Logo Beilstein Institut

Synthetic applications of the Cannizzaro reaction

  1. 1 ,
  2. 2 and
  3. 2
1Department of Chemistry, Nabadwip Vidyasagar College, West Bengal, India
2School of Chemical Sciences, Central University of Gujarat, Gandhinagar-382030, India
  1. Corresponding author email
Associate Editor: M. Rueping
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2024, 20, 1376–1395. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.20.120
Received 16 Feb 2024, Accepted 06 Jun 2024, Published 19 Jun 2024
Review
cc by logo
PDF
Album
Cite

Abstract

The Cannizzaro reaction has emerged as a versatile synthetic tool for the construction of functionalized molecules. Dating back to the 19th century, this reaction, though initially used for the synthesis of an alcohol and acid functionality from aldehydes, has henceforth proven useful to generate diverse molecular entities using both intermolecular and intramolecular synthetic strategies. Immense applications in the synthesis of hydroxy acids and esters, heterocycles, fused carbocycles, natural products, and others with broad substrate scope have raised profound interest from methodological and synthetic standpoints. The ongoing development of reagents, solvents, and technologies for the Cannizzaro reaction reflects the broader trend in organic synthesis towards more sustainable and efficient practices. The focus of this review is to highlight some recent advances in synthetic strategies and applications of the Cannizzaro reaction towards the synthesis of potentially useful molecules.

Keywords: Cannizzaro reaction; crossed-Cannizzaro; desymmetrization; Lewis acid catalyst; natural products

Introduction

The synthesis of functionalized molecules with structural complexity has always been a challenge to synthetic chemists. The Cannizzaro reaction, in its simplified form, focuses on the base-induced disproportionation of two molecules of a non-enolizable aromatic and/or aliphatic aldehyde (without an α-hydrogen atom). These aldehydes undergo in the presence of concentrated alkali or other strong bases, a simultaneous oxidation and reduction sequence of two aldehyde molecules, forming an alcohol and an acid [1-4]. Since its discovery in 1853, the Cannizzaro reaction has emerged as an important reaction in synthetic organic chemistry with intermolecular, crossed, and intramolecular versions as demonstrated by numerous applications. Notably, the Cannizzaro reaction has come across with subtle developments and changes in base modifications leading to compounds of potential interest [5,6]. The intermolecular Cannizzaro reaction is a chemical process in which two molecules of a non-enolizable aldehyde (2R1CHO) are disproportionated by a base to produce a carboxylic acid (R1CO2H) and a primary alcohol (R1CH2OH). When a mixture of formaldehyde (HCHO) and a non-enolizable aldehyde (R1CHO) is treated with a strong base, the latter is preferentially reduced to the alcohol (R1CH2OH) while formaldehyde is oxidized to formic acid (HCO2H). Herein excess formaldehyde is used as a reductant. This variant is known as the crossed-Cannizzaro reaction. On the other hand, an intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction occurs when both aldehyde groups are present in a single molecule. In this scenario, one aldehyde group is reduced to the corresponding alcohol, while the other is oxidized to a carboxylic acid. The mechanistic pathway of the intramolecular, intermolecular, and crossed-Cannizzaro reactions is well-known and is depicted in Figure 1 [7-11]. As per contemporary mechanistic understanding of this disproportionation reaction, it involves the transfer of a hydride ion from a tetracoordinated intermediate (B), which is formed upon hydroxide addition to the aldehyde (A). The primary pathway of the reaction entails the rate-determining step of hydride ion transfer via either a linear or bent transition state (C) to a second molecule of aldehyde furnishing the corresponding alcohol (D) and acid molecule (E).

[1860-5397-20-120-1]

Figure 1: Types and mechanism of the Cannizzaro reaction.

Review

Modernization of the Cannizzaro reaction

Researchers have always aimed to improve the efficiency, selectivity, and sustainability of reaction processes. The development of reagents, solvents, and application of modern technology frame the Cannizzaro reaction as an important synthetic tool in organic synthesis.

Certain developments in the Cannizzaro reaction with regard to reagents, solvents, and technologies are worth mentioning. Generally, the classical version of the Cannizzaro reaction is conducted at elevated temperatures using stoichiometric amounts of alkali metal hydroxides or other strong bases, commonly NaOH, KOH, Ba(OH)2·8H2O or sodium ethoxide, etc. [12-18]. Such harsh conditions and the competitive formation of undesired side products have been the major limiting factors for the Cannizzaro reaction in the past several decades [19-22].

The base-mediated solvent-free Cannizzaro reaction was achieved through various methods, such as by grinding reactants in mechanochemical approaches and/or solid-supported bases. Minimizing the use of hazardous solvents not only reduces environmental impact but also simplifies product isolation and purification and improves the overall sustainability of the process [23,24]. However; specific reaction requirements ensure efficient and selective utilization of solvents.

Marvi and Talakoubi carried out the Cannizzaro reaction [25] using montmorillonite K-10 and KSF clays as recyclable and heterogeneous catalysts to catalyze the Cannizzaro reaction by 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane under microwave irradiation and solvent-free conditions giving the products in excellent yields within seconds. The solid clay applied in the first cycle can be recovered and reused in subsequent reactions. Reddy and coworkers carried out the Cannizzaro reaction of aromatic aldehydes to the corresponding alcohols in high yields by crossed-Cannizzaro reactions employing solid-supported KF-Al2O3 as catalyst [26] under microwave irradiation using solvent-free conditions.

The use of different phase-transfer reagents and catalysts such as benzyltriethylammonium chloride, tetrabutylammonium bromide and many others have had profound impacts on the Cannizzaro reaction. Entezari and Shameli [27] studied the effect of an ultrasonic wave on the Cannizzaro reaction catalyzed by a phase-transfer catalyst in the presence of KOH as the base. Canipelle et al. [28] put forward an improved Cannizzaro disproportionation of 4-biphenylcarboxaldehyde into the corresponding alcohol and carboxylic acid products employing cyclodextrins as the phase-transfer agent. A Cannizzaro desymmetrization reaction of tetraethylene glycol (TEG) was accomplished by Vida et al. [29] using a barium compound.

