Abstract
The hydantoin scaffold is renowned for its wide-ranging biological activities, including antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and anticonvulsant effects. In this study, we present an innovative, sustainable approach to synthesizing hydantoins (H2a–j) directly from amino acids. This method employs a column chromatography-free, two-step, one-pot microwave-assisted synthesis that delivers hydantoins in yields ranging from 34% to 89%. The protocol demonstrates exceptional functional group tolerance, accommodating phenyl, aliphatic, phenol, alcohol, heterocyclic, and sulfide groups. This scalable, rapid, and eco-friendly strategy offers a promising avenue for the efficient synthesis of hydantoins, aligning with green chemistry principles and expanding the accessibility of these bioactive compounds for pharmaceutical applications.
Graphical Abstract
Introduction
The hydantoin moiety is a scaffold found in many biologically active compounds exhibiting a diverse range of properties, including antibacterial [1], antiviral [2], anticancer [3], anti-inflammatory [4], and anticonvulsant [5]. Hydantoins were traditionally accessed from amino acids by conversion to urea derivatives followed by cyclization (Urech reaction) or from carbonyl compounds through the cyanohydrin intermediate (Bucherer–Bergs) [6]. Furthermore, several methods for hydantoin synthesis have been reported. The modified Bucherer–Bergs reaction using nitriles or methyleneaziridines with organometallic reagents gave moderate yields of 40–77% and 48–75%, respectively [7,8]. Amino acids remain key building blocks, with approaches involving methylated amino acids and carbamates (65–75%) [9] or cyanobenziodoxolone (CBX) (54–88%) [10]. Reactions using 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes, amines, and isocyanates (47–76%) [11], as well as α-amino amides with triphosgene or carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) (41–80%) [12], have also been explored. Other strategies include copper(I)-catalyzed reactions (48–71%) [13] and the four-component Ugi reaction [14] yields 48–71% and 27–67%, respectively. In addition, pyroglutamates with isocyanates, which provide exceptionally high yields (97–99%) [15], and dipeptides have been utilized in triflate-activated Mumm’s rearrangement (63–86%) [16]. As many of these protocols employ toxic, highly reactive and moisture-sensitive reagents, our work will exploit microwave technology and the environmentally benign nature of amino acids to construct the hydantoin scaffold. Microwave irradiation technology has proven significant advantages over conventional heating, such as enhanced reaction rates and yields [17]. Microwave irradiation is also aligned with our group’s sustainability goals of adhering to the principles of green chemistry [18].
Following our previous works in the synthesis and evaluation of biologically active hydantoins [19,20], we aim towards creating a more efficient procedure to access hydantoins. We are interested in the synthesis of hydantoins from amino acids and potassium cyanate in water due to its simplicity and environmental friendliness, which also precludes the use of water-sensitive and highly toxic reagents in the procedures mentioned above. Amino acids can be procured from natural sources by enzymatic synthesis [21], as well as synthetically accessed from aldehyde building blocks via the Strecker synthesis [22], making them attractive starting materials for hydantoin synthesis.
Results and Discussion
As the first step of Urech hydantoin synthesis involved the N-carbamylation of amino acids, we carried out the microwave-assisted synthesis of urea derivatives in water, utilizing ʟ-phenylaniline as the representative amino acid. The optimal conditions for the N-carbamylation of ʟ-phenylaniline were first verified using different equivalents of KOCN at different temperatures in water under microwave heating conditions (Scheme 1, Table 1), and 5.0 equiv of KOCN and microwave irradiation at 80 °C produced the best yield for H1a (Table 1, entry 2).
Scheme 1: N-Carbamylation of ʟ-phenylaniline using KOCN in water.
Scheme 1: N-Carbamylation of ʟ-phenylaniline using KOCN in water.
Table 1: Optimization of N-carbamylation of H1a.
Entry | KOCN | Temperaturea | Yield of H1ab |
1 | 4.0 equiv | 80 °C | 70% |
2 | 5.0 equiv | 80 °C | 89% |
3 | 6.0 equiv | 80 °C | 61% |
4 | 5.0 equiv | 60 °C | 64% |
5 | 5.0 equiv | 100 °C | 60% |
aReaction mixture was heated in an Anton–Parr Monowave 400 microwave reactor with an infra-red sensor. bIsolated yield. Reaction was carried out at 5 mmol scale.
