Logo Beilstein Institut

[3 + 2]-Cycloaddition reaction of sydnones with alkynes

  1. ,
  2. ORCID Logo and
  3. ORCID Logo
Institute of Organic Chemistry and Technology, University of Pardubice, Studentská 573, 532 10 Pardubice, Czech Republic
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: I. R. Baxendale
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 1317–1348. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.14.113
Received 20 Feb 2018, Accepted 11 May 2018, Published 05 Jun 2018
Review
cc by logo
PDF
Album
Cite

Abstract

This review covers all known examples of [3 + 2]-cycloaddition between sydnones and both terminal as well as internal alkynes/cycloalkynes taken from literature since its discovery by Huisgen in 1962 up to the current date. Except enumeration of synthetic applications it also covers mechanistic studies, catalysis, effects of substituents and reaction conditions influencing reaction rate and regioselectivity.

Keywords: alkynes; Cu(I) catalysis; [3 + 2]-cycloaddition; mechanism; regioselectivity; sydnones

Review

Introduction

Since Huisgen’s discovery of the [3 + 2]-cycloaddition between 3-substituted sydnones and both terminal as well as internal alkynes [1,2] many researchers have tried to utilize this synthetic approach for the synthesis of polysubstituted 1,2-diazoles (pyrazoles, indazoles). However, until 2013 when Taran’s group introduced the regioselective Cu(I)-phenanthroline catalysis [3] this method was of limited value due to the harsh reaction conditions and sometimes also due to low regioselectivity in those cases when a non-symmetrical alkyne was employed as a reactant. Surprisingly, until the fall of 2017, no comprehensive work concerning this important topic was published. This encouraged us to write this review. During its completion a new feature article bridging this gap was published by Taran et al. [4]. In order to avoid duplication our review is therefore focused in more detail on thermal, photochemical as well as metal-catalyzed reactions of sydnones with alkynes and factors that influence the yield and ratio of both possible regioisomers and also the kinetics and mechanism of this cycloaddition reaction.

Thermal reaction of sydnones with symmetrical alkynes and cycloalkynes

As mentioned above, the thermal reaction of 3-alkyl-, 3-aryl- or even 3-substituted aminosydnones with symmetrical alkynes (Scheme 1) represents a very useful and straightforward method for the synthesis of substituted 1,3,4-tri- or 1,3,4,5-tetrasubstituted pyrazoles [1,2,5-39] or indazoles.

[1860-5397-14-113-i1]

Scheme 1: Thermal reaction of sydnones with symmetrical alkynes.

Dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate (DMAD, R3 = COOMe) or its analogues (diethyl; R3 = COOEt); di-tert-butyl, R3 = COOt-Bu etc.) act as the most common dipolarophiles because of their high reactivity. Moreover, one or both carboxylate groups in position 3 and 4 in the final pyrazole are easily removable using a hydrolysis/decarboxylation protocol [5,16] thus giving pyrazole-4-carboxylic acids – potent xanthine oxidoreductase inhibitors [40] or even 3,4-unsubstituted pyrazoles [16]. Both pyrazole carboxylic groups can be also modified to hydrazides and oxazole rings [26] or a new condensed pyridazine ring [27]. Less reactive dipolarophiles such as dibenzoylacetylenes (1,4-diphenylbut-2-yn-1,4-diones) [13,17,38,39], diphenylacetylene [1,2,9,13,15,32] or even acetylene itself [1,2] have also been successfully reacted with sydnones. The most typical procedure involves heating both components in boiling hydrocarbon solvent (benzene, toluene or xylene) for several hours (up to 24 h) and the isolated yields are often close to 90% for the ordinary substituents (alkyls, aryls, halogens) of the sydnone. Somewhat lower yields were obtained in ethyleneglycol [5]. The reaction of the parent 1-phenylsydnone with DMAD and its diethyl analogue has also been performed in supercritical carbon dioxide [41] in which 65 and 83% yields of dimethyl (or diethyl) 1-phenylpyrazole-3,4-dicarboxylates were achieved. Only in two cases involving 3-(2,4,6-trisubstituted phenyl)-4-iodosydnones (R1: 2-Br-4,6-diMe-Ph, 2,4-diBr-6-Me-Ph; R2: I) and DMAD (or its diethyl analogue) did the cycloaddition completely fail [21,22] even after heating for 3 days in boiling xylene. This result was explained by the steric hindrance between the bulky substituents in the 4-position (iodine) and the substituents (Me, Br) in both ortho-positions of the adjacent 2,4,6-trisubstituted phenyl ring. All the examples found for [3 + 2]-cycloadditions between sydnones and symmetrical non-cyclic alkynes including conditions used for the synthesis, are presented in Table 1.

Table 1: Thermal cycloaddition of sydnones with symmetrical non-cyclic alkynes.

[Graphic 1]
entry R1 R2 R3 conditions yield [%] ref.
1 Ph H H acetone, 170 °C, 25 h 75 [1,2]
2 Ph Me Ph 180 °C, 5 h 96–97 [1,2]
3 Ph H Ph 160 °C, 4.5 h 93 [2]
4 Ph Ph Ph 190 °C, 9 h 98 [2]
5 Ph H COOMe toluene, 90 °C, 4 h
xylene, reflux
p-xylene, reflux, overnight
p-xylene, reflux, overnight
p-xylene, reflux, 4 h 		92
92
98
93
93 		[1,2]
[20]
[26]
[29]
[31]
6 Ph Me COOMe xylene, 120 °C, 1 h 99 [1,2]
7 Bn H COOMe xylene, 120 °C, 5 h 93–98 [1,2]
8 Ph Cl COOMe ethyleneglycol, 120 °C, 1 h
xylene, reflux 		74
60–80 		[5]
[6]
9 Ph Br COOMe ethyleneglycol, 120 °C, 1 h
xylene, reflux 		70
60–80 		[5]
[6]
10 Me Cl COOMe ethyleneglycol, 120 °C, 1.5 h 12 [5]
11 Me Br COOMe ethyleneglycol, 120 °C, 1.5 h 82 [5]
12 Ph NO2 COOMe xylene, reflux 60–80 [6]
13 4-Br-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux
p-xylene, reflux, 6 h 		60–80
92 		[6]
[35]
14 4-Br-Ph Br COOMe xylene, reflux 60–80 [6]
15 4-Br-Ph Cl COOMe xylene, reflux 60–80 [6]
16 4-Cl-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux
p-xylene, reflux, overnight 		60–80
98 		[6]
[26]
17 4-Cl-Ph Br COOMe xylene, reflux 60–80 [6]
18 4-Cl-Ph Cl COOMe xylene, reflux 60–80 [6]
19 4-MeO-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux
xylene, reflux, overnight
p-xylene, reflux, 4 h 		60–80
91
91 		[6]
[29]
[31]
20 4-MeO-Ph Br COOMe xylene, reflux 60–80 [6]
21 4-MeO-Ph Cl COOMe xylene, reflux 60–80 [6]
22 4-Br-3-Cl-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux 89 [7]
23 4-Br-3-Cl-Ph Br COOMe xylene, reflux 71 [7]
24 4-Br-3-Cl-Ph Cl COOMe xylene, reflux 61 [7]
25 4-NO2-Ph H COOMe toluene, 110 °C, 1.75 h
p-xylene, reflux, overnight 		99
98 		[8]
[26]
26 4-NO2-Ph Ph COOMe toluene, 100–105 °C, 16 h 96 [8]
27 2,4-di-NO2-Ph Ph COOMe toluene, 100–105 °C, 4 h 97 [8]
28 Ph MeS COOMe toluene, 100 °C, 2 h 96 [8]
29 4-Me2N-Ph MeS COOMe mesitylene, 130–135 °C, 0.5 h 92 [8]
30 Ph PhS COOMe xylene, 120–125 °C, 5.75 h 91 [8]
31 Ph PhS=O COOMe mesitylene, 135–140 °C, 26 h 63 [8]
32 Ph MeC=O COOMe xylene, 160 °C, 18 h 62 [8]
33 4-MeO-Ph MeC=O COOMe mesitylene, 160–165 °C, 22 h 95 [8]
34 4-MeO-Ph CN COOMe xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 79 [8]
35 Me2N MeS COOMe xylene, 160 °C, 18 h
benzene, 80 °C, 16 h 		31
19 		[9]
36 Me2N MeS Ph xylene, 155–160 °C, 93 h 71 [9]
37 Me2N PhS COOMe xylene, 155–160 °C, 19 h
benzene, 80 °C, 23 h 		30
0 		[9]
38 Me2N H COOMe xylene, 155–160 °C, 3 h
benzene, 80 °C, 19 h 		9
2 		[9]
39 Me2N CN COOMe xylene, 155–160 °C, 3 h 0 [9]
40 O(CH2CH2)2N MeS COOMe benzene, 80 °C, 23 h 53 [9]
41 O(CH2CH2)2N PhS COOMe xylene, 155–160 °C, 22 h 70 [9]
42 (CH2)5N MeS COOMe xylene, 160 °C, 20 h 47 [9]
43 (CH2)5N PhS COOMe xylene, 150–160 °C, 24 h 27 [9]
44 [Graphic 3] COOMe benzene, reflux 71 [10]
45 [Graphic 2] COOMe benzene, reflux 77 [10]
46 4-MeCO-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux 56 [11]
47 4-MeCO-Ph Me COOMe xylene, reflux 51 [11]
48 4-MeCO-Ph Ph COOMe xylene, reflux 38 [11]
49 4-(Me(Ph)NSO2)-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux, 2 h 75 [12]
50 4-(Et(Ph)NSO2)-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux, 2 h 75 [12]
51 4-(O(CH2CH2)2NSO2)-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux, 2 h 78 [12]
52 4-((CH2)5NSO2)-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux, 2 h 76 [12]
53 4-((CH2)4NSO2)-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux, 2 h 75 [12]
54 4-(Et2NSO2)-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux, 2 h 75 [12]
55 4-(O(CH2CH2)2NSO2)-Ph Br COOMe xylene, reflux, 2 h 66 [12]
56 4-((CH2)5NSO2)-Ph Br COOMe xylene, reflux, 2 h 70 [12]
57 CH2CH2CH2 Ph xylene, reflux, 48 h 45 [13]
58 CH2CH2CH2 COOMe xylene, reflux, 8 h 80 [13]
59 CH2CH2CH2 PhCO xylene, reflux, 8 h 92 [13]
60 [Graphic 4] Me COOMe xylene, 120 °C – [14]
61 [Graphic 5] Me COOMe xylene, 120 °C – [14]
62 [Graphic 6] Me COOMe xylene, 120 °C – [14]
63 [Graphic 7] Ph COOMe xylene, 120 °C – [14]
64 [Graphic 8] Ph COOMe xylene, 120 °C – [14]
65 [Graphic 9] Br COOMe xylene, 120 °C – [14]
66 [Graphic 10] Ph COOMe xylene, 120 °C – [14]
67 [Graphic 11] Ph COOMe xylene, 120 °C – [14]
67 [Graphic 12] Me COOMe xylene, 120 °C – [14]
68 CH2CH2CH2CH2 Ph p-xylene, reflux, 24 h, 91 [15]
69 Me H Ph 160 °C, 7 d 16 [15]
70 Me Ph COOMe p-xylene, reflux, overnight 77 [16]
71 [Graphic 13] H COOMe xylene, reflux 52 [17]
72 [Graphic 14] H COOMe xylene, reflux 60 [17]
73 [Graphic 15] H PhCO xylene, reflux 50 [17]
74 [Graphic 16] H PhCO xylene, reflux 53 [17]
75 Ph [Graphic 17] COOMe toluene, reflux 67 [18]
76 Ph [Graphic 18] COOt-Bu toluene, reflux 48 [18]
77 Me [Graphic 19] COOMe toluene, reflux 54 [18]
78 Ph H Bu3Sn xylene, reflux, 16 h 98 [19]
79 Me I COOMe toluene + DMSO, reflux, 6 h 84 [20]
80 CH2CH2CN I COOMe toluene, reflux, 6 h 95 [20]
81 Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux, 6 h 80 [20]
82 2-Me-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux, 6 h 88 [20]
83 2-Et-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux, 6 h 83 [20]
84 2-MeO-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux, 6 h 83 [20]
85 3-MeO-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux, 6 h 84 [20]
86 4-MeO-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux, 6 h 90 [20]
87 2-Me-Ph Cl COOMe toluene, reflux, 6 h – [20]
88 2-Et-Ph Br COOMe toluene, reflux, 6 h 92 [20]
89 2,4-diMe-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux 87 [21]
90 2,4-diMe-6-Br-Ph H COOMe toluene, reflux 82 [21]
91 2,4-diBr-6-Cl-Ph H COOMe toluene, reflux 90 [21]
92 2-Br-4,6-diMe-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux 0 [21]
93 4-Br-2-Me-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux, 8 h 83 [22]
94 4-Br-2-Me-Ph Cl COOMe xylene, reflux, 8 h 81 [22]
96 4-Br-2-Me-Ph Br COOMe xylene, reflux, 8 h 88 [22]
97 4-Br-2-Me-Ph I COOMe xylene, reflux, 8 h 79 [22]
98 4,6-Br2-2-Me-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux, 8 h 92 [22]
99 4-Br-2-Me-Ph H COOEt xylene, reflux, 8 h 82 [22]
100 2,4-Br2-6-Me-Ph I COOMe(Et) xylene, reflux, 3 d 0 [22]
101 2-Cl-Ph I COOMe xylene, reflux, 8 h 78 [23]
102 2-Cl-4-Br-Ph I COOMe xylene, reflux, 8 h 87 [23]
103 2-Cl-4-Br-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux, 8 h 91 [23]
104 4-Br-2-Et-Ph H COOMe toluene, reflux, 10 h 82 [24]
105 4-Br-2-Me-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux, 10 h 90 [24]
106 2,5-diMe-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux, 8 h 85 [25]
107 5-Cl-2-Me-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux, 8 h 82 [25]
108 2,5-diMe-Ph Br COOMe toluene, reflux, 8 h 83 [25]
109 5-Cl-2-Me-Ph Br COOMe toluene, reflux, 8 h 87 [25]
110 2,4-diMe-Ph Br COOMe toluene, reflux, 8 h 81 [25]
111 2,4-diMe-Ph Cl COOMe toluene, reflux, 8 h 80 [25]
112 2,5-diMe-Ph H COOMe toluene, reflux, 8 h 80 [25]
113 5-Cl-2-Me-Ph H COOMe toluene, reflux, 8 h 80 [25]
114 2,4-diMe-Ph H COOMe toluene, reflux, 8 h 80 [25]
115 4-EtOOC-Ph H COOMe p-xylene, reflux, overnight 98 [26]
116 4-Me-Ph H COOMe p-xylene, reflux, overnight 98 [26]
117 4-EtO-Ph H COOMe p-xylene, reflux, overnight
xylene, 120 °C, 1 h 		98
94 		[26]
[27]
118 3-Cl-4-Me-Ph H COOMe xylene, 120 °C, 1 h 99 [27]
119 3-NO2-4-Me-Ph H COOMe xylene, 120 °C, 1 h 96 [27]
120 2,3-diMe-Ph H COOMe toluene, reflux, 10 h 89 [28]
121 2,3-diMe-Ph Cl COOMe toluene, reflux, 10 h 76 [28]
122 2,3-diMe-Ph Br COOMe toluene, reflux, 10 h 75 [28]
123 2,3-diMe-Ph I COOMe toluene, reflux, 10 h 77 [28]
124 2,3-diMe-Ph H COOCH2CF3 toluene, reflux, 12 h 83 [28]
125 Ph Ph COOMe toluene, reflux, 16 h 99 [30]
126 Ph 4-NO2-Ph COOMe toluene, reflux, 16 h 87 [30]
127 Ph 4-OCH3-Ph COOMe toluene, reflux, 16 h 82 [30]
128 Ph CF3 Ph o-dichlorobenzene, 24 h, 180 °C 53 [32]
129 Bn CF3 COOMe o-dichlorobenzene, 20 h, 120 °C (180 °C) 54a
(51)a 		[33]
130 Ph CH2F → CH2OH COOMe o-dichlorobenzene, 24 h, 100 °C 57 [33]
131 Ph [Graphic 20] COOMe o-dichlorobenzene, 5 min,
180 °C (μ-wave) 		92 [34]
132 4-MeO-Ph [Graphic 21] COOMe o-dichlorobenzene, 20 min,
180 °C (μ-wave) 		60 [34]
133 [Graphic 22] COOMe xylene, reflux, 3 h 70 [36]
134 [Graphic 23] COOMe toluene, 115 °C, overnight 81 [52]
135 2-MeO-Ph H, Br, Cl COOMe xylene, reflux n.d. [37]
136 2-NO2-Ph H, Br, Cl COOMe xylene, reflux n.d. [37]
137 3-NO2-Ph H, Br, Cl COOMe xylene, reflux n.d. [37]
138 2-Cl-Ph H, Br, Cl COOMe xylene, reflux n.d. [37]
139 3-Cl-Ph H, Br, Cl COOMe xylene, reflux n.d. [37]
140 Ph Ph PhCO toluene, heating, 92 h 69 [38]
141 Ph H PhCO PEG, 115 °C, 3 min, (μ-wave) 50 [39]
142 4-Cl-Ph H PhCO PEG, 115 °C, 3 min, (μ-wave) 51 [39]
143 4-Me-Ph H PhCO PEG, 115 °C, 3 min, (μ-wave) 54 [39]
144 Ph H 4-MeOPhCO PEG, 115 °C, 3 min, (μ-wave) 48 [39]
145 4-Cl-Ph H 4-MeOPhCO PEG, 115 °C, 3 min, (μ-wave) 48 [39]
146 4-Me-Ph H 4-MeOPhCO PEG, 115 °C, 3 min, (μ-wave) 49 [39]

