Logo Beilstein Institut

Substituent effect on TADF properties of 2-modified 4,6-bis(3,6-di-tert-butyl-9-carbazolyl)-5-methylpyrimidines

  1. 1 ,
  2. 2 ORCID Logo ,
  3. 2 ,
  4. 2 and
  5. 1 ORCID Logo
1Institute of Chemistry, Vilnius University, Naugarduko 24, LT-03225, Vilnius, Lithuania
2Institute of Photonics and Nanotechnology, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio 3, LT-10257 Vilnius, Lithuania
  1. Corresponding author email
This article is part of the thematic issue "Organic TADF materials design".
Guest Editor: E. Zysman-Colman
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2022, 18, 497–507. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.18.52
Received 04 Mar 2022, Accepted 28 Apr 2022, Published 05 May 2022
Full Research Paper
cc by logo
PDF
Album
Supp Info
Cite

Abstract

The interest in organic materials exhibiting thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) significantly increased in recent years owing to their potential application as emitters in highly efficient organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs). Simple modification of the molecular structure of TADF compounds through the selection of different electron-donating or accepting fragments opens great possibilities to tune the emission properties and rates. Here we present the synthesis of a series of novel pyrimidine–carbazole emitters and their photophysical characterization in view of effects of substituents in the pyrimidine ring on their TADF properties. We demonstrate that electron-withdrawing substituents directly connected to the pyrimidine unit have greater impact on the lowering of the energy gap between singlet and triplet states (ΔEST) for efficient TADF as compared to those attached through a phenylene bridge. A modification of the pyrimidine unit with CN, SCH3, and SO2CH3 functional groups at position 2 is shown to enhance the emission yield up to 0.5 with pronounced TADF activity.

Keywords: carbazole; pyrimidine; RTP; synthesis; thermally activated delayed fluorescence

Introduction

The first reports on highly efficient thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) mechanism and its successful realization in organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) by Adachi and co-workers [1,2] have drawn the attention to the design and synthesis of various emissive donor–acceptor organic compounds. Efficient triplet harvesting in TADF compounds leads to internal quantum efficiencies up to 100% and electroluminescence yields exceeding 20% [3,4]. TADF OLEDs usually contain pure organic molecules, which avoid expensive noble metals and allow broad possibilities of molecular design. One of the main requirement for efficient TADF is a negligible energy difference between the lowest singlet and triplet states (∆EST) which is often obtained in (hetero)aromatic compounds possessing twisted electron-donor (D) and acceptor (A) fragments with strong intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) [5-7]. Moreover, the number and nature of various side units on the emitter framework can also affect the properties of TADF compounds [3]. Among the electron-donating units, 9,10-dihydroacridine, carbazole or phenoxazine derivatives often are used as D units, while the π-electron-deficient nitrogen heterocycles such as triazine, diazines or aromatics containing cyano and sulfone groups are popular acceptor units for the construction of highly efficient TADF emitters [8-11]. Pyrimidine (1,3-diazine) owing to its aromaticity, significant π-deficiency, strong electron affinity, high luminous efficiency, good electrical and optical properties, and easy chemical modification is a desired structural unit in organic structures targeted for numerous applications including organic photovoltaic solar cells (OPV) [12-14], organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) [15-17], chemical and biosensors [18-23], and OLEDs [3,7-9,24]. In case of TADF emitters, a pyrimidine ring is often connected with a donor unit through a phenylene group as a conjugate π-spacer (s) [25-28]. As the majority of research describes TADF compounds with D-s–A–s–D layout, reports on TADF properties of pyrimidine emitters where the pyrimidine moiety is directly bonded with a donor moiety are scarce [29-31], though several examples of such pyrimidine-based conjugates found utility as high triplet energy hosts [32,33]. Envisaging the potential of the pyrimidine–carbazole pair for achieving efficient deep-blue emission, we were interested to study the influence of substituents in position 2 of the pyrimidine ring on the TADF properties of pyrimidine–carbazole emitters. For this purpose, we performed the synthesis of novel 4,6-bis(3,6-di-tert-butyl-9H-carbazol-9-yl)pyrimidines modified with various substituents in position 2 of the pyrimidine ring (Figure 1).

[1860-5397-18-52-1]

Figure 1: 2-Modified 4,6-bis(3,6-di-tert-butyl-9H-carbazol-9-yl)-5-methylpyrimidines.

For comparison, analysis of the TADF properties of a similar pyrimidine–carbazole emitter tCbz-mPYR is also included in this paper [29]. To enhance the electron-accepting character of the pyrimidine moiety some electron-withdrawing groups, namely cyano, bromo or sulfonyl groups were introduced directly or through a phenylene bridge into position 2 of the pyrimidine ring.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis

Due to the versatile reactivity of a methylthio group in the pyrimidine nucleus [34,35] we used 4,6-bis(3,6-di-tert-butyl-9H-carbazol-9-yl)-5-methyl-2-methylthiopyrimidine (tCbz-mPYR) as a starting material for the synthesis of 2-substituted pyrimidine emitters (Scheme 1). Compound tCbz-mPYR was synthesized by using the palladium-catalyzed Buchwald–Hartwig amination reaction of 4,6-dichloro-5-methyl-2-methylpyrimidine with 3,6-di-tert-butylcarbazole according to the procedure reported by us previously [29].

