Total synthesis of (−)-epimyrtine by a gold-catalyzed hydroamination approach

  1. ,
  2. ,
  3. and
Equipe PNSCM, UMR6226, Université de Rennes 1, 2 avenue du Pr Léon Bernard, 35043 Rennes Cedex, France
  1. Corresponding author email
Guest Editor: F. D. Toste
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 2042–2047. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.9.242
Received 01 Jul 2013, Accepted 24 Sep 2013, Published 09 Oct 2013

Abstract

A new approach to the total synthesis of (−)-epimyrtine has been developed from D-alanine. The key step to access the enantiopure pyridone intermediate was achieved by a gold-mediated cyclization. Finally, various transformations afforded the natural product in a few steps and good overall yield.

Findings

(−)-Epimyrtine, isolated from Vaccinium myrtillus (Ericaceae) [1,2], is a quinolizidine alkaloid. This alkaloid family exhibits potential pharmacological properties such as anticancer, antibacterial, antiviral and anti-inflammation activities [3-5]. This alkaloid has been a target of interest for synthetic chemists because of its structural simplicity among the family of quinolizidine structures. Since it has been isolated, numerous total syntheses of this alkaloid in racemic form have been reported in the literature. However, only a few asymmetric syntheses of (−)-epimyrtine have been described to date including the intramolecular allylsilane N-acyliminium ion cyclization [6], the organocatalytic aza-Michael reaction [7], the intramolecular Mannich reaction [8], and the iminium ion cascade reaction [9,10]. More efficient, convenient and highly stereoselective synthetic routes are still being sought after. In the past decades, gold catalysis has emerged as an important tool in a plethora of fields of synthetic organic chemistry, and after methodological investigations [11-16], the good functional group compatibility of gold catalysts renders gold catalysis a straightforward protocol in the realm of the synthesis of natural products [17,18].

Herein we report a short total synthesis of (−)-epimyrtine employing an alternative strategy by using a gold(I)-catalyzed hydroamination of a β-aminoynone as the key step. Actually, cyclization of enantiopure α and β-aminoynones was successfully used in our group to access pyrrolidinone and pyridone heterocycles via a gold-mediated approach [19,20]. The use of β-aminoynone intermediates for the synthesis of 2,3-dihydropyridones was recently developed by Georg [21] (Scheme 1). This strategy involves the in situ deprotection of the amine function to permit the cyclization by Michael addition. However, in some instances partial racemization of the reaction products was observed [22].

[1860-5397-9-242-i1]

Scheme 1: Previously reported approach from β-aminoynones for the synthesis of pyridones.

Here, one major advantage of gold catalysis is the use of very mild conditions for the cyclization, thereby avoiding any racemization and obtaining N-protected compounds which may be useful for further transformations. In order to illustrate the efficiency of our method, we were interested in extending this methodology to quinolizidine privileged structures.

Our retrosynthetic analysis is shown in Scheme 2. We expected that the good side-chain functionality tolerance of the gold catalyst could easily provide chiral dihydropyridone from the corresponding β-aminoynone in a 6-endo-dig selective cyclization process. The β-aminoynone could be stereoselectively prepared in two steps from N-Boc-D-alanine.

[1860-5397-9-242-i2]

Scheme 2: Retrosynthetic analysis of (−)-epimyrtine.

Preparation of the β-aminoynone 2 began with the Arndt–Eistert homologation [23] of N-Boc-protected D-alanine (Scheme 3). Thus, the N-Boc-D-alanine was treated with isobutyl chloroformate at 0 °C in THF/diethyl ether followed by the addition of diazomethane to afford the corresponding diazoketone. The Wolff rearrangement was then carried out by using silver nitrate in THF to give the intermediate ketene which was trapped with N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine to provide the corresponding Weinreb amide 1 in 84% yield over two steps. In the next step, the Weinreb amide 1 was added to a solution of O-protected 1-hexynol lithium acetylide to furnish the β-aminoynone 2 with a yield of 71%. With this key building block in hand, efforts were directed toward the gold-mediated intramolecular hydroamination for the construction of the chiral pyridone intermediate 3. For this, PPh3AuSbF6 generated in situ from a 5 mol % mixture of PPh3AuCl and AgSbF6, in 1,2-dichloroethane afforded the desired pyridone 3. These conditions, selected in our previous work, represent a good compromise in terms of reaction time, yield and cost of the catalyst. As an example, lower catalyst loading (1 mol %) does not affect the yield but lowers the reaction speed of the cyclization. A 5-exo-dig product was not observed, presumably as a result of electronic strain. The reaction was completed in 2 hours at 40 °C to afford 3 in good yield (78%).

[1860-5397-9-242-i3]

Scheme 3: Synthesis of (−)-epimyrtine.

Reduction and deprotection of 3 by means of H2 (1 atm) in the presence of Pd/C for 48 h afforded stereospecifically the corresponding piperidone 4 in 80% yield. Subsequent bromination with CBr4 in the presence of PPh3 (Appel reaction) gave 5 in 84% yield. Finally, deprotection with 1 M SnCl4 in dichloromethane then neutralization by using K2CO3 afforded the final product (−)-epimyritine in a 80% yield.

N-Cbz compound was also tested. In this case, the cyclization occurred in similar conditions as described for the N-Boc-protected compound and resulted in a good yield (81%). Yet, under the catalytic hydrogenolytic conditions as described above (H2, 1 atm, 10% Pd/C, rt, 48 h) only deprotection of the nitrogen occured, while the desired benzyl ether cleavage and pyridine reduction were unsuccessful. Increase of the pressure to 5 atm or replacement of Pd/C with Pd(OH)2 (Pearlman’s catalyst) did also not result in the obtainment of the desired product.

The natural product (−)-epimyritine was thus obtained over 6 steps in a 25% overall yield starting from N-Boc-D-alanine. The spectroscopic data and optical rotation are in agreement with the literature [6].

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have achieved the asymmetric total synthesis of (−)- epimyrtine in six steps and with a good overall yield. We have demonstrated in this work that this natural product is easily accessible from D-alanine by a gold-mediated intramolecular hydroamination in a unique 6-endo-dig process. The approach provides a straightforward tool for synthetic applications toward quinolizidines and indolizidines.

Experimental

All reagents of high quality were purchased from commercial suppliers and used without further purification. All reactions requiring anhydrous conditions were performed under an argon atmosphere by using oven-dried glassware. 1,2-DCE and THF were distilled from CaH2 and Na/benzophenone, respectively. 1H and 13C NMR were recorded at 500 or 300 and 125 or 75 MHz respectively, by using CDCl3 (and TMS as internal standard). Chemical shifts, δ values are given in parts per million (ppm), coupling constants (J) are given in Hertz (Hz), and multiplicity of signals are reported as follows: s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet; q, quartet; quint, quintet; m, multiplet; app, apparent. Thin-layer chromatography was performed by using pre-coated silica gel plates (0.2 mm thickness).

[Graphic 1]

To a solution of 6-benzyloxyhex-1-yne (2.44 g, 12.9 mmol, 4 equiv) in 10 mL of dry THF was added dropwise a solution of n-BuLi (5 mL, 12.5 mmol, 3.8 equiv) at −78 °C under argon atmosphere. The reaction mixture was stirred for 45 min at −78 °C. Then, a solution of Weinreb amide 1 (800 mg, 3.3 mmol, 1 equiv) in 8 mL of dry THF was added dropwise at −78 °C. The reaction was stirred for 1 h. The reaction was warmed to −20 °C and stirred for 2 h. The reaction was quenched with a solution of 1 M NaH2PO4 (50 mL). The aqueous layer was extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, concentrated under reduced pressure, and purified by silica gel column chromatography by using petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (9:1) as an eluent to give pure 2 as a yellow oil (250 mg, 71%). Rf 0.3 (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, 8:2). [α]D25 +2.3 (c 1.7, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.20 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.43 (s, 9H), 1.69–1.74 (m, 4H), 2.40 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.66 (ABX system, JAB = 16.2 Hz, JBX = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 2.80 (ABX system, JAB = 16.2 Hz, JAX = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (t, J = 5.8 Hz, 2H), 4.05–4.14 (m, 1H), 4.50 (s, 2H), 4.74 (brs, 1H), 7.29–7.35 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 186.0, 155.0, 138.3, 128.3, 127.6, 127.5, 106.4, 94.8, 81.1, 72.9, 69.4, 51.3, 43.3, 28.8, 28.3, 24.5, 18.7; HRMS–ESI+ (m/z): [M + Na]+ calcd for C22H31NO4Na, 396.2151; found, 396.2153.

[Graphic 2]

To a solution of 2 (838 mg, 2.2 mmol, 1 equiv) in 15 mL of anhydrous 1,2-dichloroethane was added PPh3AuCl (55 mg, 0.11 mmol, 5 mol %) and AgSbF6 (38 mg, 0.11 mmol, 5 mol %) under argon atmosphere. The mixture was stirred for 2 h at 40 °C. The reaction was cooled to room temperature and diluted with ether. The organic phase was filtered through a pad of Celite®, concentrated under reduced pressure, purified by silica gel column chromatography, and eluted with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate (9:1) to give 3 as a yellow oil (78%). Rf 0.25 (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, 8:2). [α]D25 −226.9 (c 1.6, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.25 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H), 1.52 (s, 9H), 1.55–1.67 (m, 4H), 2.23 (dt, J = 16.9 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 2.31 (ddd, J = 14.7 Hz, J = 8.5 Hz, J = 6.0 Hz, 1H), 2.81 (dd, J = 16.9 Hz, J = 6.2 Hz, 1H), 3.07 (ddd, J = 14.6 Hz, J = 9.3 Hz, J = 5.2 Hz, 1H), 3.47 (t, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H), 4.49 (s, 2H), 4.78 (app quintd, J = 6.6 Hz, J = 1.4 Hz, 1H), 5.36 (s, 1H), 7.30–7.36 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.7, 158.3, 152.1, 138.5, 128.4, 127.6, 127.6, 111.1, 82.9, 72.9, 69.8, 52.1, 42.7, 35.8, 29.4, 28.1, 24.7, 16.5; HRMS–ESI+ (m/z): [M + Na]+ calcd for C22H31NO4Na, 396.2151; found, 396.2153.

[Graphic 3]

Pd/C (45 wt %) was added to a solution of 3 (585.7 mg, 1.57 mmol, 1 equiv) in 12 mL of MeOH, and the mixture was stirred under hydrogen atmosphere (1 atm) for 48 h at room temperature. The mixture was filtered through a pad of celite®, concentrated and purified by silica gel column chromatography eluting with petroleum ether/ethyl acetate to give 4 as a yellow oil (360 mg, 80%). Rf 0.25 (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate, 5:5). [α]D25 −21.9 (c 1.5, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.28 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 3H), 1.35–1.42 (m, 3H), 1.49 (s, 9H), 1.57–1.62 (m, 4H) 2.28 (ddd, J = 14.9 Hz, J = 3.8 Hz, J = 1.6 Hz, 1H), 2.34 (dt, J = 15.0 Hz, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 2.68 (dd, J = 15.0 Hz, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 2.72 (dd, J = 14.9 Hz, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (brs, 2H), 4.61–4.62 (m, 1H), 4.70 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 208.7, 154.9, 80.3, 62.6, 52.5, 48.4, 45.5, 43.8, 36.6, 32.2, 28.4, 23.0, 22.7; HRMS–ESI+ (m/z): [M + Na]+ calcd for C15H27NO4Na, 308.1838, found, 308.1838.

[Graphic 4]

CBr4 (674.5 mg, 2 mmol, 2 equiv) and PPh3 (586.8 mg, 2.2 mmol, 2.2 equiv) were added to a solution of 4 (290 mg, 1 mmol, 1 equiv) in 6 mL of dichloromethane at 0 °C. The mixture was stirred at 0 °C for 15 min. Then, the reaction was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 1 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure and the mixture was purified by silica gel column chromatography by using dichloromethane/ethyl acetate (95:5) as eluent to give 5 as a yellow oil (293 mg, 84%). Rf 0.6 (dichloromethane/ethyl acetate, 9:1). [α]D25 −19.1 (c 1.1, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.27 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.47–1.56 (m, 12H), 1.61–1.67 (m, 1H), 1.83–1.91 (m, 2H), 2.28 (ddd, J = 14.8 Hz, J = 3.5 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, 1H), 2.32 (dt, J = 15.9 Hz, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 2.69 (dd, J = 15.3 Hz, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 2.73 (dd, J = 15.1 Hz, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 3.40 (td, J = 6.6 Hz, J = 1.5 Hz, 2H), 4.60–4.63 (m, 1H), 4.73 (brs, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 208.5, 154.8, 80.4, 52.4, 48.5, 45.5, 43.9, 36.1, 33.5, 32.2, 28.4, 25.5, 22.7; HRMS–ESI+ (m/z): [M + Na]+ calcd for C15H26NO3BrNa, 370.0994; found, 370.0990.

[Graphic 5]

To a solution of 5 (263 mg, 0.75 mmol, 1 equiv) in 5 mL of CH2Cl2 under argon atmosphere was added a solution of 1 M SnCl4 in CH2Cl2 (3.8 mL, 5.0 equiv). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. Then 25 mL of THF and 40 mL of an aqueous saturated solution of K2CO3 were added. The mixture was stirred for 12 h at room temperature. The aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2, the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over Na2SO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography eluting with dichloromethane/MeOH (9:1) to give (−)-epimyrtine as a yellow oil (102 mg, yield 80%). Rf 0.3 (dichloromethane/MeOH, 9:1). [α]D25 −16.9 (c 1.2, CHCl3); 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.20 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 3H), 1.23–1.32 (m, 1H), 1.39–1.45 (m, 1H), 1.59–1.69 (m, 2H), 1.70–1.78 (m, 2H), 1.83 (td, J = 11.2 Hz, J = 2.1 Hz, 1H), 2.17 (brt, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H), 2.22–2.32 (m, 2H), 2.27–2.32 (m, 2H), 2.34–2.45 (m, 3H), 3.32 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 208.4, 62.0, 59.3, 51.0, 49.8, 48.7, 34.2, 25.9, 23.9, 20.7; HRMS–ASAP(m/z): [M + H]+ calcd for C10H18NO, 168.1388; found, 168.1387.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Spectra of new compounds.
Format: PDF Size: 1.3 MB Download

Acknowledgements

We thank the Program Ciências Sem Fronteiras (Brazil) for supporting Patricia de Aguiar Amaral in a post-doctoral position.

References

  1. Slosse, P.; Hootelé, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 397–398. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)85135-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Slosse, P.; Hootelé, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979, 20, 4587–4588. doi:10.1016/S0040-4039(01)86656-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Bermúdez-Torres, K.; Martínez Herrera, J.; Figueroa Brito, R.; Wink, M.; Legal, L. BioControl 2009, 54, 459–466. doi:10.1007/s10526-008-9180-y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Tyski, S.; Markiewicz, M.; Gulewicz, K.; Twardowski, T. J. Plant Physiol. 1988, 133, 240–242. doi:10.1016/S0176-1617(88)80144-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Wink, M. Planta Med. 1987, 53, 509–514. doi:10.1055/s-2006-962797
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Gardette, D.; Gelas-Mialhe, Y.; Gramain, J.-C.; Perrin, B.; Remuson, R. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1998, 9, 1823–1828. doi:10.1016/S0957-4166(98)00170-0
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  7. Ying, Y.; Kim, H.; Hong, J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 796–799. doi:10.1021/ol103064f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Davis, F. A.; Zhang, Y.; Anilkumar, G. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8061–8064. doi:10.1021/jo030208d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Amorde, S. M.; Judd, A. S.; Martin, S. F. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2031–2033. doi:10.1021/ol050544b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Amorde, S. M.; Jewett, I. T.; Martin, S. F. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 3222–3231. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.10.074
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Shapiro, N. D.; Toste, F. D. Synlett 2010, 675–691. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1219369
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Bandini, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 1358–1367. doi:10.1039/c0cs00041h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Fürstner, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 3208–3221. doi:10.1039/b816696j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Arcadi, A. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3266–3325. doi:10.1021/cr068435d
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Corma, A.; Leyva-Pérez, A.; Sabater, M. J. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1657–1712. doi:10.1021/cr100414u
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Krause, N.; Winter, C. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 1994–2009. doi:10.1021/cr1004088
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Hashmi, A. S. K.; Rudolph, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 1766–1775. doi:10.1039/b615629k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Rudolph, M.; Hashmi, A. S. K. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2448–2462. doi:10.1039/c1cs15279c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Gouault, N.; Le Roch, M.; Cornée, C.; David, M.; Uriac, P. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5614–5617. doi:10.1021/jo900693a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Gouault, N.; Le Roch, M.; Cheignon, A.; Uriac, P.; David, M. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4371–4373. doi:10.1021/ol201698m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Turunen, B. J.; Georg, G. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 8702–8703. doi:10.1021/ja0609046
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Seki, H.; Georg, G. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 15512–15513. doi:10.1021/ja107329k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Arndt, F.; Eistert, B. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. B 1935, 68, 200–208. doi:10.1002/cber.19350680142
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities