Aryl iodane-induced cascade arylation–1,2-silyl shift–heterocyclization of propargylsilanes under copper catalysis

  1. 1 ORCID Logo ,
  2. 1 ,
  3. 1 ,
  4. 2 ORCID Logo and
  5. 1 ORCID Logo
1Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Technology, Riga Technical University, P. Valdena str. 3, LV-1048, Riga, Latvia
2Latvian Institute of Organic Synthesis, Aizkraukles str. 21, LV-1006, Riga, Latvia
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: J. G. Hernández
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2025, 21, 1984–1994. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.21.154
Received 19 Jun 2025, Accepted 15 Sep 2025, Published 26 Sep 2025
Full Research Paper
cc by logo

Abstract

A novel copper-catalyzed arylation strategy for propargylsilanes utilizing diaryl-λ3-iodanes has been developed, enabling a cascade sequence involving 1,2-silyl migration and heterocyclization. The β-silicon effect facilitates the formation of stabilized allyl cation intermediates that undergo regioselective trapping by internal O- and N-nucleophiles furnishing functionalized heterocycles. This method provides access to tetrahydrofuran or pyrrolidine frameworks, each bearing a trifunctionalized (E)-configured vinyl side chain. The use of a shorter linker provides entry to 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridines. Additionally, in the absence of internal nucleophiles, this methodology yields aryl-substituted 1,3-dienes. This work introduces a palladium-free, single-step alternative to multistep heterocycle construction from propargylsilanes and highlights the synthetic potential of iodane-mediated carbofunctionalization under copper catalysis.

Introduction

Highly electrophilic hypervalent iodine(III) reagents are considered as arene electrophilic synthons, making them the reagents of choice for arylation reactions, where an umpolung of reactivity is required [1]. Arylations employing diaryl-λ3-iodanes can be performed under metal-free [2] or metal-catalyzed conditions. For alkyne arylations [Cu] [3] or [Pd] catalysis [4-6] is typically employed. Internal alkynes undergo 1,2-carbofunctionalization, where the highly electrophilic Ar–M species adds to the alkyne, generating a vinyl cation intermediate [7], which typically reacts with an internal nucleophile to form five- [8,9] or six-membered rings [7,9,10] (Scheme 1A). Thus far the internal nucleophilic species are limited to aryl- [7,8,10] or heteroaryl groups [7,8]. In one example methyl ethers were used [9]. Under [Pd]-catalyzed conditions a syn-type addition is observed [8,11], while [Cu] catalysts promote anti-addition [7,10]. In substrates prone to cationic rearrangements (or hydride shifts), more interesting reaction patterns can be observed. For example, branched aliphatic chain-containing alkynes are arylated and carbocyclized into cyclopentene derivatives [12,13].

[1860-5397-21-154-i1]

Scheme 1: Alkyne arylation with diaryl-λ3-iodanes in the context of 1,2-silyl shift and potential cyclization.

The triflate moiety of the diaryl-λ3-iodane may act as an external nucleophile, resulting in 1,2-carbotriflation products [14]. Interestingly, this also works for terminal alkynes, which are typically known to undergo direct C(sp)–H arylation instead [15,16]. In the context of 1,2-carbofunctionalization, terminal alkynes are more scarcely studied. Among those few examples is a trifluoromethylative thiocyclization reaction [17] and a [4 + 2] annulation reaction between o-carboxylic ester-containing diaryl-λ3-iodanes and some terminal alkynes [18].

Looking to expand the possibilities for terminal alkyne carbofunctionalization, we turned our attention to propargylsilanes, which are prone to undergo cationic rearrangements via the 1,2-silyl shift, enabled by the β-cation-stabilizing properties of silyl groups [19,20]. This phenomenon has been successfully employed in 1,3-difunctionalization events in both intermolecular [21] and intramolecular fashion [22] (Scheme 1B). Thus far such propargylsilane rearrangements have been induced by addition of external halogen or selenium electrophiles and Brønsted acids. This encouraged us to develop a methodology involving a copper-catalyzed terminal alkyne arylation of propargylsilanes by diaryl-λ3-iodanes, followed by 1,2-silyl shift and terminated by nucleophile addition on intermediate allyl cation (Scheme 1C). The obtained tetrahydrofuran and pyrrolidine derivatives with highly substituted vinyl side-chains are regarded as privileged structures in medical chemistry [23,24]. Moreover, the resulting styryl functionality (Ph-C=C-) is often found in drug molecules as it improves lipophilicity, oral absorption and biological activity [25].