[1860-5397-18-52-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of 4,6-bis(3,6-di-tert-butyl-9H-carbazol-9-yl)-5-methyl-2-substituted pyrimidines 1–6. Reagents and conditions: i – Raney Ni, MeOH, 90 °C, 2 h; ii – arylboronic acid (1.3 equiv), Pd(PPh3)4 (5 mol %), Cs2CO3 (2 equiv; 1 equiv in case of meta-substituted boronic acids), copper(I) 3-methylsalicylate (2.2 equiv), dioxane, 130 °C, 4 h, argon; iii – oxone (2.5 equiv), DMF, 80 °C, 3 h; iv – NaCN (2.2 equiv), THF, reflux, 3.5 h; v – 4-t-BuC6H4SH (1.1 equiv), Et3N (1.1 equiv), THF, 50 °C, overnight, argon.

In order to remove the methylthio group in tCbz-mPYR and to obtain the 2-unsubstituted pyrimidine derivative 1, a hydrogenolysis reaction employing Raney Ni was carried out. Efficient methods for the introduction of aryl moieties into methylthio-substituted nitrogen heterocycles such as tCBz-mPYR are a Ni(0)-catalyzed cross-coupling reaction with Grignard reagents [34,36] or the Liebeskind–Srogl reaction employing arylboronic acids [37-39]. Taking into account a large assortment of arylboronic acids and the simplicity of the method, we chose the Liebeskind–Srogl cross-coupling reaction for the synthesis of the target 2-arylpyrimidine derivatives. Thus, heating tCbz-mPYR with phenyl-, 4-cyanophenyl-, 3-cyanophenyl-, or 3-bromophenylboronic acid at 130 °C in dioxane in the presence of Pd(PPh3)4, copper(I) 3-methylsalicylate (CuMeSal), and Cs2CO3 as a catalyst system furnished the corresponding 2-substituted pyrimidines 2a–d. For the introduction of cyano and 4-(tert-butyl)phenylthio groups into position 2 of the pyrimidine, the conversion of the methylthio group to the better leaving methylsulfonyl group was necessary to perform. A suitable oxidant for this purpose appeared to be oxone [40]. Thus, the oxidation of tCbz-mPYR with oxone proceeded in DMF at 80 °C to provide the 2-methylsulfonyl derivative 3 in 92% yield. Then, treatment of compound 3 with NaCN or 4-(tert-butyl)thiophenol led to the formation of the 2-cyano- and 2-(4-tert-butylphenylthio) derivatives 4 and 5 in 65% and 77% yield, respectively. Finally, compound 5 in the reaction with oxone furnished 2-(4-tert-butylphenylsulfonyl) derivative 6 in reasonable 68% yield. 1H and 13C NMR spectroscopy and HRMS were employed to confirm the structures of the synthesized compounds (see Figures S1–S27 in Supporting Information File 1).

DFT analysis

To assess the structural and electronic properties of the chromophores tCbz-mPYR and 1–6, quantum chemical calculations were performed. DFT analysis revealed that all studied compounds were of similar molecular geometry with partially twisted carbazole units (in the order of 45–47°). The steric hindrance between the carbazole fragments and the pyrimidine core was enhanced by introducing a methyl group in position 5 of the latter [29], enabling sufficient HOMO–LUMO decoupling. Single-bonded phenyl substituents (compounds 2a–d) are almost coplanar with the pyrimidine core (dihedral angle 0.5–1.5°), while a phenyl group connected with the pyrimidine ring via a sulfur atom (compounds 5 and 6) is twisted out of the pyrimidine plane and is not conjugated with the pyrimidine ring. Despite the similar molecular structures, the studied chromophores showed somewhat different electronic properties, mainly due to the variation of the acceptor structure. The DFT computed spatial distribution of frontier molecular orbitals (FMOs) of compounds tCbz-mPYR and 1–6 is presented in Figure 2. A comparison of the electronic structures revealed that the electron density distribution in the HOMO is rather similar for all molecules and tended to localize on the electron-donating carbazole moiety partially extending to the pyrimidine ring. The main differences in the electronic structure can be observed in the LUMO distribution. For the 2-methylthio- and 2-(tert-butylphenyl)thio-substituted compounds (tCbz-mPYR and 5) or the corresponding sulfonyl derivatives (3 and 6), the LUMO is localized over the electron-withdrawing pyrimidine unit with low extension to tCbz, being very similar to the LUMO distribution for pyrimidine derivative 1 without a substituent at the position 2 of the pyrimidine ring. The π-electron density distribution in the LUMO of compounds bearing a phenyl (2a), para/meta-cyanophenyl, and meta-bromophenyl moiety (2b–d) at position 2 of the pyrimidine ring tends to localize over the pyrimidine ring and nearby phenyl groups, resulting in a lower HOMO–LUMO overlap. A similar LUMO localization is observed for compound 4 with a 2-cyano group.

[1860-5397-18-52-2]

Figure 2: HOMO and LUMO spatial distributions of carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds.

The energies of the HOMO level were in the range from −5.50 eV to −5.70 eV with lower values for those compounds bearing electron-withdrawing groups (Table 1). The LUMO energies varied from −1,38 eV for compound 5 with a phenylthio group to −2.15 eV for compound 2b bearing a p-cyanophenyl group in position 2 of the pyrimidine ring. The S0→S1 transition energies ranged from 3–3.4 eV with lower values for the CN/Br/phenyl-substituted compounds due to the larger conjugation length of the acceptor unit (also evidenced by a deeper LUMO), followed by lower oscillator strengths of S0→S1 transition due to more evident HOMO–LUMO decoupling (≈0.04 vs ≈0.4). Lower singlet–triplet energy gaps were estimated for compounds with stronger acceptor units (down to 200 meV), beneficial for efficient thermal triplet upconversion.

Table 1: DFT computed S0→S1/T1 transition energies, oscillator strengths of S0→S1 transitions, and ΔEST values of carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds.

