Four-component reaction of cyclic amines, 2-aminobenzothiazole, aromatic aldehydes and acetylenedicarboxylate

  1. ,
  2. and
College of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China
  1. Corresponding author email
Guest Editor: T. J. J. Müller
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 2934–2939. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.9.330
Received 30 Jul 2013, Accepted 26 Nov 2013, Published 27 Dec 2013
Full Research Paper
cc by logo

Abstract

The four-component reaction of 2-aminobenzothiazole, aromatic aldehydes, acetylenedicarboxylate and piperidine or pyrrolidine in ethanol afforded the functionalized 2-pyrrolidinones containing both benzothiazolyl and piperidinyl (or pyrrolidinyl) units in good yields. On the other hand, the similar four-component reactions resulted in the functionalized morpholinium or piperidinium 2-pyrrolidinon-3-olates in the presence of p-toluenesulfonic acid.

Introduction

Over fifty years ago, Huisgen firstly described the addition reactions of nitrogen-containing heterocycles to electron-deficient alkynes to form 1,4-dipolar intermediates, which can reacted sequentially with other reagents to give cycloaddition products [1,2]. From then on much developments on the chemistry of Huisgen 1,4-dipoles have been achieved [3,4]. In the past few years, Huisgen 1,4-dipoles have been recognized as key components for designing practical multicomponent reactions and domino reactions, mainly due to their easy generation and versatile reactivity [5-10]. On the other hand, the similar reactive Huisgen 1,4-dipoles derived from the addition of primary or secondary amines to electron-deficient alkynes also provided many elegant procedures for the synthesis of various nitrogen-containing heterocycles [11-16]. In this hot research field, we also successfully developed a series of domino reactions containing primary amine, electron-deficient alkynes and the other components, and found several efficient synthetic protocols for versatile heterocycles and spiro compounds by using the in situ generated Huisgen 1,4-dipoles [17-24]. During these research works, we noticed that even through the cyclic secondary amines such as pyrrolidine, piperidine and morpholine also reacted with electron-deficient alkynes to give the Huisgen 1,4-dipoles very fast and in nearly quantitative yields [25,26]. But until now it seems that this kind of easily generated Huisgen 1,4-dipoles have not been utilized for the design of domino reactions. In continuation of our efforts to explore the practical applications of Huisgen 1,4-dipoles for the synthesis of a versatile heterocyclic system, herein we wish to report the interesting results of the four-component reaction of secondary cyclic amines, acetylenedicarboxylate, 2-aminobenzothiazole and aromatic aldehydes and the efficient synthesis of the complex 2-pyrrolidinones containing both benzothiazolyl and piperidinyl (or pyrrolidinyl) units.

Results and Discussion

Initially, we set out to investigate the reaction conditions by using piperidine to react with dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate to give the expected β-enamino ester. It is interesting to find that the reaction of piperidine with acetylenedicarboxylate in ethanol at room temperature proceeded very quickly and could be finished to give the expected β-enamino ester in less than twenty minutes [27], while the reaction of normal primary arylamine with acetylenedicarboxylate or propiolate in ethanol at room temperature usually needed more than one day [28]. Thus we chose to employ a one-pot multicomponent reaction procedure to investigate our reaction. A mixture of dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate, benzaldehyde, 2-aminobenzothiazole and excess piperidine in ethanol was stirred at room temperature for about twenty minutes and then was heated at 50–60 °C for about 48 hours. In this reaction the excess piperidine acted as base catalyst. After work-up, the expected polyfunctionalized 2-pyrrolidinone 1a was obtained in good yield (Table 1, entry 1). Under similar reaction conditions, various aromatic aldehydes were utilized in the reaction to give the polyfunctionalized 2-pyrrolidinone 1b1f (Table 1, entries 2–6) in 53–72% yields, respectively. The four-component reaction containing diethyl acetylenedicarboxylate also successfully afforded the expected 2-pyrrolidinone 1g in 63% (Table 1, entry 7).

Table 1: Synthesis of pyrrolidinones 1a1n via four-component reactionsa.