aMixture of dimethyl 1-benzyl-5-trifluoromethyl-1H-pyrazole-3,4-dicarboxylate and dimethyl 1-benzyl-3-trifluoromethyl-1H-pyrazole-4,5-dicarboxylate in the ratio 96:4 (at 120 °C) or 63:37 (at 180 °C).

Extraordinarily good dipolarophiles – e.g., cycloalkynes – containing a very reactive “bent” triple bond such as in bicyclo[6.1.0]non-4-yne-9-methanol [42-44] or in 3,3,6,6-tetramethylthiacyclohept-4-yne [44] were recently suggested as highly reactive partners for bio-orthogonal ligation reactions [45,46]. It is also possible to generate highly unstable cyclopentyne or cyclohexyne in situ from the corresponding 2-trimethylsilylcycloalken-1-yl triflates [47] and trap them by reaction with sydnones (Scheme 2).

[1860-5397-14-113-i2]

Scheme 2: Reaction of sydnones with strained cycloalkynes.

These strain-promoted reactions proceed quickly under very mild conditions (at room temperature, in aqueous phosphate buffer with solubilizing DMSO). In a similar manner, very reactive benzynes (didehydrobenzenes) generated either from 2-aminobenzoic acid [48], from symmetrically substituted 2-trimethylsilylphenyl triflates [49-52] or from 2-(trimethylsilyl)phenyl trimethylsilyl ethers [53] react with sydnones in MeCN or THF giving 2-substituted 2H-indazoles in good to excellent yields (40–99%) at room temperature (Scheme 3).

[1860-5397-14-113-i3]

Scheme 3: Reaction of sydnones with didehydrobenzenes.

It was also observed, that formation of isomeric pyrazole-4,5-dicarboxylates (B) can sometimes accompany the production of pyrazole-3,4-dicarboxylates (A) under thermal conditions [33] although their formation is not photoinduced (cf. next chapter) because the reaction also takes place in the absence of light. Depending on the temperature, a new reaction pathway involving benzylic group migration, CO2 extrusion and final cycloaddition was proposed (Scheme 4).

[1860-5397-14-113-i4]

Scheme 4: Formation of isomeric pyrazole dicarboxylates.

Kinetics and mechanism of thermal cycloaddition

The kinetics and reaction mechanism of the thermal cycloaddition between 4-methyl-3-phenylsydnone and DMAD was first studied by Huisgen and Gotthardt [54] in p-cymene at 90–110 °C. They found the cycloaddition to be overall second order and its activation entropy ΔS≠ = −130 J·mol−1·K−1 showed association character of the rate-limiting step with a relatively tight transition state. Moreover, for the cycloaddition of the structurally similar ethyl phenylpropiolate in various solvents only a small decrease of the bimolecular rate constant with increasing solvent polarity (in terms of relative permittivity) was observed excluding a transition state having a polarized character. Finally, substitution effects in the 3-(4-substituted phenyl) group of sydnones were studied and a relatively low Hammett reaction constant ρ ≈ +0.8 was estimated from four derivatives (MeO, Me, H and Cl). An even smaller dependence of the rate constants on the solvent polarity and substituent effect sensitivity (ρ ≈ +0.3 to +0.4) was described [55] for reactions of 3-(4-substituted phenyl)sydnones with more reactive DMAD while the activation entropy (ΔS≠ = −106 to −121 J·mol−1·K−1) remained similar. The reaction mechanism (Scheme 5) consistent with these kinetic measurements involves rate-limiting formation of a bicyclic intermediate via a concerted [3 + 2]-cycloaddition followed by its very fast decomposition (extrusion of CO2) via a retro-Diels–Alder [4 + 2]-cycloaddition. The almost spontaneous extrusion of CO2 is caused by an energetically favorable aromatization occurring in this step leading to the formation of the stable pyrazole ring. Both reaction steps are also compatible with Woodward–Hoffmann rules, taking into account orbital symmetry considerations [56].

[1860-5397-14-113-i5]

Scheme 5: Mechanism of thermal cycloaddition between sydnones and alkynes.

Three types of [3 + 2]-cycloadditions (labelled I–III) are known from the literature [57] each differing in the frontier molecular orbital energies between the dipole and dipolarophile. While for type I (HOMO-controlled) combining a high-lying dipole HOMO with a dipolarophile LUMO the reaction is accelerated by electron-donating substituents on the dipole and electron-withdrawing substituents on the dipolarophile (both lowering the HOMO–LUMO energy gap), for type III (LUMO-controlled) combining a low-lying dipole LUMO and a dipolarophile HOMO where substituent effects are completely opposite. For type II cycloadditions in which two-way interactions between the dipole HOMO and the dipolarophile LUMO or the dipole LUMO and the dipolarophile HOMO are possible – due to similar energy gaps – both electron-rich as well as electron-poor dipolarophiles/dipoles react more quickly than parent (unsubstituted) ones. Using semi-empirical quantum calculations (CNDO/2), Houk et al. [58] calculated average HOMO/LUMO energies for azomethine-imines (εHOMO = −8.6 eV and εLUMO = 0.3 eV) and predicted that the εLUMO for structurally related sydnones containing an electron-withdrawing –COO– motif should be even much lower suggesting a LUMO-controlled reaction (type III). Such a prediction seems to be correct for reaction of 4-(substituted phenyl)sydnones with DMAD for which positive Hammett ρ-values were observed [54,55]. On the other hand Huisgen and Gotthardt [54] measured bimolecular rate constants for the above-mentioned reaction of 4-methyl-3-phenylsydnone and various acetylenes in p-cymene at 140 °C (Table 2) and found a reactivity sequence corresponding rather to type II or even type I cycloadditions.

Table 2: Bimolecular rate constants (k, L·mol–1·s–1) measured for the reaction of 4-methyl-3-phenylsydnone and various acetylenes in p-cymene at 140 °C [54].

dipolarophile
(disubstituted alkyne) 		105k
(L·mol−1·s−1) 		dipolarophile
(monosubstituted alkyne) 		105k
(L·mol−1·s−1)
MeOOC–C≡C–COOMe 2 580 H–C≡C–COOMe 823
Ph–C≡C–COPh 135 H–C≡C–CH(OPr)2 39
Ph–C≡C–COOEt 99 H–C≡C–Ph 18
Ph–C≡C–Ph 3.0a H–C≡C–(CH2)11CH3 6.0
Ph–C≡C–Me 1.9    

aIn decaline.

The most reactive were electron-poor alkynes (acetylene(di)carboxylates, benzoyl phenylacetylene) while electron-rich alkynes (tetradec-1-yne, 1-phenylpropyne) were much less reactive. Unfortunately, the reaction rate constant was not measured for the reaction with acetylene itself. However, on the basis of the published [1,2] synthetic protocol (acetone, 170 °C, 25 h) it appears that this cycloaddition is very slow and requires a higher temperature.

Recently [42-44], a kinetic investigation was performed for the cycloaddition of various sydnones with strained cycloalkynes such as bicyclo[6.1.0]non-4-yne-9-methanol (BCN) or 3,3,6,6-tetramethylthiacyclohept-4-yne (TMTH). It was found that the reaction of BCN with 3-(4-substituted phenyl)sydnones roughly obeys a Hammett correlation with ρ ≈ +1.35 ± 0.25 [43] thus indicating a type III mechanism. However, the effect of substituent in position 4- of 3-phenylsydnone is ambiguous. While all halogens substantially accelerate the reaction rate (F > Cl > Br > I) other substituents cause up to tenfold deceleration (H > Me > CF3 > CN) regardless of their polar effects [43,44]. Steric factors cannot explain the influence of 4-substituent because 4-phenylsydnone reacts equally as unsubstituted one. The most reactive 4-fluoro-3-phenylsydnones [44] were found to react with BCN and TMTH in two kinetically independent reaction steps corresponding to fast formation of the addition intermediate and its slow decomposition to pyrazole and CO2. Such ambiguous substitution effects are therefore worthy of further investigations.

Photochemical reaction of sydnones with symmetrical alkynes

In 1966 Krauch et al. [59] dealt with irradiation (using a high-pressure Hg lamp) of benzene or dioxane solutions of 3-phenylsydnone and proposed formation of N-phenylnitrilimine as the main reaction product via an internal ring closure, extrusion of CO2 and ring opening (Scheme 6). This very reactive 1,3-dipole was trapped by reaction with external (14C-labelled) CO2 to give 3-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2(3H)-one (Scheme 6). A similar experiment was performed by Ohta et al. [60] five years later who irradiated single 3,4-diphenylsydnones and obtained the corresponding 2,4,5-triphenyl-1,2,3-triazoles in 21–24% yields (first misinterpreted as 1,3-diphenyldiazirine [61]). In the same year Angadiyavar and George [62], Gotthardt and Reiter [63,64] and Märky, Hansen and Schmid [65] found that irradiation of a mixture of 3-phenylsydnone or 3,4-diphenylsydnones together with DMAD gave different isomeric [3 + 2]-cycloadducts (pyrazole-4,5-dicarboxylates) than what were obtained under thermal conditions and proved the reaction pathway to proceed via the corresponding N-phenylnitrilimine.

[1860-5397-14-113-i6]

Scheme 6: Mechanism of photochemical reaction of sydnones with symmetrical alkynes.

The yields (Table 3) are generally lower than those of reactions performed under thermal conditions – most probably due to the lower stability of the key intermediate – N-phenylnitrilimine – which can undergo dimerization or reverse trapping of evolved CO2. Yields are always much better for 3,4-diarylsydnones for which the corresponding N-phenylnitrilimine is resonance-stabilized. The yields also depend on the photoreactor construction [64]. For example 1,3-diphenylsydnone reacts with DMAD in a batch reactor (Rayonet) under 300 nm irradiation to give only 29% of dimethyl 1,3-diphenylpyrazole-4,5-dicarboxylate while in a wetted-wall photo reactor (Normag) the yield is increased up to 84% (at 17 °C in DCM).

Table 3: Photochemical cycloaddition of N-phenylsydnones with DMAD.

entry R1 R2 conditions yield [%] ref.
1 Ph H CH2Cl2, 50 h, light (300 nm) 10 [63,64]
2 Ph Me CH2Cl2, 19 h, light (300 nm) 23 [63,64]
3 Ph Ph benzene, 2 h,
CH2Cl2, light (300 nm), batch
CH2Cl2, 29.5 h, light (300 nm)
wetted-wall photoreactor
dioxane, Hg lamp 		67
29
29
84
ca. 80 		[62]
[63] [64]
[64]
[65]
4 Ph 4-Me-Ph CH2Cl2, Hg lamp ca. 80 [65]
5 Ph MeS benzene, 25 h, Hg lamp 45 [64]
6 Ph MeSO CH2Cl2, 110 h, Hg lamp 12 [64]
7 Ph MeCO benzene, 41 h, Hg lamp 17 [64]

Thermal reaction of sydnones with terminal alkynes

As early as in his first work [1] dealing with sydnone–alkyne cycloaddition Huisgen et al. found that some non-symmetrical alkynes (oct-1-yne, phenylacetylene and especially methyl propiolate) gave mixture of both pyrazole regioisomers. The following Table 4 summarizes all known examples [1,2,8,20,24,32-34,36,66-93] where the ratio of both possible regioisomers or at least chemical yield of the major regioisomer was given.

Table 4: Thermal cycloaddition of sydnones with terminal alkynes.