Compd. fS0→S1a ES0→S1 (eV)b ES0→T1 (eV)c ΔES1T1 (meV)d HOMO (eV)e LUMO (eV)f
tCbz-mPYR 0.3940 3.4265 3.1380 289 −5.53 −1.42
1 0.3999 3.4508 3.1400 311 −5.53 −1.39
2a 0.0383 3.4094 2.9911 418 −5.51 −1.52
2b 0.0360 2.9562 2.7535 203 −5.61 −2.15
2c 0.0473 3.1616 2.9003 261 −5.57 −1.89
2d 0.0465 3.2820 2.9518 330 −5.55 −1.71
3 0.3959 3.2132 2.9251 288 −5.66 −1.79
4 0.0496 3.0245 2.7858 239 −5.70 −2.09
5 0.4100 3.4377 3.1390 299 −5.50 −1.38
6 0.3779 3.2706 2.9864 284 −5.63 −1.71

aS0→S1 transition oscillator strength; bS0→S1 transition energies; cS0→T1 transition energies; dsinglet–triplet energy gap; eHOMO energies; fLUMO energies.

Absorption and emission properties

Absorption (10−5 M toluene solutions) and emission spectra (1 wt % PMMA films) of the carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds are shown in Figure 3 and details are enclosed in Table 2. The absorption spectra were rather similar for all compounds, described with, typical for tCbz units, vibronic progression-having peaks bellow ≈340 nm [41]. Molar absorption coefficients were in the range of 19700–34200 M−1 cm−1, being in line with DFT predicted S0→S1 oscillator strengths and LUMO energies. The fluorescence spectra, on the other hand, showed much larger differences upon the modification of the acceptor unit. In this case, the emission wavelength was tuned in the range of 480 meV, starting from 411 nm (compounds 1 and 2a) to 468 nm (compound 2b). Such trend was in line with the increase of the strength of the acceptor unit, namely the energy of the LUMO (see Table 1 and Figure S28 in Supporting Information File 1), while the lower emission energy was observed for compounds with more pronounced charge-transfer (CT) character. This was also evidenced by larger FWHM values of fluorescence spectra for compounds with stronger CT emission (e.g., compounds 1 and 4). The phosphorescence (PH) spectra of the carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds were rather intriguing. 10 K PH spectra of compounds tCbz-mPYR, 1, 3, 5, and 6 clearly resembled that of individual tCbz units, peaking at about 418 nm [29], while for the rest of the compounds the PH spectra were red-shifted, though still maintaining the vibronic structure. However, the closer inspection of the PH spectra, see Figure S29 in Supporting Information File 1, revealed that all PH spectra coincided with that of the tCbz unit. Actually, the lowest-energy 0–0’ vibronic peak was of very low intensity for compounds 2a–d or 4 as well as the intensity ratio of high-energy replicas was also different, though the T1 energy was the same for all carbazole–pyrimidine compounds. The compounds 2a–d and 4 have one common feature, namely, their acceptor unit is modified with various phenyl-like fragments, increasing the flexibility of the molecular structure, probably altering the electron–vibronic coupling. A similar behavior was observed for similar pyrimidine TADF compounds [42]. Moreover, fluorescence line shapes of compounds 2a and 2d were different from the rest of compounds with low-energy shoulder. More detailed analysis (see Figure S30 in Supporting Information File 1) revealed the presence of room-temperature phosphorescence (RTP), perturbing the lineshape of PL spectra. The estimated singlet–triplet energy gaps (ΔEST) of carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds were in the range of 159–530 meV, systematically decreasing for compounds with stronger acceptor unit (see Figure S28d in Supporting Information File 1). ΔEST was large for the majority of compounds, however, for compounds 2b, 3, 4, and 6 modified with CN and SO2CH3 groups ΔEST was as low as 159 meV, promising for efficient thermally activated triplet upconversion.

[1860-5397-18-52-3]

Figure 3: Absorption (grey lines), fluorescence (black lines) and 10K phosphorescence (red lines) spectra of carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds. 10−5 M toluene solutions were used for absorption measurements, while 1 wt % PMMA films were used for emission measurements.

Table 2: Fluorescence parameters of carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds.

Compd. λabs
(nm)a 		ε
(M−1cm−1)b 		λPL
(nm)c 		ΦPFd ΦDFe kPF
(×108 s)f 		kr
(×106 s)g 		knr
(×108 s)h 		ΦDF/ΦPFi ΔEST
(meV)j
tCbz-mPYR 339 22000 415 0.05 0.40 2.5 13.0 2.4 8.0 530
1 339 33420 411 0.07 0.11 1.4 9.3 1.3 1.6 397
2a 339 29100 411 0.03 0.06 2.1 6.8 2.0 2.0 510
2b 339 34200 468 0.01 0.24 3.1 3.0 3.1 24.0 128
2c 339 28700 410 0.01 0.18 3.0 3.7 3.0 18.0 443
2d 339 30700 447 0.01 0.05 4.2 2.4 4.1 5.0 501
3 357 23000 440 0.06 0.49 0.7 4.0 0.6 8.2 265
4 358 19700 460 0.01 0.34 1.1 1.3 1.0 34.0 159
5 341 27400 408 0.03 0.05 3.0 8.2 2.9 1.7 530
6 355 23000 441 0.04 0.02 1.2 5.1 1.1 0.5 273

aAbsorption peak in toluene; bmolar absorption coefficient in toluene; cfluorescence peak in 1 wt % PMMA; dprompt fluorescence quantum yield 1 wt % PMMA; edelayed fluorescence quantum yield 1 wt % PMMA; ffluorescence decay rates 1 wt % PMMA; gradiative decay rates 1 wt % PMMA; hnonradiative decay rates 1 wt % PMMA; iprompt and delayed fluorescence quantum yield ratio 1 wt % PMMA; jsinglet–triplet energy gap 1 wt % PMMA.

