Logo Beilstein Institut

Facile synthesis of functionalized tetrahydroquinolines via domino Povarov reactions of arylamines, methyl propiolate and aromatic aldehydes

  1. ,
  2. ,
  3. and
College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: J. P. Wolfe
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 1839–1843. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.8.211
Received 16 Aug 2012, Accepted 24 Sep 2012, Published 26 Oct 2012
Full Research Paper
cc by logo
PDF
Album
Supp Info
Cite

Abstract

In the presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid as catalyst the domino reaction of arylamines, methyl propiolates and aromatic aldehydes in ethanol proceeded smoothly to give polysubstituted 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines in moderate yields. The reaction is believed to involve the Povarov reaction of in situ generated β-enamino ester with the in situ formed aromatic imine.

Keywords: β-enamino ester; domino reaction; electron-deficient alkyne; Povarov reaction; tetrahydroquinoline

Introduction

The Diels–Alder reaction is recognized as a powerful reaction in synthetic strategies for the production of natural and unnatural polycarbocycles and polyheterocycles [1-3]. Therefore, the hetero-Diels–Alder reactions and domino reaction procedures have been developed as the most powerful synthetic routes to construct oxygen or nitrogen-containing six-membered heterocycles [4-8]. In recent years, the imine Diels–Alder reaction (also known as Povarov reaction) and the [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of imines (obtained from the corresponding aromatic aldehyde and aniline derivatives) with alkenes have become efficient strategies for the generation of N-heterocycles [9-11]. In these reactions the alkene must be electron-rich, which means that functional groups attached to the alkene should be able to donate electrons. Among the electron-rich dienophiles, vinyl enol ethers, vinyl enamides, vinyl sulfides, cyclopentadienes, indenes, alkynes and enamines have been mostly used in this method [12-22]. β-Enamino esters [23-26], which may be readily generated in situ by the addition of a primary amine to electron-deficient alkynes, such as methyl propiolate or dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate [27-30], have shown versatile reactivity and have been widely used as key intermediates in a number of domino reactions to construct heterocyclic systems [31-42]. However, a survey of literature reveals that a Povarov reaction with in situ generated β-enamino ester as dienophile has not been reported until now. Recently, Zhu and Masson successfully developed three-component Povarov reactions using enamides as dienophiles leading to a highly efficient synthesis of enantiomerically enriched 4-amino-tetrahydroquinolines [43,44]. In this work our aim is to describe the domino Povarov reaction with both in situ formed aldimine and in situ generated β-enamino ester for the facile synthesis of the functionalized tetrahydroquinoline.

Results and Discussion

It is known that the formation of β-enamino ester by the reaction of arylamine with methyl propiolate requires a relative long time [38-42]. Thus, under our previously established reaction conditions a molar excess of p-toludine (4.0 mmol) and methyl propiolate (2.0 mmol) reacted in ethanol at room temperature overnight to give the desired β-enamino ester. Then, benzaldehyde and p-toluenesulfonic acid was introduced in the reaction system and the sequential reaction was finished in 48 hours at room temperature monitored by TLC. After workup we were pleased to find that the functionalized tetrahydroquinoline 1c was prepared in 63% yield (Scheme 1). The tetrahydroquinoline was obviously formed by the reaction of the previously formed β-enamino ester with in situ generated N-aryl aldimine. Thus, a domino Povarov reaction is successfully established. Similarly, various arylamines and aromatic aldehydes were used in the reaction under the same conditions. The results are summarized in Table 1. All the reactions proceeded smoothly to afford the corresponding functionalized tetrahydroquinolines (1a–1m) in moderate to good yields (41–67%). Arylamines and aromatic aldehydes with an electron-donating alkyl or methoxy group and with weak electron-withdrawing chloro or bromo groups reacted efficiently to give the expected products.

[1860-5397-8-211-i1]

Scheme 1: Synthesis of polysubstituted tetrahydroquinolines 1a–1m.

Table 1: Synthesis of the polysubstituted tetrahydroquinolines 1a–1m.