[Graphic 24]
entry R1 R2 R3 conditions ratio
1,3:1,4 		yield [%]a ref.
1 Ph Me n-Hex xylene, 140 °C, 30 h n.d. 78 [1]
2 Ph H n-Hex toluene, 111 °C, 52 h
xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 		n.d.
90:10 		72
65 		[2]
[91]
3 Ph H Ph chlorobenzene, 120 °C, 20 h
xylene, 140 °C, 16 h
o-DCB, μ-wave, 200 °C, 2 h
o-DCB, 140 °C, 24 h 		n.d.
>95:5
91:9
91:9 		79/<2
35
66
62 		[1,2]
[82]
[84]
[92]
4 Ph Me Ph 140 °C, 12 h
142 °C, 7 h 		~80:20
~89:11 		64/15
73/9 		[1]
[2]
5 Bn H Ph xylene, 135–140 °C, 20 h 100:0 69–74 [1,2]
6 Ph H COOMe xylene, 100 °C, 48 h
sc-CO2, 60–160 °C, 7.6 MPa 		76:24
85:15–76:24 		70/22
– 		[1,2]
[93]
7 Ph Me COOMe 140 °C, 4 h
xylene, reflux, 1 h 		n.d.
65:35 		61/10
55/29 		[1]
[2]
8 Ph H CH(OPr)2 xylene, 135–140 °C, 3 h n.d. 28/58 [2]
9 Ph Me CH(OPr)2 xylene, 135–140 °C, 15 h n.d. 77 [1]
10 Bn H CH(OPr)2 xylene, 135–140 °C, 15 h n.d 78 [2]
11 Ph H CH2OH reflux, 24 h 100:0 66–72 [1,2]
12 Ph H CN chlorobenzene, 110 °C, 24 h 100:0 50 [66]
13 NMe2 H Ph tetraline, reflux, 5 h n.d. 60/– [67]
14 NMe2 H 4-Cl-Ph tetraline, reflux, 5 h n.d. 23/– [67]
15 NMe2 H 4-Me-Ph tetraline, reflux, 5 h n.d. 32/– [67]
16 NMe2 H n-Hex tetraline, reflux, 5 h n.d. 50/– [67]
17 O(CH2CH2)2N H Ph tetraline, reflux, 5 h n.d. 22/– [67]
18 (CH2)5N H 4-Cl-Ph tetraline, reflux, 5 h n.d. 24/1 [67]
19 NMe2 Me Ph tetraline, reflux, 5 h n.d. 81/10 [67]
20 NMe2 Me 4-Cl-Ph tetraline, reflux, 5 h n.d. 30/4 [67]
21 NMe2 O(CH2CH2)2NCH2 Ph tetraline, reflux, 5 h n.d. 34/2 [67]
22 NMe2 O(CH2CH2)2NCH2 4-Cl-Ph tetraline, reflux, 5 h n.d. 12/2 [67]
23 Ph MeS COOMe toluene, 95–105 °C, 12.5 h 46:54 39/50 [8]
24 Ph PhS COOMe xylene, 140 °C, 35 h 53:47 95 [8]
25 Ph MeSO COOMe mesitylene, 135–140 °C, 19 h 81:19 65/15 [8]
26 Ph MeCO COOMe mesitylene, 155–160 °C, 90 h 60:40 46/37 [8]
27 Ph Ph COOMe xylene, 110–115 °C, 12 h
o-DCB, reflux, 48 h 		50:50
50:50 		40/44
97 		[8]
[80]
28 4-NO2-Ph Ph COOMe toluene, 95–105 °C, 16 h 56:44 51/37 [8]
29 2,4-diNO2-Ph Ph COOMe toluene, 100–105 °C, 18.5 h 61:39 55/36 [8]
30 4-NO2-Ph H COOMe toluene, 95–105 °C, 4 h 86:14 99 [8]
31 Ph H PhSO2 toluene, 100 °C, 24 h 25:75 56 [68]
32 CH2CH2CH2 Ph xylene ≈75:25 51/18 [69]
33 Ph I COOMe xylene, reflux, 24 h 58:42 n.d. [20]
35 2-Et-Ph I COOMe xylene, reflux, 24 h 56:44 n.d. [20]
36 Me H COOMe toluene, reflux, 12 h 100:0 75 [70]
37 CH2CH2CH2CH2 COOMe xylene, reflux, 10 h
xylene, reflux, 16 h
xylene, reflux, 6 h 		67:33
n.d.
n.d. 		60
65/26
56/– 		[71]
[77]
[83]
38 CH2CH2CH2CH2 COOEt xylene, reflux, 10 h 75:25 75 [71]
39 CH2CH2CH2CH2 COOn-Bu xylene, reflux, 10 h 63:37 72 [71]
40 CH2CH2CH2CH2 COOBn xylene, reflux, 10 h 69:31 59 [71]
41 CH2CH2CH2CH2 COO(1-PhEt) xylene, reflux, 10 h 66:34 60 [71]
42 4-Br-2-Et-Ph I COOEt xylene, reflux, 24 h – – [24]
43 [Graphic 25] COOMe o-xylene, reflux, 15 h n.d. 68/12 [72,77]
44 CH2SCH2 COOMe o-xylene, reflux, 19 h
xylene, reflux, 4 h 		n.d. 49/22
53/21 		[72,73]
[36]
45 [Graphic 26] COOMe o-xylene, reflux, 16 h n.d. 64/24 [72,77]
46 [Graphic 27] COOMe o-xylene, reflux, 16 h n.d. 32/32 [72]
47 [Graphic 28] COOMe o-xylene, reflux, 16 h
o-xylene, reflux, 15 h 		n.d. 59/34
68/12 		[72]
[73]
48 [Graphic 29] COOMe o-xylene, reflux, 21 h 40:60 80 [72]
49 CH2CH2CH2 COOMe xylene, reflux, 8 h
1,2-diethoxyethane, 120–125°C, 8 h 		n.d.
≈87:13 		40/35
47 		[13]
[74]
50 4-EtO-Ph H COOEt chlorobenzene, reflux, 48 h 76:24 90 [75]
51 4-EtO-Ph I COOEt chlorobenzene, reflux, 48 h 56:44 81 [75]
52 4-EtO-Ph CN COOEt chlorobenzene, reflux, 48 h 58:42 80 [75,76]
53 4-EtO-Ph CH2OH COOEt chlorobenzene, reflux, 48 h 63:37 71 [75]
54 4-EtO-Ph PhS COOEt chlorobenzene, reflux, 48 h 52:48 71 [75]
55 4-EtO-Ph CN COOBn chlorobenzene, reflux, 48 h 57:43 76 [75,76]
56 4-EtO-Ph CN COOt-Bu chlorobenzene, reflux, 48 h 78:22 79 [75,76]
57 4-EtO-Ph CN COOCHPh2 chlorobenzene, reflux, 48 h 100:0 85 [75,76]
56a Ph CN COOCHPh2 chlorobenzene, reflux, 48 h 100:0 80 [75,76]
57a [Graphic 30] COOMe o-xylene, reflux, 21 h n.d. 87 [77]
58 2,3-diMe-Ph H COOMe xylene, reflux, 12 h 75:25 n.d. [28]
59 Ph H Me3Si toluene, reflux n.d. 95/– [78]
60 Ph H Me2PhSi toluene, reflux n.d. 80/– [78]
61 Ph H t-BuPh2Si toluene, reflux n.d. 15/– [78]
62 Ph H BPin mesitylene, reflux, 16 h 88:12 47/7 [79,81]
63 Ph Ph 4-(Me2N)-Ph o-DCB, reflux, 48 h n.d. 65/– [80]
64 4-NO2-Ph Me BPin o-DCB, reflux, 24 h 89:11 79 [81]
65 4-NO2-Ph iPr BPin o-DCB, reflux, 24 h >98:2 75 [81]
66 CH2CH2CH2CH2 BPin xylene, reflux, 24 h 90:10 78 [81]
67 4-NO2-Ph H Ph xylene, 140 °C, 8 h 95:5 60 [82]
68 4-NO2-Ph I Ph xylene, 140 °C, 8 h 91:9 84 [82]
69 Ph I Ph xylene, 140 °C, 16 h >95:5 73 [82]
70 4-MeO-Ph H Ph xylene, 140 °C, 24 h
o-DCB, 140 °C, 24 h 		91:9
91:9 		30
76 		[82]
[92]
71 4-MeO-Ph I Ph xylene, 140 °C, 24 h 91:9 72 [82]
72 4-NO2-Ph H Me3Si xylene, 140 °C, 8 h 89:11 75b [82]
73 4-NO2-Ph I Me3Si xylene, 140 °C, 8 h 95:5 99b [82]
74 4-NO2-Ph H n-Bu xylene, 140 °C, 8 h 91:9 47b [82]
75 4-NO2-Ph I n-Bu xylene, 140 °C, 8 h 91:9 82b [82]
76 4-NO2-Ph I Bn xylene, 140 °C, 8 h 91:9 64b [82]
77 4-NO2-Ph I cyclo-Pr xylene, 140 °C, 8 h 94:6 77b [82]
78 4-NO2-Ph I CH2OBn xylene, 140 °C, 8 h >95:5 62b [82]
79 4-NO2-Ph I C(OH)Ph2 xylene, 140 °C, 8 h >95:5 70b [82]
80 4-NO2-Ph I 4-MeO2C-Ph xylene, 140 °C, 8 h >95:5 65b [82]
81 3-Py H Ph o-DCB, μ-w, 200 °C, 2 h 89:11 84 [84]
82 Ph H 2-Py
2-PyH+ TsO– 		o-DCB, μ-w, 200 °C, 2 h
ethylene glycol, reflux, 16 h 		60:40
91:9 		85
14 		[84]
83 3-Py H 2-Py o-DCB, μ-w, 200 °C, 2 h 67:33 80 [84]
84 Ph H [Graphic 31] o-DCB, μ-w, 200 °C, 2 h 60:40 86 [84]
85 3-Py H [Graphic 32] o-DCB, μ-w, 200 °C, 2 h 60:40 84 [84]
86 4-NO2-Ph Me 2-Py o-DCB, reflux, 20 h 80:20 87 [84]
87 4-NO2-Ph iPr 2-Py o-DCB, reflux, 20 h 86:24 78 [84]
88 4-NO2-Ph iPr [Graphic 33] o-DCB, reflux, 20 h n.d. 66/19 [84]
89 3-Py H BPin mesitylene, reflux, 16 h 89:11 84 [84]
90 CH2CH2CH2 4-F-Ph mesitylene, 155–160 °C, 16 h n.d. 27/– [85]
91 Ph CF3 Ph o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 94:6 87 [32,33]
92 Ph CF3 cyclo-Pr o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h >98:2 88 [32,33]
93 Ph CF3 Me3Si o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h >98:2 75 [32,33]
94 Ph CF3 2-Py o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 95:5 84 [32,33]
95 Ph CF3 BnOCH2 o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 96:4 84 [32,33]
96 Ph CF3 2-F-4-Cl-5-Me-Ph o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h n.d. 86/– [32]
97 Ph CF3 Bu o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h >98:2 78 [33]
98 Ph CF3 [Graphic 34] o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h >98:2 89 [33]
99 Ph CF3 (CH2)3Cl o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 98:2 70 [33]
100 4-MeO-Ph CF3 Ph o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h >98:2 85 [33]
101 4-MeO-Ph CF3 Bu o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h >98:2 71 [33]
102 4-MeO-Ph CF3 cyclo-Pr o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h >98:2 75 [33]
103 4-NO2-Ph CF3 Ph o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h >98:2 85 [33]
104 4-NO2-Ph CF3 (CH2)3Cl o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h >98:2 68 [33]
105 Me CF3 Ph o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 98:2 95 [33]
106 Me CF3 [Graphic 35] o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 98:2 82 [33]
107 Me CF3 BnOCH2 o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h >98:2 89 [33]
108 Me CF3 COOEt o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 93:7 94 [33]
109 Ph CF3 BPin o-DCB, 140 °C, 72 h 93:7 69 [32,33]
110 Me CF3 BPin o-DCB, 140 °C, 72 h 96:4 44 [33]
111 Bn CF3 Ph (2 equiv)
Ph (2 equiv)
Ph (2 equiv)
Ph (10 equiv) 		o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h
o-DCB, 140 °C, 24 h
o-DCB, 140 °C, 48 h
o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 		64:36
96:4
88:12
88:12 		61
34
66
64 		[33]
112 Bn CF3 Bu o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 72:28 48 [33]
113 Ph CH2OH Ph o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h n.d. 72/– [33]
114 Ph [Graphic 36] COOEt o-DCB, 180 °C, 30 min, μ-wave 88:12 66 [34]
115 Ph [Graphic 37] Ph xylene, 140 °C, 6 h, μ-wave 98:2 51 [34]
116 Ph [Graphic 38] Me3Si xylene, 140 °C, 3.5 h, μ-wave 98:2 17 [34]
117 4-MeO-Ph [Graphic 39] COOEt o-DCB, 180 °C, 1 h, μ-wave 83:17 44 [34]
118 Bn [Graphic 40] COOEt o-DCB, 180 °C, 30 min, μ-wave 67:33 21 [34]
119 Ph H [Graphic 41] toluene, reflux, 12 h 100:0 33 [86]
120 4-Me-Ph H [Graphic 42] toluene, reflux, 12 h 100:0 35 [86]
121 4-I-Ph H [Graphic 43] toluene, reflux, 12 h 100:0 40 [86]
122 4-Cl-Ph H [Graphic 44] toluene, reflux, 12 h 100:0 43 [86]
123 4-F-Ph H [Graphic 45] toluene, reflux, 12 h 100:0 38 [86]
124 4-MeO-Ph H [Graphic 46] toluene, reflux, 12 h 100:0 33 [86]
125 3,4-OCH2O-Ph H [Graphic 47] toluene, reflux, 12 h 100:0 30 [86]
126 Ph H [Graphic 48] toluene, reflux, 12 h ≈34:67 18/36 [86]
127 4-Me-Ph H [Graphic 49] toluene, reflux, 12 h ≈40:60 28/42 [86]
128 4-I-Ph H [Graphic 50] toluene, reflux, 12 h ≈80:20 20/5 [86]
129 4-Cl-Ph H [Graphic 51] toluene, reflux, 12 h ≈83:17 35/4 [86]
130 4-F-Ph H [Graphic 52] toluene, reflux, 12 h ≈67:33 20/10 [86]
131 4-MeO-Ph H [Graphic 53] toluene, reflux, 12 h ≈20:80 10/40 [86]
132 3,4-OCH2O-Ph H [Graphic 54] toluene, reflux, 12 h ≈67:33 20/10 [86]
133 [Graphic 55] CF3 o-xylene, −78–270 °C, 12 h n.d. 61/10 [87]
134 Ph H 3,5-di-HC≡C-Ph N-methylpyrrolidone, 185 °C, 48 h n.d. (32) [88]
135 3,4,5-tri-MeO-Ph 3-BnO-4-MeO-Ph Me3Si xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 74 [89]
136 3-BnO-4-MeO-Ph 3,4,5-tri-MeO-Ph Me3Si xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 79 [89]
137 Me H 3,4,5-tri-MeO-Ph xylene, 160 °C, 24 h >98:2 88 [89]
138 Bn H 3,4,5-tri-MeO-Ph xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 90:10 65 [89]
139 Me H 3-TBSO-4-MeO-Ph xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 90:10 65 [89]
140 Bn H 3-TBSO-4-MeO-Ph xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 90:10 58 [89]
141 4-MeO-Ph 4-MeO-Ph COOEt o-DCB, 140–180 °C, 16 h 50:50 <60 [90]
142 4-MeO-Ph 4-MeO-Ph 3-CN-4-Cl-Ph-CO o-DCB, 140 °C, 16 h 50:50 95 [90]
143 4-MeO-Ph 4-MeO-Ph CH2OH xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 93:7 97 [90]
144 4-MeO-Ph 3,4,5-tri-MeO-Ph Me3Si xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 100 [91]
145 3,4,5-tri-MeO-Ph 3-NH2-4-MeO-Ph Me3Si xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 91 [91]
146 Ph CON(Me)OMe Me3Si xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 89 [91]
147 Bn 3-CF3-Ph Me3Si xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 77 [91]
148 3,4,5-tri-MeO-Ph 3-OH-4-MeO-Ph Me3Si xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 82 [91]
149 Ph [Graphic 56] Me3Si xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 87 [91]
150 4-F-Ph H Ph xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 90:10 100 [91]
151 4-MeO-Ph H cyclo-Pr xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 90:10 91 [91]
152 Ph [Graphic 57] cyclo-Pr xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 91 [91]
153 Ph 4-Me-Ph CH2OH xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 63 [91]
154 Ph CON(Me)OMe cyclo-Pr xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 84 [91]
155 Ph 2-Py Ph xylene, 160 °C, 24 h 95:5 98 [91]
156 Ph H COOEt o-DCB, 140 °C, 16 h 67:33 59 [92]
156 4-MeO-Ph H COOEt o-DCB, 140 °C, 24 h 67:33 57 [92]