Results and Discussion

Arylation of aliphatic chain-containing propargylsilanes

We started our investigation with the arylation of aliphatic chain-containing propargylsilanes. The starting material – tert-butyl(hept-1-yn-3-yl)dimethylsilane (7a) – and analogous aliphatic chain-containing propargylsilanes 7b,c were obtained from the commercial hept-1-yne [26]. While searching for appropriate arylation conditions (Table 1, entry 1) we observed the formation of both the arylated diene 10a and silylindene 11a (≈75:25). Both products are likely formed via the allylic cation intermediate Int-1 (Scheme 2), from where on two competing mechanistic pathways are possible. Deprotonation of the β-H and reductive elimination affords diene 10. Alternatively, an intramolecular cyclization leads to silylindenes 11.

Table 1: Reaction conditions optimization for the arylation of aliphatic chain-containing propargylsilane 7a.

[Graphic 1]
Entry Iodane
(equiv)
[Cu]
(mol %)
Base
(equiv)
Solvent (abs.)a T
(°C)
Recovered 7a
(%)b
(1E,3E)-10a/11a (ratio)c (1E,3E)-10a, (%)b
1d I-1 (1) CuCl (20) B1 (1.3) EtOAc 60 52 75:25 35
2d I-1 (1) [CuOTf]2∙PhH (15) B1 (1.3) EtOAc 60 42 68:32 32
3d I-1 (1) Cu(OTf)2 (23) B1 (1.3) EtOAc 60 63 60:40 12
4d I-1 (1) CuCl (20) B1 (1.3) Tol 60 78 77:33 17
5d I-1 (1) CuCl (20) B1 (1.3) DCE 60 53 72:28 34
6d I-1 (1) CuCl (20) B1 (1.3) MeNO2 60 69 0
7d I-1 (1) CuCl (20) B2 (1.2) EtOAc 60 95 0
8d I-1 (1) CuCl (20) B3 (1.2) EtOAc 60 61 2
9d I-1 (3) CuCl (20) B1 (3.0) EtOAc 60 0 60:40 60
10d I-1 (3) CuCl (5) B1 (3.0) EtOAc 60 0 67:33 35
11e I-2 (3) CuCl (20) B1 (1.2) EtOAc 60 0 84:16 38
12d I-3 (3) CuCl (20) B1 (1.3) EtOAc 60 97 0
13d I-4 (4) CuCl (20) B1 (1.3) EtOAc 60 98 0
14d I-1 (3) Cu(MeCN)4BF4 (8) B1 (1.3) EtOAc 60 0 63:37 60
15e I-1 (3) CuCl (20) B1 (1.2) EtOAc 70 0 71:29 59
16e I-2 (3) CuCl (20) B1 (1.2) EtOAc 70 0 85:15 63
17f I-2 (3) CuCl (20) B1 (1.2) EtOAc 70 0 87:13 66
18e I-2 (3) CuCl (20) B1 (1.2) EtOAc c7a = 0.05 mmol/mL 70 0 98:2 35

aStarting material 7a concentration in solvent was 0.1 mmol/mL unless stated otherwise. bNMR yield. cMolar ratio of products in the crude mixture, determined by 1H NMR in CDCl3. dReaction scale: 0.24 mmol of 7a. eReaction scale: 0.48 mmol of 7a. fReaction scale: 1.90 mmol of 7a.

[1860-5397-21-154-i2]

Scheme 2: Competing mechanistic pathways for diene 10 and indene 11 formation.

We were interested to see whether the reaction selectivity can be directed towards the formation of arylated dienes 10, which would directly contribute to our previous work [26]. Therefore, we performed optimization of the arylation conditions (Table 1) to improve the reaction selectivity towards the aryldiene 10a formation, indicated by the diene/indene 10a/11a molar ratio (determined by NMR).

