C–C Coupling in sterically demanding porphyrin environments

Introduction

Porphyrins are tetrapyrrolic macrocycles that perform essential processes in nature, such as oxygen transport in hemoglobin and photosynthesis [1]. Porphyrins are often described as planar 18π aromatic macrocycles; however, molecular structure analysis frequently reveals nonplanar ring distortion [2,3]. In fact, porphyrins with nonplanar ring distortions are vital for many natural processes to occur, e.g., nonplanarity can alter oxygen affinity of the metal iron core [4,5]. Nonplanar porphyrins offer a marked difference in chemical and physical properties when compared to their planar compatriots [6], with relatively smaller HOMO–LUMO gaps resulting in an observed bathochromic shift in the UV–vis absorption spectrum [7]. The phenomenon of nonplanarity results from the porphyrin ring deforming from the mean porphyrin plane either by steric repulsion in the core of the macrocycle or by bulky substituents at the porphyrin periphery [3]. This affords four principle distortion modes, saddle, dome, ruffle or wave [8], which can be quantified by the normal-coordinate structural decomposition (NSD) method developed by Shelnutt and co-workers [9] and further implemented and visualized by us [8,10]. Of the four main quantifiable distortion modes, saddle-shaped porphyrins can be afforded by peri-interactions between β-substituents and the meso-substituents [3,11], or alternatively by core protonation, whereby all four-core nitrogen atoms are protonated to produce the diacid [12,13]; these diacids can tilt the pyrrole rings 20–40° [14] from the mean-porphyrin plane. Norvaiša et al. showed that a saddle-shaped porphyrin as a dodecasubstituted diacid can bind anions via two independent faces and trap anions such as pyrophosphate [15]. Saddle-shaped porphyrins have also been exploited by researchers for the use in organocatalysis as bifunctional system [16,17]. Dodecasubstitution of porphyrin, as seen in Figure 1, often results in saddle-shaped distortion; however, ruffled [18] and almost planar [19] dodecasubstituted porphyrins have been reported.

Despite the increasing interest in the chemical and physical properties of nonplanar porphyrins only limited synthetic methods are available for the functionalization of these macrocycles [6]. An attractive approach to accomplish further substitution directly on the meso- or a meso-phenyl ortho/meta/para positions of a porphyrin, is the introduction of C–C bond forming chemistry. This is typically achieved using palladium and/or another transition-metal catalyst [20]. Sonagashira [21], Suzuki–Miyaura [22], Heck [23], Stille [24,25], Negishi [26], and Kumada [27] coupling reactions, as well as modern iridium and rhodium-based coupling techniques [28], are just some examples of the C–C bond formations that have been implemented to achieve complex substitution patterns and functional arrangements on porphyrins.

Of these named coupling reactions, Suzuki–Miyaura couplings are known to be a robust tool when functionalizing porphyrins [29,30]. Many complex porphyrinoid architectures have been synthesized in this manner, from functional porphyrin arrays [31-33] to sterically challenging meso-substituted aryl bis-pocket porphyrins [34] and tetrabromoanthracenyl porphyrins [35]. In general, the halogen atom needed for the Suzuki coupling reaction resides on the porphyrin; however, Suzuki–Miyaura reactivity has also been shown to be reversed whereby the synthesis of borolanylporphyrins leads to a different approach to reactivity [36]. Borolanylporphyrins can be synthesized by Miyaura-borylation of the halogenated porphyrin [24,37]. There are also reported instances of borolanylporphyrins being synthesized under condensation conditions [36,38]. Despite the many synthetic advancements for the decoration of porphyrins, many of these strategies are utilized only with planar porphyrins. Apart from the arylation of the β-position of 2,3,5,7,8,10,12,13,15,17,18,20-dodecaarylporphyrins, developed by Smith and co-workers [39] few reports on synthetic techniques for dodecasubstituted nonplanar porphyrins can be found in literature. In light of the promise of appropriately designed nonplanar porphyrins as receptors and catalysts we report here on our efforts to use the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction for the modification of the o,m,p-phenyl positions in 5,10,15,20-tetraryl-2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethylporphyrins.