aIsolated yield of single or both regioisomers. bIn a sealed tube. n.d. – not determined.

The first people who qualitatively discussed the regioselectivity on the basis of semi-empirical quantum calculations was Houk et al. [94] who (except of above-mentioned low-lying LUMO of sydnone [58]) calculated sydnone LUMO terminal orbital coefficients and found them to be almost identical thus indicating low selectivity in LUMO-controlled cycloadditions (type III). However, Gotthardt and Reiter [8] who were also dealing with regioselectivity of sydnone cycloadditions with methyl propiolate pointed out that the reason for the lower regioselectivity can also be attributed to the low-lying HOMO of this dipolarophile. While for the LUMO-controlled reaction (type III) only the 3-substituted pyrazole is expected to be the main product, for the HOMO-controlled reaction (type I) 4-substituted pyrazole should be formed preferentially (Scheme 7 adapted from reference [8]).

[1860-5397-14-113-i7]

Scheme 7: HOMO–LUMO diagram for thermal [3 + 2]-cycloaddition of sydnones with alkynes.

The combination of both reaction pathways (type II) therefore gives a mixture of 3- and 4-substituted pyrazoles. This situation is typical especially for cycloadditions with alkyl propiolates (cf. Table 4, entries 6, 7, 23–29, 33, 34, 50–55, 58, 118, 141) and acylalkynes (Table 4, entry 142). Other terminal alkynes, for which the calculated lower HOMO–LUMO energy gaps correspond to the type III mechanism (especially phenylacetylenes, alkylacetylenes, trimethylsilylacetylene and BPin-acetylene), innately prefer formation of 1,3- (or 1,3,5-) di- (or tri-)substituted pyrazoles in ratios about or even better than 90:10. Recent quantum calculations undertaken for 3-phenylsydnone and phenylacetylene by Harrity et al. [92] clearly support a preferential formation of 1,3-diphenyl-1H-pyrazole. The calculated difference in energies of transition states leading to 1,3- and 1,4-diphenyl-1H-pyrazole (4.1 kcal·mol−1 = 17.2 kJ·mol−1) predicts at 140 °C the ratio ≈99:1 which corresponds well with found experimental value >95:5 (see entry 3 in Table 4 [83]).

There are only some known exceptions in which the 1,4-substituted pyrazole prevails (Table 4, entries 8, 23, 31, 48, 126, 127 and 131). The most significant is the reaction of the parent phenylsydnone with phenylsulfonylacetylene which gives the ratio 25:75 [68] consistent with the strong electron-withdrawing effect of the phenylsulfonyl group lowering the HOMO of this dipolarophile. In addition, quantum calculations of orbital coefficients show that the HOMO is mainly located on the phenyl moiety and not in the acetylene moiety thus excluding the type III mechanism leading to a 1,3-disubstituted pyrazole.

Even though the HOMO–LUMO energy gaps and terminal orbital coefficients can be tuned by substitution of the sydnone (and alkyne) the ratio of both isomers is often only slightly influenced. For example 3-(substituted phenyl)sydnones react with methyl propiolate to give a mixture of both regioisomers in a 75:25 ratio (for 2,3-diMe [28], 4-OEt [75], H [1,2]), whilst only for 4-NO2 derivative [8] is an enhanced ratio of 86:14 observed. The same pattern can be seen for reaction of 3,4-diphenylsydnones. While unsubstituted (R1 = R2 = Ph) reacts with methyl propiolate to give equimolar amounts of the corresponding pyrazole 3-/4-carboxylate, an introduction of one or two nitro group(s) into position(s) 4- or 2,4- of the 3-phenyl ring (R1 = 4-NO2-Ph or 2,4-diNO2-Ph) leads to ratios 56:44 and 61:39, respectively [8]. The presence of the nitro group(s) lower(s) the LUMO energy of the sydnone and a type III mechanism is slightly favored. The same trend [8] can be seen from the substitution effect in position 4 of the starting 3-phenylsydnone when reacted with methyl propiolate (Table 4, entries 6, 7, 23–26) but almost no influence is observed for reactions with phenylacetylene (Table 4, entries 3, 4, 69, 91). Generally, it can be concluded that any substituent in position 4 reduces the regioselectivity.

The steric hindrance can also affect the ratio of the regioisomers formed. The classical example was described by Yeh et al. [75,76] who performed reactions of 3-(4-ethoxyphenyl)sydnone-4-carbonitrile with various alkyl propiolates (Et, Bn, t-Bu, Ph2CH – see entries 52, 55–57 in Table 4) and observed that the 3-/4-ratio increased from 58:42 to 100:0. However, this trend is not general because Lee et al. [71] observed the best regioselectivity for the reaction of 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro[1,2,3]oxadiazolo[3,4-a]pyridin-8-ium-3-olate with methyl propiolate and the lowest selectivity with n-butyl and 1-phenylethyl propiolates (see entries 38–41 in Table 4).

The last factor that influences the ratio of isomers involves the thermodynamic conditions – namely the temperature and pressure. A nice temperature/pressure-selectivity study of the cycloaddition of 3-phenylsydnone with methyl propiolate was undertaken by McGowin et al. [93] in supercritical CO2. At 7.6 MPa they found a linear dependence between the natural logarithm of selectivity (defined as the 3-/4-isomer ratio) and the reaction temperature. In accordance with the common reactivity–selectivity principle, the higher temperature lowers selectivity from 5.52 (i.e., 85:15) at 80 °C to 3.14 (i.e., 76:24) at 160 °C but increases sydnone conversion and pyrazole yield. On the other hand, a variation of the pressure from 7.6 to 30.4 MPa at constant temperature (80 °C) caused a decrease in the total yield by approximately 50%, with slightly increased selectivity (from 4.96 to 6.56). Lowering of the yield with increasing pressure confirms the reversibility of the first step (see Scheme 5) because of retardation of CO2 cleavage from the bicyclic intermediate. Such reversibility was also suggested by Harrity et al. [92] on the basis of quantum calculations. While the formation of the bicyclic intermediate was calculated to be only slightly exergonic (−3.3 kcal·mol−1) the overall reaction is highly exothermic (−108.2 kcal·mol−1).

These results show that minor differences in selectivity published by various authors (e.g., entry 3 in Table 4) can be ascribed to changes in temperature (different boiling point of benzene, toluene, xylenes, DCB, …) used in synthesis. In several cases (e.g., entries 83-86 [84] and 141 and 142 [90] in Table 4) too high temperature (200 °C) can contribute to a substantial drop of selectivity. It is also known that some sydnones start to decompose at temperatures exceeding 180 °C [74] which can cause lowering of the pyrazole yield.

From a synthetic point of view, the cycloaddition with terminal alkynes represents a very good strategy for the preparation of 1-,1,3-, 1,5- and 1,3,5-substituted pyrazoles. Although 1- and 1,5-(di)substituted pyrazoles are directly available from 3- or 3,4-(di)substituted sydnones and acetylene (e.g., entry 1 in Table 1 [1,2]), handling with gaseous acetylene or its solution in pressurized reaction vessels is inconvenient and may be even dangerous. Two strategies can overcome such problems: liquid DMAD, diethyl acetylenedicarboxylate or alkyl propiolate can be used instead of acetylene and the resulting pyrazole-3,4-dicarboxylates or pyrazole-3-/4-carboxylates can then undergo hydrolysis and decarboxylation [16,95,96]. A novel strategy (Scheme 8) was recently developed by Harrity et al. (see entries 73, 74, 94, 117, 136, 137, 145–150 [32-34,82,89,91] in Table 4) who used trimethylsilyl acetylene as a dipolarophile. After regioselective cycloaddition giving 3-trimethylsilylpyrazole (cf. also entries 59–61 [78]) in high yields (74–100%) the trimethylsilyl group was removed by TBAF-mediated protodesilylation in moderate to good yields (47–76%).

[1860-5397-14-113-i8]

Scheme 8: Synthetic strategy leading to 1,2-disubstituted pyrazoles.

Thermal reaction of sydnones with internal non-symmetrical alkynes and cycloakynes

The reaction with internal non-symmetrical alkynes giving 1,3,4-trisubstituted or even 1,3,4,5-tetrasubstituted pyrazoles seems to be the most complicated case of cycloaddition due to the influence of both substituents (R3, R4) bound on a triple bond on the formation of pyrazole regioisomers. Moreover, not all substituents are compatible with the reaction conditions. For example phenylpropiolic acid (R3: COOH) gives only minor a yield of the cycloaddition/decarboxylation product with 5,6-dihydro-3-hydroxy-4H-pyrrolo[1,2-c][1,2,3]oxadiazol-7-ium [97,98] (Scheme 9).

[1860-5397-14-113-i9]

Scheme 9: Unsuccessful reaction with phenylpropiolic acid.

The Table 5 again summarizes all the examples found, including reaction conditions from which we have come to several conclusions.

Table 5: Thermal cycloaddition of sydnones with internal non-symmetrical alkynes.