Fluorescence decay transients of 1 wt % PMMA films of carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds are shown in Figure 4. Typical for TADF compounds temporal profiles having two decay regimes were observed when the initial decay was of prompt fluorescence and the latter one was of TADF. The PF decay rate (1–4 × 108 s−1) was typical for directly bound carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds [43,44], though a somewhat lower value was estimated for compound 3 modified with a methylsulfonyl group. More insights could be drawn by analyzing the fluorescence quantum yield (ΦF) as well as radiative (kr) and non-radiative (knr) fluorescence decay rates (see Table 2). The ΦPF was typical for carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds [31,43,44], in the range of 0.01–0.07 and decreased for compounds with stronger acceptor units (see Figure S28b in Supporting Information File 1). The radiative decay rate was in the range of 1.3–13.0 × 106 s−1. Typically, kr was larger for compounds with weaker acceptor units and a lower CT fluorescence strength (see Figure S28c in Supporting Information File 1). In case of knr, a similar analysis is hardly possible, as knr accounts for two different rates, namely internal conversion to S0 and intersystem crossing. However, some faint trends could be seen, as compounds with the strongest donor units tend to have the larger knr (compounds 2b–d).

[1860-5397-18-52-4]

Figure 4: Fluorescence decay transients of 1 wt % PMMA films of carbazole–pyrimidine TADF compounds in oxygen-free conditions.

In case of delayed fluorescence, more complicated fluorescence temporal profiles were observed, aggravating its analysis. DF decay transients were perturbed by conformational disorder, typical for D–A TADF compounds in solid films [41,45-47]. The presence of conformational disorder made exponential fitting of DF transients hardly possible due to the multiexponential temporal profiles of the DF decay. Unfortunately, TADF decay rates were inaccessible. Similar emission decay transients were also estimated for RTP compounds 2a and 2d both at singlet and triplet emission peaks (see Figure S31 in Supporting Information File 1). The largest DF quantum yield, ranging from 0.34–0.49, was estimated for compounds tCbz-mPYR, 3, and 4 with the lowest ΔEST, modified with CN, SCH3, and SO2CH3 functional groups directly at the pyrimidine unit. The introduction of phenyl substituents (compounds 2a–d) or S-aryl units (compounds 5 and 6) at position 2 of the pyrimidine ring led to lower ΦDF, probably due to the enlarged nonradiative decay rate. Interestingly, ΔEST was remarkably larger for tCbz-mPYR despite its high ΦDF. In this case, rISC probably was promoted by efficient triplet upconversion through spin-vibronicaly bound Tn energy levels [48].

Conclusion

In summary, a series of novel pyrimidine–carbazole TADF emitters bearing different substituents in position 2 of the pyrimidine moiety were successfully prepared by using Liebeskind–Srogl cross-coupling, hydrogenolysis, oxidation reactions of 4,6-bis(3,6-di-tert-butyl-9-carbazolyl)-5-methyl-2-methylthiopyrimidine and following nucleophilic substitution of the methylsulfonyl group with sodium cyanide and 4-(tert-butyl)thiophenol. The thorough photophysical analysis was carried out to assess the impact of different substituents in position 2 of the pyrimidine ring. It was shown that HOMO–LUMO overlap and the resulting ΔEST can be easily minimized, enabling rather efficient TADF. We have shown that electron-withdrawing substituents connected directly to the pyrimidine unit have a larger impact on TADF efficiency in comparison with those attached through a phenylene bridge. The largest delayed fluorescence quantum yield, ranging from 0.34–0.49, was estimated for compounds with CN, SCH3, and SO2CH3 functional groups at the position 2 of the pyrimidine unit. We believe that our findings on the TADF properties of differently substituted carbazole–pyrimidines will be useful for molecular design of high-performance TADF emitters in the future.

Experimental

General information

Reagents and solvents were purchased directly from commercial suppliers and solvents were purified by known procedures. Melting points were determined in open capillaries with a digital melting point IA9100 series apparatus (ThermoFischer Scientific) and were not corrected. Thin-layer chromatography was performed using TLC aluminum sheets with silica gel (Merck 60 F254). Visualization was accomplished by UV light. Column chromatography was performed using silica gel 60 (0.040–0.063 mm, Merck). NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Ascend 400 (400 MHz and 100 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively). 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were referenced to residual solvent peaks. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) analyses were carried out on a Dual-ESI Q-TOF 6520 (Agilent Technologies) mass spectrometer.

Photophysical properties were analyzed in 10−5 M toluene solutions as well as 1 wt % PMMA (poly(methyl methacrylate)) films. The solid-state samples were prepared by dissolving the compounds and polymer or host material at appropriate ratios in toluene solution and then wet-casting the solutions on quartz substrates. The absorption spectra were recorded by a Lambda 950 UV–vis–NIR spectrometer (Perkin Elmer). The fluorescence quantum yields (ΦF) in ambient air were estimated by the integrating sphere method [49] in integrating sphere (Sphere Optics) coupled to a CCD spectrometer PMA-12 (Hamamatsu) via optical fibers excited with a CW xenon lamp. ΦPF and ΦDF values were estimated according to [50]. Time-integrated fluorescence, phosphorescence spectra as well as fluorescence decay kinetics were recorded with a time-gated intensified iCCD camera iStar DH340T (Andor) with a spectrograph SR-303i (Shamrock) coupled with nanosecond YAG:Nd3+ laser NT 242 with an optical parametric generator (Ekspla, pulse width 7 ns, 1 kHz frequency, 100 nJ pulse energy). Fluorescence decay transients were obtained by exponentially increasing the delay and integration time [51]. Phosphorescence spectra were recorded at 10 K temperature after a 100 μs delay with a 49 ms integration time. Solid-state samples were mounted in a closed cycle He cryostat (Cryo Industries 204 N) for PL measurements in oxygen-free conditions.

Quantum chemical calculations were carried out by using density functional theory at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level as implemented in a software package Gaussian 09 [52]. The solvation behaviour of the surrounding toluene was estimated by the polarizable continuum model. Although the B3LYP/6-31G(d) theory level due to the neglected long-range exchange interaction can give less accurate results for calculated molecular geometries and transition energies [53], however, it should be sufficient for brief analysis.

Procedures and product characterization

4,6-Bis[3,6-di(tert-butyl)-9H-carbazol-9-yl]-5-methylpyrimidine (1). Compound 1 was synthesized in a manner similar to [30]. A mixture of compound tCbz-mPYR (90 mg, 0.13 mmol, 1 equiv), Raney nickel (270 mg, 3 equiv by mass), prepared before reaction according to [54], and methanol (3 mL) were placed in a screw-cap vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar. The reaction mixture was heated at 90 °C under stirring for 2 h. Then, Raney nickel was filtered off and washed with hot chloroform. The filtrate was concentrated and the obtained residue was purified by column chromatography using chloroform/petroleum ether 2:1 to pure chloroform as an eluent to give 13.5 mg (16%) of compound 1. Mp > 300 °C (from 2-propanol); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.52 (s, 36H, (CH3)3C), 2.01 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.48 (d, J = 8 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 7.62 (d, J = 8 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 8.18 (s, 4H, CHCbz), 9.23 (s, 1H, CHpy) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 15.2, 31.9, 34.9, 110.7, 116.6, 121.8, 124.2, 124.7, 137.8, 144.6, 157.1, 160.2 ppm; HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C45H53N4, 649.4265; found, 649.4265.

2-Aryl-4,6-bis[3,6-di(tert-butyl)-9H-carbazol-9-yl]-5-methylpyrimidines 2a–d

General procedure. 4,6-Bis(3,6-di-tert-butyl-carbazol-9-yl)-5-methyl-2-methylthiopyrimidine (50 mg, 0.072 mmol), the corresponding boronic acid (0.094 mmol), CuMeSal (34 mg, 0.158 mmol), Pd(PPh3)4 (4.2 mg, 0.0036 mmol), Cs2CO3 (46.8 mg, 0.144 mmol, in case of meta-substituted boronic acid, 1 equiv) and dioxane (3 mL) were placed in a screw-cap vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar and flushed with argon for 10 min. The reaction mixture was heated at 130 °C under stirring for 4 h. Then, dioxane was removed by distillation under reduced pressure, water (40 mL) was added to the residue, and the mixture was extracted with chloroform (3 × 25 mL). The combined extracts were washed with brine, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and chloroform was removed by distillation under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using chloroform/petroleum ether (1:1 for compound 2a; 1:2 for compounds 2b, 2c; 1:4 for compound 2d) as an eluent to give the corresponding product.

4,6-Bis[3,6-di(tert-butyl)-9H-carbazol-9-yl]-5-methyl-2-phenylpyrimidine (2a). Yield 48%; mp > 320 °C (from 2-propanol); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.54 (s, 36H, (CH3)3C), 1.96 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.52–7.59 (m, 7H, ArH, CHCbz) 7.61–7.66 (m, 4H, CHCbz), 8.20 (s, 4H, CHCbz), 8.58–8.63 (m, 2H, ArH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 15.2, 32.0, 34.86; 111.0, 116.5, 118.4, 124.0, 124.6, 128.4, 128.7, 131.1, 136.9, 137.9, 144.4, 160.2, 163.0 ppm; HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C51H57N4, 725.4578; found, 725.4576.

4,6-Bis[3,6-di(tert-butyl)-9H-carbazol-9-yl]-2-(4-cyanophenyl)-5-methylpyrimidine (2b). Yield 35%; mp 266–270 °C (from 2-propanol); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.54 (s, 36H, (CH3)3C), 2.00 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.54 (d, 3J = 8.61 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 7.64 (dd, 3J = 8.61 Hz, 4J = 1.69 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 7.82 (d, 3J = 8.35 Hz, 2H, ArH), 8.21 (d, 4J = 1.61 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 8.70 (d, 3J = 8.35 Hz, 2H, ArH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 15.4, 32.0, 34.9, 110.9, 114.3, 116.7, 118.9, 119.7, 124.1, 124.7, 128.8, 132.6, 137.7, 140.9, 144.7, 160.5 ppm; HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C52H56N5), 750.4530; found, 750.4534.

4,6-Bis[3,6-di(tert-butyl)-9H-carbazol-9-yl]-2-(3-cyanophenyl)-5-methylpyrimidine (2c). Yield 19%; mp 233–236 °C (from 2-propanol); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.44 (s, 36H, (CH3)3C), 1.89 (s, 3H; CH3), 7.43 (d, 3J = 8.63 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 7.52–7.56 (m, 5H, CHCbz, ArH), 7.71 (d, 3J = 7.7 Hz, 1H, ArH), 8.10 (d, 4J = 1.68 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 8.72 (d, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 1H, ArH), 8.77 (s, 1H, ArH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 15.4, 32.0, 34.9, 110.8, 113.0, 116.7, 118.7, 119.7, 124.2, 124.7, 129.6, 131.9, 132.5, 134.2, 137.7, 138.1, 144.7, 160.5, 160.8 ppm; HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C52H56N5, 750.4530; found, 750.4524.