[Graphic 1]
Entry Compd X R’ Ar Yieldb (%)
1 1a CH2 CH3 C6H5 58
2 1b CH2 CH3 m-CH3C6H4 72
3 1c CH2 CH3 p-CH(CH3)2C6H4 55
4 1d CH2 CH3 p-ClC6H4 53
5 1e CH2 CH3 m-ClC6H4 67
6 1f CH2 CH3 m-NO2C6H4 70
7 1g CH2 CH2CH3 p-CH3C6H4 63
8 1h O CH3 C6H5 66c
9 1i O CH3 p-CH3OC6H4 55c
10 1j O CH3 p-ClC6H4 58c
11 1k O CH3 m-ClC6H4 63c
12 1l O CH3 m-NO2C6H4 68c
13 1m O CH3 p-NO2C6H4 52c
14 1n O CH3 p-CH3OC6H4 10c

aReaction conditions: 2-aminobenzothiazole (2.0 mmol), acetylenedicarboxylate (2.0 mmol), aromatic aldehyde (2.0 mmol), piperidine (3.0 mmol) in EtOH (10.0 mL), rt, 20 min, 50–60 °C, 48 h; bIsolated yield; cPyrrolidine or morpholine (2.0 mmol) and DABCO (0.5 mmol) were used.

In view of the success of the above reaction, we explored the scope of this promising reaction by varying the structure of the secondary cyclic amines. When excess pyrrolidine was used in the reaction by using the above reaction procedure, it was surprising to find that only very low yields of 3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)-2-pyrrolidinones were produced. After carefully optimizing the reaction conditions, we were pleased to find that the expected 3-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)-2-pyrrolidinones 1h1m could be prepared in the satisfactory yields by adding the stronger base DABCO into the reaction as base catalyst (Table 1, entries 8–13). Another common cyclic amine morpholine still gave a very low yield of the desired 3-morpholinyl-2-pyrrolidinone 1n (Table 1, entry 14). It is known that pyrrolidine (pKb = 2.73) and piperidine (pKb = 2.88) have near similar basicity, while morpholine has a relative weak basicity (pKb = 5.64). At present, the exact reason for the different reactivity of piperidine, pyrrolidine and morpholine in this reaction is not very clear. The structures of the prepared 2-pyrrolidinones 1a1n were fully characterized by 1H and 13C NMR, HRMS, IR spectra, and were further confirmed by single crystal structure determination of compound 1f (Figure 1). In 1H NMR spectra of compounds 1a1n, the proton at the 5-position of the newly-formed 2-pyrrolidonyl ring usually displays a singlet at about 6.15 ppm. The piperidin-1yl or pyrrolidin-1-yl groups usually show two or three characteristic mixed peaks.

[1860-5397-9-330-1]

Figure 1: Molecular structure of compound 1f.

Two years ago, we reported that a p-toluenesulfonic acid-catalyzed three-component reaction of arylamine, aromatic aldehyde and acetylenedicarboxylate afforded 3-hydroxy-2-pyrrolidinone as main product [28]. In order to improve the reactivity of morpholine in this four-component reaction, p-toluenesulfonic acid was added in the four-component reaction of morpholine, p-methoxybenzaldehyde, 2-aminobenzothiazole and dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate. After work-up, we found that the reaction afforded unexpected morpholinium 2-pyrrolidinon-3-olate 2a in 75% yield (Table 2, entry 1). Under similar conditions, the reactions with other aromatic aldehydes also gave the morpholinium 2-pyrrolidinon-3-olates 2b2e (Table 2, entries 2–5) in 65–87% yields, respectively. The formation of morpholinium 2-pyrrolidinon-3-olates 2a2e clearly indicated that the reaction initially gave the expected 3-hydroxy-2-pyrrolidinone, which in turn converted to enolate by deprotonation of basic morpholine. This result also showed that this four-component reaction has an interesting molecular diversity in basic or acidic solution. We also utilized piperidine in this acid-catalyzed four component reaction and obtained the corresponding piperidinium 2-pyrrolidinon-3-olates 2f2h in good yields (Table 2, entries 6–8). The prepared piperidinium and morpholinium 2-pyrrolidinon-3-olates 2a2h are very stable compounds. Their structures were fully characterized by 1H and 13C NMR, HRMS, IR spectra, and were also confirmed by single crystal structure determination of compounds 2a (Figure 2) and 2h (Figure 3).

Table 2: Synthesis of pyrrolidinones 2a2h via four-component reactionsa.

[Graphic 2]
Entry Compd X Ar Yieldb (%)
1 2a O p-CH3OC6H4 75c
2 2b O p-CH(CH3)2C6H4 73
3 2c O p-CH3C6H4 65
4 2d O C6H5 87
5 2e O m-NO2C6H4 79
6 2f CH2 p-CH3C6H4 75
7 2g CH2 m-CH3C6H4 72
8 2h CH2 p-(CH3)3CC6H4 80

aReaction condition: 2-aminobenzothiazole (2.0 mmol), acetylenedicarboxylate; (2.0 mmol), aromatic aldehyde (2.0 mmol), piperidine or piperidine (2.0 mmol), p-TsOH (0.5 mmol), in EtOH (10.0 mL), rt, 20 min., 50–60 °C 48 h; bIsolated yield.