Among the tested diaryl-λ3-iodanes, only those containing a triflate anion showed reactivity. PhMesIOTf (I-1) and Ph2IOTf (I-2) showed comparable results in terms of diene yield, however, the symmetrical iodane I-2 displayed better chemoselectivity towards diene formation (Table 1, entries 15 and 16).

In accordance with the proposed reaction mechanism (Scheme 2), an equimolar amount of protons is generated in the reaction, which would likely induce the formation of additional side-products either by protodecupration [27] or the acid-catalyzed propargylsilane activation pathway [26]. Therefore, the presence of a base was imperative. The only applicable base was found to be the non-nucleophilic 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine (B1, Table 1, entries 1–6, 9–18). We also considered the structurally similar, but less sterically hindered 2,6-lutidine (B2, Table 1, entry 7) and Et3N (B3, Table 1, entry 8), both of which effectively halted the reaction. The same was observed when using N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylnaphthalene-1,8-diamine (“Proton sponge”) or TMEDA (see Supporting Information File 1 for details). In the case of Et3N (B3) and TMEDA, partial degradation of the starting material 7a was also observed.

Among the tested solvents, EtOAc gave the best results (Table 1, entries 1–3, 7–18). As for reaction catalysts, Cu(I) salts demonstrated far better reactivity than Cu(II) salts, likely because the reaction proceeds via the Cu(I/III) catalytic cycle [28]. However, in the case of Cu(OTf)2, the active catalytic species must be generated in situ. The highest diene 10a NMR yields (63–66%) were achieved by using 20 mol % of CuCl, 3.0 equiv of Ph2IOTf (I-2) and 1.2 equiv of 2,6-di-tert-butylpyridine (B1) in EtOAc at 70 °C (Table 1, entries 16 and 17). The obtained diene 10a contained 13–15% of silylindene 11a as impurity. Products 10a and 11a are separable by preparative HPLC. Lowering the starting material concentration in the reaction mixture to 0.05 mmol/mL significantly decreased the diene 10a yield due to the formation of other unidentified impurities. However, it turned out to be the key to achieving the best diene/indene ratio 10a/11a = 98:2. With the optimized conditions for aryldiene synthesis (Table 1, entries 16 and 17) we proceeded to explore the substrate scope (Table 2).

Table 2: Aryldiene scope.

[Graphic 2]
Entry Product Iodane 10/11a
(mol/mol)
Yield 10 + 11
(%)
Isomeric ratio for diene 10 (mol/mol)b
(1E,3E) ∑(1E,3Z) + (1Z,3E) + (1Z,3Z)
1 [Graphic 3]
10a
I-2 87:13 51c 92 8
2 [Graphic 4]
10b
I-2 67:33 61d 93 7
3 [Graphic 5]
10c
I-5 85:15 69d 87 13
4 [Graphic 6]
10d
I-6 98:2 37d 95 5
5 [Graphic 7]
10e
I-2 0e  

aRatio after column chromatography. bDetermined after C18 silica gel column chromatography by 1H NMR in CDCl3. cReaction scale: 1.90 mmol of 7. dReaction scale: 0.48 mmol of 7. eNo reaction at 70 °C in EtOAc (3 h) or 110 °C in BuOAc (17 h).

Arylations employing aryl groups with electron-donating substituents demonstrated higher yields (p-Tol > p-BrC6H4) (Table 2, entries 3 and 4). The p-bromo-substituted iodane I-6, albeit in a more modest yield, gave the diene 10d with 98:2 selectivity. Switching to the more sterically challenged triisopropylsilyl (TIPS) group (Table 2, entry 2) resulted in higher indene proportion in the resulting mixture (10b/11b = 67:33). In all cases the (1E,3E)-dienes 10ae were obtained as the major isomer (87–95% isomeric purity). In small quantities the other isomers (1Z,3E) and (1E,3Z) or (1Z,3Z) were also detected by their characteristic signals in the 1H NMR spectra.

Interestingly, the internal alkyne 7c (R = Ph, Si = TIPS) was completely unreactive under both standard arylation conditions (70 °C in EtOAc) and higher reaction temperatures (110 °C in BuOAc). In these cases, the starting material was recovered with no signs of degradation. This indicates that the provided method is limited to propargylsilanes containing a terminal alkyne group.