[Graphic 58]
entry R1 R2 R3 R4 conditions ratio
a:b 		yield [%]a ref.
1 Ph H Me Ph xylene, 135–140 °C, 20 h n.d. 83/– [1,2]
2 Ph H COOEt Ph toluene, 95 °C, 84 h n.d. 82–83/– [1,2]
3 4-Cl-Ph H COOEt Ph xylene, reflux, 3 h n.d. 92/– [2]
4 4-MeO-Ph H COOEt Ph xylene, reflux, 3 h n.d. 83/– [2]
5 4-Me-Ph H COOEt Ph xylene, reflux, 3 h n.d. 98/– [2]
6 Bn H COOEt Ph xylene, reflux, 16 h n.d. 46/– [2]
7 Ph Ph COOEt Ph p-cymene, 160 °C, 16 h n.d. 87/– [2]
8 Ph Me COOEt Ph xylene, 110 °C, 8 h 100:0 82 [1,2]
9 Ph H COMe Ph chlorobenzene, 130 °C, 12 h 100:0 100 [1,2]
10 Ph H COPh Ph xylene, 135–140 °C, 16 h 100:0 82 [1,2]
11 Me H COPh Ph o-DCB, reflux, 144 h 69:31 99 [16]
12 Ph H CN Cl chlorobenzene, 110 °C, 10 h n.d. 15/20 [66]
13 Ph H SO2Ph Me toluene, 100 °C, 24 h 100:0 58 [68]
14 Ph H SO2Ph Ph toluene, 100 °C, 24 h 100:0 73 [68]
15 Ph H COOMe CH(OMe)2 toluene, reflux, 60 h 21:79 84 [99]
16 Bn H COOMe CH(OMe)2 toluene, reflux, 72 h 19:81 80 [99]
17 Bn H COOMe CHO toluene, reflux, 18 h 72:28 90 [99]
18 Ph H COOMe CHO toluene, reflux, 18 h 66:34 93 [99]
19 Bn H COOMe CH2OH toluene, reflux, 72 h 50:50 75 [99]
20 Ph H COOMe CH2OH toluene, reflux, 48 h 60:40 79 [99]
21 Ph H CF3 4-MeO-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 93:7 56 [100]
22 Ph H CF3 4-NO2-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 93:7 93 [100]
23 Ph H CF3 4-MeS-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 93:7 90 [100]
24 Ph H CF3 2-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 94:6 92 [100]
25 Ph H CF3 4-MeSO2-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 92:8 86 [100]
26 Ph H CF3 4-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 93:7 75 [100]
27 4-Cl-Ph H CF3 4-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 93:7 90 [100]
28 4-MeO-Ph H CF3 4-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 93:7 84 [100]
29 Bn H CF3 4-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 91:9 65 [100]
30 t-Bu H CF3 4-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 93:7 58 [100]
31 Me H CF3 4-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 92:8 92 [100]
32 Ph Me CF3 4-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 84:16 75 [100]
33 Ph 4-Cl-Ph CF3 4-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 60:40 57 [100]
34 Ph Br CF3 4-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 71:29 73 [100]
35 Ph MeS CF3 4-Cl-Ph xylene, 120 °C, 48–72 h 43:57 62 [100]
36 t-Bu H COOEt Et xylene, reflux, 72 h n.d. 38/8 [101]
37 Ph H PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h 100:0 74 [102]
38 Ph H 4-Me-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h 100:0 80 [102]
39 Ph H 4-Cl-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h 100:0 72 [102]
40 4-MeO-Ph H PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h 100:0 73 [102]
41 4-MeO-Ph H 4-Me-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h 100:0 74 [102]
42 4-MeO-Ph H 4-Cl-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h 100:0 73 [102]
43 4-Me-Ph H PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h 100:0 79 [102]
44 4-Me-Ph H 4-Me-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3-4 h 100:0 83 [102]
45 4-Me-Ph H 4-Cl-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h 100:0 75 [102]
46 Me H COOEt CF3 xylene, 100 °C, 4 h n.d. 18/25 [103]
47 Ph H SnBu3 SiMe3 toluene, reflux 100:0 80 [78]
48 Ph H SiMe2Ph SiMe3 toluene, reflux n.d. 63/34 [78]
49 Ph H COMe SiMe3 toluene, reflux n.d. 81/16 [78]
50 Ph H BPin Ph xylene, reflux, 4 h 98:2 58 [79,81]
51 Ph H BPin Bu xylene, reflux, 4 h 71:29 64 [79,81]
52 Ph H BPin Me3Si xylene, reflux, 4 h 67:33 76 [79,81]
53 4-MeO-Ph H BPin Ph xylene, reflux, 4 h 98:2 58 [79]
54 4-NO2-Ph H BPin Ph xylene, reflux, 4 h 98:2 70 [79]
55 4-MeO-Ph H BPin Bu xylene, reflux, 4 h 83:17 55 [79]
56 4-NO2-Ph H BPin Bu xylene, reflux, 4 h 83:17 62 [79]
57 4-MeO-Ph H BPin Me3Si xylene, reflux, 4 h 67:33 61 [79]
58 4-NO2-Ph H BPin Me3Si xylene, reflux, 4 h 60:40 83 [79]
59 3-Py H BPin Ph xylene, reflux, 16 h >98:2 60 [84]
60 3-Py H BPin Me3Si xylene, reflux, 16 h 57:43 70 [81,84]
61 3-Py H BPin n-Bu mesitylene, reflux, 16 h 71:29 56 [84]
62 4-Me-Ph CHO PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 79/– [104]
63 4-Me-Ph CHO 4-Me-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 74/– [104]
64 4-Me-Ph Br 4-MeO-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 62/– [104]
65 4-MeO-Ph Br 4-MeO-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 69/– [104]
66 4-Me-Ph Br PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 73/– [104]
67 4-Me-Ph Br 4-Me-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 66/– [104]
68 4-MeO-Ph Br 4-Me-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 63/– [104]
69 Ph Br 4-Me-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 72/– [104]
70 4-MeO-Ph MeCO PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 74/– [104]
71 4-MeO-Ph MeCO 4-MeO-PhCO 5-NO2-furan-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 73/– [104]
72 Ph H 4-Me-PhCO 5-NO2-thiophen-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 71/– [105]
73 Ph H 4-MeO-PhCO 5-NO2-thiophen-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 73/– [105]
74 4-Me-Ph H PhCO 5-NO2-thiophen-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 75/– [105]
75 4-Me-Ph H 4-Me-PhCO 5-NO2-thiophen-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 73/– [105]
76 Ph H 4-Cl-PhCO 5-NO2-thiophen-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 72/– [105]
77 4-Me-Ph H 4-Cl-PhCO 5-NO2-thiophen-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 77/– [105]
78 4-MeO-Ph H 4-Cl-PhCO 5-NO2-thiophen-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 78/– [105]
79 Ph H PhCO 5-NO2-thiophen-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 80/– [105]
80 4-MeO-Ph H PhCO 5-NO2-thiophen-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 75/– [105]
81 4-MeO-Ph H 4-Me-PhCO 5-NO2-thiophen-2-yl xylene, reflux, 3–4 h n.d. 76/– [105]
82 CH2CH2CH2 p-Tos Bu anisol, reflux, 0.5 h n.d. 90/– [106]
83 CH2CH2CH2 p-Tos Ph anisol, reflux, 0.5 h n.d. 89/– [106]
84 Ph 4-Me-Ph BPin Me3Si o-DCB, reflux, 48 h 100:0 48 [80]
85 Ph 4-NO2-Ph BPin Me3Si o-DCB, reflux, 48 h 100:0 70 [80]
86 Me H BPin Ph mesitylene, reflux, 48 h >98:2 53 [81]
87 Bn H BPin Ph xylene, reflux >98:2 62 [81]
88 Ph Ph BPin Ph o-DCB, reflux, 48 h >98:2 59 [81]
89 Ph Ph BPin Me3Si o-DCB, reflux, 48 h >98:2 73 [81]
90 Me Ph BPin Me3Si o-DCB, reflux, 48 h >98:2 68 [81]
91 Ph Me BPin Ph o-DCB, reflux, 48 h >98:2 53 [81]
92 Ph iPr BPin Ph o-DCB, reflux, 48 h >98:2 38 [81]
93 Ph Me BPin Me3Si o-DCB, reflux, 48 h >98:2 56 [81]
94 Ph iPr BPin Me3Si o-DCB, reflux, 48 h >98:2 43 [81]
95 4-NO2-Ph Me BPin Ph o-DCB, reflux, 18 h >98:2 67 [81]
96 4-NO2-Ph iPr BPin Ph o-DCB, reflux, 24 h >98:2 45 [81]
97 4-NO2-Ph Me BPin Me3Si o-DCB, reflux, 18 h >98:2 80 [81]
98 4-NO2-Ph iPr BPin Me3Si o-DCB, reflux, 24 h >98:2 69 [81]
99 CH2CH2CH2 BPin Me3Si xylene, reflux, 24 h
o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 		>98:2
100:0 		21
66 		[81]
[107]
100 CH2CH2CH2CH2 BPin Me3Si xylene, reflux, 24 h >98:2 79 [81]
101 CH2CH2CH2CH2 BPin Ph xylene, reflux, 24 h >98:2 70 [81]
102 CH2CH2CH2 BPin Ph o-DCB, 180 °C, 72 h 50:50 51 [107]
103 CH2CH2CH2CH2 [Graphic 59] 4-F-Ph mesitylene, 165 °C, 18 h n.d. 46/– [108]
104 CH2CH2CH2CH2 [Graphic 60] 4-F-Ph mesitylene, 165 °C, 18 h n.d. 66/– [108]
105 [Graphic 61] [Graphic 62] 4-F-Ph mesitylene, 140 °C, 4 h n.d. 30/– [108]
106 [Graphic 63] [Graphic 64] 4-F-Ph mesitylene, 140 °C, 4 h n.d. 45/– [108]
107 [Graphic 65] [Graphic 66] 4-F-Ph mesitylene, 160 °C, 24 h n.d. 12/– [108]
108 CH2SCH2 [Graphic 67] 4-F-Ph mesitylene, 160 °C, 48 h n.d. 13/– [108]
109 4-Cl-Ph H Me [Graphic 68] mesitylene, 140 °C, 18 h n.d. 13/– [109]
110 Ph H [Graphic 69] Me3Si o-DCB, μ-wave, 200 °C, 2 h n.d. 55/9 [84]
111 Ph I COOEt Br toluene, reflux, 18 h 76:24 52/16 [110]
112 Me I COOEt Br xylene, reflux, overnight 58:42 50/37 [110]
113 Bn I COOEt Br xylene, reflux, overnight 59:41 39/27 [110]
114 4-F-Ph I COOEt Br xylene, reflux, overnight 75:25 48/16 [110]
115 4-MeO-Ph I COOEt Br xylene, reflux, overnight 75:25 63/21 [110]
116 4-MeO-Ph I COOt-Bu Br xylene, reflux, overnight 77:23 43/13 [110]
117 4-MeO-Ph I COOEt I xylene, reflux, overnight 60:40 58/28 [110]
118 4-MeO-Ph Br COOEt I xylene, reflux, overnight – 0/0 [110]
119 CH2CH2CH2CH2 4-Py 4-F-Ph mesitylene, 165 °C, 16 h n.d. 27/– [85]
120 Ph H COOEt Br toluene, reflux, 18 h 46:54 41/48 [111]
121 4-Me-Ph H COOEt Br toluene, reflux, 18 h 44:56 41/49 [111]
122 4-MeO-Ph H COOEt Br toluene, reflux, 18 h 41:59 33/49 [111]
123 4-F-Ph H COOEt Br toluene, reflux, 18 h 47:53 38/43 [111]
124 Ph CF3 COOMe Me o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 85:15 90 [32]
125 Ph CF3 Ph n-Bu o-DCB, 180 °C, 24 h 52:48 62 [32]
126 Ph CF3 BPin Me3Si o-DCB, 140 °C, 48 h 90:10 68 [32]
127 Ph CF3 BPin n-Bu o-DCB, 140 °C, 72 h >98:2 55 [32]
128 Me 3,4,5-
triMeO-Ph 		BPin Me3Si xylene, 180 °C, 24 h 83:17 92 [89]
129 Bn 3,4,5-
triMeO-Ph 		BPin Me3Si xylene, 180 °C, 24 h 90:10 66 [89]
130 Me 3-BnO-
4-MeO-Ph 		BPin Me3Si xylene, 180 °C, 24 h 80:20 73 [89]
131 Bn 3-BnO-
4-MeO-Ph 		BPin Me3Si xylene, 180 °C, 24 h 90:10 64 [89]
132 Ph 4-Me-Ph BPin Me3Si xylene, 180 °C, 48 h >98:2 74 [91]
133 Ph 2-Py BPin Me3Si xylene, 180 °C, 48 h >98:2 52 [91]
134 Ph 2-thienyl BPin Me3Si xylene, 180 °C, 48 h 88:12 64/6 [91]
135 Me 4-Me-Ph BPin Me3Si xylene, 180 °C, 48 h >98:2 55 [91]
136 4-EtO-Ph 4-MeO-Ph BPin Me3Si xylene, 180 °C, 48 h 88:12 74 [91]

aIsolated overall yield or isolated yields of both regioisomers a/b. n.d. – not determined.

According to frontier molecular orbital theory both combinations, i.e., HOMO(dipole)–LUMO(dipolarophile) (type I) and HOMO(dipolarophile)–LUMO(dipole) (type III) should lead to the production of individual regioisomers (cf. Scheme 7). All substituents R1–R4 have an influence on the HOMO–LUMO energy gaps and consequently on the ratio of both isomers especially in those cases when such energy gaps are similar. Again, the substituents on the alkyne (R3, R4) have great influence on the outcome of the reactions. Strong electron-withdrawing substituents R3 (COOR, COR, SO2Ar, CF3) in combination with any aryl (R4: Ph, substituted Ph, heteroaryls) strongly prefer position 4 in the final pyrazole ring (see entries 2–6, 9, 10, 14, 21–28, 37–45, 64–83 in Table 5) when reacting with 4-unsubstituted 3-phenylsydnones or 3-alkylsydnones (see entries 6, 29–31 in Table 5). Both these substituents jointly lower the LUMO while their influence on energy of the HOMO is contradictory. Consequently, the type I mechanism is clearly preferred. If R4 has also similar electron-withdrawing ability (e.g., CHO, CF3, see entries 17, 18, 46 in Table 5 or R4 = halogen, see entries 12, 120–123 in Table 5 and even R4 = CH2OH, see entries 19 and 20 in Table 5) then almost complete loss of selectivity occurs and the ratio of both regioisomers is close to 50:50. Markedly reversed regioselectivity is observed only for R4 = CH(OMe)2 which is probably connected with the higher steric demands of this group.

A substitution in position 3 of the sydnone has a much smaller influence on the regioselectivity which is in accordance with longer distance between the substituent and both dipole termini. Substitution of the 3-phenyl ring (e.g., entries 26–28, 37–45, 50, 53, 54 in Table 5) or even change of the whole 3-substituent (alkyls vs phenyl, see entries 29–31, 86, 87 in Table 5) cause no or only a minor change in the ratio of both regioisomers. In some cases the same conclusion can be drawn for changes of the substituent in 4-position of the sydnone (cf. entries 2, 7, 8, 89, 93, 94 or 88, 91, 92 in Table 5). On the other hand, the presence of a substituent can sometimes increase as well as decrease the ratio of both regioisomers (cf. entries 26 and 32–35) for no easily discernible reason.

A synthetically useful cycloaddition of 4-substituted 3-phenylsydnones with 4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-2-(2-substituted ethynyl)-1,3,2-dioxaborolanes (R4–C≡C–BPin; Scheme 10) was recently developed by Harrity et al. [79-81,84,91,107]. In most cases this reaction proceeds with excellent regioselectivity (>98:2) to give the corresponding 1-(substituted phenyl)-3,5-disubstituted -4-BPin-pyrazole, whose BPin group can be easily substituted by an aryl group using a Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. In those cases when a trimethylsilyl group (R4) is also present, it can be removed by TBAF-mediated protodesilylation to give a 1,4,5-trisubstituted pyrazole.

[1860-5397-14-113-i10]

Scheme 10: Synthetic strategy leading to 1,4,5-trisubstituted pyrazoles.

It is worth noting that the parent 4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-2-ethynyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (R4: H) reacts with alkyl/arylsydnones with completely opposite ratio (>7:1) of both regioisomers – i.e., for the BPin group the reaction preferentially occurs in position 3 of the final pyrazole (see entries 62, 64–66, 89, 109 and 110 in Table 4). In this case, using quantum chemical calculations (DFT/B3LYP-6-31G*) [81] steric effects were identified as the main factor influencing the ratio of both regioisomers. These calculations clearly proved the almost apolar character of both possible transition states giving 3- and 4-BPin substituted pyrazoles through bicyclic intermediates (cf. Scheme 5) with a negligible charge transfer flowing from sydnone to the alkyne. This result suggests that there should be a very low influence of the substituents polar effects on the energy of the transition state. Moreover, energy gaps between the dipole HOMO and the dipolarophile LUMO or the dipole LUMO and the dipolarophile HOMO were found to be similar in most cases.

Different reaction course was also observed [112] for 3-alkyl and 3-arylsydnones carrying in position 4 a six-membered heterocyclic ring containing a nitrogen atom adjacent to a linkage with parent sydnone ring (pyridin-2-yl, quinolin-2-yl, 5,6-dihydro-4H-1,3-oxazin-2-yl). Such sydnones reacted with potassium 2-substituted acetylene trifluoroborates under boron trifluoride diethyl etherate catalysis to give corresponding pyrazolo[3',4':4,5][1,2]azaborolo[2,3-a]pyridin-5-ium-4-uides (or quinolin-5-ium-4-uide) in good to excellent yields (Scheme 11). These zwitterionic compounds can be further hydrolyzed to 1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazoles, oxidized to 4-hydroxy-1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazoles, transformed to 4-BPin derivative of 1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazole or arylated under palladium catalysis to give 4-aryl-1,3,5-trisubstitutedpyrazole (Scheme 11). Overall therefore, a nitrogen atom in the sydnone 4-heterocyclyl substituent (especially 2-pyridyl) acts as powerful activating group enabling cycloaddition reaction under ambient conditions and also influencing the regioselectivity. Boron carrying two alkynyl groups always appear formally in position 4 of pyrazole ring including reaction with potassium acetylene trifluoroborate.