4,6-Bis[3,6-di(tert-butyl)-9H-carbazol-9-yl]-2-(3-bromophenyl)-5-methylpyrimidine (2d). Yield 55%; mp > 250 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.54 (s, 36H, (CH3)3C), 1.95 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.40 (t, 3J = 7.88 Hz, 1H, ArH), 7.53 (d, 3J = 8.6 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 7.63 (dd, 3J = 8.68 Hz, 4J = 1.92 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 7.67 (m, 1H, ArH), 8.20 (d, 4J = 1.64 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 8.53 (dt, 3J = 8.0 Hz, 4J = 1.24 Hz, 1H, ArH), 8.72 (t, 4J = 1.72 Hz, 1H, ArH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 15.2, 32.0, 34.9, 110.9, 116.6, 119.2, 123.0, 124.1, 124.6, 127.0, 130.3, 131.2, 134.0, 137.8, 139.0, 144.5, 160.4, 161.7 ppm; HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C51H56BrN4, 803.3683; found, 803.3675.

4,6-Bis(3,6-di-tert-butyl-9H-carbazol-9-yl)-5-methyl-2-methylsulfonylpyrimidine (3). A mixture of compound tCbz-mPYR (60 mg, 0.086 mmol), oxone (133.2 mg, 0.217 mmol, 2.5 equiv by active component), and DMF (3 mL) were stirred at 80 °C for 3 h. After completion of the reaction, water (40 mL) was added to reaction mixture and the aqueous solution was extracted with chloroform (3 × 25 mL). The combined extract was washed with brine twice, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and chloroform was removed by distillation under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using chloroform/petroleum ether 2:1 as an eluent to give 58 mg (92%) of compound 3. Mp > 350 °C (from 2-propanol); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.52 (s, 36H, (CH3)3C), 2.03 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.45 (s, 3H, CH3SO2), 7.54 (d, J = 8.65 Hz, 4H, CH), 7.64 (dd, J = 8.67 Hz, J = 1.89 Hz, 4H, CH), 8.15 (d, J = 1.68 Hz, 4H, CH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 16.5, 31.9, 34.9, 39.4, 111.2, 116.7, 122.6, 124.4, 125.2, 137.3, 145.6, 160.8, 162.5, 163.8 ppm; HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C46H55N4O2S, 727.4040; found, 727.4034.

4,6-Bis(3,6-di-tert-butyl-9H-carbazol-9-yl)-5-methylpyrimidine-2-carbonitrile (4). A mixture of compound 3 (50 mg, 0.069 mmol), NaCN (7.4 mg, 0.151 mmol), and THF (2 mL) was refluxed under stirring for 3.5 h. After completion of the reaction, THF was removed by distillation under reduced pressure, water (30 mL) was added to the residue, and the aqueous solution was extracted with chloroform (3 × 25 mL). The combined extract was washed with brine, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and chloroform was removed by distillation under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using chloroform/petroleum ether 1:2 as an eluent to give 30 mg (65%) of compound 4. Mp > 320 °C (from 2-propanol); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.43 (s, 36H, (CH3)3C), 1.92 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.40 (d, 3J = 8.63 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 7.55 (dd, 3J = 8.66 Hz, 4J = 1.93 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 8.07 (d, 4J = 1.67 Hz, 4H, CHCbz) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 16.4, 31.9, 34.9, 111.0, 115.4, 116.8, 123.8, 124.3, 125.1, 137.2, 142.4, 145.6, 160.7 ppm; HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C46H52N5, 674.4217; found, 674,4213.

4,6-Bis[3,6-di(tert-butyl)-9H-carbazol-9-yl]-2-[4-(tert-butyl)phenylthio]-5-methylpyrimidine (5). A mixture of compound 3 (40 mg, 0.055 mmol), 4-(tert-butyl)thiophenol (10.4 μL, 0.061 mmol), NEt3 (8.4 μL, 0.061 mmol), and THF (2 mL) were placed in a screw-cap vial equipped with a magnetic stirring bar and flushed with argon for 10 min. The reaction mixture was stirred at 50 °C overnight. Then, THF was removed by distillation under reduced pressure, water (30 mL) was added to residue, and the aqueous solution was extracted with chloroform (3 × 25 mL). The combined extract was washed with brine, dried with anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and chloroform was removed by distillation under reduced pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography using chloroform/petroleum ether 1:2 as an eluent to give 35 mg (77%) of compound 5. Mp 214–217 °C (from 2-propanol); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.19 (s, 9H, (CH3)3Cbenz), 1.37 (s, 36H, (CH3)3CCbz), 1.69 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.28–7.35 (m, 6H, ArH, CHCbz), 7.44 (dd, 3J = 8.65 Hz, 4J = 1.66 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 7.60 (d, 3J = 8.27 Hz, 2H, ArH), 8.00 (d, 4J = 1.39 Hz, 4H, CHCbz) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 15.3, 31.3, 32.0, 34.7, 34.8, 111.4, 114.8, 116.3, 123.8, 124.6, 125.6, 126.2, 135.7, 137.6, 144.5, 152.6, 159.9, 170.9 ppm; HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C55H65N4S, 813.4924; found, 813.4919.