Arylation of internal nucleophile-containing propargylsilanes

Internal nucleophile-containing substrates are interesting, because they offer the possibility of heterocyclization, as described in our previous work [22]. The internal O-nucleophile-containing starting material, 4-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)hex-5-yn-1-ol (7d), was obtained from the commercial hex-5-yn-1-ol by a O-silylation and subsequent retro-Brook reaction sequence [29]. Arylation of silane 7d with 1.2 equiv PhMesIOTf (I-1), 5 mol % CuCl and 1.2 equiv 2,6-(t-Bu)2Py in EtOAc gave the styryl side chain-containing tetrahydrofuran 8a with 82% NMR yield after 3 h at 60 °C (Table 3, entry 2). The formed double-bond geometry in product 8a was proved by the 2D-NOESY spectrum. The corresponding (Z)-isomer was not detected by NMR spectroscopy techniques, indicating that the observed arylation–cyclization cascade reaction is highly stereospecific. With this result in hand, we performed copper catalyst screening (Table 3).

Table 3: Conditions screening for copper-catalyzed arylation–cyclization of propargylsilane 7d.

[Graphic 8]
Entry CuX
(mol %)
T
(°C)
8a, % (NMR) 12, % (NMR)
1b CuCl (2.5) 20 0 0
2c CuCl (5) 60 82, 76d 0
3b CuI (5) 60 0 0
4e,f [CuOTf]2∙PhH (5) 60 84 0
5e Cu(MeCN)4BF4 (5) 70 77 0
6e Cu2O (5) 70 6 2
7e [CuOTf]2∙PhH (2.5) 70 70 0
8e,g [CuOTf]2∙PhH (2.5) 70 43 0
9b [CuOTf]2∙PhH (11) 70 47 0

ac7d = 0.10 mmol/mL, bReaction scale: 0.24 mmol of 7d. cReaction scale: 4.2 mmol of 7d. dIsolated yield (%). eReaction scale: 0.47 mmol of 7d. fReaction time: 2 h (full conv.). g15 mol % of H2O as additive.

We observed that CuCl and the CuOTf benzene complex gave similarly good yields (82–84% by NMR, Table 3, entries 2 and 4), while the CuBF4 acetonitrile complex was the next best choice (77% by NMR, Table 3, entry 5). Heterogenous catalysis using Cu2O gave a mixture of the arylated product 8a and protodecupration side-product 12, both in poor yields (Table 3, entry 6). Increased catalyst loading (11 mol % of [CuOTf]2∙PhH) resulted in the formation of more side products (Table 3, entry 9), and we therefore decided to proceed with 5 mol % of the catalyst for the substrate scope.

We also observed that, in the absence of base, even at room temperature, only the protodecupration product 12 was obtained (with up to 69% NMR yield). A reaction temperature of 60 °C was found to be optimal and lower temperatures resulted in incomplete conversion.

Under the optimized conditions we explored the reaction scope (Scheme 3). Unlike the previously explored dienes 10, the obtained tetrahydrofuran products 8 were easy to purify by standard column chromatography techniques (30–50% DCM). Iodanes, containing electron-rich aryl groups (p-Tol, m-MeO-C6H4, Ph) or halogens (Br, F) gave the highest tetrahydrofuran 8 yields (70–83%). In contrast, electron-withdrawing group-containing iodanes, especially those holding nucleophilic heteroatoms (CN ≈ COR >> NO2) reacted poorly. Iodanes, containing electron-withdrawing groups with low nucleophilicity (CF3), however, gave fair yields. We also found that ortho-substituted iodanes did not provide arylation products, which can be attributed to the unfavorable steric hindrance [30].

[1860-5397-21-154-i3]

Scheme 3: Reaction scope for the synthesis of arylated tetrahydrofurans 8. Conditions: All reactions were performed on a 0.47 mmol scale. aStarting material 7d concentration: 0.1 mmol/mL. bNo reaction at 60 and 120 °C. cSame result at 120 °C.

Iodanes containing N-heterocycles, such as pyridine and pyrazole, provided the non-arylated tetrahydrofuran 12 as the main reaction product (Scheme 3), which is likely formed via the protodecupration pathway. However, to our delight the thiophenyl group was successfully added to the propargylsilane with 34% yield by using the symmetrical dithiophen-2-yliodonium p-tosylate (I-7). It should be noted that all products 8 were obtained with exclusive (E)-selectivity.