[1860-5397-14-113-i11]

Scheme 11: Reaction of sydnones carrying in position 4- six-membered 2-N-heterocyclic ring.

The last type of non-symmetrical internal alkynes to be considered are cycloalkynes. Their strain-promoted reactions again proceed quickly under mild reaction conditions (cf. section concerning symmetrical internal alkynes) but their regioselectivity is generally low, which is in accordance with the reactivity–selectivity principle. The first example was described [44] by Taran’s group in 2016 when they observed an ultrafast reaction of 6-[11,12-didehydrodibenzo[b,f]azocine-5(6H)-yl]-6-oxohexanoic acid with 4-fluoro-3-(4-methylphenyl)sydnone (Scheme 12). Unfortunately the regioselectivity of the reaction was not specified.

[1860-5397-14-113-i12]

Scheme 12: Strain-promoted sydnone alkyne cycloaddition (SPSAC).

An aryne generation (Scheme 13) was also used for the synthesis of a key intermediate of the potent antitumor PARP inhibitor – niraparib – containing an indazole core [113]. A substituted 2,3-aryne was generated in situ from (siloxy)benzocyclobutenes and CsF but the regioselectivity was poor: a ratio of both possible regioisomers of 45:55 was obtained.

[1860-5397-14-113-i13]

Scheme 13: Synthesis of a key intermediate of niraparib.

A much better regioselectivity was achieved [114] in a reaction of 1,3-/1,4-benzdiyne equivalents (2,4-bissilyl-1,3-bistriflates) with two different dipoles from which one was 3-phenyl-4-(4-methoxyphenyl)sydnone (Scheme 14). The reason for the much better regioselectivity probably lies in the steric hindrance between the bulky t-BuMe2Si and 4-MeO-Ph groups.

[1860-5397-14-113-i14]

Scheme 14: Reaction of sydnones with 1,3-/1,4-benzdiyne equivalents.

The in situ generation of arynes or six-membered cycloalkynes from their corresponding trimethylsilyl triflates was recently used by Garg et al. [115] and Bräse et al. [116] in expanding the utility of oxygen- or nitrogen-containing strained heterocycloalkynes (Scheme 15) but the regioselectivity was poor in most cases.

[1860-5397-14-113-i15]

Scheme 15: Reaction of sydnones with heterocyclic strained cycloalkynes.

Photochemical reaction of sydnones with non-symmetrical alkynes

As mentioned in the previous section, Gotthardt and Reiter [63,64] studied the photochemical reaction of sydnones with terminal alkynes. They have also studied the reaction with phenylacetylene, methyl propiolate and ethyl phenylpropiolate in a batch reactor under irradiation with 300 nm light (Table 6).

Table 6: Photochemical cycloaddition of N-phenylsydnones with non-symmetrical alkynes.

[Graphic 70]
entry R2 R3 R4 conditions ratio a:b yield a/b [%] ref.
1 Ph H COOMe benzene, 23 h, light (300 nm) 16:84 12/62 [63,64]
2 Ph COOEt Ph CH2Cl2, 27.5 h, light (300 nm) 0:100 0/33 [63,64]
3 Ph H Ph CH2Cl2, 66 h, light (300 nm) 0:100 0/63 [63,64]
4 Me H Ph CH2Cl2, 62 h, light (300 nm) 0:100 0/13 [64]
5 MeS H COOMe CH2Cl2, 27 h, light (300 nm) 12:88 6/44 [64]
6 PhS H COOMe benzene, 18.5 h, light (300 nm) n.d. 5/41 [64]

The formation of both regioisomers a and b was observed when the most reactive methyl propiolate was used as a reactant. Moreover, the ratio (16:84) obtained from starting 3,4-diphenylsydnone is similar with those obtained from 1,3-diphenylnitrilimine independently generated either from 2,5-diphenyltetrazol or from N-phenylbenzenecarbohydrazonoyl chloride. This observation clearly supports the mechanism depicted in Scheme 6. The distribution of both regioisomers qualitatively agrees with the proposal of Houk et al. [94] combining the dipole HOMO with the dipolarophile LUMO (type-I mechanism).

Copper-catalyzed reaction of sydnones with terminal alkynes

A substantial breakthrough in the field of 3-arylsydnone-terminal alkyne cycloaddition was achieved by Taran’s group in 2013 [3]. They developed a regioselective Cu(I)-phenanthroline-catalyzed variant of this reaction (i.e., copper-catalyzed sydnone alkyne cycloaddition; henceforth called CuSAC) enabling regioselective formation of 1,4-disubstituted pyrazoles under much milder reaction conditions (in various solvents including aqueous solution at 25–60 °C, Table 7) than previously used for its thermal-mediated counterpart. Such mild reaction conditions together with very high and reverse regioselectivity and efficiency (in most cases 85–99% yields) makes the CuSAC reaction a very good alternative to the well-established azide–alkyne click-reaction [117] useful not only in classical organic synthesis but also in bioconjugation applications. Moreover, a further improvement was later devised by the same authors, which avoids the highly toxic N-nitroso-N-phenylglycine, (precursor of sydnone) and involves a three-step one-pot transformation of starting N-phenylglycine to the corresponding pyrazole [118].

Table 7: Cu(I)-catalyzed cycloaddition of sydnones with terminal alkynes.

[Graphic 71]
entry R1 R2 R3 ligand (L) yield [%] ref.
1 Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1
L1
L2 		96–98
85a
99 		[3,119,120]
[118]
[3]
2 Ph H Ph L1 80 [3,120]
3 Ph H 4-MeOPh L1 64 [3,120]
4 Ph H 2-Py L1 95
69a 		[3]
[118]
5 Ph H thiophen-3-yl L1 95 [3,120]
6 Ph H 1-heptyl L1 61 [3,120]
7 Ph H PhCOOCH2 L1 93 [3,120]
8 Ph H (CH3)2C(OH) L1 83 [3,120]
9 Ph H COOEt L1 95
51a 		[3,120]
[118]
10 4-COOH-Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1 99 [3,120]
11 4-MeCO-Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1 97 [3]
12 4-COOH-Ph H (CH3)2C(OH) L1 93 [3,120]
13 4-COOH-Ph H [Graphic 72] L1 99 [3,120]
14 Ph H [Graphic 73] L1 85 [3]
15 Ph H [Graphic 74] L1 85 [3,120]
16 Ph H [Graphic 75] L1 96 [3,120]
17 Ph H [Graphic 76] L1 62
55a 		[3,120]
[118]
18 Ph H [Graphic 77] L1 92 [3,120]
19 Ph H [Graphic 78] L1 84 [3,120]
20 [Graphic 79] H [Graphic 80] L1 99 [3,120]
21 Ph H Bn–N–Ts L2 64 [116]
22 4-F-Ph H Bn–N–Ts L2 54 [116]
23 4-CF3-Ph H Bn–N–Ts L2 57 [116]
24 4-MeO-Ph H Bn–N–Ts L2 57 [116]
25 4-MeO-Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1 69a [118]
26 4-Me-Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1 72a [118]
27 4-I-Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1 78a [118]
28 4-NO2-Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1 69a [118]
29 4-CN-Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1 92a [118]
30 4-COOH-Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1 85a [118]
31 4-CF3-Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1 80a [118]
32 3-I-Ph H PhCH2CH2 L1 83a [118]
33 naphthalen-1-yl H PhCH2CH2 L1 69a [118]
34 2-COOMe-thiophen-3-yl H PhCH2CH2 L1 50a [118]
35 Ph H Ph L1 84a [118]
36 Ph H n-pentyl L1 82a [118]
37 Ph H CH2NHCOO-t-Bu L1 85a [118]
38 Ph H [Graphic 81] L1 91a [118]
39 Ph Br PhCH2CH2 L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6 		74b
67c
60d
75
74
13 		[119,120]
[119]
[119]
[119]
[119]
[119]
40 4-Me-Ph Br PhCH2CH2 L4 80 [119]
41 4-MeO-Ph Br PhCH2CH2 L4 70 [119,120]
42 4-F-Ph Br PhCH2CH2 L4 55 [119]
43 4-I-Ph Br PhCH2CH2 L4 72 [119]
44 Ph Br COOEt L4 38 [119]
45 Ph Br Ph L4 63 [119]
46 Ph Br 6-MeO-naphthalen-2-yl L4 77 [119]
47 Ph Br 4-MeO-Ph L4 44 [119]
48 Ph Br CH2NHCOO-t-Bu L4 69 [119]
49 Ph Br CH2OCOPh L4 52 [119]
50 Ph Br BrCH2CH2 L1
L4 		45a
63 		[119]
51 quinolin-5-yl Br PhCH2CH2 L4 33 [119]
52 Ph Br [Graphic 82] L4 52 [119]
53 Ph Br [Graphic 83] L4 65 [119]
54 Ph Me PhCH2CH2 L1 7 [119]
55 Ph Cl PhCH2CH2 L1 80e [119]
56 Ph CN PhCH2CH2 L1 10f [119]

aOne-pot protocol starting from corresponding N-phenyl glycine; bratio 1,4,5:1,3,5 is 83:17; cratio 1,4,5:1,3,5:1,4,5-debrominated product is 83:10:7; dratio 1,4,5:1,3,5:1,4,5-debrominated product is 97:0:3; eratio 1,4,5:1,3,5 is 96:4; fratio 1,4,5:1,3,5 is 50:50.

There are several limitations of the CuSAC reaction. First, it apparently fails with 3-alkyl sydnones and also with almost all 4-substituted 3-phenylsydnones except 4-F [44], 4-Cl and 4-Br derivatives [119]. However, this fortunate exception gave the further possibility to exchange halogen (especially bromine) by either an aryl, alkyl or alkenyl group via Suzuki coupling reaction with boronic acids to give otherwise rarely available 1,4,5-trisubstituted pyrazoles [119]. The second limitation is that the CuSAC reaction proceeds only with terminal alkynes. The latter fact clearly indicates some kind of participation of the alkyne’s slightly acidic terminal hydrogen in the reaction mechanism. Indeed, as early as in his primary paper [3] Taran suggested formation of Cu(I) acetylide (for additional information concerning reactions involving Cu(I) acetylides see references [121,122]) as the key species coordinating N2 of the sydnone through the Cu atom in the transition state. This suggestion was supported by Gomez-Bengoa and Harrity et al. [92] who performed thorough quantum calculation of various transition states involving different modes of interaction between 3-phenylsydnone and Cu(I) phenylacetylide (Scheme 16) and found Taran’s suggestion as the most plausible because of the lowest activation free energy (ΔG‡ = 25.4 kcal·mol−1) and due to the observed 1,4-regiocontrol. Intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations also showed concerted but asynchronous formation of the pyrazole ring, through initial C–C bond formation followed by Cu–N dissociation and C–N bond formation. Experiments performed in t-BuOD/D2O [119] also showed almost exclusive (>98:2) deuteration of position 3 in the final pyrazole ring. This finding supports the idea of Cu(I)-acetylide addition to give 3-metalated pyrazole (Cu-pyrazolide) that is, in deuteric solvent hydrolyzed to give 3-deutero pyrazole.

[1860-5397-14-113-i16]

Scheme 16: Mono-copper catalyzed cycloaddition reaction.

However, Fokin et al. has recently [123] revealed that monomeric copper acetylide complexes are not reactive toward organic azides in analogous copper-catalyzed alkyne–azide cycloaddition (CuAAC) and the catalysis by an external Cu(I) salt is necessary. This means that a dinuclear copper complex – most probably copper(I) acetylide bearing the π-bound copper salt – plays a key role during the cycloaddition step. On the basis of a crossover experiment with an isotopically enriched 63Cu(I) salt it was concluded that the CuAAC involves addition of azide nitrogen N3 to π-bound copper of dinuclear copper complex with concerted addition of alkyne β-carbon to azide terminal nitrogen N1. An intermediate formed in which N3 is coordinated to both copper atoms undergoes fast ligand exchange between both copper atoms which makes them equivalent. Then the same N3 coordinating both Cu atoms attacks the terminal carbon of the polarized double bond with concerted cleavage of one of the two copper atoms. The copper triazolide formed in this way is then hydrolyzed to the final triazole. The same presumption (Scheme 17) concerning the role of the two Cu atoms was also adopted by Taran in his newer paper [119] but no experimental evidence for this mechanism has been given yet.

[1860-5397-14-113-i17]

Scheme 17: Di-copper catalyzed cycloaddition reaction.

From previous studies it is known that for the spherically symmetric d10 Cu(I) ion, the common geometries are two-coordinate linear, three-coordinate trigonal planar, and four-coordinate tetrahedral [124]. Phenanthrolines form with Cu(I) at 1:1 ratio three-coordinated trigonal planar complexes or at 2:1 ratio tetra-coordinated tetrahedral complexes [125]. If Cu2(CN)2 (in which CN is isoelectronic with acetylide) is employed as a Cu(I) source then three-coordinated trigonal planar polymeric arrangement was observed [126]. From this observations it appears that mono- or dimeric three-coordinated trigonal planar Cu(I)-acetylide-phenanthroline complex should be the reactive species during CuSAC. This idea was supported by the fact that during the reaction of 4-bromosydnones with 4-phenylbut-1-yne [119] tridentate tris(benzimidazole) ligands completely failed and tris(triazole) ligands gave only poor to moderate yields (16–65%) even at 100 °C, whereas all the bidentate ligands (phenanthrolines L1, L2 and diimidazo[1,2-a:2',1'-c]quinoxalines L3–L6) were found to be more efficient both in terms of the isolated yield as well as the regioselectivity (see entry 39 in Table 7). From the comparison of phenanthroline (L1, L2) and diimidazo[1,2-a:2',1'-c]quinoxaline (L3–L6) complexes it appears that the higher angle between the two coordinative nitrogen atoms may have a positive impact on the catalytic efficiency.

Gomez-Bengoa and Harrity et al. [92] also inspected the role of Cu(I)/Cu(II) salts as well as other Lewis acids which could strengthen the electrophilicity of the starting sydnone under thermal reaction conditions. They found two competitive catalytic routes leading to different cycloaddition products. According to their original presumption some Lewis acids (TMSOTf < Zn(OAc)2 < MgBr2 < Cu(OTf)2) catalyzed the thermal reaction of phenylsydnone with phenylacetylene to give the expected 1,3-diphenylpyrazole in a ratio >10:1 over the 1,4-diphenyl isomer. Quantum calculations and IR measurements performed for the most active Cu(OTf)2 have shown that this salt coordinates to the sydnone oxygen carrying a negative charge which leads to an energy decrease of the sydnone LUMO and an increase of its electrophilicity. Also computed activation free energy (ΔG‡ = 25.4 kcal·mol−1) for the rate-limitting [3 + 2]-cycloaddition step leading to the 1,3-isomer was substantially lower if compared to the uncatalyzed reaction pathway (ΔG‡ = 32.5 kcal·mol−1).