4,6-Bis[3,6-di(tert-butyl)-9H-carbazol-9-yl]-2-[4-(tert-butyl)phenylsulfonyl]-5-methylpyrimidine (6). Compound 6 was synthesized from compound 5 according to the procedure described for compound 3. Yield 68%, mp 275–278 °C (from 2-propanol); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.38 (s, 9H, (CH3)3Cbenz), 1.51 (s, 36H, (CH3)3CCbz), 1.91 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.43 (d, 3J = 8.66 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 7.56–7.65 (m, 6H, ArH, CHCbz), 8.13 (d, 4J = 1.69 Hz, 4H, CHCbz), 8.17 (m, 2H, ArH) ppm; 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 16.6, 31.1, 31.9, 34.9, 35.4, 111.4, 116.6, 121.3, 124.2, 125.1, 126.2, 129.9, 134.5, 137.3, 145.4, 158.2, 160.5, 164.5 ppm; HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C55H65N4O2S, 845.4823; found, 845.4812.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Copies of NMR spectra and extended photophysical properties.
Format: PDF Size: 1.5 MB Download

References

  1. Uoyama, H.; Goushi, K.; Shizu, K.; Nomura, H.; Adachi, C. Nature 2012, 492, 234–238. doi:10.1038/nature11687
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Endo, A.; Sato, K.; Yoshimura, K.; Kai, T.; Kawada, A.; Miyazaki, H.; Adachi, C. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2011, 98, 083302. doi:10.1063/1.3558906
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Xie, F.-M.; Zhou, J.-X.; Li, Y.-Q.; Tang, J.-X. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 9476–9494. doi:10.1039/d0tc02252g
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  4. Wong, M. Y.; Zysman-Colman, E. Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 2017, 29, 1605444. doi:10.1002/adma.201605444
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Dias, F. B.; Penfold, T. J.; Monkman, A. P. Methods Appl. Fluoresc. 2017, 5, 012001. doi:10.1088/2050-6120/aa537e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Tao, Y.; Yuan, K.; Chen, T.; Xu, P.; Li, H.; Chen, R.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, L.; Huang, W. Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 2014, 26, 7931–7958. doi:10.1002/adma.201402532
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Yang, Z.; Mao, Z.; Xie, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhao, J.; Xu, J.; Chi, Z.; Aldred, M. P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 915–1016. doi:10.1039/c6cs00368k
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  8. Cai, X.; Su, S.-J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1802558. doi:10.1002/adfm.201802558
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  9. Komatsu, R.; Sasabe, H.; Kido, J. J. Photonics Energy 2018, 8, 032108. doi:10.1117/1.jpe.8.032108
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  10. Lee, C. H.; Choi, S. H.; Oh, S. J.; Lee, J. H.; Shim, J. W.; Adachi, C.; Lee, S. Y. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 42897–42902. doi:10.1039/d0ra07865d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Yu, L.; Yang, C. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 17265–17286. doi:10.1039/d1tc04397h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Lin, L.-Y.; Tsai, C.-H.; Wong, K.-T.; Huang, T.-W.; Wu, C.-C.; Chou, S.-H.; Lin, F.; Chen, S.-H.; Tsai, A.-I. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 5950–5958. doi:10.1039/c1jm10201j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Chiu, S.-W.; Lin, L.-Y.; Lin, H.-W.; Chen, Y.-H.; Huang, Z.-Y.; Lin, Y.-T.; Lin, F.; Liu, Y.-H.; Wong, K.-T. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 1857–1859. doi:10.1039/c2cc16390j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Wu, C.-H.; Pan, T.-Y.; Hong, S.-H.; Wang, C.-L.; Kuo, H.-H.; Chu, Y.-Y.; Diau, E. W.-G.; Lin, C.-Y. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 4329–4331. doi:10.1039/c2cc30892d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Ortiz, R. P.; Casado, J.; Hernández, V.; López Navarrete, J. T.; Letizia, J. A.; Ratner, M. A.; Facchetti, A.; Marks, T. J. Chem. – Eur. J. 2009, 15, 5023–5039. doi:10.1002/chem.200802424
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Irfan, A.; Al-Sehemi, A. G.; Al-Assiri, M. S. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2013, 44, 168–176. doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2013.06.003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Kojima, T.; Nishida, J.-i.; Tokito, S.; Yamashita, Y. Chem. Lett. 2009, 38, 428–429. doi:10.1246/cl.2009.428
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Achelle, S.; Nouira, I.; Pfaffinger, B.; Ramondenc, Y.; Plé, N.; Rodríguez-López, J. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3711–3717. doi:10.1021/jo900107u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Cvejn, D.; Achelle, S.; Pytela, O.; Malval, J.-P.; Spangenberg, A.; Cabon, N.; Bureš, F.; Robin-le Guen, F. Dyes Pigm. 2016, 124, 101–109. doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.09.012
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Tang, R.; Wang, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhuang, X.; Bi, S.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, F. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 7640–7648. doi:10.1039/c6tc02591a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Achelle, S.; Rodríguez‐López, J.; Bureš, F.; Robin‐le Guen, F. Chem. Rec. 2020, 20, 440–451. doi:10.1002/tcr.201900064
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Verbitskiy, E. V.; Dinastiya, E. M.; Baranova, A. A.; Khokhlov, K. O.; Chuvashov, R. D.; Yakovleva, Y. A.; Makarova, N. I.; Vetrova, E. V.; Metelitsa, A. V.; Slepukhin, P. A.; Rusinov, G. L.; Chupakhin, O. N.; Charushin, V. N. Dyes Pigm. 2018, 159, 35–44. doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.05.075
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Boländer, A.; Kieser, D.; Voss, C.; Bauer, S.; Schön, C.; Burgold, S.; Bittner, T.; Hölzer, J.; Heyny-von Haußen, R.; Mall, G.; Goetschy, V.; Czech, C.; Knust, H.; Berger, R.; Herms, J.; Hilger, I.; Schmidt, B. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 9170–9180. doi:10.1021/jm300653b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Achelle, S.; Hodée, M.; Massue, J.; Fihey, A.; Katan, C. Dyes Pigm. 2022, 200, 110157. doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2022.110157
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Komatsu, R.; Sasabe, H.; Seino, Y.; Nakao, K.; Kido, J. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 2274–2278. doi:10.1039/c5tc04057d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Xiang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, N.; Gong, S.; Ni, F.; Wu, K.; Luo, J.; Xie, G.; Lu, Z.-H.; Yang, C. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 12204–12210. doi:10.1039/c7tc04181k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Xiang, Y.; Li, P.; Gong, S.; Huang, Y.-H.; Wang, C.-Y.; Zhong, C.; Zeng, W.; Chen, Z.; Lee, W.-K.; Yin, X.; Wu, C.-C.; Yang, C. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaba7855. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba7855
