Abstract
A new phenylethyl alkyl amide, (10R)-10-hydroxy-N-phenethyloctadecanamide (1), was isolated from the beetle Ambrostoma quadriimpressum Motschulsky. The structure of the amide was determined by NMR and MS. The absolute configuration of compound 1 was confirmed by an asymmetric total synthesis, which was started from L-glutamic acid. The construction of the aliphatic chain was accomplished by the selective protection of the hydroxy groups and two-time implementation of the Wittig olefination reaction.
Introduction
The leaf beetle Ambrostoma quadriimpressum Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) is a serious pest of elm that exists primarily in north-eastern China. Adult beetles hibernate over the winter and emerge in the spring when their host plant is most succulent. The developmental stages of beetles are able to defend themselves against predatory attracks, and this defence is associated with chemical defensive compounds.
Insects are able to produce a vast array of biologically active secondary metabolites, which are used for defence purposes or as pheromones. In particular, the chemical defensive phenomenon of the beetle has been observed in Coleoptera [1,2]. Over the last few years, many research efforts have concentrated on chemical communication among beetles [3-6]. Only a limited number of semiochemicals [7-13] are known in leaf beetles. To the best of our knowledge, fatty acid amides from terrestrial insects have not been reported so far. In addition, certain marine organisms [14,15] and mushrooms [16,17] are the only two natural sources of phenylethyl alkyl amides with remarkable activities, such as cytotoxicity to murine leukemia cells (P-388) [14] and protective activity against endoplasmic reticulum stress-dependent cell death [17]. In the current study, we report the isolation of (10R)-10-hydroxy-N-phenethyloctadecanamide (1), a possible chemical defensive compound from the beetle A. quadriimpressum, and confirmation of its absolute configuration by total synthesis.
Results and Discussion
Isolation of (10R)-10-hydroxy-N-phenethyloctadecanamide (1)
Petroleum ether extracts from adult A. quadriimpressum were purified repeatedly by means of silica gel column chromatography. Compound 1 was obtained as a white solid. An ion peak at m/z 403 and an [M − H2O]+ peak at m/z 385 in the EIMS suggested the presence of an OH group. The molecular formula of 1 was confirmed as C26H45NO2 (m/z 404.3529, [M + H]+) by HRMS–ESI analysis. The 1H NMR spectrum showed aromatic protons [δ 7.33–7.18 (m, 5H)], CH2 groups [δ 3.52 (q, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.11 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.58–1.05 (m, 24H)], an amide proton [δ 5.39 (br s, 1H)], a CH group [δ 3.58 (br m, 1H)] and an Me group [δ 0.88 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H)]. The COSY spectrum showed that compound 1 had a coupled proton spin system CH2CH2NH (δ 5.39, 3.52, 2.82 ppm). Correlations obtained from an HMBC spectrum provided partial evidence to assign a phenylethylamine moiety. The location of the OH group in the aliphatic chain was assigned by EIMS analysis; specifically, evidence was provided by a strong [M − 113]+ peak at m/z 290 corresponding to the loss of C8H17 (Scheme 1). Hence, compound 1 was confirmed as 10-hydroxy-N-phenethyloctadecanamide. In addition, compound 1 showed positive optical rotation ([α]20D +38.5 (c 0.13, CHCl3)). To confirm the absolute configuration at C(10), an asymmetric total synthesis was performed.
Synthesis of (10R)-10-hydroxy-N-phenethyloctadecanamide (1)
The retrosynthetic analysis of compound 1 is outlined in Scheme 2. The target molecule is disconnected into two fragments, 2 and 3. The intermediate fragment 2 would be readily prepared from the commercially available ε-caprolactone. The crucial fragment 3 would be constructed from the intermediate 4 through Wittig olefination. The polyhydroxy compound 4 would be obtained from L-glutamic acid by selective protection.