[1860-5397-9-330-2]

Figure 2: Molecular structure of compound 2a.

[1860-5397-9-330-3]

Figure 3: Molecular structure of compound 2h.

A plausible reaction mechanism for this four-component reaction both in basic media and in acid solution was proposed based on the previous reported similar reactions (Scheme 1) [29-34]. At first, piperidine adds to acetylenedicarboxylate to give 1,3-dipolar intermediate A. In the meantime, the condensation of the aromatic aldehyde with 2-aminobenzothiazole affords an aldimine B. Secondly, the nucleophilic addition of 1,3-dipole intermediate A to aldimine B gives an addition intermediate C. Thirdly, the intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the amino group to the carbonyl group produces the polyfunctionalized 2-pyrrolidinone 1. There is one reactive enamine unit in the obtained 2-pyrrolidinone 1. Under the catalysis of p-toluenesulfonic acid, the enamine moiety in 2-pyrrolidinone 1 was easily hydrolyzed to yield a 2, 3-pyrrolidinedione (D) and piperidine. Then 2,3-pyrrolidinedione D transforms to the more stable enol-form through the keto–enol tautomerism. Because the enol connects to both ester and amide groups, it has much stronger acidity and is deprotonated by piperidine in the solution to give the piperidinium 2-pyrrolidinon-3-olate 2 as the final product.

[1860-5397-9-330-i1]

Scheme 1: The proposed reaction mechanism for the four-component reaction.

Conclusion

In summary, we have successfully developed a four-component reaction of an aromatic aldehyde, 2-aminobenzothiazole, secondary cyclic amines and acetylenedicarboxylate in basic or acidic soution. This four-component reaction provides a convenient procedure for the preparation of the mixed heterocyclic compounds containing units of benzothiazole, piperidine and 2-pyrrolidinone in satisfactory yields. The range of substrates and the reaction mechanism for this reaction were briefly discussed. This convenient synthetic reaction might be potentially used for complex heterocyclic systems in synthetic and medicinal chemistry.

Experimental

Reagents and apparatus: Melting points were taken on a hot-plate microscope apparatus. IR spectra were obtained on a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer (KBr disc). NMR spectra were recorded with a Bruker AV-600 spectrometer with DMSO-d6 as solvent and TMS as internal standard (600 and 150 MHz for 1H and 13C NMR spectra, respectively). HRMS were measured at UHR-TOF maXis instrument. X-ray data were collected on a Bruker Smart APEX-2 diffractometer. 2-Aminobenzothiazole, dimethyl or diethyl acetylenedicarboxylate, aromatic aldehyde and other reagents are commercial reagents and used as received. Solvents were purified by standard techniques. All reactions were monitored by TLC.

General procedure for the preparation of the functionalized 2-pyrrolidinones 1a–1n as a one-pot four-component reaction: A mixture of 2-aminobenzothiazole (2.0 mmol), acetylenedicarboxylate (2.0 mmol), aromatic aldehyde (2.0 mmol), piperidine (3.0 mmol) (in cases of pyrrolidine or morpholine was used in the reaction, pyrrolidine or morpholine (2.0 mmol), DABCO (0.5 mmol)) in ethanol (10.0 mL) was stirred at room temperature for about twenty minutes and then was heated at about 50–60 °C for about two days. After cooling to room temperature, the resulting precipitates were collected by filtration and washed with cold ethanol to give the crude product, which was recrystallized in ethanol to give the pure products 1a1n for analysis.

General procedure for the preparation of functionalized 2-pyrrolidinon-3-olates 2a–2h as a one-pot reaction: A mixture of 2-aminobenzothiazole (2.0 mmol), acetylenedicarboxylate (2.0 mmol), aromatic aldehyde (2.0 mmol), morpholine or piperidine (3.0 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonic acid (0.5 mmol) in ethanol (10.0 mL) was stirred at room temperature for about twenty minutes and then was heated at about 50–60 °C for about two days. After cooling to room temperature, the resulting precipitates were collected by filtration and washed with cold ethanol to give the products 2a2h.

X-ray crystallographic data: Single crystal data for compounds 1f (CCDC 950634), 2a (CCDC 950635) and 2h (CCDC 952039) have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.ac.ck./data_request/cif .