Results and Discussion

Investigation of the Suzuki coupling reaction at the meso-phenyl position of dodecasubstituted porphyrins

Synthesis of porphyrin precursors

To investigate the Suzuki coupling at the ortho-, meta- and para-position of a dodecasubstituted saddle-shaped porphyrin, first the precursor porphyrins 11, 12, and 13 had to be synthesized (Scheme 1). The synthetic route to achieve OET-xBrPPs (2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethyl-5,10,15,20-tetra(x-bromo)phenylporphyrin, where x = ortho/meta/para) pyrrole 7 was synthesized through literature procedures [40,41]. Pyrrole 7 was then subjected to condensation with aldehydes 8, 9, and 10 under Lindsey conditions [42] utilizing BF₃·OEt₂ and DDQ [43] to achieve porphyrins 4, 5, and 6, which were not isolated and instead reacted immediately.

Ni(II)porphyrins 11, 12, and 13 were prepared by reacting porphyrins 4, 5, and 6 in toluene for 18 hours using Ni(II)(acac)₂ under an inert atmosphere [43] attaining a 18%, 28%, and 29% yield for porphyrins 11, 12, and 13, respectively, over two steps. Porphyrins 6 and 13 had previously been described in literature [43].

Coupling at the meso-para-phenyl position

The exploration of aryl substitution of OET-xBrPPs using the Suzuki coupling began with investigating first the Suzuki reaction compatibility of boronic acid 14 with porphyrin 13. Porphyrin 13 and phenylboronic acid (14) were subjected to coupling at 85 °C for 48 hours using Pd₂dba₃/SPhos as a catalyst/ligand giving porphyrin 26 in a 32% yield, based on a literature procedure [35]. With initial success in the synthesis porphyrin 26, this Suzuki coupling reaction was performed on 13, for a range of boronic acids/esters as shown in Figure 2 and Scheme 2. Boronic acids/esters were chosen based on their electronic properties (activating/deactivating) as well as their steric bulk (e.g., 9-anthracenylboronic acid (15)). Table 1 lists all attempts at the meso-para-phenyl position.

When attempting the synthesis of tetra(p-phenylanthracene)porphyrin (27) the conditions used before (Table 1, entry 1) resulted only in trace amounts of porphyrin 27 (Table 1, entry 2).

The reaction temperature was increased to 110 °C, affording the desired porphyrin 27 in a 39% yield (Table 1, entry 3). A temperature of 110 °C was also used for the synthesis of terphenylporphyrin 28 using boronic acid 17, affording terphenylporphyrin 28 in 48% yield (Table 1, entry 7).

Boronic acids with heteroatoms and activating/deactivating electronic properties were investigated next. Attempts to introduce electron-withdrawing groups at the para-position with substrate boronic acid 16a (Table 1, entries 4 and 5) yielded no tetracoupled product. Similarly, coupling with 18a resulted in most of the starting material porphyrin 13 being left unreacted. On switching the substrate from boronic acid to the boronic acid ester and opting for the weaker base Cs₂CO₃ instead of K₃PO₄, a significant difference in reactivity was observed with a 72% yield accomplished in the synthesis of porphyrin 29 (Table 1, entry 9), bearing a methoxycarbonyl electron-withdrawing group utilizing boronic acid pinacol ester 18b. Following on from these results porphyrin 30 was synthesized in an 8% yield, when switching to weaker base Cs₂CO₃ using pinacol ester 16b (Table 1, entry 6). Switching the base to a weaker one, may have slowed down the protodeboronation process, as substrates with electron-withdrawing groups are postulated to increase the Lewis acidity of the boronic acid, which may allow an increased incidence of protodeboronation to occur. It is also known that aryl–B(Pin) complexes have a greater stability than boronic acids and other employed esters as the four methyl groups protect the boron center from attack of water [44,45], preventing protodeboronation from the hydrolysis route. However, protodeboronation can be complex when it comes to pK_a considerations, for example, 3,5-dinitrophenylboronic acid has a marginally lower pK_a than pentafluorophenyl boronic acid [46]; however, it undergoes protodeboronation, several orders of magnitude slower [47].

The synthesis of porphyrin 31 with a benzothiophene moiety, proved challenging (Table 1, entries 14–19). Use of a microwave-assisted procedure [48], switching catalyst to Pd(PPh)₃, and base to Na₂CO₃ (Table 1, entry 16) gave no product.