Tetrahydrofuran 8a and some analogous compounds could be synthesized previously from alcohol 7d, but in two steps, employing a halogen electrophile-induced propargylsilane 7d halogenation–cyclization cascade and Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling in the second step [22]. Thus, we have developed a faster and palladium-free route towards tetrahydrofurans 8. The latter can still be modified further through silicon–halide exchange followed by cross-coupling chemistry as described by us recently, among other possible transformations [21,22].

Interestingly, the addition of O-nucleophiles to form 1,3-carbofunctionalization products, can only be achieved in an intramolecular fashion. In the presence of an excess (5 equiv) of external an O-nucleophile R–OX (alcohol, carboxylic acid, its sodium salt or the silylated carboxylic acid), the arylation reaction of aliphatic chain-containing propargylsilane 7b (standard conditions; see Scheme 3) only resulted in the arylation of the oxygen nucleophile itself.

Next, we proceeded to expand the substrate scope by exploring other internal nucleophiles (Scheme 4), that could be used instead of the alcohol. The carboxylic acid-containing silane 7 (R = COOH), which was obtained by stepwise oxidation of the alcohol 7d, failed to give the desired lactone 8t product due to O-arylation of the carboxylic acid, leading to phenyl alkyl ester formation. Its silylated version (7, where R = COOSi(Me)3) only resulted in starting material degradation. Interestingly, tert-butyl ester 7e (R = COOt-Bu) provided the desired arylated lactone 8t, along with the protodecupration product 13, which was formed in excess under the standard arylation conditions (Scheme 4). An additional equivalent of base (2.2 equiv of 2,6-(t-Bu)2Py) helped to suppress the formation of the non-arylated product 13, making the arylated lactone 8t the main reaction product. By adding a larger excess of base, conversion rates were significantly reduced. For detailed reaction optimization see Supporting Information File 1.

[1860-5397-21-154-i4]

Scheme 4: Synthesis of lactone and pyrrolidine derivatives. Conditions: ac7e = 0.1 mmol/mL. bReaction conditions modifications: a) 1.2 equiv I-1, CuCl (5 mol %), 60 °C, 3 h, c7f = 0.3 mmol/mL; b) 3.0 equiv I-1, CuCl (10 mol %), 70 °C, 3 h, c7g = 0.1 mmol/mL; c) 1.2 equiv I-1, [CuOTf]2·PhH (2.5 mol %), 70 °C, 22 h, c7g = 0.1 mmol/mL; d) 1.2 equiv I-1, [CuOTf]2·PhH (2.5 mol %), 70 °C, 3 h, c7h = 0.1 mmol/mL.

Next, we switched to internal N-nucleophiles. N-Nosylated starting material 7f under standard arylation conditions gave the 2-(1-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)vinyl)-1-((4-nitrophenyl)sulfonyl)pyrrolidine (14) with a 56% yield. Most likely in this case sulfonamide N–H is too acidic and this may lead to protodecupration. The arylation–cyclization of benzamide 7g afforded the pyrrolidine derivative 8v as a mixture of (E/Z)-isomers. By treating the isomeric mixture (E/Z = 55:45) with HNTf2 (0.9 equiv) in DCM (0.03 mmol/mL) and stirring at 0 °C to rt for 3 h, (Z)-8v selectively degraded and the pure product (E)-8v could be isolated with 47% yield. On the other hand, if the amine group was too nucleophilic, as in the case of N-(4-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)hex-5-yn-1-yl)aniline (7h), the amine N–H was arylated instead of the alkyne, resulting in the formation of N-(4-(tert-butyldimethylsilyl)hex-5-yn-1-yl)-N-phenylaniline (15). Thus, acylamides were found to have optimal pKa and nucleophilicity to react according to our desired pathway (Scheme 4).

