Unraveling the neurotoxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: focusing on molecular mechanisms

• Bin Song,
• Yanli Zhang,
• Jia Liu,
• Xiaoli Feng,
• Ting Zhou and
• Longquan Shao

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 645–654, doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.57

• associated with nanoneurotoxicity. Genotoxicity Genotoxicity is simply defined as the induction of DNA damage, in a direct or indirect manner, caused by substances such as benzopyrene in cigarettes or some chemotherapeutic drugs. In vivo and in vitro studies typically measure genotoxicity using the comet

• cells. Obviously, the relationship between neurotoxicity of TiO2 NPs and genotoxicity should be investigated comprehensively. Recently, El-Ghor et al. [43] determined that TiO2 NPs could cause DNA damage in the mouse brain. This genotoxicity could be alleviated by co-treatment with chlorophyllin (CHL

• activities of SOD and GPx, elevated MDA and DNA damage, as well as an increased proportion of apoptotic cells. Minor mechanisms In addition to major mechanisms of TiO2 NPs-induced neurotoxicity, other minor mechanisms exist. Disdier et al. [6] discovered that after rats received TiO2 NPs through intravenous

Comparison of the interactions of daunorubicin in a free form and attached to single-walled carbon nanotubes with model lipid membranes

• Dorota Matyszewska

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 524–532, doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.46

• as well as DNA damage by the inhibition of topoisomerase II [1][2]. However, the second mechanism involving the increased production of ceramides inside cells has been recently postulated [3]. Application of this drug in the cancer treatment is limited because of serious side effects including drug

Application of biclustering of gene expression data and gene set enrichment analysis methods to identify potentially disease causing nanomaterials

• Andrew Williams and
• Sabina Halappanavar

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 2438–2448, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.252

• fibrosis. The pro-fibrogenic potential of CNTs is well established. Although CB has not been shown to induce fibrosis, it induces stronger inflammatory, oxidative stress and DNA damage responses than nano-TiO2 particles. Conclusion: The results of the analysis correctly identified all NMs to be

NanoE-Tox: New and in-depth database concerning ecotoxicity of nanomaterials

• Katre Juganson,
• Angela Ivask,
• Irina Blinova,
• Monika Mortimer and
• Anne Kahru

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 1788–1804, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.183

• ][183], oxidative stress [71][73][89][175][176][184][185], DNA damage/genotoxicity [102][186][187], and binding to sulfhydryl groups [100]. Similar effects were also demonstrated in case of ZnO NPs [84][85][86][188][189][190]. The mechanism of toxic action of insoluble ENMs like CeO2 [109][110], CNTs

Analysis of soil bacteria susceptibility to manufactured nanoparticles via data visualization

• Rong Liu,
• Yuan Ge,
• Patricia A. Holden and
• Yoram Cohen

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 1635–1651, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.166

• communities [18][19]; quantum dots (QDs) were linked to DNA damage of both freshwater mussels and gills [24]; and carbon nanotubes have been found to induce harmful effects to various organs (such as aquatic animals, bacteria, and plants) [25]. MNPs in soil can cause compositional changes to soil bacterial

Influence of surface chemical properties on the toxicity of engineered zinc oxide nanoparticles to embryonic zebrafish

• Zitao Zhou,
• Jino Son,
• Bryan Harper,
• Zheng Zhou and
• Stacey Harper

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 1568–1579, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.160

• (lacking surface ligands) are known to cause delayed embryo hatching, developmental abnormalities [12] through dissolution and release of ionic zinc [13][14] as well as induction of DNA damage through generation of reactive oxidative species (ROS) [12][15]. ZnO NPs are often coated with a variety of

Influence of gold, silver and gold–silver alloy nanoparticles on germ cell function and embryo development

• Ulrike Taylor,
• Daniela Tiedemann,
• Christoph Rehbock,
• Wilfried A. Kues,
• Stephan Barcikowski and
• Detlef Rath

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 651–664, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.66

• fertility were found [38]. A study examining the influence of AgNP on spermatological parameters following intraveneous injection revealed a reduced sperm count and an increase in sperm DNA damage [39]. It remained unclear though whether AgNP had actually reached the germinative tissue, or whether the

Novel ZnO:Ag nanocomposites induce significant oxidative stress in human fibroblast malignant melanoma (Ht144) cells

• Syeda Arooj,
• Samina Nazir,
• Akhtar Nadhman,
• Nafees Ahmad,
• Bakhtiar Muhammad,
• Ishaq Ahmad,
• Kehkashan Mazhar and
• Rashda Abbasi

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2015, 6, 570–582, doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.59

• , reduction in size of the NPs and increase in the photocatalytic activity [26][34]. It is, however, not well-understood how these NPs exactly work in the exposed cells. ZnO NPs were reported to cause toxicity by generating ROS [35], causing DNA damage, oxidative stress [36], an increase in caspase-3 activity

Interaction of dermatologically relevant nanoparticles with skin cells and skin

• Annika Vogt,
• Fiorenza Rancan,
• Sebastian Ahlberg,
• Berouz Nazemi,
• Chun Sik Choe,
• Maxim E. Darvin,
• Sabrina Hadam,
• Ulrike Blume-Peytavi,
• Kateryna Loza,
• Jörg Diendorf,
• Matthias Epple,
• Christina Graf,
• Eckart Rühl,
• Martina C. Meinke and
• Jürgen Lademann

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 2363–2373, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.245

• . Reported studies on nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress use different read-outs for radical production including fluorochromic assays [39], depletion of antioxidants [40], enzyme activity (e.g., catalase [41], superoxide dismutase), or oxidative DNA damage. For example, reactive oxygen species-mediated

• DNA damage and apoptosis were detected in human skin epidermal cells after exposure to nickel nanoparticles [42]. Phototoxicity of zinc oxide nanoparticles induced the generation of oxidative DNA damage during UVA and visible light irradiation in keratinocytes [43]. Oxidative stress and skin cell

PVP-coated, negatively charged silver nanoparticles: A multi-center study of their physicochemical characteristics, cell culture and in vivo experiments

• Sebastian Ahlberg,
• Alexandra Antonopulos,
• Jörg Diendorf,
• Ralf Dringen,
• Matthias Epple,
• Rebekka Flöck,
• Wolfgang Goedecke,
• Christina Graf,
• Nadine Haberl,
• Jens Helmlinger,
• Fabian Herzog,
• Frederike Heuer,
• Stephanie Hirn,
• Christian Johannes,
• Stefanie Kittler,
• Manfred Köller,
• Katrin Korn,
• Wolfgang G. Kreyling,
• Fritz Krombach,
• Jürgen Lademann,
• Kateryna Loza,
• Eva M. Luther,
• Marcelina Malissek,
• Martina C. Meinke,
• Daniel Nordmeyer,
• Anne Pailliart,
• Jörg Raabe,
• Fiorenza Rancan,
• Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser,
• Eckart Rühl,
• Carsten Schleh,
• Andreas Seibel,
• Christina Sengstock,
• Lennart Treuel,
• Annika Vogt,
• Katrin Weber and
• Reinhard Zellner

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 1944–1965, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.205

• radiation induce genomic DSB, there is evidence in both cases that radicals are involved [114][115]. In the case of bleomycin, reasonable models suggest that metal ions play a role during DSB formation [116]. In the case of silver nanoparticles, it has also been proposed that DNA damage may result from

• ) were exposed to silver nanoparticles. The DNA damage was greater in the normal and in the DNA-PKcs-deficient cells. Therefore this study shows the importance of DNA-PKcs in the repair of DNA-damage caused by silver nanoparticles. It also shows that a combination of silver nanoparticles and DNA-PKcs

Carbon-based smart nanomaterials in biomedicine and neuroengineering

• Antonina M. Monaco and
• Michele Giugliano

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 1849–1863, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.196

• were incubated with oxidised NDs, suggesting it was a specific consequence of the surface chemistry of NDs. Nonetheless, Xing and co-workers noted that NDs and oxidised NDs induce overall less DNA damage than that caused by MWCNTs. The investigation of the cellular uptake mechanisms of NDs is also a

Mimicking exposures to acute and lifetime concentrations of inhaled silver nanoparticles by two different in vitro approaches

• Fabian Herzog,
• Kateryna Loza,
• Sandor Balog,
• Martin J. D. Clift,
• Matthias Epple,
• Peter Gehr,
• Alke Petri-Fink and
• Barbara Rothen-Rutishauser

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 1357–1370, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.149

• , increased levels of oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected over a time period of 48 h [22][25][26]. Environmental stressors trigger the production of intracellular ROS, which can overwhelm the cellular antioxidant defence system. ROS can cause DNA damage, which results in the

• breaking of DNA strands and covalent DNA modifications [10]. Hence, Ag NPs have been shown to cause significant DNA damage in human lung cells in vitro [25][27] suggesting a potential genotoxic mechanism. Despite this, the specific interaction of Ag NPs with cells still remains unclear. Ag NPs released

Near-infrared dye loaded polymeric nanoparticles for cancer imaging and therapy and cellular response after laser-induced heating

• Tingjun Lei,
• Alicia Fernandez-Fernandez,
• Romila Manchanda,
• Yen-Chih Huang and
• Anthony J. McGoron

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2014, 5, 313–322, doi:10.3762/bjnano.5.35

• under rapid heating the cells are not able to initiate protective mechanisms by inducing the expression of proteins of the heat shock family to reduce DNA damage [23][31]. Although the laser/NP HT produced approximately 9 times less thermal dose than incubator HT, it still resulted in significantly

• important as a therapeutic target [34]. Traditional HT with slow and long-term heating appears beneficial as an adjuvant therapy for radiotherapy and chemotherapy since it can hinder DNA damage repair mechanisms and increase drug delivery by enhancing its diffusion into the tumor [35][36]. However, this

Cytotoxic and proinflammatory effects of PVP-coated silver nanoparticles after intratracheal instillation in rats

• Nadine Haberl,
• Stephanie Hirn,
• Alexander Wenk,
• Jörg Diendorf,
• Matthias Epple,
• Blair D. Johnston,
• Fritz Krombach,
• Wolfgang G. Kreyling and
• Carsten Schleh

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 933–940, doi:10.3762/bjnano.4.105

• times did not cause adverse health effects in rats as measured by lung function, hematology, and body weight chances [25][26]. The mechanisms of toxicity are proposed to be oxidative stress, DNA damage, and the modulation of cytokine production [20]. In addition, Liu et al. showed that AgNP undergo

Modulation of defect-mediated energy transfer from ZnO nanoparticles for the photocatalytic degradation of bilirubin

• Tanujjal Bora,
• Karthik K. Lakshman,
• Soumik Sarkar,
• Abhinandan Makhal,
• Samim Sardar,
• Samir K. Pal and
• Joydeep Dutta

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 714–725, doi:10.3762/bjnano.4.81

• . In summary, from the present study, it is clear that for the efficient photocatalytic degradation of BR in blood, the defect-states in the ZnO nanoparticle catalyst, which can be modulated simply by annealing the nanoparticles, is crucial. Although DNA damage due to the exposure to UV irradiation can

Nanolesions induced by heavy ions in human tissues: Experimental and theoretical studies

• Marcus Bleicher,
• Lucas Burigo,
• Marco Durante,
• Maren Herrlitz,
• Michael Krämer,
• Igor Mishustin,
• Iris Müller,
• Francesco Natale,
• Igor Pshenichnov,
• Stefan Schramm,
• Gisela Taucher-Scholz and
• Cathrin Wälzlein

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2012, 3, 556–563, doi:10.3762/bjnano.3.64

• takes place at sites of DNA damage [8], we investigated the acetylation of different histone residues that may be involved in this process. We investigated the histone residues H4K16 as well as H3K56. It is known that these residues play a role in the DNA damage response after irradiation by X-rays and

• . DNA-damage-induced foci of the repair factor XRCC1 (green) and γH2AX (red) are clearly visualized at the sites of ion traversal. Both proteins colocalize within each of the targeted chromo centers (blue: DAPI DNA staining). (b) Analysis of the time-dependent localization of XRCC1 and γH2AX radiation

• fibroblasts. Cells were irradiated with Au ions (energy: 8 MeV/n, linear energy transfer (LET): 13000 keV/μm; fluence: 3·106 ions/cm2) at a low angle and fixed after 1 h. H4K16ac (green) is increased at damage sites. DNA damage is shown by γH2AX staining (red). DNA is counterstained with ToPro3 (blue). From

Radiation-induced nanostructures: Formation processes and applications

• Michael Huth

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2012, 3, 533–534, doi:10.3762/bjnano.3.61

• or as templates for the (galvanic) growth of metallic or semiconducting nanowires, as is also reviewed in one of the following contributions. In close connection to this, highly energetic particles, in particular those from the sun, pose a risk for astronauts as they can induce severe DNA damage upon

• in living tissue, which causes different types of DNA damage on bases, as well as single- and double-bond breaks. High-energy particles travel in straight trajectories and have a relatively well-defined stopping point, at which the majority of the energy is deposited. In the tracks, the linear energy

• understanding of the different dissociation pathways and bond-breaking mechanisms would be highly valuable. On the one hand, for FEBID this holds the promise of developing this technique towards electron-controlled chemistry on the nanometer scale. For cancer therapy and the understanding of DNA damage, a