If other Cu(II) salts were used as a catalyst then the ratio of 1,3-/1,4-isomers gradually changed from 90:10 to 3:97 (Table 8).

Table 8: Influence of Cu(II) salt (1 equiv) on reaction of phenyl sydnone (1 equiv) with phenylacetylene (2 equiv).

copper salta conversion after 20 min. in o-DCB at 140 °C (%) ratio 1,3-/1,4-pyrazole
Cu(OTf)2 100 90:10
Cu(TFA)2 75 80:20
Cu(BF4)2 44 64:36
CuCl2·4H2O 74 48:52
CuCO3 29 27:73
Cu(acac)2 19 20:80
CuBr2 91 19:81
Cu(OAc)2 39 17:83
Cu(2-Et-hexanoate)2 88 8:92
Cu(hfacac)2 13 3:97

aacac – acetylacetonate; hfacac – hexafluoroacetylacetonate; TFA - trifluoroacetate.

A completely different ratio of both isomers was observed when Cu(II) carboxylates and acetylacetonates were employed instead of Cu(OTf)2. This was explained by different operating mechanisms. While Cu(OTf)2, Cu(TFA)2 and Cu(BF4)2 behave mainly as Lewis acids, other Cu(II) salts/complexes preferentially oxidize one equivalent of phenylacetylene to give 1,4-diphenylbuta-1,3-diyne (isolated in 80% yield) and the evolved Cu(I) salt then forms Cu(I) acetylide with a second equivalent of phenylacetylene. Thus formed Cu(I) acetylide is then responsible for gradual increasing of 1,4-pyrazole occurrence. Quantum calculations [92] and IR measurements performed for Cu(OAc)2 also show that the Lewis acid character of this salt is less pronounced and formation of the 1,3-diphenylpyrazole necessitates a much higher activation free energy (ΔG‡ = 41.4 kcal·mol−1) than for the uncatalyzed reaction. Formation of 1,4-diphenylpyrazole through Cu(I)-acetylide addition is then the clearly preferred reaction pathway. Moreover, Cu(OAc)2 acts as a very good catalyst not only in the reaction of parent phenylsydnone with phenylacetylene [92]. After appropriate prolongation of the reaction time it delivers the corresponding 1,4-disubstituted pyrazoles in good to excellent yields and with a regioselectivity ratio exceeding 95:5 (Table 9). It is worth noting that 3-benzyl sydnone (representative of otherwise unreactive 3-alkylsydnones) reacts with the highly reactive ethyl propiolate to give ethyl 1-benzylpyrazole-4-carboxylate in good yield.

Table 9: Cu(OAc)2-catalyzed cycloaddition.

[Graphic 84]
entry R1 R3 reaction time (h) ratio 1,3:1,4 yield [%]
1 4-MeO-Ph Ph 5 <5:95 53
2 Ph COOEt 1 <5:95 93
3 4-MeO-Ph COOEt 2 <5:95 81
4 Ph n-Hex 3.5 <5:95 73
5 4-MeO-Ph n-Hex 3.5 <5:95 54
6 Ph cyclo-Hex 4 <5:95 100
7 4-MeO-Ph cyclo-Hex 2.5 <5:95 71
8 Ph cyclohex-1-enyl 2.5 <5:95 71
9 4-MeO-Ph cyclohex-1-enyl 2.5 <5:95 60
10 Ph cyclopropyl 4 <5:95 96
11 Ph thiophen-3-yl 2.5 <5:95 95
12 4-F-Ph COOEt 4 <5:95 95
13 Bn COOEt 4 <5:95 60

Copper(II) acetate anchored on a modified silica gel can also serve as an efficient catalyst in batch reactor or if housed in stainless steel cartridges [127] in continuous-flow conditions (Table 10). Again, the 4-substituted pyrazole is preferentially formed.

Table 10: The solid-supported CuSAC reaction in batch or flow reactor.

[Graphic 85]
entry R1 R3 solvent reaction (residence) time yield [%]
1 Ph Ph o-DCB
toluene 		2 h
(5 min) 		100
100
2 Ph COOEt o-DCB
toluene 		6 h
(5 min) 		71
95
3 Ph cyclopentyl o-DCB
toluene 		6 h
(15 min) 		33
73
4 Ph CH2OH o-DCB
toluene 		20 h
(15 min) 		69
18
5 Ph 2-Py o-DCB
toluene 		7 h
(5 min) 		70
24
6 4-MeO-Ph Ph o-DCB
toluene 		5 h
(5 min) 		85
75
7 4-MeO-Ph COOEt o-DCB
toluene 		6 h
(5 min) 		47
56
8 4-MeO-Ph cyclopentyl o-DCB
toluene 		6 h
(15 min) 		28
24
9 4-MeO-Ph CH2OH o-DCB
toluene 		20 h
(15 min) 		55
33
10 4-MeO-Ph 2-Py o-DCB
toluene 		7.5 h
(10 min) 		68
26
11 Bn Ph o-DCB
toluene 		16 h
(5 min) 		47
77
12 Bn COOEt o-DCB 16 h 21

Conclusion

Since its discovery in the sixties of the last century, the thermal [3 + 2]-cycloaddition of sydnones with alkynes represents a valuable synthetic tool for the preparation of polysubstituted pyrazoles and indazoles despite the limitations: the need for high temperatures (90–170 °C) and sometimes poorer regioselectivity. These obstacles can be surpassed either by suitable substitution (activating electron-withdrawing groups, removable silyl or carboxylate groups or replaceable boronic esters) or by efficient catalysis using Lewis acids. Preferential formation of 1,3-di- or 1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazoles (>90:10) is observed in most cases when a terminal alkyne was used as a reactant. On the other hand, the recent discovery of Cu(I) catalysis in the sydnone–alkyne cycloaddition (CuSAC) enables regioselective formation of complementary 1,4-disubstituted or 5-halogeno-1,4-disubstituted pyrazoles under very mild reaction conditions (aqueous t-BuOH solution at 60 °C) and can be considered as a good illustration of the click-reaction. Another important example of sydnone cycloaddition involves a very fast reaction with strained seven- or eight-membered cycloalkynes (strain-promoted sydnone alkyne cycloaddition; SPSAC) which takes place without any catalyst and at ambient temperature. Such mild reaction conditions, (ultra) fast and unambiguous product formation make SPSAC useful in bio-orthogonal applications and competitive in comparison with analogous strain-promoted azide–alkyne cycloaddition (SPAAC). The last possibility of how to influence the cycloaddition between sydnones and alkynes involves photochemical performance of this reaction. Under UV-irradiation sydnones form the corresponding unstable nitrilimines which then undergo [3 + 2]-cycloaddition to give pyrazoles carrying substituents originating from alkynes in positions 4 and 5 instead of 3 and 4. Yields of this photochemical reaction are mostly lower than 50% which makes this method less convenient.

