Impact of adsorbate–substrate interaction on nanostructured thin films growth during low-pressure condensation

• Alina V. Dvornichenko,
• Vasyl O. Kharchenko and
• Dmitrii O. Kharchenko

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2025, 16, 473–483, doi:10.3762/bjnano.16.36

• on the substrate–adsorbate interaction strength δ at different adsorption rates α and adsorbate–adsorbate interaction strengths ε are shown in Figure 1. It follows that an increase in the interaction strength δ from zero results in first-order transitions from a low-density state towards a high

• substrate–adsorbate interaction strength onto pattern formation during deposition, we consider here two different cases. The first one relates to the one-component substrates (OCS) characterized by different values of δ. The second case is the deposition onto multicomponent substrates (MCS) representing

• –substrate interactions, can be rescaled for particular adsorbate–substrate systems by exploiting data from the experimental studies and/or atomistic modeling. Dependencies of the homogeneous stationary states xst on the substrate–adsorbate interaction strength δ at different α end ε. Stability diagram for

Adsorption of the ionic liquid [BMP][TFSA] on Au(111) and Ag(111): substrate effects on the structure formation investigated by STM

• Benedikt Uhl,
• Florian Buchner,
• Dorothea Alwast,
• Nadja Wagner and
• R. Jürgen Behm

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2013, 4, 903–918, doi:10.3762/bjnano.4.102

• –liquid interface at room temperature and above, e.g., by the much higher molecular mobility, these measurements provide sensitive information on the interactions between the adsorbed ions and on the variation in substrate–adsorbate interaction (adsorption potential) along the surface. These

Intermolecular vs molecule–substrate interactions: A combined STM and theoretical study of supramolecular phases on graphene/Ru(0001)

• Michael Roos,
• Benedikt Uhl,
• Daniela Künzel,
• Harry E. Hoster,
• Axel Groß and
• R. Jürgen Behm

Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2011, 2, 365–373, doi:10.3762/bjnano.2.42

• intermolecular interactions and long-range lateral variations in the substrate–adsorbate interaction was studied by scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) and force field based calculations, by comparing the phase formation of (sub-) monolayers of the organic molecules (i) 2-phenyl-4,6-bis(6-(pyridin-3-yl)-4

• interaction; large organic molecules; substrate–adsorbate interaction; supramolecular structure; Introduction It is well known that the formation of highly ordered 2D supramolecular networks on smooth surfaces, such as metal substrates or highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG), is mainly governed by the