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Komatsu, R.; Ohsawa, T.; Sasabe, H.; Nakao, K.; Hayasaka, Y.; Kido, J. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 4742–4749. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b13482
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Serevičius, T.; Skaisgiris, R.; Fiodorova, I.; Steckis, V.; Dodonova, J.; Banevičius, D.; Kazlauskas, K.; Juršėnas, S.; Tumkevičius, S. Org. Electron. 2020, 82, 105723. doi:10.1016/j.orgel.2020.105723
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  30. Serevičius, T.; Skaisgiris, R.; Fiodorova, I.; Kreiza, G.; Banevičius, D.; Kazlauskas, K.; Tumkevičius, S.; Juršėnas, S. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 836–841. doi:10.1039/d0tc05503d
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  31. Tsiko, U.; Bezvikonnyi, O.; Sych, G.; Keruckienė, R.; Volyniuk, D.; Simokaitienė, J.; Danyliv, I.; Danyliv, Y.; Bučinskas, A.; Tan, X.; Gražulevičius, J. V. J. Adv. Res. 2021, 33, 41–51. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2021.01.014
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  32. Li, S.-W.; Yu, C.-H.; Ko, C.-L.; Chatterjee, T.; Hung, W.-Y.; Wong, K.-T. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 12930–12936. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b02766
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Rodella, F.; Saxena, R.; Bagnich, S.; Banevičius, D.; Kreiza, G.; Athanasopoulos, S.; Juršėnas, S.; Kazlauskas, K.; Köhler, A.; Strohriegl, P. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 17471–17482. doi:10.1039/d1tc03598c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Itami, K.; Yamazaki, D.; Yoshida, J.-i. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15396–15397. doi:10.1021/ja044923w
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  35. Maddess, M. L.; Carter, R. Synthesis 2012, 44, 1109–1118. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1289744
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Urbonas, R. V.; Poskus, V.; Bucevicius, J.; Dodonova, J.; Tumkevicius, S. Synlett 2013, 24, 1383–1386. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1338951
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Kusturin, C.; Liebeskind, L. S.; Rahman, H.; Sample, K.; Schweitzer, B.; Srogl, J.; Neumann, W. L. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4349–4352. doi:10.1021/ol035649y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Prieur, V.; Pujol, M. D.; Guillaumet, G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 6547–6556. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201500625
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Belaroussi, R.; Ejjoummany, A.; El Hakmaoui, A.; Akssira, M.; Guillaumet, G.; Routier, S. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 732–741. doi:10.1039/c7ra12246b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Jakubkienė, V.; Vaičiūnaitė, E.; Kriukaitė, K.; Didžgalvis, J.; Tumkevičius, S. Synth. Commun. 2018, 48, 1974–1985. doi:10.1080/00397911.2018.1474229
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Serevičius, T.; Skaisgiris, R.; Gudeika, D.; Kazlauskas, K.; Juršėnas, S. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 313–320. doi:10.1039/d1cp04905d
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  42. Serevičius, T.; Skaisgiris, R.; Dodonova, J.; Jagintavičius, L.; Banevičius, D.; Kazlauskas, K.; Tumkevičius, S.; Juršėnas, S. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 10727–10736. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b21394
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Li, Z.; Li, W.; Keum, C.; Archer, E.; Zhao, B.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Huang, W.; Gather, M. C.; Samuel, I. D. W.; Zysman-Colman, E. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 24772–24785. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08479
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  44. Chan, C.-Y.; Cui, L.-S.; Kim, J. U.; Nakanotani, H.; Adachi, C. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1706023. doi:10.1002/adfm.201706023
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  45. Northey, T.; Stacey, J.; Penfold, T. J. J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 11001–11009. doi:10.1039/c7tc04099g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Stavrou, K.; Franca, L. G.; Monkman, A. P. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2020, 2, 2868–2881. doi:10.1021/acsaelm.0c00514
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Woo, S.-J.; Kim, Y.-H.; Kim, J.-J. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 5618–5630. doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01011
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Etherington, M. K.; Gibson, J.; Higginbotham, H. F.; Penfold, T. J.; Monkman, A. P. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 13680. doi:10.1038/ncomms13680
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. de Mello, J. C.; Wittmann, H. F.; Friend, R. H. Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 1997, 9, 230–232. doi:10.1002/adma.19970090308
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Serevičius, T.; Skaisgiris, R.; Kreiza, G.; Dodonova, J.; Kazlauskas, K.; Orentas, E.; Tumkevičius, S.; Juršėnas, S. J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 1637–1641. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.0c10391
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Rothe, C.; Monkman, A. P. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 68, 075208. doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.075208
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Gaussian 09; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Chen, X.-K. CCS Chem. 2020, 2, 1256–1267. doi:10.31635/ccschem.020.202000281
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Yang, Z.; Huang, Y.-B.; Guo, Q.-X.; Fu, Y. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 5328–5330. doi:10.1039/c3cc40980e
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2022 Fiodorova et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Beilstein-Institut Open Access License Agreement (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/terms), which is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). The reuse of material under this license requires that the author(s), source and license are credited. Third-party material in this article could be subject to other licenses (typically indicated in the credit line), and in this case, users are required to obtain permission from the license holder to reuse the material.

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities
Journal Logo
Institut Logo
Preprint Logo
Symposia Logo