Ultimately, an increased catalyst loading of 25 mol % per C–Br bond gave the desired porphyrin in a 16% yield when using Cs₂CO₃ as base. The synthesis of other heterocycle-appended dodecasubstituted porphyrins, achieved porphyrins 32 and 33 in a 47% and 56% yield, respectively (Table 1, entries 13 and 21), using Cs₂CO₃ as the base. Electron-withdrawing sulfur-containing heterocyclic substrates 21 and 23 do not readily undergo protodeboronation even at high pH [44,47] making the yields of porphyrins 31 and 33 higher than expected considering the electronic similarities between substrates 4-nitrophenylboronic acid and 3-thiaphenylboronic acid (16a and 21) and the yields obtained when coupling. The weakly electron-withdrawing boronic acid 24 when coupled with porphyrin 13, resulted in porphyrin 35 in a 58% yield (Table 1, entry 20). Reactivity with the electron-donating 4-methylphenylboronic acid (34) was established using K₃PO₄ at 110 °C (Table 1, entry 12). No product was obtained in the coupling of electron-donating (4-(dimethylamino)phenyl)boronic acid (19), even upon increasing the number of equivalents of boronic acid (Table 1, entries 10 and 11).

Coupling at the meso-meta-phenyl position

Optimization of conditions for OET-meta-BrPPs 12 (Scheme 3) were investigated next. Table 2 summarizes the reaction conditions used to synthesize a library of OET-meta-arylPPs as shown in Scheme 3. As a starting point initial conditions used in the synthesis for porphyrin 26 were used (Table 1, entry 1). This gave biphenylporphyrin 36 in a 16% yield (Table 2, entry 1). The lower yield is expected due to the increased steric demand at the meta-positions. Coupling of sterically bulky 9-anthracenylboronic acid (15) and porphyrin 12 gave no conversion when the base was switched from K₃PO₄ to Cs₂CO₃ (Table 2, entry 2). K₃PO₄ was reimplemented in the reaction and trace reactivity was observed by TLC (Table 2, entry 3). Next, the catalyst loading was increased to 12.5 mol % (Table 2, entry 4). Formation of palladium black was observed but product formation was also indicated by TLC and ¹H NMR. For a final attempt at establishing reactivity with boronic acid 15 the temperature was increased to 110 °C and gave the desired anthracenylporphyrin 37 in a 32% yield. In the case of boronic acids with larger π-systems, e.g., 15, K₃PO₄ was required to achieve the tetra-coupled product. This trend is consistent in reactivity observed with porphyrins 12 and 13. Similarly, no terphenyl product was formed in the coupling reaction between 12 and 17 (Table 2, entry 6) when using Cs₂CO₃. Similar to the reactivity observed with 9-anthracenylboronic acid (15), no conversion to the desired product was established. Increasing the temperature and catalyst loading (Table 2, entry 5) gave the terphenylporphyrin 38 in a 7% yield (Table 2, entry 7).

The use of Cs₂CO₃ is still required for boronic acids bearing electron-withdrawing functionalities at the meta-phenyl position (Table 2, entries 9 and 10). However, an increase in catalyst loading to 12.5% was required per C–Br bond when coupling at the meso-meta-phenyl position in 12 compared to the corresponding para- position in 13 (Table 2, entry 8). Porphyrins 39 and initially 40 were synthesized in a 23% and 4% yield, respectively. This is significantly lower than for the corresponding para-products. Porphyrin 45 was synthesized in a 31% yield (Table 2, entry 15), with a 3-methoxy electron-withdrawing group, again a lower yield compared to the para-analogue porphyrin 35. Use of the electron-donating p-tolylboronic acid (20), resulted in a 30% yield (Table 2, entry 12) again requiring an increase of catalyst loading and a change of base to K₃PO₄. Heterocyclic boronic acids/esters were again investigated for coupling reactivity with a consistent trend of lower yields experienced for porphyrins 41, 42, and 43 of 4%, 30%, and 10%, respectively. Overall, a general trend of decreased yield moving from the para- to meta-position was observed, also a general increased catalyst concentration was needed for reactivity to occur at the meta-position.

Lastly, decreasing the basicity of the solution further by switching to sodium acetate as a basic source increased the yield of porphyrin 40 from 4% with Cs₂CO₃ to 18% using sodium acetate (Table 2, entry 17). This indicates that a further decrease in basicity may improve yields.