Our synthesis started from the ready available L-glutamic acid, as shown in Scheme 3. On the basis of the preceding literature [18-20], the hydroxy diester 5 was obtained in 35% yield (BnOH, H2SO4; NaNO2, AcOH; CH2N2). Protection of the secondary alcohol with the TBDPS group gave compound 6 in quantitative yield. The following debenzylation and reduction with BH3·THF afforded alcohol 7 in 95% isolated yield. Then primary alcohol 7 was protected again with TBDMSCl to give compound 8 in 100% yield. An initial attempt to synthesize compound 9 by reduction of 8 with LiAlH4, however, resulted in the deprotection of the TBDPS group. Alternatively, the alcohol 9 could be obtained by reduction with diisobutylaluminium hydride (Dibal-H) in 86% yield, which was then converted to the corresponding aldehyde 10 by oxidation with PCC. Wittig olefination of aldehyde 10 with n-heptylidenetriphenylphosphonium bromide in the presence of n-BuLi gave adduct 11 as an (E/Z)-mixture (E/Z = 1:5) in 75% yield. Selective removal of the TBS group with pyridinium tosylate gave 12 in 98% yield [21].
With the alcohol 12 in hand, our next step was to synthesize the phosphonium salt 15 [22,23] (Scheme 4). Therefore, ε-caprolactone was hydrolyzed with 5% NaOH to give hydroxy acid 13 in quantitative yield, which was reacted with PBr3 in CH2Cl2 to afford compound 14 in 82% yield. Treatment of 14 with PPh3 in CH3CN gave the phosphonium salt 15 in 98% yield.
The construction of the aliphatic chain was achieved according to the synthetic plan shown in Scheme 5. Oxidation of the alcohol 12 with PCC afforded the corresponding aldehyde 16, followed by a Wittig reaction with salt 15 in the presence of two equiv LDA, which afforded the adduct 17 as an (E/Z)-mixture in 72% yield. The E/Z isomers of 17 were not separated because the olefin geometry has no effect on the synthesis. Therefore, compound 17 was directly converted to the amide 18 with DCC and DMAP in 80% yield. Reduction of the C=C double bond by hydrogenation with Pd/C gave compound 19 in quantitative yield, which was transferred to the final product (R)-1 in 93% yield by removal of the TBDPS group. Both NMR and EIMS data were in complete agreement with those of the natural product 1. In addition, the synthetic compound (R)-1 showed positive optical rotation ([α]20D +37.2 (c 0.85, CHCl3)), suggesting that the absolute configuration of natural product 1 is to be assigned (R).
Conclusion
In summary, a new natural product, (10R)-10-hydroxy-N-phenethyloctadecanamide (1) from Ambrostoma quadriimpressum Motschulsky was identified and synthesized. Further studies on the biological roles of fatty acid amides are currently being performed by our group.
Experimental
General Methods: Commercial, spectral-grade solvents were used for the experiments unless otherwise stated. Infrared spectra were recorded on a Perkin–Elmer 1710 Fourier transform spectrometer. Low-resolution mass spectra were obtained from Agilent 7890A-5975C GC–MS by means of electron impact (EI) ionization at 70 eV. 1H NMR spectra were obtained at 400 MHz on a Bruker AV-400 instrument. 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 100 MHz. High-resolution mass spectra were recorded on an Agilent 1200-6520 Q-TOF electrospray mass spectrometer.