Entry Compound R R’ Yield (%)
1 1a H H 64
2 1b H p-Cl 48
3 1c p-CH3 H 63
4 1d p-CH3 p-CH3O 46
5 1e p-CH3 p-CH(CH3)2 41
6 1f p-CH3 p-Cl 48
7 1g p-CH3O p-CH3 51
8 1h p-Cl H 59
9 1i p-Cl p-CH3 66
10 1j p-Cl p-CH3O 54
11 1k p-Cl p-Cl 61
12 1l p-Br H 67
13 1m p-Br p-CH3 56

The structures of the above-prepared functionalized tetrahydroquinolines 1a–1m were characterized by 1H and 13C NMR, MS, HRMS and IR spectra and were further confirmed by single-crystal X-ray diffraction performed for the compound 1c (Figure 1). The 1H NMR spectra of compounds 1a–1m usually show two doublets and one triplet shift for the three cyclic CH units at the tetrahydroquinoline core. For example, in the 1H NMR spectrum of 1a the triplet at 3.09 ppm belongs to the proton at the 3-position, while the doublets at 4.76 and 5.24 ppm are clearly the protons at the 2- and 4-position. The three groups at the 2-, 3- and 4-position of tetrahydroquinoline could be of either cis or trans configuration. Thus, several diastereoisomers would exist in tetrahydroquinolines 1a–1m. 1H NMR spectra clearly indicates that there is only one diastereoisomer in the compounds 1a–1m. Single crystal structure of compound 1c (Figure 1) clearly showed that three groups at the 2-, 3- and 4-positions exist in trans-configuration. Thus, by analyzing 1H NMR spectra and the single crystal structure we could conclude that the prepared tetrahydroquinolines 1a–1m exist in (2,3)-trans-(3,4)-trans-configuration, which also means that this domino Povarov reaction is a highly stereoselective reaction.

[1860-5397-8-211-1]

Figure 1: Molecular structure of compound 1c.

A reaction mechanism for this domino Povarov reaction is briefly outlined in Scheme 2 based on the published domino Povarov reaction [45-49]. At first, arylamine adds to methyl propiolate to form the β-enamino ester A. Secondly, excess arylamine reacts with the aromatic aldehyde to form the N-aryl aldimine B in the presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid as catalyst. Thirdly, the Mannich type addition of intermediate A with the acid-promoted N-aryl aldimine B gives the intermediate C. Lastly, the intramolecular electrophilic aromatic substitution at the ortho position of the activated N-aryl ring gives the final tetrahydroquinoline 1. On the other hand, the concerted imine-Diels–Alder reaction of N-aryl aldimine B as the N-hetero diene with β-enamino ester A as the dienophile may give directly the tetrahydroquinoline 1. At present it is very difficult to distinguish these two reaction paths. It may be due to the fact that the four sequential reactions are all retro equilibrium reactions; the thermodynamically stable trans-isomer is obtained as the final separated product.

[1860-5397-8-211-i2]

Scheme 2: The proposed mechanism of domino Povarov reaction.

In the reaction mechanism shown in Scheme 2, arylamine reacts not only with methyl propiolate to form a β-enamino ester, but it also reacts with an aromatic aldehyde to form an imine. We envisioned that two kinds of aryl amines could be used in the reaction to give more polysubstituted tetrahydroquinolines. Thus, after the addition reaction of one kind of arylamine with methyl propiolate had been completed, the aromatic aldehyde and the second arylamine were introduced to the reaction system. By using this method the functionalized tetrahydroquinolines 2a–2e were successfully obtained in good yields (Table 2). This result showed that this domino Povarov reaction has a broad substrate scope.

Table 2: Synthesis of functionalized tetrahydroquinolines 2a–2e.

[Graphic 1]
Entry Compound R R’ R’’ Yield (%)
1 2a p-CH3 p-Cl p-Cl 60
2 2b p-CH3O p-Cl p-Cl 63
3 2c p-CH3 p-Cl H 56
4 2d p-CH3O p-Br p-Cl 57
5 2e p-CH3 m-CH3 p-Cl 55

Conclusion

In summary we investigated the domino three-component reaction of aromatic aldehydes, arylamines and methyl propiolates, and successfully established the imino Diels–Alder reaction with β-enamino ester as dienophile. This reaction provides a convenient and stereoselective procedure for the preparation of 2-aryl-4-arylamino-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinoline-3-carboxylates in satisfactory yields. Furthermore, we successfully developed the domino Povarov reaction with in situ generated β-enamino ester as dienophiles. This methodology is potentially useful in the synthesis of tetrahydroquinoline derivatives.