Coupling at the meso-ortho-phenyl position

Unlike the success achieved in the synthesis of OET-meta/para-arylPPs, the ortho-position on the meso-phenyl proved much more intractable (Scheme 4). Table 3 provides a summary of the attempts made to achieve Suzuki-coupling reactivity in OET-ortho-BrPPs.

Increasing the reaction temperature compared to the 85 °C used in the synthesis of the para-equivalent 26 gave no conversion and was accompanied by the formation of palladium black [49]. No reactivity was observed by either TLC or mass spectrometry when switching back to Pd₂(dba)₃ with three different ligands SPhos, XantPhos, and Rac-Binap (Table 3, entries 3–5). Increasing the time of reaction, catalyst loading, and equivalents of boronic acid significantly also resulted in no product formation (Table 3, entry 6).

Next, a change in the catalyst was investigated, based on a literature procedure which was developed by Johnstone and co-workers for the synthesis of meso-substituted aryl bis-pocket porphyrins [34]. Therein catalysts Pd(dppf)Cl₂ and Pd(PPh₃)₃ were identified to be the most effective for accomplishing the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling at the ortho-position of the meso-phenyl position in sterically hindered planar porphyrins (Table 3, entries 7 and 8). The same success could not be replicated for OET-o-BrPPs with no reactivity being observed by TLC or by mass spectrometry. Likewise, a microwave-assisted coupling [48], resulted in no product formation (Table 3, entry 9). Thiophene-3-ylboronic acid (21) was also chosen for this reaction due to the smaller size compared to the phenyl- and p-tolylboronic acids 14 and 20. Using 21 as the starting material and the procedure by Droege et al. [34] it was anticipated the less steric substrate size would possibly allow conversion to occur; however, no product formation was observed (Table 3, entries 9 and 10). 4-Pyridylboronic acid pinacol ester (25) was also attempted; however, no product was formed. Vinylboronic acid ester 22, was also explored as a substrate, with multiple porphyrin products being observed by TLC and by ¹H NMR. Desymmetrization of the porphyrin was also observed with the β-ethyl CH₃ resonances splitting into two separate chemical environments; however, the identity of the product synthesized was not fully characterized. In future, if reactivity for OET-o-BrPPs were to be further explored a larger library of ligands whether biphenyl-based or other could be explored, or further changes in the pH of the solution. Enrichment to the αβαβ-atropisomer may also be favorable [50], as to alleviate the steric hindrance caused by the short distances (4.3–4.4 Å) between bromines in the α₂β₂-atropisomers (cf., Figure 5).

Borylation and further coupling of dodecasubstituted porphyrins

A Miyaura borylation was performed on porphyrin 13, using bis(pinacolato)diboron (B₂Pin₂), adapting a procedure from the literature [51]. This procedure was further optimized (Table 4) by utilizing conditions in the synthesis of 29 (Table 1, entry 9). Next, a reversed polarity Suzuki reaction was performed on the borolanyl porphyrin 46 (Scheme 5). This reaction yielded porphyrin 26 in a 53% yield and tetrapyrenylporphyrin 47 in a 36% yield, respectively. Compared to the synthesis of 26 by Suzuki coupling of para-bromo-phenylporphyrin 13 a significant increase in yield was observed. Furthermore, pyrene was installed on the para-phenyl position, showing large aromatic systems can also be installed through this route. Failure of the similar anthracenylboronic acid 15 to react in the presence of Cs₂CO₃ at 85 °C (Table 2, entry 2) shows reversing the polarity of the reaction can induce reactivity, where not previously possible.

X-ray crystal structure analysis

Despite the many examples in literature of the crystal structure and packing of nonplanar porphyrins [3,6,8,13,52,53], few examples of crystal structure and packing analysis exist for arm-extended porphyrins. One of the few examples are azide-porphyrin derivatives reported by Flanagan et al. [43]. Here, five crystal structures were obtained of meso-para-phenyl arm-extended porphyrins (26, 27, 28, 29, 33) and two crystal structures for meso-meta-phenyl derivatives 36 and 37. In addition, single crystal structures of 11 and 46 were determined. All structures were investigated using the NSD method [8,9], which allows a quantification and visualization of distortion modes.