Isolation of (10R)-10-hydroxy-N-phenethyloctadecanamide (1)
Approximately 3000 adult A. quadriimpressum were extracted with petroleum ether. The combined extract was filtered and vacuum dried on a rotary evaporator to give a thick paste (18 g). Flash chromatographic (FC) separation of this extract on a silica gel column with 100%→0% PE/AcOEt gave five fractions. Fraction 4 was further separated into seven fractions on a silica gel column (PE/AcOEt 10:1→1:1). GC–MS analysis showed that fractions 4-4 and 4-5 included derivatives of a fatty acid amide. Fraction 4-5 was further purified by crystallization in diethyl ether to yield compound 1 (3 mg) as a white solid. Mp 107 °C (Et2O); [α]20D +38.5 (c 0.13, CHCl3); IR (KBr) νmax: 3312, 2920, 2846, 1643, 1554 cm−1; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.32 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 5.39 (br s, 1H), 3.58 (br m, 1H), 3.52 (q, J = 6.4 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H), 2.11 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 1.58–1.05 (m, 24H), 0.88 (t, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.1, 139.0, 128.8, 128.6, 126.5, 72.0, 40.5, 37.5, 37.5, 36.8, 35.7, 31.9, 29.7, 29.6, 29.4, 29.3, 29.2, 25.7, 25.6, 22.7, 14.1; EIMS (m/z): 403, 385, 294, 290, 265, 176, 163, 122, 104 (base), 91, 83, 69, 55, 43; HRMS–ESI (m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C26H45NO2, 404.3529; found, 404.3529.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information File 1: Detailed experimental procedures for the synthesis of compound 1. | ||
Format: PDF | Size: 1.2 MB | Download |
References
-
Duffey, S. S. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1980, 25, 447–477. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.002311
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Burse, A.; Frick, S.; Discher, S.; Tolzin-Banasch, K.; Kirsch, R.; Strauß, A.; Kunert, M.; Boland, W. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1899–1909. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.08.002
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Visser, J. H.; van Straten, S.; Maarse, H. J. Chem. Ecol. 1979, 5, 13–25. doi:10.1007/BF00987684
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Pasteels, J. M.; Dobler, S.; Rowell-Rahier, M.; Ehmke, A.; Hartmann, T. J. Chem. Ecol. 1995, 21, 1163–1179. doi:10.1007/BF02228318
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Termonia, A.; Pasteels, J. M. Chemoecology 1999, 9, 13–23. doi:10.1007/s000490050029
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Wegener, R.; Schulz, S.; Meiners, T.; Hadwich, K.; Hilker, M. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001, 27, 499–515. doi:10.1023/A:1010397107740
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Schulz, S.; Gross, J.; Hilker, M. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 9203–9212. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(97)00618-2
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Pasteels, J. M.; Rowell-Rahier, M.; Braekman, J. C.; Dupont, A. Physiol. Entomol. 1983, 8, 307–314. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1983.tb00362.x
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Pasteels, J. M.; Duffey, S.; Rowell-Rahier, M. J. Chem. Ecol. 1990, 16, 211–222. doi:10.1007/BF01021280
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Willinger, G.; Dobler, S. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2001, 29, 335–346. doi:10.1016/S0305-1978(00)00082-X
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Laurent, P.; Dooms, C.; Braekman, J.-C.; Daloze, D.; Habib-Jiwan, J.-L.; Rozenberg, R.; Termonia, A.; Pasteels, J. M. Naturwissenschaften 2003, 90, 524–527. doi:10.1007/s00114-003-0471-y
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Gillespie, J. J.; Kjer, K. M.; Duckett, C. N.; Tallamy, D. W. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29, 161–175. doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00256-2
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Hartmann, T. Planta 2004, 219, 1–4. doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1249-y
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Liyanage, G. K.; Schmitz, F. J. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 148–151. doi:10.1021/np960032t
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Böröczky, K.; Laatsch, H.; Wagner-Döbler, I.; Stritzke, K.; Schulz, S. Chem. Biodiversity 2006, 3, 622–634. doi:10.1002/cbdv.200690065
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Shiono, Y.; Tamesada, Y.; Muravayev, Y. D.; Murayama, T.; Ikeda, M. Nat. Prod. Res. 2005, 19, 363–366. doi:10.1080/14786410412331280113
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Choi, J.-H.; Maeda, K.; Nagai, K.; Harada, E.; Kawade, M.; Hirai, H.; Kawagishi, H. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5012–5015. doi:10.1021/ol102186p
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Civitello, E. R.; Rapoport, H. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3775–3782. doi:10.1021/jo00093a008
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Liu, R.-C.; Huang, W.; Ma, J.-Y.; Wei, B.-G.; Lin, G.-Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4046–4049. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.04.097
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Qabar, M. N.; Kahn, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 965–968. doi:10.1016/0040-4039(95)02340-2
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Andreou, T.; Costa, A. M.; Esteban, L.; Gonzàlez, L.; Mas, G.; Vilarrasa, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4083–4086. doi:10.1021/ol051200o
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Sankaranarayanan, S.; Chattopadhyay, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1345–1350. doi:10.1016/S0957-4166(98)00091-3
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Nanda, S.; Yadav, J. S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 1799–1806. doi:10.1016/S0957-4166(03)00369-0
Return to citation in text: [1]
1. | Duffey, S. S. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1980, 25, 447–477. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.002311 |
2. | Burse, A.; Frick, S.; Discher, S.; Tolzin-Banasch, K.; Kirsch, R.; Strauß, A.; Kunert, M.; Boland, W. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1899–1909. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.08.002 |
16. | Shiono, Y.; Tamesada, Y.; Muravayev, Y. D.; Murayama, T.; Ikeda, M. Nat. Prod. Res. 2005, 19, 363–366. doi:10.1080/14786410412331280113 |
17. | Choi, J.-H.; Maeda, K.; Nagai, K.; Harada, E.; Kawade, M.; Hirai, H.; Kawagishi, H. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5012–5015. doi:10.1021/ol102186p |
14. | Liyanage, G. K.; Schmitz, F. J. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 148–151. doi:10.1021/np960032t |
15. | Böröczky, K.; Laatsch, H.; Wagner-Döbler, I.; Stritzke, K.; Schulz, S. Chem. Biodiversity 2006, 3, 622–634. doi:10.1002/cbdv.200690065 |
7. | Schulz, S.; Gross, J.; Hilker, M. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 9203–9212. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(97)00618-2 |
8. | Pasteels, J. M.; Rowell-Rahier, M.; Braekman, J. C.; Dupont, A. Physiol. Entomol. 1983, 8, 307–314. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1983.tb00362.x |
9. | Pasteels, J. M.; Duffey, S.; Rowell-Rahier, M. J. Chem. Ecol. 1990, 16, 211–222. doi:10.1007/BF01021280 |
10. | Willinger, G.; Dobler, S. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2001, 29, 335–346. doi:10.1016/S0305-1978(00)00082-X |
11. | Laurent, P.; Dooms, C.; Braekman, J.-C.; Daloze, D.; Habib-Jiwan, J.-L.; Rozenberg, R.; Termonia, A.; Pasteels, J. M. Naturwissenschaften 2003, 90, 524–527. doi:10.1007/s00114-003-0471-y |
12. | Gillespie, J. J.; Kjer, K. M.; Duckett, C. N.; Tallamy, D. W. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2003, 29, 161–175. doi:10.1016/S1055-7903(03)00256-2 |
13. | Hartmann, T. Planta 2004, 219, 1–4. doi:10.1007/s00425-004-1249-y |
3. | Visser, J. H.; van Straten, S.; Maarse, H. J. Chem. Ecol. 1979, 5, 13–25. doi:10.1007/BF00987684 |
4. | Pasteels, J. M.; Dobler, S.; Rowell-Rahier, M.; Ehmke, A.; Hartmann, T. J. Chem. Ecol. 1995, 21, 1163–1179. doi:10.1007/BF02228318 |
5. | Termonia, A.; Pasteels, J. M. Chemoecology 1999, 9, 13–23. doi:10.1007/s000490050029 |
6. | Wegener, R.; Schulz, S.; Meiners, T.; Hadwich, K.; Hilker, M. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001, 27, 499–515. doi:10.1023/A:1010397107740 |
21. | Andreou, T.; Costa, A. M.; Esteban, L.; Gonzàlez, L.; Mas, G.; Vilarrasa, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4083–4086. doi:10.1021/ol051200o |
18. | Civitello, E. R.; Rapoport, H. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 3775–3782. doi:10.1021/jo00093a008 |
19. | Liu, R.-C.; Huang, W.; Ma, J.-Y.; Wei, B.-G.; Lin, G.-Q. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 4046–4049. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.04.097 |
20. | Qabar, M. N.; Kahn, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 965–968. doi:10.1016/0040-4039(95)02340-2 |
17. | Choi, J.-H.; Maeda, K.; Nagai, K.; Harada, E.; Kawade, M.; Hirai, H.; Kawagishi, H. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5012–5015. doi:10.1021/ol102186p |
14. | Liyanage, G. K.; Schmitz, F. J. J. Nat. Prod. 1996, 59, 148–151. doi:10.1021/np960032t |
22. | Sankaranarayanan, S.; Chattopadhyay, S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1345–1350. doi:10.1016/S0957-4166(98)00091-3 |
23. | Nanda, S.; Yadav, J. S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 1799–1806. doi:10.1016/S0957-4166(03)00369-0 |
© 2011 Zhao et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)