This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2024, 15, 694–703, doi:10.3762/bjnano.15.57
Figure 1: (a) Microcantilever beams with different inputs (purple) and outputs (red). (b) Diagram of the brid...
Figure 2: Bode plot of the response of the macroscale bridge/cantilever coupled system.
Figure 3: Lower surface schematic diagram of the macroscale bridge/cantilever coupled system model. The total...
Figure 4: The first two orders of modal frequency response of a traditional rectangular cantilever beam (blue...
Figure 5: The modal response of the left side of the coupled system for lengths l of 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 2.75, ...
Figure 6: (a) Influence of different excitation positions la of the coupled system on the modal response when ...
Figure 7: Experimental setup of the macroscale cantilever platform.
Figure 8: Image of the macroscale cantilever. The left side is clamped by (a) a size-adjustable optical dry p...
Figure 9: Sweep results for (a) the traditional rectangular cantilever beam and (b) the bridge/cantilever cou...
Figure 10: First two orders of frequency response of traditional cantilever beam (blue) and bridge/cantilever ...
Figure 11: Experimental results of the first two orders of frequency response for different lengths of the lef...
Figure 12: Experimental influence of excitation position la on the first two orders of modal response when l =...