It can be observed from the crystal structures that the porphyrins’ rings all exhibit the typical saddle-shaped conformation. Interestingly, substitution at the para- or meta-position can also induce partial ruffling of the porphyrin core (Table 5). Of all para-functionalized structures, porphyrin 33 bears the most similarity to that of compound 26, with minimal ruffling observed and the overall magnitudes of out-of-plane and in-plane distortions are comparable.

With compound 26, no ruffling of the porphyrin ring is observed; however, with anthracene residues (27) a ruffling distortion of almost 1 Å is observed. This is not obvious at first, but differences in molecular symmetry [55] can be easily visualized using the neoplastic NSD plot [10] shown in Figure 3. Furthermore, the mean pyrrole ring tilt increases by 3–5° in the case of compounds 28 and 29 compared to that of compound 26. Saddle-shape distortion is reduced compared to that of biphenyl 26; this may be due to the proximity of the anthracene moiety to the β-ethyl positions, with C₂₃–C_14B within 3.63 Å and their respective hydrogen atoms 1.97 Å away from each other. However, this does not account for the increased ruffling observed in porphyrins 28 and 29, with similar distances to the β-ethyl groups as in porphyrin 26, and despite this there is almost 0.5 Å magnitude of ruffle distortion. This may also be due to crystal packing effects or the Ni(II) metal center [56,57], as well as the crystallization solvent [43]. It is not possible to ascertain whether steric effects of the β-ethyl and the anthracenyl carbons are causing the ruffling observed, and a full statistical model of a large library of dodecasubstituted porphyrins is needed to understand these observed effects.

When comparing meta-substituted porphyrins 36 and 37, ruffle distortion of the porphyrin ring is also observed. Interestingly in the case of the meta-anthracenyl derivative, the para-anthracenylporphyrin 27 experiences a magnitude of ≈0.3 Å less ruffling when compared to that of the meta-substituted porphyrin 37. In terms of meta-phenyl-substituted porphyrin 36 a contribution of ruffling is observed, but no ruffling is observed in the planar analogue.

Crystal packing analysis of arm-extended para-substituted porphyrins

Nonplanar porphyrins are known to form supramolecular assemblies [6], either through hydrogen-bonding networks or through π–π interactions. Examples of this can be seen in the trapping of Keggin-type heteropolyoxometalate (POM) through nonplanar Mo(V)–porphyrin complexes [58], or porphyrin nanotubes/nanochannels by intermolecular π–π interactions of the peripheral phenyl groups [59]. Additionally nonplanar supramolecular assemblies have found use in anion capture [12,15], and sensing [60], making the synthesis of these structures desirable from a supramolecular standpoint.

Two especially interesting crystal packing features were that observed in the structures of compound 27 and borylated porphyrin 46. In the case of porphyrin 27, when crystallized by slow evaporation from CDCl₃, a crystal structure with a void diameter of approximately 5.8 Å was obtained (Figure 4). The void was measured from the Ni(II)^...Ni(II) vector approximately perpendicular to the metals through the c-axis.

Upon co-crystallization of borylated porphyrin 46 and bis(pinacolato)diboron, the accommodation of bis(pinacolato)diboron in the void of the lattice was observed (Figure 4). The crystal packing of this structure is quite similar to the supramolecular assembly of borylated porphyrin 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(5,5-dimethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborinan-2-yl)porphyrin, where nitrobenzene accommodated tunnels of width of 7–8 Å [61]. The assembly of compound 46 also presents channel-type voids, making it part of only a few porphyrins appended with boronic ester groups to be structurally disseminated by X-ray crystallography [62,63]. Compound 46 was found to crystallize in a 1:1 ratio with bis(pinacolato)diboron, with a void size of 8–9 Å. The formation of channel-type lattice structures is thermodynamically unfavorable, when compared to tightly packed arrangements, similar to nitrobenzene, bis(pinacolato)diboron may be templating the formation of these channels [61]. However, more research is needed to understand the formation of these supramolecular assemblies.

X-ray crystal structure analysis of compound 11

As observed in the single crystal X-ray structure of 11 (Figure 5), the environment around the ortho-bromo-position is extremely sterically hindered.

Figure 5, shows the Br^…Br separations in the α₂β₂-atropsiomer of compound 11 to be 4.3–4.4 Å. While only an illustration of the situation in the solid phase this illustrates that coupling phenyl, thiophene or other aryl moieties at this position would be extremely difficult. Furthermore, the distance between the o-bromine atoms and the nearest carbon neighbor of the β-ethyl groups is 3.7 Å, further complicates the success of coupling at this position. As discussed previously, enrichment to the αβαβ, isomer may be necessary to remove the impact of opposing bromine atoms on the coupling reaction. Separation of the four individual atropisomers (αβαβ, α₂β₂, α₃β, α₄) has been accomplished before in dodecasubstituted porphyrins through Ni(II) metalation [15]. The core metalation effect prevents inner core N–H tautomerism [64] and thus increases the structural symmetry of the macrocycle [65,66], leading to more facile atropisomeric separation. However, in the case of compound 11 the atropisomers could not be separated due to low rotational barriers and similar polarities, even with Ni(II) metalation. There are many other methods available to achieve different desired atropisomeric ratios. These include thermal enrichment [67,68], photoracemization [69,70], axial-ligand coordination [71], precise separation techniques [50] or a combination of the procedures mentioned [72]. Many more examples of atropisomeric enrichment methods can be found in a 2024 review on atropisomerism by Maguire et al. [73] and could be further explored to isolate the αβαβ-atropisomer of porphyrin 11.

X-ray crystal structure analysis of compound 37

Interestingly the anthracenyl arm-extension on the meso-meta-phenyl position revealed a doubly sandwiched, intercalated dimeric structure, wherein by two anthracenyl units is sandwiched a single anthracenylphenyl arm whilst a anthracenylphenyl arm is sandwiched on the opposing side of the molecules in the same fashion (Figure 6). Support of the existence of this structure in solution was obtained from VT-NMR studies (Figure S51 and Figure S52 in Supporting Information File 1), with asymmetry observed in the β-ethyl CH₃ resonances δ_H = 0.58 and 0.73 ppm and peak broadening in both the aromatic region and the {¹H}¹³C NMR spectra. Coalescence of the β-ethyl resonances was observed when heating the sample to 70 °C and the same ¹H NMR spectrum was observed after subsequent cooling of the sample as before heating. This indicates the thermodynamically favored dimeric structure to reassemble when cooling, reverting to the previous NMR trace.

Conclusion

When considering sterically demanding systems with haloaryl and boronic acids as substrates for the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling, many may consider 2,6-alkyl-disubstituted phenyl rings as a model sterically demanding system to test the robust nature of both metal catalyst and ligand, for example, much work has been done on the synthesis of ortho-substituted biaryls, by the groups of Buchwald [74], Snieckus [75], Ackermann [76], and Tang [77] among others. Many of these examples have steric hindrance ‘adjacent’ to that of the reactive halogen/boronic site as opposed to the ‘adjacent’ and ‘opposite’ steric demand as seen with compound 11 with opposing bromines, coupled with the added complication of being a rotameric mixture, as well as adjacent hindrance of the nearby β-ethyl groups. Examples of palladium coupling on ‘opposing’ halogen atoms can be seen in the annulation of vic-bis(pinacolatoboryl)alkenes and -phenanthrenes [78]; yet, adjacent hindrance is not a problem in this case. Clearly, more work is required on the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling of molecules with sterically demanding ‘pockets’ with opposing and adjacent hindrance.

In conclusion, a library of arm-extended dodecasubstituted porphyrins was synthesized through classic C–C coupling reactions at the meso-phenyl position. It was found varying temperature and the pH of the solution are effective mitigations to overcome unfavorable reaction electronics or demanding sterics presented at the meso-phenyls’ meta- or para-position. Functionalization at the meso-phenyls’ ortho- position was not manageable and more research is needed to optimize conditions. Comparing the yields in coupling of borylated porphyrins and the halogenated analogues revealed a greater yield, when the polarity of the reaction was reversed; however, due to tedious synthesis and a lower yield over two steps, this synthetic approach is disadvantageous.

X-ray crystal structures were reported for almost half of these compounds. Crystal packing arrangements revealed this new library of arm-extended porphyrins as interesting candidates for the formation of supramolecular assemblies possibly capable of carrying out sensing and or capturing molecules of interest, as well as a dimeric intercalated structure.