References

  1. Huisgen, R.; Gotthardt, H.; Grashey, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1962, 1, 49. doi:10.1002/anie.196200491
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]
  2. Huisgen, R.; Gotthardt, H.; Grashey, R. Chem. Ber. 1968, 101, 536–551. doi:10.1002/cber.19681010223
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34]
  3. Kolodych, S.; Rasolofonjatovo, E.; Chaumontet, M.; Nevers, M.-C.; Créminon, C.; Taran, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 12056–12060. doi:10.1002/anie.201305645
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24]
  4. Decuypère, E.; Plougastel, L.; Audisio, D.; Taran, F. Chem. Commun. 2017, 53, 11515–11527. doi:10.1039/C7CC06405E
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Dickopp, H. Chem. Ber. 1974, 107, 3036–3042. doi:10.1002/cber.19741070926
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  6. Badami, B. V.; Puranik, G. S. Indian J. Chem. 1974, 12, 671–673.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13]
  7. Badami, B. V.; Puranik, G. S. Can. J. Chem. 1975, 53, 913–914. doi:10.1139/v75-127
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  8. Gotthardt, H.; Reiter, F. Chem. Ber. 1979, 112, 1193–1205. doi:10.1002/cber.19791120414
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]
  9. Gotthardt, H.; Reiter, F. Chem. Ber. 1981, 114, 2450–2464. doi:10.1002/cber.19811140712
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
  10. Maffrand, J.-P. Heterocycles 1981, 16, 35–37. doi:10.3987/R-1981-01-0035
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  11. Dambal, D. B.; Badami, B. V.; Puranik, G. S. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1982, 21, 865–868.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  12. Tikare, R. K.; Badami, B. V.; Puranik, G. S. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1983, 22, 673–677.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
  13. Ranganathan, D.; Bamezai, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 1067–1070. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)81606-8
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  14. Havanur, S. B.; Puranik, G. S. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1985, 24, 864–866.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  15. Collibee, W. L.; Anselme, J.-P. Bull. Soc. Chim. Belg. 1986, 95, 655–662. doi:10.1002/bscb.19860950809
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  16. Kano, K.; Scarpetti, D.; Warner, J. C.; Anselme, J.-P.; Springer, J. P.; Arison, B. H. Can. J. Chem. 1986, 64, 2211–2219. doi:10.1139/v86-364
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  17. Badachikar, S. V.; Tikare, R. K.; Puranik, G. S. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1986, 25, 1079–1080.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  18. Kalinin, V. N.; Min, S. F. Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. (Engl. Transl.) 1988, 37, 762–764. doi:10.1007/BF01455497
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  19. Sakamoto, T.; Shiga, F.; Uchiyama, D.; Kondo, Y. Heterocycles 1992, 33, 813–818. doi:10.3987/COM-91-S87
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  20. Dumitraşcu, F.; Drăghici, C.; Dumitrescu, D.; Tarko, L.; Răileanu, D. Liebigs Ann./Recl. 1997, 2613–2616. doi:10.1002/jlac.199719971229
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
  21. Dumitraşcu, F.; Drăghici, C.; Căproiu, M.; Crangus, C.; Mitan, C. I.; Barbu, L.; Răileanu, D. Rev. Chim. (Bucharest, Rom.) 2001, 52, 183–187.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  22. Dumitraşcu, F.; Mitan, C. I.; Dumitrescu, D.; Drăghici, C.; Căproiu, M. T. ARKIVOC 2002, No. ii, 80–86. doi:10.3998/ark.5550190.0003.209
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
  23. Dumitraşcu, F.; Mitan, C. I.; Drăghici, C.; Barbu, L.; Căproiu, M. T. A. Univ. Bucuresti, Chim. 2002, 11, 237–242.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  24. Dumitraşcu, F.; Drăghici, C.; Crangus, C.; Căproiu, M.; Mitan, C. I.; Dumitrescu, D.; Răileanu, D. Rev. Roum. Chim. 2002, 47, 315–318.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  25. Dumitraşcu, F.; Mitan, C. I.; Dumitrescu, D.; Barbu, L.; Hrubaru, M.; Caprau, D.; Vuluga, D. Rev. Chim. (Bucharest, Rom.) 2003, 54, 747–751.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  26. Chang, E.-M.; Lin, C.-J.; Wong, F. F.; Yeh, M.-Y. Heterocycles 2006, 68, 733–748. doi:10.3987/COM-06-10699
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  27. Sanyal, R.; Badami, B. V. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2006, 43, 827–834. doi:10.1002/jhet.5570430403
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  28. Dumitraşcu, F.; Drăghici, C.; Vuluga, D.; Căproiu, M. T. Rev. Roum. Chim. 2006, 51, 255–260.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  29. Chang, E.-M.; Lee, C.-T.; Chen, C.-Y.; Wong, F. F.; Yeh, M.-Y. Aust. J. Chem. 2008, 61, 342–349. doi:10.1071/CH07381
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  30. Rodriguez, A.; Moran, W. J. Synthesis 2009, 650–654. doi:10.1055/s-0028-1083344
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  31. Chang, E.-M.; Huang, S.-L.; Lee, C.-T.; Lin, H.-C.; Chen, C.-Y.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Lin, S.-K.; Wong, F. F. Aust. J. Chem. 2009, 62, 1355–1362. doi:10.1071/CH08344
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  32. Foster, R. S.; Jakobi, H.; Harrity, J. P. A. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4858–4861. doi:10.1021/ol3021918
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
  33. Foster, R. S.; Adams, H.; Jakobi, H.; Harrity, J. P. A. J. Org. Chem. 2013, 78, 4049–4064. doi:10.1021/jo400381a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28]
  34. Nassoy, A.-C.; Raubo, P.; Harrity, J. P. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 3094–3096. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.03.139
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  35. Wang, L.-Y.; Chang, E.-C.; Yeh, M.-Y.; Chung, Y. H.; Huang, J.-J.; Wong, F. F. Heteroat. Chem. 2014, 25, 171–177. doi:10.1002/hc.21151
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  36. Lopes, S. M. M.; Correia, C. F. O.; Nunes, S. C. C.; Pereira, N. A. M.; Ferreira, A. R. F.; Sousa, E. P.; Gomes, C. S. B.; Salvador, J. A. R.; Pais, A. A. C. C.; Pinho e Melo, T. M. V. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2015, 13, 9127–9139. doi:10.1039/C5OB01110H
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  37. Badami, B. V.; Puranik, G. S. Rev. Roum. Chim. 1982, 27, 281–284.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  38. Gotthardt, H.; Böhm, F.-R.; Brauer, D. J.; Weisshuhn, C. M.; Wilke, C. J. Chem. Ber. 1988, 121, 95–104. doi:10.1002/cber.19881210115
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  39. Rao, H. S. P.; Barthasarathy, N. Indian J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2007, 16, 413–414.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  40. Li, J.; Wu, F.; Liu, X.; Zou, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, L. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 140, 20–30. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2017.08.047
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. McGowin, A. E.; Jackson, L.; Marshall, L. W.; Tumbull, K. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2001, 33, 100–102. doi:10.1080/00304940109356581
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Wallace, S.; Chin, J. W. Chem. Sci. 2014, 5, 1742–1744. doi:10.1039/C3SC53332H
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  43. Plougastel, L.; Koniev, O.; Specklin, S.; Decuypere, E.; Créminon, C.; Buisson, D.-A.; Wagner, A.; Kolodych, S.; Taran, F. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9376–9378. doi:10.1039/C4CC03816A
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  44. Liu, H.; Audisio, D.; Plougastel, L.; Decuypere, E.; Buisson, D.-A.; Koniev, O.; Kolodych, S.; Wagner, A.; Elhabiri, M.; Krzyczmonik, A.; Forsback, S.; Solin, O.; Gouverneur, V.; Taran, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 12073–12077. doi:10.1002/anie.201606495
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  45. Narayanam, M. K.; Liang, Y.; Houk, K. N.; Murphy, J. M. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 1257–1261. doi:10.1039/C5SC03259H
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Liu, F.; Liang, Y.; Houk, K. N. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 2297–2308. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00265
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Medina, J. M.; McMahon, T. C.; Jiménez-Osés, G.; Houk, K. N.; Garg, N. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 14706–14709. doi:10.1021/ja508635v
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Lazaris, A. Y. Zh. Org. Khim. 1966, 2, 1322–1323.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Wu, C.; Fang, Y.; Larock, R. C.; Shi, F. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2234–2237. doi:10.1021/ol100586r
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Fang, Y.; Wu, C.; Larock, R. C.; Shi, F. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 8840–8851. doi:10.1021/jo201605v
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Seliverstov, M. Y.; Afanas'ev, O. I.; Sosonyuk, S. E.; Temnov, V. V.; Proskurnina, M. V.; Zefirova, N. S. Dokl. Chem. 2016, 466, 41–44. doi:10.1134/S0012500816020063
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Li, L.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Kong, L.; Wang, F.; Li, X. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 12038–12045. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.6b02356
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  53. Ikawa, T.; Masuda, S.; Nakajima, H.; Akai, S. J. Org. Chem. 2017, 82, 4242–4253. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.7b00238
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Huisgen, R.; Gotthardt, H. Chem. Ber. 1968, 101, 1059–1071. doi:10.1002/cber.19681010343
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  55. Youn, B. H.; Lyu, H. S.; Han, J. H.; Kim, S. H. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1987, 8, 233–235.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  56. Hoffmann, R.; Woodward, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 2046–2048. doi:10.1021/ja01087a034
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Sustmann, R. Pure Appl. Chem. 1974, 40, 569–593. doi:10.1351/pac197440040569
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Houk, K. N.; Sims, J.; Duke, R. E., Jr.; Strozier, R. W.; George, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 7287–7301. doi:10.1021/ja00803a017
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  59. Krauch, C. H.; Kuhls, J.; Piek, H.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1966, 7, 4043–4048. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)90284-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Huseya, Y.; Chinone, A.; Ohta, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1971, 44, 1667–1668. doi:10.1246/bcsj.44.1667
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Chinone, A.; Huseya, Y.; Ohta, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1970, 43, 2650. doi:10.1246/bcsj.43.2650
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. George, M. V.; Angadiyavar, C. S. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 1589–1594. doi:10.1021/jo00811a004
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  63. Gotthardt, H.; Reiter, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 2749–2752. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)96970-9
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  64. Gotthardt, H.; Reiter, F. Chem. Ber. 1979, 112, 1206–1225. doi:10.1002/cber.19791120415
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
  65. Märky, M.; Hansen, H.-J.; Schmid, H. Helv. Chim. Acta 1971, 54, 1275–1278. doi:10.1002/hlca.19710540506
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  66. Sasaki, T.; Kanematsu, K. J. Chem. Soc. C 1971, 2147–2150. doi:10.1039/j39710002147
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  67. Kishimoto, S.; Noguchi, S.; Masuda, K. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1976, 24, 3001–3010. doi:10.1248/cpb.24.3001
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
  68. Croce, P. D.; La Rosa, C.; Zecchi, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1985, 2621–2624. doi:10.1039/p19850002621
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  69. Ranganathan, D.; Bamezai, S. Synth. Commun. 1985, 15, 259–265. doi:10.1080/00397918508063796
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  70. Jeon, D. J.; Lee, J. N.; Kim, H. R.; Ryu, E. K. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 1998, 19, 725–726.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  71. Lee, J. N.; Jeon, D. J.; Kim, Y. M.; Kim, K. M.; Song, H. S. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2000, 21, 761–762.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  72. Venkatesan, A. M.; Mansour, T. S.; Abe, T.; Yamamura, I.; Takasaki, T.; Agarwal, A.; Dos Santos, O.; Sum, F.-W.; Lin, Y.-I. Bicyclic 6-alkylidene-penems as ß-lactamases inhibitors. WO Patent WO 2003093279 A1, Nov 13, 2003.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  73. Abe, T.; Matsunaga, H.; Mihira, A.; Sato, C.; Ushirogochi, H.; Sato, K.; Takasaki, T.; Venkatesan, A. M.; Mansour, T. S. Process for preparing 6-alkylidene penem derivatives. WO Patent WO 2003093277 A1, Nov 13, 2003.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  74. Nikitenko, A. A.; Winkley, M. W.; Zeldis, J.; Kremer, K.; Chan, A. W.-Y.; Strong, H.; Jennings, M.; Jirkovský, I.; Blum, D.; Khafizova, G.; Grosu, G. T.; Venkatesan, A. M. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2006, 10, 712–716. doi:10.1021/op050218b
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  75. Chang, E.-M.; Wong, F. F.; Chen, T.-H.; Chiang, K.-C.; Yeh, M.-Y. Heterocycles 2006, 68, 1007–1015. doi:10.3987/COM-06-10714
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
  76. Chang, E.-M.; Chen, T.-H.; Wong, F. F.; Chang, E.-C.; Yeh, M.-Y. Synlett 2006, 901–904. doi:10.1055/s-2006-939041
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]
  77. Venkatesan, A. M.; Agarwal, A.; Abe, T.; Ushirogochi, H.; Yamamura, I.; Ado, M.; Tsuyoshi, T.; Dos Santos, O.; Gu, Y.; Sum, F.-W.; Li, Z.; Francisco, G.; Lin, Y.-I.; Petersen, P. J.; Yang, Y.; Kumagai, T.; Weiss, W. J.; Shlaes, D. M.; Knox, J. R.; Mansour, T. S. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 4623–4637. doi:10.1021/jm060021p
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  78. González-Nogal, A. M.; Calle, M.; Cuadrado, P.; Valero, R. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 224–231. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2006.10.026
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  79. Browne, D. L.; Helm, M. D.; Plant, A.; Harrity, J. P. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8656–8658. doi:10.1002/anie.200703767
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
  80. Browne, D. L.; Taylor, J. B.; Plant, A.; Harrity, J. P. A. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 396–400. doi:10.1021/jo802240e
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  81. Browne, D. L.; Vivat, J. F.; Plant, A.; Gomez-Bengoa, E.; Harrity, J. P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7762–7769. doi:10.1021/ja902460n
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27]
  82. Browne, D. L.; Taylor, J. B.; Plant, A.; Harrity, J. P. A. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 984–987. doi:10.1021/jo902514v
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]
  83. Carceller Gonzalez, E.; Virgili Bernado, M. 2H-Pyrazolo[4,3-d]pyrimidin-5-amine derivatives as H4 Histamine receptor antagonists for the treatment of allergic, immunological and inflamatory diseases. WO Patent WO 2010043633 A1, April 22, 2010.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  84. Foster, R. S.; Jakobi, H.; Harrity, J. P. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 1506–1508. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.01.115
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]
  85. Mattes, A.; Helmke, H.; Hillebrand, S.; Peris, G.; Sudau, A.; Rodefeld, L.; Gauger, S.; Benting, J.; Dahmen, P.; Meissner, R.; Wachendorff-Neumann, U.; Hadano, H. Bicyclic pyrimidinyl pyrazoles. WO Patent WO 2011124539 A1, Oct 13, 2011.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  86. Dürüst, Y.; Sağırlı, A.; Kariuki, B. M.; Knight, D. W. Tetrahedron 2014, 70, 6012–6019. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2014.04.083
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
  87. Chappie, T. A.; Helal, C. J.; Kormos, B. L.; Tuttle, J. B.; Verhoest, P. R. Imidazo-triazine derivatives as PDE10 inhibitors. WO Patent WO 2014177977 A1, Nov 6, 2014.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  88. Handa, N. V.; Li, S.; Gerbec, J. A.; Sumitani, N.; Hawker, C. J.; Klinger, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6400–6403. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b03381
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  89. Brown, A. W.; Fisher, M.; Tozer, G. M.; Kanthou, C.; Harrity, J. P. A. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 9473–9488. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01128
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
  90. Brown, A. W.; Harrity, J. P. A. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 80, 2467–2472. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.5b00143
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  91. Brown, A. W.; Harrity, J. P. A. Tetrahedron 2017, 73, 3160–3172. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2017.04.049
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21]
  92. Comas-Barceló, J.; Foster, R. S.; Fiser, B.; Gomez-Bengoa, E.; Harrity, J. P. A. Chem. – Eur. J. 2015, 21, 3257–3263. doi:10.1002/chem.201406118
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
  93. Totoe, H.; McGowin, A. E.; Turnbull, K. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2000, 18, 131–140. doi:10.1016/S0896-8446(00)00060-7
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  94. Houk, K. N.; Sims, J.; Watts, C. R.; Luskus, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 7301–7315. doi:10.1021/ja00803a018
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  95. Huppatz, J. L. Aust. J. Chem. 1983, 36, 135–147. doi:10.1071/CH9830135
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  96. Bernard, A.; Cocco, M. T.; Maccioni, A.; Plumitallo, A. Farmaco, Ed. Sci. 1985, 40, 259–271.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  97. Ranganathan, D.; Bamezai, S.; Cun-Heng, H.; Clardy, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 5739–5742. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(00)98912-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  98. Ranganathan, D.; Bamezai, S.; Saini, S. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 1991, 30, 169–175.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  99. Fariňa, F.; Fernández, P.; Fraile, T.; Martín, V. M.; Martín, M. R. Heterocycles 1989, 29, 967–974. doi:10.3987/COM-89-4930
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  100. Meazza, G.; Zanardi, G.; Piccardi, P. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1993, 30, 365–371. doi:10.1002/jhet.5570300213
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
  101. Chan, D. M.-T.; Kamireddy, B.; Kim, H. B.; Patel, K. M.; Sharpe, P. L.; Casini, M. S.; Xu, M.; Armel, G. R.; Stevenson, T. M. Azolecarboxamide herbicides. WO Patent WO 2004106324 A1, Dec 9, 2004.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  102. Rai, G.; Puranik, V. G.; Kalluraya, B.; Hegde, J. C. Synth. Commun. 2006, 36, 1285–1290. doi:10.1080/00397910500518874
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
  103. Plant, A.; Boehmer, J. E.; Black, J.; Sparks, T. D. Isoxazoline derivatives and their use as herbicides. WO Patent WO 2006024820 A1, March 9, 2006.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  104. Satheesha Rai, N.; Kalluraya, B. Indian J. Chem., Sect. B 2007, 46, 375–378.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  105. Satheesha Rai, N.; Kalluraya, B.; Lingappa, B.; Shenoy, S.; Puranic, V. G. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 1715–1720. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2007.08.002
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
  106. Gao, D.; Zhai, H.; Parvez, M.; Back, T. G. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8057–8068. doi:10.1021/jo801621d
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  107. Foster, R. S.; Huang, J.; Vivat, J. F.; Browne, D. L.; Harrity, J. P. A. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 4052–4056. doi:10.1039/b910632d
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  108. Bisaha, J. J.; Crews, A. D., Jr.; Howard, M. H., Jr.; Sharpe, P. L.; Stevenson, T. M.; Taggi, A. E. Fungicidal bicyclic pyrazoles. WO Patent WO 2009076440 A2, June 18, 2009.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  109. Stevenson, T. M.; Marshall, E. A.; Taggi, A. E. Herbicidal pyridazinone derivatives. WO 2009086041 A1, July 9, 2009.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  110. Delaunay, T.; Es-Sayed, M.; Vors, J.-P.; Monteiro, N.; Balme, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 3837–3848. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201100119
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
  111. Chang, E.-C.; Wen, Y.-L.; Chang, C.-H.; Shen, Y.-H.; Wen, S.-B.; Yeh, M.-Y.; Wong, F. F. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 5920–5924. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2012.04.093
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  112. Brown, A. W.; Comas-Barceló, J.; Harrity, J. P. A. Chem. – Eur. J. 2017, 23, 5228–5231. doi:10.1002/chem.201701019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  113. Shi, J.; Xu, H.; Qiu, D.; He, J.; Li, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 623–626. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b12161
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  114. Ikawa, T.; Masuda, S.; Takagi, A.; Akai, S. Chem. Sci. 2016, 7, 5206–5211. doi:10.1039/C6SC00798H
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  115. Shah, T. K.; Medina, J. M.; Garg, N. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 4948–4954. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b01986
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  116. Wezeman, T.; Comas-Barceló, J.; Nieger, M.; Harrity, J. P. A.; Bräse, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 1575–1579. doi:10.1039/C6OB02518H
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  117. Lallana, E.; Riguera, R.; Fernandez-Megia, E. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8794–8804. doi:10.1002/anie.201101019
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  118. Specklin, S.; Decuypere, E.; Plougastel, L.; Aliani, S.; Taran, F. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 7772–7777. doi:10.1021/jo501420r
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]
  119. Decuypere, E.; Specklin, S.; Gabillet, S.; Audisio, D.; Liu, H.; Plougastel, L.; Kolodych, S.; Taran, F. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 362–365. doi:10.1021/ol503482a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29]
  120. Taran, F.; Chaumontet, M.; Kolodych, S.; Rasolofonjatovo Andovola, E. Method for producing pyrazoles, novel pyrazoles and application thereof. WO Patent WO2014122407 A2, Aug 14, 2014.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]
  121. Comas-Barceló, J.; Harrity, J. P. A. Synthesis 2017, 49, 1168–1181. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1588922
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  122. Adeleke, A. F.; Brown, A. P. N.; Cheng, L.-J.; Mosleh, K. A. M.; Cordier, C. J. Synthesis 2017, 49, 790–801. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1588405
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  123. Worrell, B. T.; Malik, J. A.; Fokin, V. V. Science 2013, 340, 457–460. doi:10.1126/science.1229506
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  124. Conry, R. R. Copper: Inorganic & Coordination Chemistry. Encyclopedia of Inorganic Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2006.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  125. Pallenberg, A. J.; Koenig, K. S.; Barnhart, D. M. Inorg. Chem. 1995, 34, 2833–2840. doi:10.1021/ic00115a009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  126. Nitsch, J.; Kleeberg, C.; Fröhlich, R.; Steffen, A. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 6944–6960. doi:10.1039/C4DT03706E
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  127. Comas-Barceló, J.; Blanco-Ania, D.; van den Broek, S. A. M. W.; Niuwland, P. J.; Harrity, J. P. A.; Rutjes, F. P. J. T. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2016, 6, 4718–4723. doi:10.1039/C5CY02247A
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2018 Hladíková et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities
Journal Logo
Institut Logo
Preprint Logo
Symposia Logo