For the heterocyclization mechanism under arylating conditions, we propose a Cu(I/III) catalyzed pathway (Scheme 5). Firstly, the copper(I) salt reacts with the diaryl-λ3-iodane (ArMesIY) to generate the strongly electrophilic arylcopper(III) species. The latter activates the propargylic system to induce the 1,2-silyl shift, producing the allylic cation intermediate Int-4, which is stabilized by the β-silicon effect. A following attack of an internal nucleophile (O-, N-) and reductive elimination affords the arylated product 8 and regenerates the Cu(I) catalyst. The added base (B:) traps the H+, generated in this catalytic cycle. In the case of tert-butyl esters (7: R = COOt-Bu) an equivalent of isobutylene gas is released as a side-product. In the absence of a base, the protodecupration pathway is predominant, affording non-arylated heterocycles 1214 instead.

[1860-5397-21-154-i5]

Scheme 5: Proposed arylation–heterocyclization mechanism for internal nucleophile-containing silanes 7.

When considering shorter carbon chain-containing acylamides 16ac as starting materials, we expected a similar cyclization pattern, involving imidate formation [10]. Instead aminopentynes 16ac underwent allylic rearrangement, affording tetrahydropyridines 9 (Scheme 6). The tetrahydropyridine core was confirmed unambiguously by X-ray structure analysis of dinitrobenzamide 9c. More electron-rich acylamides reacted faster and gave less side-products, compared to more electron-poor analogs, that needed longer reaction times to reach full conversion (4 h for R = Ph, Me; 20 h for R = 3,5-(NO2)2C6H3).

[1860-5397-21-154-i6]

Scheme 6: Arylation of C5-chain containing acylamides 16ac. aThe reaction was performed under modified conditions: I-2 (3.0 equiv), 20 h because under standard reaction conditions incomplete conversion was observed (with 48% recovered 16c).

Conclusion

In this work we have reported copper-catalyzed arylation reactions of propargylsilanes, using iodanes as the electrophilic aryl synthon equivalents. For internal nucleophile-containing propargylsilanes subsequent heterocyclization was observed, and, depending on the chain length, giving either 1,3- or 1,1-carbofunctionalization products: tetrahydrofuran 8ao and pyrrolidine 8v derivatives, containing a functionalized styryl group in the side chain, and 1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine derivatives 9ac. We observed a distinct preference for (E)-geometry formation in the resulting C=C bond. Internal alcohol, ester, and acylamide functional groups were found to be compatible with the reaction conditions, whereas for external nucleophiles N- or O-arylation precedes that of the alkyne. In the absence of reactive nucleophiles, aryl-substituted 1,3-dienes were obtained. The presented conditions were best applicable for arylations introducing aryl fragments with medium to high electron density, although some less electron-rich iodanes could be used, albeit in more modest yields. In contrast to previously studied alkyne 1,2-carbofunctionalization reactions [7-10], which were mostly limited to internal alkynes, only terminal alkyne-containing propargylsilanes were found to be reactive under these conditions. In summary, we have demonstrated that under copper-catalyzed conditions aryl iodanes can arylate propargylsilanes and induce a 1,2-silyl shift to generate β-Si-stabilized allyl cations. Compared to the previously employed two-step halocyclization–cross-coupling sequence [22], this approach offers a shorter, [Pd]-free synthetic sequence to the modified styryl-containing tetrahydrofuran 8a and its previously unknown analogs. Efforts to broaden the scope of propargylsilanes by modifying their backbones, which connect the propargylic position with the internal nucleophile, are currently underway in our laboratory and will be reported elsewhere.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Experimental data, synthesis procedures, 1H and 13C NMR spectra, and X-ray data.
Format: PDF Size: 13.0 MB Download

Funding

This work was supported by the Latvian Council of Science Grant LZP-2023/1-0576 and the EU RRF within project No 5.2.1.1.i.0/2/24/I/CFLA/003 academic career doctoral grant, ID 1134.

Author Contributions

Rasma Kroņkalne: funding acquisition; investigation; writing – original draft. Rūdolfs Beļaunieks: investigation; methodology. Armands Sebris: investigation. Anatoly Mishnev: investigation. Māris Turks: conceptualization; funding acquisition; methodology; supervision; writing – review & editing.

Data Availability Statement

All data that supports the findings of this study is available in the published article and/or the supporting information of this article.