Different types of solvents were also applied for the Cannizzaro reactions. The use of aqueous or solvent-free conditions has played pivotal roles in terms of environmental consciousness and a greener reaction [30,31]. Daemi et al. employed polyurethane nanomicelles as an eco-friendly and efficient polymeric ionic solvent [32]. Morooka et al. used supercritical water for the catalys-free Cannizzaro-type reaction of acetaldehyde [33]. Thus, the originally developed Cannizzaro reaction was subjected to numerous modified techniques, which established the greener side of the reaction. The use of Lewis acid catalysis in this regard [34-39] played a significant role, which also suppressed the epimerization in the case of chiral molecules. Among the various Lewis acid catalysts such as ytterbium triflate, ZrO2, Cu(OT)2, MgBr2, LiBr, AlCl3, Fe and Ru catalysts have gained attention [40-43].

The Cannizzaro reaction has also found extensive use in the synthesis of bioactive and drug molecules [44-46]. Moreover, enzymatic transformations have been also observed for the synthesis of α-hydroxycarboxylic acids [47]. They are also used in the development of different nanoparticle preparations and other reactions for synthesis of bioactive compounds [48-50].

Green synthesis methodologies, such as microwave-assisted [51-53] and ultrasound-assisted reactions [54] are established techniques in green chemistry due to their potential benefits in terms of reduced reaction times, increased yields, and the ability to perform reactions under milder conditions than traditional methods. The Cannizzaro reaction, being a useful synthetic tool, has also been explored in this regard. The Cannizzaro reaction also finds extensive industrial use in synthesizing pentaerythritol, a crucial intermediate in manufacturing of alkyd resins and plasticizers [55]. The crossed-Cannizzaro reaction contributes to polyol production for polyester resin synthesis. In the field of fragrance and flavoring agents, it plays a vital role for the development of unique sensory compounds [56,57].

The Cannizzaro disproportionation has also been observed in several electrochemical transformations [58] and during the electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide [59]. A recent study by Liu et al. witnessed a competing Cannizzaro reaction during the electrochemical oxidation of furfural [60]. On the other hand, 5-hydroxymethyl-2-furancarboxylic acid (HMFCA) and dihydroxymethylfuran (DHMF), obtained via the Cannizzaro disproportionation of 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural, were electrochemically oxidized to 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid (FDCA), a monomer used for biopolymer production [61]. Other modifications include the use of ortho-substituted aromatic amines as a base in the Cannizzaro reaction and others (Figure 2) [62].

[1860-5397-20-120-2]

Figure 2: Various approaches of the Cannizzaro reaction.

The synthesis of several useful molecular entities [63,64] and synthons of biologically relevant compounds, which include prostaglandins [65], β-lactams [66,67], homatropine [68,69] among many more [70] (Figure 3), reinforce the importance of the Cannizzaro reaction. Modifications of both intermolecular and intramolecular Cannizzaro reactions have been observed in numerous methodologies, such as Lewis acid catalysis, desymmetrization of symmetrical dialdehydes, synthesis of natural products, and building blocks. These modifications constitute the main highlight of this review. The use of modern technology and newer strategies aiming towards industrial benefit is the goal for the future [71,72]. Herein, we discuss recent advances in the Cannizzaro reaction, focusing on the synthetic developments of natural products and important building blocks in the last two decades.

[1860-5397-20-120-3]

Figure 3: Representative molecules synthesized via the Cannizzaro reaction.

Applications of the Cannizzaro reaction in organic synthesis

The Cannizzaro reaction has been significantly important in synthetic organic chemistry due to its ability to provide a convenient route for the synthesis of alcohols and carboxylic acids from aldehydes. This disproportionation reaction has evoked numerous developments and applications. The Cannizzaro reaction proved to be particularly valuable in cases where other methods of oxidation or reduction might be challenging or impractical. The present discussion focuses on some recent synthetic advances and their application in biologically active compounds.

Lewis acid-catalyzed intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction

Wang et al. [73] depicted a highly enantioselective intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction of aryl and alkyl glyoxals 1a–h and alcohol 2 using trisoxazoline (TOX) ligand (4)/copper catalysts to furnish the requisite mandelic esters 3a–h in good yields (greater than 90%) and high enantioselectivity. This was observed in the wide substrate scope as represented in the table below. The yields and selectivity were found to be superior compared to bisoxazoline (BOX) ligands, which was attributed to the steric bulk imparted by the ligand at the stereoinduction step. Increasing the steric size of the alcohol also contributed to the increased enantioselectivity of the resultant product (Scheme 1).

[1860-5397-20-120-i1]

Scheme 1: Intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction of aryl glyoxal hydrates using TOX catalysts.

A one-pot oxidation–Cannizzaro reaction of aryl methyl ketones to mandelic acid derivatives was observed in the presences of ytterbium triflate as the catalyst. The intramolecular reaction sequence employed a SeO2/Yb(OTf)3 combination to affect the in-situ oxidation of the aryl methyl ketones 5 to the corresponding aryl glyoxal with concomitant rearrangement of the aryl glyoxal to the target α-hydroxycarboxylic acid derivatives 6, catalyzed by Yb(OTf)3. The simple process reflects the generality of the methodology with yields ranging from 78–99% as represented below (Scheme 2) [34].

[1860-5397-20-120-i2]

Scheme 2: Intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction of aryl methyl ketones using ytterbium triflate/selenium dioxide.

Morken and coworkers [36] set forth an intramolecular Lewis acid-mediated Cannizzaro reaction of aryl glyoxals 7 at room temperature using appropriate chromium or copper catalysts. The strategy afforded moderate to good yields of Mandelic esters 8 in the presence of Cr(ClO4)3 (Scheme 3).

[1860-5397-20-120-i3]

Scheme 3: Intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction of aryl glyoxals using Cr(ClO4)3 as catalyst.

They also extended the approach to study enantioselective Cannizzaro reactions of similar substrates using a Cu bisoxazoline (A) [Cu(OTf)2-PhBox] complex as the chiral catalyst, producing the desired enantiomeric compounds in modest yields and up to 33% ee (Scheme 4). The mechanistic transformation of the aryl glyoxals is outlined below (Scheme 4), which depicts the coordination of the hemiacetal B with the metal catalyst to give C, followed by hydride transfer to form the metal-coordinated Cannizzaro product D.

[1860-5397-20-120-i4]

Scheme 4: Cu(II)-PhBox-catalyzed asymmetric Cannizzaro reaction.

Another intramolecular asymmetric Cannizzaro reaction was reported by Wu et al. where they applied a FeCl3-based chiral catalyst with an N,N′-dioxide ligand [74]. The optimization of the reaction conditions revealed the L–RaPr2–FeCl3 complex being superior and delivering good to excellent results, thus witnessing a broad substrate scope taking different glyoxal monohydrates 1 and alcohols 10. Excellent yields and enantioselectivities of the intramolecular Cannizzaro version were observed furnishing a wide range of alkyl and aryl mandelate esters 9 and 3 (Scheme 5).

[1860-5397-20-120-i5]

Scheme 5: FeCl3-based chiral catalyst applied for the enantioselective intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction reported by Wu et al.

The asymmetric intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction of anhydrous phenylglyoxal (7a) with alcohols was envisaged by Ishihara et al. using chiral copper bis(oxazoline) (S,S-11) catalysts to provide optically active mandelic acid esters 9 [75]. Among the different catalysts employed, Cu(SbF6)2 in the presence of t-butanol and (S,S)-bis oxazoline (S,S-11), afforded the desired product in 71% yield and 54% enantioselectivity. They employed a double asymmetric induction with (+)/(−)-menthol (12), and CuX2 bis(oxazoline) catalyst where the corresponding chiral mandelate ester 13 was obtained in 81% yield and high selectivity (90% de) (Scheme 6). The proposed mechanism of the reaction is depicted below.

[1860-5397-20-120-i6]

Scheme 6: Copper bis-oxazoline-catalysed intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction and proposed mechanism.

Hong et al. developed an asymmetric iron catalyst with the aim of expanding the platform of metal catalysis. Catalysts 14 and 15 proved to be effective in the transformation of glyoxal monohydrates 1a and alcohol 2, to deliver mandelate esters 3a in good yields and enantioselectivities via an enantioselective intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction (Scheme 7) [76].

[1860-5397-20-120-i7]

Scheme 7: Chiral Fe catalysts-mediated enantioselective Cannizzaro reaction.

Lewis acid-catalyzed intermolecular Cannizzaro reactions

Kim et al. succeeded in the transformation of aromatic aldehydes 16 to the corresponding alcohols 17 using ruthenium catalysis in the presence of KOH and dioxane as solvent (Scheme 8). The reaction proceeded with modest to good yields, in the range of 40–82%, and depicts the Cannizzaro reaction in the transfer hydrogenation process [35].

[1860-5397-20-120-i8]

Scheme 8: Ruthenium-catalyzed Cannizzaro reaction of aromatic aldehydes.

A facile room temperature Cannizzaro reaction protocol was established by Abaee et al. employing magnesium bromide etherate and triethylamine in dichloromethane [77]. The methodology afforded smooth transformation of aromatic aldehydes 16 to the corresponding alcohols 17 and carboxylic acids 18 in good yields (>80%). They also extended the methodology to dialdehydes such as phenylglyoxal (7a) and phthalaldehyde (16m), achieving an intramolecular version of the reaction to afford α-hydroxy acids and derivatives thereof (Scheme 9).

[1860-5397-20-120-i9]

Scheme 9: MgBr2·Et2O-assisted Cannizzaro reaction of aldehydes.

They also devised a similar intermolecular Cannizzaro protocol using LiBr as the catalyst to achieve an analogous disproportionation of aromatic aldehydes 16 to the respective alcohols 17 and acids (18)/esters (19). The reaction proceeded with more than 85% yield in all cases with clean conversion to the products (Scheme 10) [78].

[1860-5397-20-120-i10]

Scheme 10: LiBr-catalyzed intermolecular Cannizzaro reaction of aldehydes.

The utility of neutral γ-alumina has been exploited as a polymeric Lewis acid catalyst in the Cannizzaro reaction of similar aromatic aldehydes 16. The conversion to the respective aromatic alcohols 17 and carboxylic acids 18 was efficient as reflected in the modest to very good yields in each case (Scheme 11). The reaction proceeded under microwave conditions without the use of any base affording the desired Cannizzaro products [79].

[1860-5397-20-120-i11]

Scheme 11: γ-Alumina as a catalyst in the Cannizzaro reaction.

An analogous Cannizzaro disproportionation was achieved by Sharifi et al. [80] where they made use of a catalyst system comprising AlCl3/Et3N in dichloromethane, transforming different aliphatic and aromatic aldehydes 16 to their end products. A wide variety of substrates were tested, using stoichiometric amounts of AlCl3 and transformed in good to excellent yields to the corresponding alcohols 17 and acids 18 (Scheme 12).

[1860-5397-20-120-i12]

Scheme 12: AlCl3-mediated Cannizzaro disproportionation of aldehydes.

Santilli et al. demonstrated a dehydrogenative protocol for the synthesis of carboxylic acids 21 from primary alcohols 19 employing a ruthenium p-cymene complex (20) in the presence of a suitable hydroxide [81]. Both primary aliphatic alcohols and benzylic alcohols delivered fruitful results. However, the reaction of benzyl alcohols was found to proceed within shorter reaction times and much higher yields compared to aliphatic alcohols. This process presumably involves a Cannizzaro reaction during the conversion of the benzyl alcohols and the intermediate aldehyde reacts with the hydroxide under the Cannizzaro conditions to give the desired product (Scheme 13). The mechanistic pathway for the transformation is represented in Figure 4.

[1860-5397-20-120-i13]

Scheme 13: Ru–N-heterocyclic carbene catalyzed dehydrogenative synthesis of carboxylic acids.

[1860-5397-20-120-4]

Figure 4: Proposed catalytic cycle for the dehydrogenation of alcohols.

Desymmetrization via intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction

Vida et al. reported the intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction of dialdehyde 23, synthesized from tetraethylene glycol (TEG) 22. The dialdehyde 23 underwent a clean desymmetrization to form the hydroxy carboxylic acid derivative 24. The reaction was mediated by Ba2+ which perfectly bound the TEG and allowed the aldehyde functionalities to be placed in the appropriate vicinity for the reaction to take place in appreciably good yields (84%). The barium cation template is the key for the reaction, as is the base concentration for effective hydride transfer (Scheme 14) [29].

[1860-5397-20-120-i14]

Scheme 14: Intramolecular desymmetrization of tetraethylene glycol.

They also extended the scope of the intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction to ethylene glycol units of different chain lengths ranging from 2–5 (25, 26, and 27), by varying the aromatic substitution in the ortho, meta and para-positions and finally obtained the desymmetrized products 28, 29, and 30 in good to excellent yields (Scheme 15). This has been effectively depicted in the proposed strategy where the metal ion acts as the binding cation template for the intramolecular desymmetrization (Scheme 15) [82].

[1860-5397-20-120-i15]

Scheme 15: Desymmetrization of oligoethylene glycol dialdehydes.

A similar highly efficient intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction of calix[4]arene dialdehydes was observed by Galli et al. where the 1,3-distal cone 35 significantly responded to Cannizzaro disproportionation, forming the hydroxy acid product 38, using a strong base [83]. On the other hand, the analogous 1,2-vicinal isomer 36 and the monoaldehyde 37 failed to produce any fruitful results. This difference in reactivity was referred to the relative positions of the formyl groups in the respective isomers where the geometry of the 1,3-distal dialdehyde 35 was conformationally favorable for the intramolecular hydride attack to take place leading to the formation of the product (Scheme 16).

[1860-5397-20-120-i16]

Scheme 16: Intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction of calix[4]arene dialdehydes.

Symmetrical crown ethers having two aldehyde groups 39–42 were functionalized and desymmetrized by Rouser et al. using an intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction to give the corresponding unsymmetrical acid–alcohol substituted crown ether derivatives 43–46. Good to excellent yields of the desymmetrized Cannizarro products 43–46 were obtained using Ba(OH)2 as the base, thus effecting efficient desymmetrization of crown ether dialdehydes (Scheme 17) [84].

[1860-5397-20-120-i17]

Scheme 17: Desymmetrization of dialdehydes of symmetrical crown ethers using Ba(OH)2.

Synthesis of natural products and pharmaceuticals

Exploring intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction: The Cannizzaro reaction is a versatile synthetic tool with applications in the synthesis of natural products, fine chemicals, and pharmaceuticals. Its ability to introduce carboxylic acid functionalities and facilitate functional group interconversions makes it a valuable method for chemists engaged in the design and synthesis of diverse organic compounds. A selection of applications is depicted herein.

Mehta et al. established a highly selective intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction while accomplishing the synthesis of the bicyclic core structure of proposed ottelione A (47) [85]. Commencing from the Diels–Alder adduct 48, an enzymatic desymmetrization of the reduced diol 49 formed the enantiopure 50 (ee >99%). A cascade of reaction sequences delivered the tetracyclic cage compound 51. Acetal opening in 51 afforded the keto-aldehyde 52 which underwent an intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction to give the trihydroxy acid 53, finally cyclizing to the lactone diol 54, elaboration of which led to the desired target (Scheme 18).

[1860-5397-20-120-i18]

Scheme 18: Synthesis of ottelione A (proposed) via intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction.

An interesting application of the intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction was demonstrated by the group of Schmalz in the total synthesis of the marine antibiotic pestalone [86]. They observed a facile isomerization of the pestalone derivatives 55/57 into the intramolecular lactone derivatives rac-56a,b which features a Cannizzaro–Tishchenko-type reaction representing analogous derivatives related to pestalachloride A. The mechanistic transformation could be illustrated schematically following the transformation from 58 to 61 through the intermediates 59 and 60. The natural pestalone 62 when subjected to a photo-induced transformation leads to pestalalactone (rac-63), involving a photo-induced Cannizzaro–Tishchenko sequence (Scheme 19).

[1860-5397-20-120-i19]

Scheme 19: Intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction for the synthesis of pestalalactone.

An efficient synthetic strategy for nigricanin was accomplished by Abe et al. wherein they utilized the intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction as a key step for desymmetrization of the crucial dialdehyde intermediate 65 [87]. The sequence of transformations commencing from the aldehyde 64 afforded the desymmetrized biaryl derivative 66 and proceeded towards the final natural product 67 (Scheme 20).

[1860-5397-20-120-i20]

Scheme 20: Synthetic strategy towards nigricanin involving an intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction.

Applying crossed-Cannizzaro reaction: Mondal and coauthors demonstrated an efficient application of the aldol/crossed-Cannizzaro reaction in the construction of the spiro-β-lactone ring while targeting the spiro-β-lactone-γ-lactam ring of oxazolomycin and lazollamycin [88]. Proceeding towards the requisite fragment they envisaged a series of crucial diastereoselective transformations arriving at the precursor 69 to the Cannizzaro reaction commencing from 68. The primary hydroxymethyl functionality in 69 was oxidized to the corresponding aldehyde 70, which was subsequently treated with 37% aqueous formaldehyde and NaOH, to result in a mixture of the gem-hydroxymethyl derivative 72 and the carbamate 71 which led to the spiro-β-lactone core 73 (Scheme 21).

[1860-5397-20-120-i21]

Scheme 21: Spiro-β-lactone-γ-lactam part of oxazolomycins via aldol crossed-Cannizzaro reaction.

An expedient use of the Cannizzaro reaction was exemplified in the noteworthy enantioselective synthesis towards the indole alkaloids 16-epivellosimine, (+)-polyneuridine, and (+)-macusine A as reported by Cook and coworkers [89]. This was effectively worked out from ᴅ-(−)-tryptophan via the common intermediate, (+)-vellosimine (74). The protocol reflected the stereocontrolled formation of the C-16 quaternary center in 76 created via an intermolecular crossed-Cannizzaro reaction of 75, generated from 74, using 37% aqueous formaldehyde. The quaternization proceeded in excellent yield (92%) and formed the diol 77, after the removal of the Boc-protecting group, where the prochiral hydroxymethyl groups ultimately paved the way towards the natural products (Scheme 22).

[1860-5397-20-120-i22]

Scheme 22: Synthesis of indole alkaloids via aldol crossed-Cannizzaro reaction.

Bernhardson and coworkers developed a simple scalable route towards ertugliflozin (80), a C-glycoside containing a bicyclic ketal motif. The method illustrates the potent use of an aldol-crossed-Cannizzaro reaction to form the quaternarized pentol 79 from the aldehyde 78 in 94% yield and >99.8% purity after recrystallization. This symbolizes the efficient applicability of the Cannizzaro reaction for the synthesis of medicinally useful molecules (Scheme 23) [90].

[1860-5397-20-120-i23]

Scheme 23: Aldol and crossed-Cannizzaro reaction towards the synthesis of ertuliflozin.

The Cannizzaro reaction has also been applied to the preparation of mandelic acid-based synthons, which gain potential importance in the synthesis of prostaglandins, cephalosporins, and homatropine [65-69].

Synthesis of useful scaffolds

Burroughs et al. developed an intramolecular Cannizzaro-based cascade synthesis for the construction of 8-membered cycloocta-2,5-dienones [91]. The initial formation of the organolithium species 82 formed by acetylide addition to the ortho-substituted bromoaldehyde 81, was subjected to halogen exchange and transmetalation to the organocuprate 83. The latter undergoes an SN2’ addition to the propargyl chloride 84 and the resulting allene intermediate 85 undergoes an intramolecular Cannizzaro-type hydride transfer via 86 to produce the 8-membered cyclized target 87 in good yield (70%) (Scheme 24).

[1860-5397-20-120-i24]

Scheme 24: Synthesis of cyclooctadieneones using a Cannizzaro reaction.

Huang et al. set up a clean crossed-Cannizzaro-aldol reaction strategy of isatin derivatives 88 and 90 with paraformaldehyde under microwave irradiation to furnish 3,3-disubstituted oxindole derivatives 89a–h and 91a–d [92]. The representative 3-hydroxymethyloxindole adducts with varying substituents (R1 and R2) were obtained in good to excellent yields witnessing the feasibility of the methodology (Scheme 25). The mechanism depicting the proposed strategy for the Cannizzaro-aldol transformation involves an initial Cannizzaro reaction between paraformaldehyde and the isatin substrate, followed by an aldol transformation to the final product.

[1860-5397-20-120-i25]

Scheme 25: Microwave-assisted crossed-Cannizzaro reaction for the synthesis of 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles.

Bruckner and coworkers synthesized pyrrole-modified porphyrin ring systems from secochlorin bisaldehydes, representing an interesting application of the intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction. Subjecting the bisaldehyde 92 to basic conditions using Et4NOH, formed the product 93 in 36–59% yield along with the overoxidized compound 95, and the dimer 94 as byproducts. However, upon reaction with methanol under acidic conditions, the product 93 and the dimer 94 underwent a smooth transformation to the methyl acetal in high yields. Similar exposure of the nickel(II) complex 96 to the same basic conditions resulted in the formation of the Cannizzaro adduct hemiacetal Ni(II) complex 97 in 56–65% yield predominantly with the byproduct 98 in less than 5% yield (Scheme 26) [93].

[1860-5397-20-120-i26]

Scheme 26: Synthesis of porphyrin-based rings using the Cannizzaro reaction.

Schmalz and coworkers transformed 2-formylarylketones 99 into 3-substituted phthalides 100, as evidenced by the per-O-methylated derivative of pestalone, a marine natural substance. Either in a Cannizarro–Tishchenko-type reaction with nucleophile catalysis (NaCN) or under photochemical conditions (DMSO, 350 nm), the transformation often proceeds without any problems in DMSO (Scheme 27) [94].

[1860-5397-20-120-i27]

Scheme 27: Synthesis of phthalides and pestalalactone via Cannizarro–Tishchenko-type reaction.

Two isomeric bislactones 4,6,10,12-tetrahydro-4,12-dioxo-5,11-dioxadibenzo[ef,kl]heptalene (103a) and 4,6,10,12-tetrahydro-4,10-dioxo-5,11-dioxadibenzo [ef,kl]heptalene (103b) were synthesized [95] as chiral and atropisomeric molecules via double intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction of 1,1'-biphenyl-2,2',6,6'-tetracarboxaldehyde (101) (Scheme 28).

[1860-5397-20-120-i28]

Scheme 28: Synthesis of dibenzoheptalene bislactones via a double intramolecular Cannizzaro reaction.

Conclusion

The Cannizzaro reaction is one of the oldest reactions in organic chemistry for the synthesis of acid and alcohol functionalities through disproportionation reaction of non-enlizable aldehydes. Apart from the conventional methods, several modern modifications using mild and sustainable reagents, solvents, advanced instrumental techniques, and catalysts in both intramolecular and intermolecular versions of the reaction have made the Cannizzaro reaction an important tool for the synthesis of diverse molecules containing alcohol, acid, ester, and amide, etc. functionalities. The vast area of synthetic venture highlights the significance of this reaction, as exemplified here, in some of the most recent advances of this reaction during the last two decades. Proper utilization of Lewis acid catalysis, desymmetrization of symmetrically remote dialdehyde molecules, synthesis of bioactive natural products like oxazolomycin, ottelione A, pestalalactone, nigricanin and other useful molecules of potential interest such as oxindoles, cyclooctadienones, mandelic acid derivatives have been represented. The high yielding methodologies, emphasizing different greener perspectives, are evident in every case and reflect the inner potential of the Cannizzaro reaction in accomplishing the synthesis of a diverse series of molecular entities. Being the first of its kind, this review presents a comprehensive outlook of the Cannizzaro reaction in several aspects. The application of this highly valuable reaction to the functionalization of bioactive molecules with improved synthetic conditions, will broaden its use in the future.

Acknowledgements

BC expresses deepest gratitude to Nabadwip Vidyasagar College for providing the infrastructure. SB and DM would like to convey their sincere appreciation to the Central University of Gujarat, India for the infrastructural facilities.

Author Contributions

Bhaskar Chatterjee: writing – original draft. Dhananjoy Mondal: supervision; writing – review & editing. Smritilekha Bera: supervision; writing – review & editing.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable as no new data was generated or analyzed in this study.

References

  1. Cannizzaro, S. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1853, 88, 129–130. doi:10.1002/jlac.18530880114
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Geissman, T. A. Org. React. 1944, 2, 94–113. doi:10.1002/0471264180.or002.03
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Fry, E. M.; Wilson, E. J., Jr.; Hudson, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1942, 64, 872–873. doi:10.1021/ja01256a038
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Chandrasekhar, S.; Srimannarayana, M. Synth. Commun. 2009, 39, 4473–4478. doi:10.1080/00397910902916049
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Ishihara, K.; Yano, T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1983–1986. doi:10.1021/ol0494459
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Basavaiah, D.; Sharada, D. S.; Veerendhar, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5771–5774. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.06.003
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Yamabe, S.; Yamazaki, S. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 951–961. doi:10.1039/b817849f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Cramer, L. R.; Berg, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1968, 72, 3686–3688. doi:10.1021/j100856a062
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Ashby, E. C.; Coleman, D.; Gamasa, M. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 4079–4085. doi:10.1021/jo00227a025
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Swain, C. G.; Powell, A. L.; Sheppard, W. A.; Morgan, C. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 3576–3583. doi:10.1021/ja00507a023
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Lachowicz, D. R.; Gritter, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 1963, 28, 106–112. doi:10.1021/jo01036a024
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Kellogg, R. M. Reduction of C=X to CHXH by Hydride Delivery from Carbon. In Comprehensive Organic Synthesis; Trost, B. M.; Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 8, pp 79–106. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-052349-1.00219-5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Wittcoff, H. A. Org. Synth. 1951, 31, 101. doi:10.15227/orgsyn.031.0101
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Fuentes, A.; Sinisterra, J. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 2967–2970. doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(00)84692-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. An, J.; Bagnell, L.; Cablewski, T.; Strauss, C. R.; Trainor, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 2505–2511. doi:10.1021/jo962115k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Yang, Y.; Mu, T. Green Chem. 2021, 23, 4228–4254. doi:10.1039/d1gc00914a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Muchez, L.; De Vos, D. E.; Kim, M. J. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 15860–15864. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b04612
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Thakuria, J. A.; Baruah, M.; Sandhu, J. S. Chem. Lett. 1999, 28, 995–996. doi:10.1246/cl.1999.995
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Fuson, R. C.; Emerson, W. S.; Gray, H. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1939, 61, 480–482. doi:10.1021/ja01871a072
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Maruyama, K.; Murakami, Y.; Yoda, K.; Mashino, T.; Nishinaga, A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 1617–1618. doi:10.1039/c39920001617
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Jin, S. J.; Arora, P. K.; Sayre, L. M. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3011–3018. doi:10.1021/jo00297a013
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Okuyama, T.; Kimura, K.; Fueno, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1982, 55, 2285–2286. doi:10.1246/bcsj.55.2285
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Yoshizawa, K.; Toyota, S.; Toda, F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 7983–7985. doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(01)01562-3
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Motiur Rahman, A. F. M.; Kadi, A. A. Arabian J. Chem. 2016, 9, S1373–S1377. doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.02.010
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Marvi, O.; Talakoubi, M. Orient. J. Chem. 2016, 32, 359–365. doi:10.13005/ojc/320140
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  26. Reddy, B. V. S.; Srinivas, R.; Yadav, J. S.; Ramalingam, T. Synth. Commun. 2002, 32, 219–223. doi:10.1081/scc-120002005
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Entezari, M. H.; Shameli, A. A. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2000, 7, 169–172. doi:10.1016/s1350-4177(00)00037-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Canipelle, M.; Landy, D.; Fourmentin, S. J. Inclusion Phenom. Macrocyclic Chem. 2011, 69, 349–353. doi:10.1007/s10847-010-9747-y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Vida, Y.; Perez-Inestrosa, E.; Suau, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1575–1577. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.11.093
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  30. Brun, N.; González-Sánchez, J. M.; Demelas, C.; Clément, J.-L.; Monod, A. Chemosphere 2023, 319, 137977. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.137977
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Dakhil, O. O.; Elarfi, M. G.; Al-Difar, H. A. Asian J. Green Chem. 2022, 6, 248–254. doi:10.22034/ajgc.2022.3.5
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Daemi, H.; Barikani, M.; Jahani, M. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 2121–2125. doi:10.1039/c5nj02313k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Nagai, Y.; Wakai, C.; Matubayasi, N.; Nakahara, M. Chem. Lett. 2003, 32, 310–311. doi:10.1246/cl.2003.310
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Curini, M.; Epifano, F.; Genovese, S.; Marcotullio, M. C.; Rosati, O. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 1331–1333. doi:10.1021/ol050125e
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  35. Kim, B. T.; Cho, C. S.; Kim, T.-J.; Shim, S. C. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 2003, 368–369. doi:10.3184/030823403103174173
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  36. Russell, A. E.; Miller, S. P.; Morken, J. P. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 8381–8383. doi:10.1021/jo0010734
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  37. Yang, X.; Guo, J.; Zou, G. Lett. Org. Chem. 2005, 2, 145–147. doi:10.2174/1570178053202973
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Innocenti, G.; Papadopoulos, E.; Fornasari, G.; Cavani, F.; Medford, A. J.; Sievers, C. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 11936–11950. doi:10.1021/acscatal.0c03761
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Albuquerque, E. M.; Borges, L. E. P.; Fraga, M. A.; Sievers, C. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 2675–2683. doi:10.1002/cctc.201700305
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Parra-Melipán, S.; López, V.; Moya, S. A.; Valdebenito, G.; Aranda, B.; Aguirre, P. Mol. Catal. 2021, 513, 111729. doi:10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111729
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Yu, F.; Xiao, F.-S. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 9372–9381. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c00886
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Neumann, C. N.; Rozeveld, S. J.; Dincă, M. ACS Catal. 2021, 11, 8521–8526. doi:10.1021/acscatal.1c01391
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Huang, R.; Chang, J.; Choi, H.; Vohs, J. M.; Gorte, R. J. Catal. Lett. 2022, 152, 3833–3842. doi:10.1007/s10562-022-03960-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Liu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Feng, T.; Luo, J.; Sameen, D. E.; Md Hossen, A.; Dai, J.; Li, S.; Qin, W. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 187, 566–574. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.132
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  45. Omran, A.; Menor-Salvan, C.; Springsteen, G.; Pasek, M. Life 2020, 10, 125. doi:10.3390/life10080125
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  46. Tabata, H.; Chikatani, G.; Nishijima, H.; Harada, T.; Miyake, R.; Kato, S.; Igarashi, K.; Mukouyama, Y.; Shirai, S.; Waki, M.; Hase, Y.; Nakanishi, S. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 13475–13484. doi:10.1039/d3sc03377e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Yedigenov, M.; Amire, N.; Abdirassil, A.; Mulikova, T.; Begenov, A.; Kiesilä, A.; Peshkov, A. A.; Peshkov, V. A.; Utepbergenov, D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2024, 22, 2539–2543. doi:10.1039/d3ob02098c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  48. Shi, S.-C.; Liu, H.-H.; Chen, T.-H.; Chen, C.-K.; Ko, B.-T. Front. Mater. 2023, 10, 1180745. doi:10.3389/fmats.2023.1180745
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  49. Derflinger, C.; Kamm, B.; Leitner, G.; Paulik, C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 26, e202300311. doi:10.1002/ejoc.202300311
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  50. Petkov, H.; Ravutsov, M. A.; Verganista, M. J.; Mitrev, Y. N.; Candeias, N. R.; Simeonov, S. P. ChemSusChem 2024, e202400013. doi:10.1002/cssc.202400013
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  51. Sharifi, A.; Mojtahedi, M. M.; Saidi, M. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1179–1180. doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(98)02558-1
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Varma, R. S.; Naicker, K. P.; Liesen, P. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8437–8440. doi:10.1016/s0040-4039(98)01922-4
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Meciarova, M.; Polackova, V.; Toma, S. Chem. Pap. 2002, 56, 208–213.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Poláčková, V.; Tomová, V.; Elečko, P.; Toma, S. Ultrason. Sonochem. 1996, 3, 15–17. doi:10.1016/1350-4177(95)00040-2
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Armour, C. A.; Bonner, T. G.; Bourne, E. J.; Butler, J. J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 301–304. doi:10.1039/jr9640000301
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Bogert, T. M. J. Chem. Educ. 1931, 8, 1311. doi:10.1021/ed008p1311
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Albaigés, J.; Castells, J.; Pascual, J. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 3507–3510. doi:10.1021/jo01349a009
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Peng, Z.; Li, S.; Li, R.; Sun, K.; Li, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ge, J.; Xiang, K. Appl. Catal., B 2024, 342, 123450. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123450
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  59. Birdja, Y. Y.; Koper, M. T. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 2030–2034. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b12008
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  60. Liu, H.; Agrawal, N.; Ganguly, A.; Chen, Y.; Lee, J.; Yu, J.; Huang, W.; Mba Wright, M.; Janik, M. J.; Li, W. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 4175–4189. doi:10.1039/d2ee01427k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  61. Krebs, M. L.; Bodach, A.; Wang, C.; Schüth, F. Green Chem. 2023, 25, 1797–1802. doi:10.1039/d2gc04732b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  62. Irie, Y.; Koga, Y.; Matsumoto, T.; Matsubara, K. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 2243–2250. doi:10.1002/ejoc.200900079
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  63. Teimuri-Mofrad, R.; Aghaiepour, A.; Rahimpour, K. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2020, 17, 2449–2462. doi:10.1007/s13738-020-01938-7
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  64. Liu, E.; Jin, Z. S.; Jian, F. F. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 59, 196–201. doi:10.1134/s1070428023010220
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  65. Miersch, O.; Kramell, R.; Parthier, B.; Wasternack, C. Phytochemistry 1999, 50, 353–361. doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(98)00597-4
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  66. Hoover, J. R. E.; Dunn, G. L.; Jakas, D. R.; Lam, L. L.; Taggart, J. J.; Guarini, J. R.; Phillips, L. J. Med. Chem. 1974, 17, 34–41. doi:10.1021/jm00247a008
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  67. Nishihata, T.; Takahagi, H.; Yamamoto, M.; Tomida, M.; Rytting, J. H.; Higuchi, T. J. Pharm. Sci. 1984, 73, 109–112. doi:10.1002/jps.2600730129
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  68. El Nimr, A. E.; Salama, H. A.; Khalil, R. M.; Kassem, M. A. Pharmazie 1983, 38, 728–730.
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  69. Glushkov, R. G.; Koretskaya, N. I.; Dombrovskaya, K. I.; Shvarts, G. Y.; Mashkovskii, M. D. Pharm. Chem. J. 1977, 11, 905–909. doi:10.1007/bf00778015
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  70. Yoshioka, M.; Yoshida, A.; Ichihashi, Y.; Saito, H. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985, 33, 2145–2148. doi:10.1248/cpb.33.2145
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  71. Brun, R.; Verriele, M.; Romanias, M. N.; Chenal, M.; Soisson, A.; Maier, W.; Thevenet, F. Build. Environ. 2023, 229, 109948. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109948
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  72. Alam, D.; Lui, M. Y.; Yuen, A. K. L.; Li, Z.; Liang, X.; Maschmeyer, T.; Haynes, B. S.; Montoya, A. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 5375–5383. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c00361
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  73. Wang, P.; Tao, W.-J.; Sun, X.-L.; Liao, S.; Tang, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 16849–16852. doi:10.1021/ja409859x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  74. Wu, W.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, J.; Huang, T.; Lin, L.; Feng, X. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 11646–11649. doi:10.1039/c5cc04213e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  75. Ishihara, K.; Yano, T.; Fushimi, M. J. Fluorine Chem. 2008, 129, 994–997. doi:10.1016/j.jfluchem.2008.04.008
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  76. Hong, Y.; Jarrige, L.; Harms, K.; Meggers, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 4569–4572. doi:10.1021/jacs.9b01352
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  77. Abaee, M. S.; Sharifi, R.; Mojtahedi, M. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5893–5895. doi:10.1021/ol052506y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  78. Mojtahedi, M. M.; Akbarzadeh, E.; Sharifi, R.; Abaee, M. S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2791–2793. doi:10.1021/ol070894t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  79. Pourjavadi, A.; Soleimanzadeh, B.; Marandi, G. B. React. Funct. Polym. 2002, 51, 49–53. doi:10.1016/s1381-5148(02)00032-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  80. Sharifi, S.; Sharifi, H.; Koza, D.; Aminkhani, A. Monatsh. Chem. 2021, 152, 803–808. doi:10.1007/s00706-021-02785-9
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  81. Santilli, C.; Makarov, I. S.; Fristrup, P.; Madsen, R. J. Org. Chem. 2016, 81, 9931–9938. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.6b02105
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  82. Ruiz-Sanchez, A. J.; Vida, Y.; Suau, R.; Perez-Inestrosa, E. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 11661–11665. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2008.10.015
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  83. Galli, M.; Berrocal, J. A.; Di Stefano, S.; Cacciapaglia, R.; Mandolini, L.; Baldini, L.; Casnati, A.; Ugozzoli, F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 5109–5112. doi:10.1039/c2ob25458a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  84. Rouser, M. A.; Gibson, H. W. New J. Chem. 2019, 43, 16801–16805. doi:10.1039/c9nj04679h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  85. Mehta, G.; Islam, K. Synlett 2000, 1473–1475. doi:10.1055/s-2000-7630
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  86. Slavov, N.; Cvengroš, J.; Neudörfl, J.-M.; Schmalz, H.-G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 7588–7591. doi:10.1002/anie.201003755
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  87. Abe, H.; Nagai, T.; Imai, H.; Horino, Y. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 65, 1078–1080. doi:10.1248/cpb.c17-00448
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  88. Mondal, D.; Bera, S. Synthesis 2010, 3301–3308. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1257872
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  89. Yin, W.; Kabir, M. S.; Wang, Z.; Rallapalli, S. K.; Ma, J.; Cook, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3339–3349. doi:10.1021/jo100279w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  90. Bernhardson, D.; Brandt, T. A.; Hulford, C. A.; Lehner, R. S.; Preston, B. R.; Price, K.; Sagal, J. F.; St. Pierre, M. J.; Thompson, P. H.; Thuma, B. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2014, 18, 57–65. doi:10.1021/op400289z
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  91. Burroughs, L.; Eccleshare, L.; Ritchie, J.; Kulkarni, O.; Lygo, B.; Woodward, S.; Lewis, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 10648–10651. doi:10.1002/anie.201505347
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  92. Huang, X.; Wang, H.; Cao, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 17320–17323. doi:10.1039/d1ra02150h
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  93. Akhigbe, J.; Ryppa, C.; Zeller, M.; Brückner, C. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 4927–4933. doi:10.1021/jo9006046
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  94. Gerbino, D. C.; Augner, D.; Slavov, N.; Schmalz, H.-G. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2338–2341. doi:10.1021/ol300757m
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  95. Moore, J. A.; Robello, D. R.; Rebek, J., Jr.; Gadwood, R. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1988, 20, 87–91. doi:10.1080/00304948809355872
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2024 Chatterjee et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Beilstein-Institut Open Access License Agreement (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/terms), which is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). The reuse of material under this license requires that the author(s), source and license are credited. Third-party material in this article could be subject to other licenses (typically indicated in the credit line), and in this case, users are required to obtain permission from the license holder to reuse the material.

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities
Journal Logo
Institut Logo
Preprint Logo
Symposia Logo