Experimental

Reagents and apparatus. All reactions were monitored by TLC. Melting points were taken on a hot-plate microscope apparatus. IR spectra were obtained on a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer (KBr disc). NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker AV-600 spectrometer with CDCl3 as solvent and TMS as internal standard (600 and 150 MHz for 1H and 13C NMR spectra, respectively). HPLC/MS were measured on a Fennigan LCQ Deca XP MAX instrument. High-resolution mass (ESI) were obtained with a Bruker MicroTOF spectrometer. X-ray data were collected on a Bruker Smart APEX-2 CCD diffractometer. Aromatic aldehydes, arylamines, methyl propiolate and other reagents were commercial reagents and used as received. Solvents were purified by standard techniques.

General procedure for the synthesis of polysubstituted tetrahydroquinolines. A solution of arylamine (4.0 mmol) and methyl propiolate (2.0 mmol, 0.168 g) in 5 mL ethanol was stirred at room temperature overnight. Then, the aromatic aldehyde (2.0 mmol) and p-toluenelsulfonic acid (0.5 mmol) were added. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for an additional 48 h. The resulting precipitate was collected and washed with cold ethanol to give the solid product, which was subjected to thin-layer chromatography with light petroleum and ethyl acetate (v/v, 10:1) as developing reagent to give the pure product for analysis.

Supporting Information

Experimental details and detailed spectroscopic data including crystallographic data (CIF) of all new compounds are available as Supporting Information. Single crystal data for compound 1c (CCDC 890916) have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK (Fax: +44-1223-336033; e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk or www: http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk).

Supporting Information File 1: General experimental methods and characterization of compounds.
Format: PDF Size: 919.7 KB Download
Supporting Information File 2: X-ray crystallographic data of 1c.
Format: CIF Size: 17.0 KB Download

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21172189) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