Inspired by the simplicity of the procedure, a second step was attempted as part of a one-pot synthesis of hydantoins by the addition of concentrated hydrochloric acid followed by microwave irradiation of the reaction mixture at 80 °C for 15 min (Scheme 2). Gratifyingly, the acid-induced intra-cyclization of the urea derivative H1a proceeded smoothly to give hydantoin H2a with an overall yield of 89%, which indicated complete conversion of the intermediate to the product.
Scheme 2: One-pot microwave-assisted synthesis of hydantoins from amino acids.
Scheme 2: One-pot microwave-assisted synthesis of hydantoins from amino acids.
Encouraged by the result of the one-pot procedure, we tested the method with amino acids carrying different functional groups on the side chains (Figure 1). Phenol (H2b), isopropyl (H2h) and methyl groups (H2i) were well-tolerated in the reaction, yielding excellent and consistent conversions of the amino acids to the corresponding hydantoins (83–86%). However, the other aliphatic group – isobutyl – was poorly tolerated, giving a low yield (34%) of H2f. This could be attributed to the methyl group in the isobutyl side chain projected into the plane of the hydantoin ring, where the end methyl groups are conformationally positioned to hinder the reaction center. In the case where a phenyl group is directly connected to the reaction center – as opposed to a benzylic attachment – a near two-fold decrease in yield was observed (H2a vs H2e), inferring that the reaction is strongly affected by steric effects. A high yield (78%) was also observed for the hydroxy-bearing hydantoin from threonine (H2g), suggesting that the reaction works smoothly in the presence of an electron-donating protic group close to the reaction center. Good yields (70–71%) of hydantoins containing heterocyclic groups, such as indole (H2c) and imidazole (H2d) were also achieved. This demonstrates potential application of this protocol in the synthesis of pharmacologically active hydantoin compounds. The conversion of the thioether-containing methionine to hydantoin (H2j) was obtained with a moderate yield of 59%. Lastly, no hydantoin product was observed by 1H NMR when cysteine was subject to the one-pot procedure, possibly due to disulfide formation of the highly nucleophilic thiol group of the cysteine amino acid. The hydantoins were found to be optically active (except for H2d), suggesting that enantiomeric information was preserved during the reaction (see Supporting Information File 1). Hydantoin yields (34–89%) are generally comparable to previously reported methods [7-16], but reaction times are significantly shorter. In addition, TLC analysis confirmed complete consumption of starting material, which was further confirmed by NMR analysis showing no detectable impurities or unreacted starting material. Variations in yields (34–89%) may be due to differences in substrate reactivity, minor side reactions, or minor losses during microwave irradiation. The remaining part may be caused by factors such as slight volatilization or incomplete conversion under specific use conditions.
Figure 1: Hydantoins (H2a–j) synthesized from the one-pot procedure. The hydantoins were characterized using 1H and 13C NMR and HRMS.
Figure 1: Hydantoins (H2a–j) synthesized from the one-pot procedure. The hydantoins were characterized using 1...
We found the synthetic procedure facile as the less polar hydantoin products (H2a–c, H2e,f) often precipitated out of the reaction mixture and were sufficiently pure (>95% by HPLC) after the simple washing steps, and the more polar hydantoin products could be extracted out of the reaction mixture with ethyl acetate and did not require further chromatographic purification. The “one-pot” aspect of the protocol under microwave irradiation conditions, which enables rapid conversion of the starting materials to the products in water – a green solvent – in less than two hours makes this protocol an expedient and environmentally benign synthesis of hydantoins from amino acids.
The scalability of this process is promising, driven by its simplicity, moderate to high yields, and the use of environmentally friendly reagents. Notably, microwave-assisted one-pot reactions eliminate the need for column chromatography, a common step in traditional purification methods but limits scalability. Additionally, the reaction proceeds efficiently without the need for toxic or moisture-sensitive reagents, further making it suitable for large-scale applications. The shorter reaction time (less than 2 hours) also contributes to improve energy efficiency when compared to traditional methods. These factors demonstrate that the process can be effectively scaled up, particularly in industries that prioritize sustainability and operational efficiency.
In terms of green chemistry principles, this approach already meets several key goals, such as reducing the use of hazardous reagents and solvents, increasing reaction efficiency, and minimizing waste. Future studies can quantitatively evaluate these aspects using established metrics such as E-factor, atom economy, and reaction mass efficiency. These indicators will provide a more comprehensive evaluation of the environmental sustainability of the reaction and further demonstrate its potential for large-scale, environmentally responsible production.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we report a facile, environmentally friendly, chromatography-free hydantoin synthesis method using a sequential two-step, one-pot microwave-assisted method. This strategy utilizes amino acids as precursors and achieves yields of 34–89%, with a broad functional group tolerance for phenyl, aliphatic, phenol, alcohol, heterocyclic, and sulfide groups. By eliminating highly reactive and moisture-sensitive reagents, our method improves practicality and safety, while microwave irradiation significantly speeds up reaction times, making it a valuable advancement in green and sustainable chemistry.
Experimental
General procedure for the synthesis of (S)-5-benzylimidazolidine-2,4-dione (H2a)
A 30 mL microwave reactor vial was charged with ʟ-phenylalanine (5 mmol), distilled water (7 mL), and potassium cyanate (25 mmol) and irradiated in an Anton–Paar Monowave 400 microwave reactor at 80 °C for 1 hour. Upon completion of the N-carbamylation reaction, as confirmed by TLC analysis, the reaction mixture was treated with concentrated hydrochloric acid (7 mL) and microwave irradiated at 80 °C for 15 min. The precipitates in the reaction mixture were filtered, washed with 1 M HCl solution (2 × 7 mL), distilled water (2 × 10 mL), and dried to afford H2a as a white solid. Yield 89%. [α]D20 −100.9 (c 11, CH3CN); 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.44 (s, 1H), 7.93 (s, 1H), 7.17–7.30 (m, J = 8 Hz, 5H), 4.33 (td, J = 5, 1 Hz, 1H), 2.92 (m, J = 5 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.2, 157.2, 135.6, 129.8, 128.1, 126.7, 58.4, 36.4; LC–MS (ESI) m/z: 191 [M + H]+, 163, 120; HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C10H11N2O2 191.0815; found, 191.0815. The procedure was repeated by substituting ʟ-phenylalanine with the corresponding amino acid to obtain H2b,c and H2e,f.
General procedure for the synthesis of (S)-5-((2,5-dioxoimidazolidin-4-yl)methyl)-1H-imidazol-3-ium chloride (H2d)
A 30 mL microwave reactor vial was charged with ʟ-histidine (5 mmol), distilled water (7 mL), and potassium cyanate (25 mmol) and irradiated in an Anton–Paar Monowave 400 microwave reactor at 80 °C for 1 hour. Upon completion of the N-carbamylation reaction, as confirmed by TLC analysis, the reaction mixture was treated with concentrated hydrochloric acid (7 mL) and microwave irradiated at 80 °C for 15 min. The reaction mixture was neutralized to pH 7 using saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and extracted with ethyl acetate multiple times. The organic extracts were combined, dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate, and concentrated under reduced pressure to afford H2d as a white solid. Yield 70%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 10.59 (s, 1H), 7.88 (s, 1H), 7.74 (s, 1H), 6.88 (s, 1H), 5.52 (s, 2H), 4.25 (t, J = 6 Hz, 1H), 2.95 (dd, J = 15, 4 Hz, 1H), 2.81 (dd, J = 15, 6 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 175.5, 157.4, 134.6, 131.6, 117.0, 57.6, 28.8; LC–MS (ESI) m/z: 181 [M + H]+, 136. The procedure was repeated by substituting ʟ-histidine with the corresponding amino acid to obtain H2g–j.
Supporting Information
Supporting Information File 1: NMR and MS spectra of synthesized compounds. | ||
Format: PDF | Size: 3.1 MB | Download |
Data Availability Statement
All data that supports the findings of this study is available in the published article and/or the supporting information of this article.
References
-
Khodair, A. I.; Metwally, A. I.; Kheder, N. A.; El–Tahawy, M. M. T. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1303, 137565. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.137565
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Chen, L.; Hao, Y.; Song, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Q. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 10618–10625. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04488
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Shankaraiah, N.; Nekkanti, S.; Chudasama, K. J.; Senwar, K. R.; Sharma, P.; Jeengar, M. K.; Naidu, V. G. M.; Srinivasulu, V.; Srinivasulu, G.; Kamal, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 5413–5417. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.10.038
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Lin, X.; Tago, K.; Okazaki, N.; So, T.; Takahashi, K.; Mashino, T.; Tamura, H.; Funakoshi-Tago, M. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 100, 108092. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108092
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Wolf, H. H.; Swinyard, E. A.; Goodman, L. S. J. Pharm. Sci. 1962, 51, 74–76. doi:10.1002/jps.2600510114
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Meusel, M.; Gütschow, M. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2004, 36, 391–443. doi:10.1080/00304940409356627
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Montagne, C.; Shipman, M. Synlett 2006, 2203–2206. doi:10.1055/s-2006-949644
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Montagne, C.; Shiers, J. J.; Shipman, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 9207–9209. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.10.135
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Tanwar, D. K.; Ratan, A.; Gill, M. S. Synlett 2017, 28, 2285–2290. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1588468
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Declas, N.; Le Vaillant, F.; Waser, J. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 524–528. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03843
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Attanasi, O. A.; De Crescentini, L.; Favi, G.; Nicolini, S.; Perrulli, F. R.; Santeusanio, S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 353–355. doi:10.1021/ol102664n
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Zhang, D.; Xing, X.; Cuny, G. D. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1750–1753. doi:10.1021/jo052474s
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Song, J.; Zhang, Z.-J.; Chen, S.-S.; Fan, T.; Gong, L.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3177–3180. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b12628
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Vroemans, R.; Bamba, F.; Winters, J.; Thomas, J.; Jacobs, J.; Van Meervelt, L.; John, J.; Dehaen, W. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 626–633. doi:10.3762/bjoc.14.49
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Dieltiens, N.; Claeys, D. D.; Stevens, C. V. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3863–3868. doi:10.1021/jo060370r
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Liu, H.; Yang, Z.; Pan, Z. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 5902–5905. doi:10.1021/ol502900j
Return to citation in text: [1] [2] -
Martina, K.; Cravotto, G.; Varma, R. S. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 13857–13872. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.1c00865
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Ivanković, A. Int. J. Sustainable Green Energy 2017, 6, 39. doi:10.11648/j.ijrse.20170603.12
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Chin, E.-Z.; Chang, W.-J.; Tan, H.-Y.; Liew, S. Y.; Lau, Y.-L.; Ng, Y.-L.; Nafiah, M. A.; Kurz, T.; Tan, S.-P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2024, 103, 129701. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2024.129701
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Chin, E.-Z.; Tan, S.-P.; Liew, S.-Y.; Kurz, T. Malaysian J. Chem. 2021, 23 (2), 19–25.
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Wang, M.-X.; Lin, S.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6542–6545. doi:10.1021/jo0256282
Return to citation in text: [1] -
Harada, K. Nature 1963, 200, 1201. doi:10.1038/2001201a0
Return to citation in text: [1]
21. | Wang, M.-X.; Lin, S.-J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 6542–6545. doi:10.1021/jo0256282 |
18. | Ivanković, A. Int. J. Sustainable Green Energy 2017, 6, 39. doi:10.11648/j.ijrse.20170603.12 |
19. | Chin, E.-Z.; Chang, W.-J.; Tan, H.-Y.; Liew, S. Y.; Lau, Y.-L.; Ng, Y.-L.; Nafiah, M. A.; Kurz, T.; Tan, S.-P. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2024, 103, 129701. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2024.129701 |
20. | Chin, E.-Z.; Tan, S.-P.; Liew, S.-Y.; Kurz, T. Malaysian J. Chem. 2021, 23 (2), 19–25. |
1. | Khodair, A. I.; Metwally, A. I.; Kheder, N. A.; El–Tahawy, M. M. T. J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1303, 137565. doi:10.1016/j.molstruc.2024.137565 |
5. | Wolf, H. H.; Swinyard, E. A.; Goodman, L. S. J. Pharm. Sci. 1962, 51, 74–76. doi:10.1002/jps.2600510114 |
16. | Liu, H.; Yang, Z.; Pan, Z. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 5902–5905. doi:10.1021/ol502900j |
4. | Lin, X.; Tago, K.; Okazaki, N.; So, T.; Takahashi, K.; Mashino, T.; Tamura, H.; Funakoshi-Tago, M. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 100, 108092. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108092 |
17. | Martina, K.; Cravotto, G.; Varma, R. S. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 86, 13857–13872. doi:10.1021/acs.joc.1c00865 |
3. | Shankaraiah, N.; Nekkanti, S.; Chudasama, K. J.; Senwar, K. R.; Sharma, P.; Jeengar, M. K.; Naidu, V. G. M.; Srinivasulu, V.; Srinivasulu, G.; Kamal, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 5413–5417. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.10.038 |
14. | Vroemans, R.; Bamba, F.; Winters, J.; Thomas, J.; Jacobs, J.; Van Meervelt, L.; John, J.; Dehaen, W. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 626–633. doi:10.3762/bjoc.14.49 |
2. | Chen, L.; Hao, Y.; Song, H.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Q. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 10618–10625. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.0c04488 |
15. | Dieltiens, N.; Claeys, D. D.; Stevens, C. V. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3863–3868. doi:10.1021/jo060370r |
10. | Declas, N.; Le Vaillant, F.; Waser, J. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 524–528. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03843 |
12. | Zhang, D.; Xing, X.; Cuny, G. D. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1750–1753. doi:10.1021/jo052474s |
9. | Tanwar, D. K.; Ratan, A.; Gill, M. S. Synlett 2017, 28, 2285–2290. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1588468 |
13. | Song, J.; Zhang, Z.-J.; Chen, S.-S.; Fan, T.; Gong, L.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3177–3180. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b12628 |
7. | Montagne, C.; Shipman, M. Synlett 2006, 2203–2206. doi:10.1055/s-2006-949644 |
8. | Montagne, C.; Shiers, J. J.; Shipman, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 9207–9209. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.10.135 |
6. | Meusel, M.; Gütschow, M. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2004, 36, 391–443. doi:10.1080/00304940409356627 |
11. | Attanasi, O. A.; De Crescentini, L.; Favi, G.; Nicolini, S.; Perrulli, F. R.; Santeusanio, S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 353–355. doi:10.1021/ol102664n |
7. | Montagne, C.; Shipman, M. Synlett 2006, 2203–2206. doi:10.1055/s-2006-949644 |
8. | Montagne, C.; Shiers, J. J.; Shipman, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 9207–9209. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2006.10.135 |
9. | Tanwar, D. K.; Ratan, A.; Gill, M. S. Synlett 2017, 28, 2285–2290. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1588468 |
10. | Declas, N.; Le Vaillant, F.; Waser, J. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 524–528. doi:10.1021/acs.orglett.8b03843 |
11. | Attanasi, O. A.; De Crescentini, L.; Favi, G.; Nicolini, S.; Perrulli, F. R.; Santeusanio, S. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 353–355. doi:10.1021/ol102664n |
12. | Zhang, D.; Xing, X.; Cuny, G. D. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1750–1753. doi:10.1021/jo052474s |
13. | Song, J.; Zhang, Z.-J.; Chen, S.-S.; Fan, T.; Gong, L.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 3177–3180. doi:10.1021/jacs.7b12628 |
14. | Vroemans, R.; Bamba, F.; Winters, J.; Thomas, J.; Jacobs, J.; Van Meervelt, L.; John, J.; Dehaen, W. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 626–633. doi:10.3762/bjoc.14.49 |
15. | Dieltiens, N.; Claeys, D. D.; Stevens, C. V. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 3863–3868. doi:10.1021/jo060370r |
16. | Liu, H.; Yang, Z.; Pan, Z. Org. Lett. 2014, 16, 5902–5905. doi:10.1021/ol502900j |
© 2025 Chang et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Beilstein-Institut Open Access License Agreement (https://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc/terms), which is identical to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). The reuse of material under this license requires that the author(s), source and license are credited. Third-party material in this article could be subject to other licenses (typically indicated in the credit line), and in this case, users are required to obtain permission from the license holder to reuse the material.