Beilstein J. Org. Chem.2011,7, 290–297, doi:10.3762/bjoc.7.38
-dependent.
The addition of AC (0–0.26 mM) to the above solutions of 7 or 6 (0.2 mM) produced a strong positive exciton couplet at the 1Bb transition of AC (Figure 2 and Figure 3) which overwhelmed the inherent signals. The positive couplet observed indicates the right-handed helicalconformation of the two
PDF
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1:
Biphenyl-capped (5), naphthalene-capped (6), and naphthalene-appended γ-cyclodextrin (7).
Beilstein J. Org. Chem.2010,6, No. 38, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.38
. This concept is elegantly illustrated by the diastereoisomeric β-peptides 66 and 67 (Figure 18) [56]. The β-amino acid sequence of 66 and 67 is known to promote the formation of a left-handed helix and this helicalconformation can be either reinforced or destabilised by a fluorine substituent. In the
case of β-peptide 66, the fluorine atom aligns antiparallel to the adjacent C=O bond and gauche to the adjacent amide nitrogen, and this reinforces the helicalconformation of the β-peptide. In contrast, the helicalconformation of β-peptide 67 cannot accommodate these favourable alignments, so in this
65. The electron-withdrawing trifluoromethyl group of 65 disrupts a key hydrogen bond, leading to a different conformation as determined by NOESY experiments.
The C–F bond influences the conformation of β-peptides. β-Heptapeptide 66 adopts a helicalconformation, reinforced by the α-fluoroamide
PDF
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1:
Conformational effects associated with C–F bonds.