References

  1. Rani, N.; Soni, R.; Sihag, M.; Kinger, M.; Aneja, D. K. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2022, 364, 1798–1848. doi:10.1002/adsc.202200088
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Mamgain, R.; Sakthivel, K.; Singh, F. V. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2024, 20, 2891–2920. doi:10.3762/bjoc.20.243
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Fañanás-Mastral, M. Synthesis 2017, 49, 1905–1930. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1589483
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Kang, S.-K.; Kim, J.-S.; Choi, S.-C.; Lim, K.-H. Synthesis 1998, 1249–1251. doi:10.1055/s-1998-6086
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Deprez, N. R.; Sanford, M. S. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 1924–1935. doi:10.1021/ic0620337
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Wang, D.; Li, Q.; Li, M.; Du, Z.; Fu, Y. Curr. Org. Chem. 2021, 25, 1298–1320. doi:10.2174/1385272825666210512015410
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Walkinshaw, A. J.; Xu, W.; Suero, M. G.; Gaunt, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 12532–12535. doi:10.1021/ja405972h
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
  8. Tang, S.; Peng, P.; Zhong, P.; Li, J.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 5476–5480. doi:10.1021/jo8008808
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  9. Chen, J.; Chen, C.; Chen, J.; Wang, G.; Qu, H. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 1356–1359. doi:10.1039/c4cc08363f
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4]
  10. Sinai, Á.; Mészáros, Á.; Gáti, T.; Kudar, V.; Palló, A.; Novák, Z. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 5654–5657. doi:10.1021/ol402600r
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  11. Suarez, L. L.; Greaney, M. F. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 7992. doi:10.1039/c1cc13094c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Peng, J.; Chen, C.; Chen, J.; Su, X.; Xi, C.; Chen, H. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 3776–3779. doi:10.1021/ol501655g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Villo, P.; Olofsson, B. Arylations Promoted by Hypervalent Iodine Reagents. Patai’s Chemistry of Functional Groups; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp 1–61. doi:10.1002/9780470682531.pat0950
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Suero, M. G.; Bayle, E. D.; Collins, B. S. L.; Gaunt, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 5332–5335. doi:10.1021/ja401840j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Kang, S.-K.; Yoon, S.-K.; Kim, Y.-M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2697–2699. doi:10.1021/ol0162825
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Radhakrishnan, U.; Stang, P. J. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 859–860. doi:10.1021/ol015555t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Kwak, Y.; Choi, Y. R.; Yu, J.; Choi, S.; Hong, K. B. Asian J. Org. Chem. 2023, 12, e202300235. doi:10.1002/ajoc.202300235
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Wang, W.; Zhou, J.; Wang, C.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, X.-Q.; Wang, Y. Commun. Chem. 2022, 5, 145. doi:10.1038/s42004-022-00768-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Beļaunieks, R.; Puriņš, M.; Turks, M. Synthesis 2020, 52, 2147–2161. doi:10.1055/s-0039-1690898
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Roberts, D. D.; McLaughlin, M. G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2022, 364, 2307–2332. doi:10.1002/adsc.202200237
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Beļaunieks, R.; Puriņš, M.; Līpiņa, R. A.; Mishnev, A.; Turks, M. Org. Lett. 2023, 25, 4627–4631. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.3c01245
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  22. Kroņkalne, R.; Beļaunieks, R.; Ubaidullajevs, A.; Mishnev, A.; Turks, M. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 88, 13857–13870. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.3c01481
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
  23. Delost, M. D.; Smith, D. T.; Anderson, B. J.; Njardarson, J. T. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 10996–11020. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b00876
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Vitaku, E.; Smith, D. T.; Njardarson, J. T. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57, 10257–10274. doi:10.1021/jm501100b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Bhurta, D.; Bharate, S. B. ChemMedChem 2022, 17, e202100706. doi:10.1002/cmdc.202100706
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Puriņš, M.; Mishnev, A.; Turks, M. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 3595–3611. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.8b02735
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  27. Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 12775–12783. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.8b02215
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Chen, B.; Hou, X.-L.; Li, Y.-X.; Wu, Y.-D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7668–7671. doi:10.1021/ja201425e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Wang, X.; Gao, Q.; Buevich, A. V.; Yasuda, N.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, R.-S.; Zhang, L.-K.; Martin, G. E.; Williamson, R. T. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 84, 10024–10031. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.9b01190
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Phipps, R. J.; Grimster, N. P.; Gaunt, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8172–8174. doi:10.1021/ja801767s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities