This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2024, 15, 867–883, doi:10.3762/bjnano.15.72
Figure 1: Focal species. (A) Adult female of Sungaya aeta. (B–D) Overviews of the tarsal morphology obtained ...
Figure 2: Attachment tests using a tilting platform. (A) Schematic of the experimental setup. (B) Comparison ...
Figure 3: Attachment force measurements. (A, B) Comparisons of attachment forces of old and young adult femal...
Figure 4: Morphological changes of tarsi during ageing. (A–D) Full tarsi, ventral views. (A) Young adult fema...
Figure 5: Ventral views of attachment pads obtained from WFM. (A–D) Subadult female. (E–H) Young adult female...
Figure 6: Maximum intensity projections of tarsi in different age groups obtained by CLSM. (A) Tarsus of suba...
Figure 7: SEM micrographs of ageing effects on the tarsi. (A) Pretarsus of old female, ventral view. (B) Inta...
Figure 8: Combination of visualizations of the same attachment organs with different microscopy techniques. A...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2024, 15, 612–630, doi:10.3762/bjnano.15.52
Figure 1: Medauroidea extradentata and its tarsal structures. Example images of the animals used in the exper...
Figure 2: Sections of the arolium visualized with different imaging techniques. The internal ultrastructure o...
Figure 3: Arolium material structure visualised using different techniques. Detailed images of the adhesive p...
Figure 4: Morphology of the tarsomere. The internal ultrastructure of the tarsomere was visualized using four...
Figure 5: The euplantula sections. Detailed images of the attachment pad of the euplantula. The different met...
Figure 6: The connective pad between neighbouring euplantulae. Detailed images of the connective pad. The dif...
Figure 7: Detailed images of additional morphological observations. The different methods highlight the morph...
Figure 8: Scheme of the arolium (left) and euplantula (right) of M. extradentata. Schematic representation of...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2021, 12, 725–743, doi:10.3762/bjnano.12.57
Figure 1: Diversity of investigated study organisms with attachment devices visualised across the animal tree...
Figure 2: Attachment systems of animals. (A) Schematic representation of hairy (a, b) and smooth (c, d) attac...
Figure 3: Phylogeny of Polyneoptera (following [122]). Coloured squares indicate the type of attachment pads, 1dif...
Figure 4: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of a typical phasmatodean tarsus. Orestes draegeri Bresse...
Figure 5: Diversity of stick insect ecomorphs and their respective euplantular AMS. (A) Eurycantha calcarata,...
Figure 6: Compliancy of adhesive structures to the substrate (A,B) and contact splitting (C). (A) Contact of ...
Figure 7: Convergent evolution of an asymmetry of micro- and nanostructural features (scheme is given in the ...
Figure 8: Fluid micro- and nanodrops in animal attachment pads. (A) Carbon–platinum replica of frozen and coa...
Figure 9: Diagram summarizing structural features of smooth attachment pads that evolved in a convergent matt...
Figure 10: Sources of bioinspiration for attachment systems from the animal tree of life. Shown are the exampl...