Organic–inorganic nanosystems

• Paul Ziemann

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 363–364, doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.41

• control of the chemical composition of the structures or of their spatial arrangement add further difficulties to the preparation. Finally, excluding time consuming, and thus costly, sequential top-down methods, one is almost naturally led to self-organizing bottom-up processes. At this point organic

Review and outlook: from single nanoparticles to self-assembled monolayers and granular GMR sensors

• Alexander Weddemann,
• Inga Ennen,
• Anna Regtmeier,
• Camelia Albon,
• Annalena Wolff,
• Katrin Eckstädt,
• Nadine Mill,
• Michael K.-H. Peter,
• Jochen Mattay,
• Carolin Plattner,
• Norbert Sewald and
• Andreas Hütten

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2010, 1, 75–93, doi:10.3762/bjnano.1.10

• random direction and adherent rows tend to align with each other in areas of high concentration [10][60]. The arrangement of disks is not yet completely understood. The minimization and size dependence of the van der Waals contribution are supposed to be the main driving forces for the spatial

• arrangement [15][51] and the size distribution along the chains [51]. Bao et al. explained the formation of disk rows by a hydrophobic interaction between the ligand tails, thus, minimizing exposure to air by maximizing the contact between the ligand tails [60]. Due to the magnetic nature of the Co disks, a

Preparation and characterization of supported magnetic nanoparticles prepared by reverse micelles

• Ulf Wiedwald,
• Luyang Han,
• Johannes Biskupek,
• Ute Kaiser and
• Paul Ziemann

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2010, 1, 24–47, doi:10.3762/bjnano.1.5

• the finally obtained spatial arrangement of the NPs. This basic idea of preparation and the different steps involved are summarized in the schematics shown in Scheme 1. The first experimental realization of the above approach was demonstrated by the preparation of hexagonally ordered arrays of Au NPs