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Analytical data and 1H and 13C NMR spectra.
Format: PDF Size: 1.0 MB Download

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21172189) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

References

  1. Huisgen, R.; Morikawa, M.; Herbig, K.; Brunn, E. Chem. Ber. 1967, 100, 1094–1106. doi:10.1002/cber.19671000406
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Huisgen, R. Z. Chem. 1968, 8, 290–298. doi:10.1002/zfch.19680080803
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Nair, V.; Rajesh, C.; Vinod, A. U.; Bindu, S.; Sreekanth, A. R.; Mathen, J. S.; Balagopal, L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 899–907. doi:10.1021/ar020258p
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Nair, V.; Menon, R. S.; Sreekanth, A.; Abhilash, N.; Biju, A. T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 520–530. doi:10.1021/ar0502026
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Kielland, N.; Lavilla, R. Top. Heterocycl. Chem. 2010, 25, 127–168. doi:10.1007/7081_2010_42
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Shaabani, A.; Maleki, A.; Rezayan, A. H.; Sarvary, A. Mol. Diversity 2011, 15, 41–68. doi:10.1007/s11030-010-9258-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Nair, V.; Devipriya, S.; Suresh, E. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 3567–3577. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.01.106
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Nair, V.; Devipriya, S.; Suresh, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3667–3670. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.03.123
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Yavari, I.; Mirzaei, A.; Moradi, L.; Khalili, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 396–398. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.11.040
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Yavari, I.; Seyfi, S.; Hossaini, Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 2193–2194. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.02.107
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Yadav, N. N.; Gupta, M. K.; Sridhar, B. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6857–6859. doi:10.1021/jo8007034
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Ding, H.; Zhang, Y.; Bian, M.; Yao, W.; Ma, C. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 578–584. doi:10.1021/jo702299m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Srikrishna, A.; Sridharan, M.; Prasad, K. R. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 3651–3654. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2010.03.084
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Bezenšek, J.; Koleša, T.; Grošelj, U.; Wagger, J.; Stare, K.; Meden, A.; Svete, J.; Stanovnik, B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3392–3397. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2010.04.106
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Liu, W.; Jiang, H.; Huang, L. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 312–315. doi:10.1021/ol9026478
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Yang, J.; Wang, C.; Xie, X.; Li, H.; Li, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 4189–4193. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201000607
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Sun, J.; Xia, E.-Y.; Wu, Q.; Yan, C.-G. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3678–3681. doi:10.1021/ol101475b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Sun, J.; Xia, E.-Y.; Wu, Q.; Yan, C.-G. ACS Comb. Sci. 2011, 13, 421–426. doi:10.1021/co200045t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Gao, H.; Yan, C.-G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 6952–6956. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201101198
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Xia, E.-Y.; Yan, C.-G. ACS Comb. Sci. 2011, 13, 436–441. doi:10.1021/co200071v
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Gong, H.; Xie, Y.-J.; Yan, C.-G. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 5172–5175. doi:10.1021/ol302530m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Han, Y.; Sun, Y.; Sun, J.; Yan, C.-G. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 8256–8260. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2012.07.056
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Han, Y.; Wu, Q.; Sun, J.; Yan, C.-G. Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 8539–8544. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2012.08.030
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Sun, J.; Sun, Y.; Gao, H.; Yan, C.-G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 1976–1983. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201101737
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Schmidt, R. R.; Kast, J.; Speer, H. Synthesis 1983, 725–727. doi:10.1055/s-1983-30488
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Ziyaei-Halimehjani, A.; Saidi, M. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 1244–1248. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.12.042
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Sun, J.; Gao, H.; Wu, Q.; Yan, C.-G. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 1839–1843. doi:10.3762/bjoc.8.211
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Sun, J.; Wu, Q.; Xia, E.-Y.; Yan, C.-G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 2981–2986. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201100008
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  29. Zhu, Q.; Jiang, H.; Li, J.; Liu, S.; Xia, C.; Zhang, M. J. Comb. Chem. 2009, 11, 685–696. doi:10.1021/cc900046f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Khan, A. T.; Ghosh, A.; Musawwer, M. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 2622–2626. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.03.046
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Rana, S.; Brown, M.; Dutta, A.; Bhaumik, A.; Mukhopadhyay, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 1371–1379. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2012.12.109
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Ramesh, K.; Murthy, S. N.; Karnakar, K.; Nageswar, Y. V. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 3937–3941. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.05.100
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Gao, H.; Sun, J.; Yan, G.-C. Tetrahedron 2013, 69, 589–594. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2012.11.018
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Sarkar, R.; Mukhopadhyay, C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2013, 54, 3706–3711. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2013.05.017
    Return to citation in text: [1]
Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities