tlustý, M.; Slavík, P.; Dvořáková, H.; Eigner, V.; Lhoták, P. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 1230–1237. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2017.01.025
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Hanauer, T.; Hopkinson, R. J.; Patel, K.; Li, Y.; Correddu, D.; Kawamura, A.; Sarojini, V.; Leung, I. K. H.; Gruber, T. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 1100–1105. doi:10.1039/C6OB02616H
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Stoikov, I. I.; Ibragimova, D. S.; Shestakova, N. V.; Krivolapov, D. B.; Litvinov, I. A.; Antipin, I. S.; Konovalov, A. I.; Zharov, I. Supramol. Chem. 2009, 21, 564–571. doi:10.1080/10610270802438820
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  43. Stoikov, I. I.; Galukhin, A. V.; Zaikov, E. N.; Antipin, I. S. Mendeleev Commun. 2009, 19, 193–195. doi:10.1016/j.mencom.2009.07.006
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Llinares, J. M.; Powell, D.; Bowman-James, K. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 57–75. doi:10.1016/S0010-8545(03)00019-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Best, M. D.; Tobey, S. L.; Anslyn, E. V. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 3–15. doi:10.1016/S0010-8545(02)00256-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Stibor, I. Anion Sensing; Topics in Current Chemistry, Vol. 255; Springer Verlag: Berlin-Heidelberg, Germany, 2005.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Naher, S.; Hiratani, K.; Ito, S. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2006, 55, 151–157. doi:10.1007/s10847-005-9031-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Pelizzi, N.; Casnati, A.; Friggeri, A.; Ungaro, R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1998, 1307–1312. doi:10.1039/a801762j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Cuřínová, P.; Stibor, I.; Budka, J.; Sýkora, J.; Lang, K.; Lhoták, P. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 612–619. doi:10.1039/b816790g
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  50. Maitya, D.; Bhatt, M.; Desai, M. L.; Suresh, E.; Si, M. K.; Boricha, V. P.; Ganguly, B.; Paul, P. Supramol. Chem. 2017, 29, 600–615. doi:10.1080/10610278.2017.1301450
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Shen, Y.-Y.; Li, Y.; Wang, B.; Li, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2016, 57, 582–586. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2015.12.090
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Pandian, T. S.; Srinivasadesikan, V.; Lin, M. C.; Kang, J. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 8350–8356. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2015.08.015
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Takeda, S.; Yamada, H.; Mutai, T.; Yoshikawa, I.; Houjou, H. Dyes Pigm. 2015, 121, 372–378. doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.05.038
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Tabisz, Ł.; Pankiewicz, R.; Rozwadowski, Z.; Łęska, B. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 2267–2272. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2015.02.056
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Harris, W. R. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj. 2012, 1820, 348–361. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2011.07.017
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Moreno-Corral, R.; Höpfl, H.; Yatsimirsky, A. K.; Gálvez-Ruiz, J. C.; Lara, K. O. Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 1232–1240. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2015.01.005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Zuo, H.; Wang, C.; Shen, Y. Tetrahedron 2016, 72, 1244–1248. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2016.01.019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Zlatušková, P.; Stibor, I.; Tkadlecová, M.; Lhoták, P. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 11383–11390. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2004.09.088
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Marcos, P. M.; Teixeira, F. A.; Segurado, M. A. P.; Ascenso, J. R.; Bernardino, R. J.; Brancatelli, G.; Geremia, S. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 6497–6505. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2014.07.020
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Bozkurt, S.; Turkmen, M. B.; Soykan, C. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2016, 84, 35–41. doi:10.1007/s10847-015-0579-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Rahman, S.; Tomiyasu, H.; Kawazoe, H.; Zhao, J.-L.; Cong, H.; Ni, X.-L.; Zeng, X.; Elsegood, M. R. J.; Warwick, T. G.; Teat, S. J.; Redshaw, C.; Georghiou, P. E.; Yamato, T. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 9245–9251. doi:10.1039/C6NJ00923A
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. Jeong, H.; Choi, E. M.; Kang, S. O.; Nam, K. C.; Jeon, S. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1999, 20, 1232–1234.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Arduini, A.; Giorgi, G.; Pochini, A.; Secchi, A.; Ugozzoli, F. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 8302–8308. doi:10.1021/jo016035e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Antipin, I. S.; Stoikov, I. I.; Repeikov, S. A.; Yarkova, E. G.; Gubaidullin, A. T.; Litvinov, I. A.; Konovalov, A. I. Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 1998, 68, 1455–1461.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  65. Antipin, I. S.; Stoikov, I. I.; Khrustalev, A. A.; Konovalov, A. I. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2001, 50, 2134–2143. doi:10.1023/A:1015005502810
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  66. Young, D. C. Computational chemistry: A practical guide for applying techniques to real-world problems; Wiley-Interscience: New York, Chichester, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto, 2001. doi:10.1002/0471220655
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  67. Hirose, K. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2001, 39, 193–209. doi:10.1023/A:1011117412693
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2017 Vavilova and Stoikov; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities
Journal Logo
Institut Logo
Preprint Logo
Symposia Logo