References

  1. Nicolaou, K. C.; Snyder, S. A.; Montagnon, T.; Vassilikogiannakis, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1668. doi:10.1002/1521-3773(20020517)41:10<1668::AID-ANIE1668>3.0.CO;2-Z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Takao, K.-i.; Munakata, R.; Tadano, K.-i. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4779. doi:10.1021/cr040632u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Reymond, S.; Cossy, J. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 5359. doi:10.1021/cr078346g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Schmidt, R. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 1986, 19, 250. doi:10.1021/ar00128a004
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Weinreb, S. M.; Scola, P. M. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1525. doi:10.1021/cr00097a008
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Tietze, L. F.; Kettschau, G. Top. Curr. Chem. 1997, 189, 1. doi:10.1007/BFb0119240
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Madhuri, C. R.; Sabitha, G. Synthesis 2001, 1065. doi:10.1055/s-2001-14904
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Pellissier, H. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2839. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.01.068
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Kouznetsov, V. V. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2721. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.12.059
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Choudhury, L. H.; Parvin, T. Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 8213. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2011.07.020
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Majumdar, K. C.; Taher, A.; Nandi, R. K. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 5693. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2012.04.098
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Palacios, A.; Herrán, E.; Alonso, C.; Rubiales, G. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 7661. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2006.05.073
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Alves, M. J.; Azoia, N. G.; Fortes, A. G. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 727. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2006.10.085
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Jin, G.; Zhao, J.; Han, J.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, J. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 913. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.11.092
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Spanedda, M. V.; Hoang, V. D.; Crousse, B.; Bonnet-Delpon, D.; Bégué, J. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 217. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(02)02558-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Maiti, G.; Kundu, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5733. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.06.034
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Chen, Z.; Lin, L.; Chen, D.; Li, J.; Liu, X.; Feng, X. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3088. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.04.009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Rajanarendar, E.; Reddy, M. N.; Reddy, K. G.; Krishna, S. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 2909. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.04.002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Kouznetsov, V. V.; Mora Cruz, U.; Zubkov, F. I.; Nikitina, E. V. Synthesis 2007, 375. doi:10.1055/s-2007-965875
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Kouznestov, V. V.; Romero Bohórquez, A. R.; Astudillo Saavedra, L.; Fierro Medina, R. Mol. Diversity 2006, 10, 29. doi:10.1007/s11030-006-2344-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Guinó, M.; Phua, P. H.; Caille, J.-C.; Hii, K. K. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6290. doi:10.1021/jo071031g
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Katrizky, A. R.; Rachwal, B.; Rachwal, S. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 3993. doi:10.1021/jo00118a014
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Lue, P.; Greenhill, J. V. Adv. Heterocycl. Chem. 1996, 67, 207. doi:10.1016/S0065-2725(08)60072-0
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Elassara, A.-Z. A.; El-Khair, A. A. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 8463. doi:10.1016/S0040-4020(03)01201-8
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Bagley, M. C.; Dale, J. W.; Bower, J. Chem. Commun. 2002, 1682. doi:10.1039/b203900a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Valla, A.; Valla, B.; Cartier, D.; Le Guillou, R.; Labia, R.; Potier, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6671. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.07.141
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Glotova, T. E.; Dvorko, M. Yu.; Ushakov, I. A.; Chipanina, N. N.; Kazheva, O. N.; Chekhlov, A. N.; Dyachenko, O. A.; Gusarova, N. K.; Trofimov, B. A. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 9814. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.09.069
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Ziyaei-Halimehjani, A.; Saidi, M. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1244–1248. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.12.042
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Li, X.; Wang, J.-Y.; Yu, W.; Wu, L.-M. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 1140. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.11.095
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Yavari, I.; Bayat, M. J.; Sirouspour, M.; Souri, S. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 7995. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2010.08.016
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Srikrishna, A.; Sridharan, M.; Prasad, K. R. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 3651. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2010.03.084
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Bezenšek, J.; Koleša, T.; Grošelj, U.; Wagger, J.; Stare, K.; Meden, A.; Svete, J.; Stanovnik, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3392. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.04.106
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Alizadeh, A.; Rostamnia, S.; Zohreh, N.; Hosseinpour, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1533. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.12.107
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Cao, H.; Jiang, H.-F.; Qi, C.-R.; Yao, W.-J.; Chen, H.-J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1209. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.01.002
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. Liu, W.-B.; Jiang, H.-F.; Zhu, S.-F.; Wang, W. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 7985. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2009.07.046
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Jiang, H.-F.; Li, J.-H.; Chen, Z.-W. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 9721. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2010.10.041
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Zhu, Q.; Jiang, H.; Li, J.; Liu, S.; Xia, C.; Zhang, M. J. Comb. Chem. 2009, 11, 685. doi:10.1021/cc900046f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Sun, J.; Xia, E.-Y.; Wu, Q.; Yan, C.-G. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3678. doi:10.1021/ol101475b
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  39. Sun, J.; Wu, Q.; Xia, E. Y.; Yan, C.-G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2981. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201100008
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  40. Sun, J.; Xia, E.-Y.; Wu, Q.; Yan, C.-G. ACS Comb. Sci. 2011, 13, 421. doi:10.1021/co200045t
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  41. Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Xia, E.-Y.; Yan, C.-G. ACS Comb. Sci. 2011, 13, 436. doi:10.1021/co200071v
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  42. Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Gao, H.; Yan, C.-G. Synthesis 2012, 1069. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1289718
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  43. Liu, H.; Dagousset, G.; Masson, G.; Retailleau, P.; Zhu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 4598. doi:10.1021/ja900806q
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Dagousset, G.; Zhu, J.; Masson, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 14804. doi:10.1021/ja205891m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Zhang, W.; Guo, Y.; Liu, Z.; Jin, X.; Yang, L.; Liu, Z.-L. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 1325. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2004.11.042
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Zhou, Y.; Jia, X.; Li, R.; Liu, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wu, L. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8937. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.10.083
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Han, B.; Jia, X.-D.; Jin, X.-L.; Zhou, Y.-L.; Yang, L.; Liu, Z.-L.; Yu, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3545. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.03.083
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Savitha, G.; Perumal, P. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 3589. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.03.046
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Nomura, Y.; Kimura, M.; Takeuchi, Y.; Tomoda, S. Chem. Lett. 1978, 267. doi:10.1246/cl.1978.267
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2012 Sun et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities
Journal Logo
Institut Logo
Preprint Logo
Symposia Logo