Logo Beilstein Institut

Copper-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of alkenes with an electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagent

  1. 1,2 ,
  2. 1 ,
  3. 1 ,
  4. 1 and
  5. 2
1Key Laboratory of Organofluorine Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences,345 Lingling Road, Shanghai 200032, China
2Institute of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China
  1. Corresponding author email
This article is part of the Thematic Series "Organo-fluorine chemistry III".
Guest Editor: D. O'Hagan
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2013, 9, 2635–2640. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.9.299
Received 18 Jul 2013, Accepted 06 Nov 2013, Published 25 Nov 2013

Abstract

An efficient method for the copper-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes with an electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagent has been developed. The reactions proceeded smoothly to give trifluoromethylated alkenes in good to excellent yields. The results provided a versatile approach for the construction of Cvinyl–CF3 bonds without using prefunctionalized substrates.

Keywords: alkenes; catalysis; copper; electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagent; trifluoromethylation

Introduction

The incorporation of a trifluoromethyl group into pharmaceutically and agrochemically relevant molecules usually enhances their chemical and metabolic stability, lipophilicity and binding selectivity [1-7]. As a result, considerable effort has been directed towards the development of efficient and versatile trifluoromethylation methods [8-16]. The past few years has witnessed the rapid advances in transition metal-promoted trifluoromethylation for the construction of Caryl–CF3 bonds [17-31]. In contrast, transition metal-mediated trifluoromethylation to form Cvinyl–CF3 bonds has been much less explored. As illustrated in Scheme 1, the strategies developed recently usually require the use of prefunctionalized alkenes, which could be classified into the following: vinylboronic acids, vinyl borates, vinyl halides, vinyl sulfonates and vinyl carboxylic acids (Scheme 1, reaction 1) [32-38]. Cho and co-workers reported a radical process for the trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes without using prefunctionalized substrates, but a volatile reagent was used (Scheme 1, reaction 1) [39]. Szabó described trifluoromethyl-benzoyloxylation of alkynes to construct Cvinyl–CF3 bonds (Scheme 2, reaction 2) [40]. As part of our continuing interest in trifluoromethylation reactions [25,41-45], we investigated the copper-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes with electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagents (Scheme 1, reaction 3).

[1860-5397-9-299-i1]

Scheme 1: Construction of the Cvinyl–CF3 bond.

Transition metal-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes has been reported by several groups. However, these methods focused on the formation of Csp3–CF3 bonds [46-56]. In copper-catalyzed reactions with electrophilic trifluoromethylating reagents, it was proposed that the transformation might proceed via a radical, electrophilic or Heck-type process (Scheme 2) [47-50]. We reasoned that even if the reaction involved the radical process (path A, Scheme 2), the radical intermediate could still be oxidized to a cation because electrophilic trifluoromethylation reagents can be considered as an oxidant. In the presence of base, both of the cation and Heck-type intermediates should be able to undergo hydrogen elimination to form a Cvinyl–CF3 bond. On the basis of these reports and our hypothesis, we commenced to examine the reaction of aromatic alkenes with electrophilic trifluoromethylation reagents in the presence of copper and base.

[1860-5397-9-299-i2]

Scheme 2: Proposed reaction paths for the trifluoromethylation of alkenes.

Results and Discussion

Previously, we reported that copper powder or cuprous iodide could promote trifluoromethylation of heteroaromatics, arylboronic acids or terminal alkynes with trifluoromethyl sulfonium salt I [25,44,45,57,58]. But the same trifluoromethylation reagent (2 equiv) failed to convert 4-vinylbiphenyl to the expected alkene in reasonable yields in acetonitrile with B1 (DBU) as the base, even though cuprous iodide gave better results (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). In the presence of cuprous iodide, Umemoto’s reagent (II) and Togni’s reagent (III) were found to be more efficient in this transformation (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). 19F NMR measurements showed that the reaction system turned to be complex and low yield of the desired product was determined when another Togni’s reagent (IV) was used (Table 1, entry 5). Other cuprous complexes were also studied with the use of Togni’s reagent (III) (Table 1, entries 6–10). Better result obtained with [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 prompted us to continue to use this copper source (Table 1, entry 10). When B2 was used instead of B1, almost no desired product was observed (Table 1, entry 11). That might be because B2 not only acted as base, but also acted as strongly coordinating ligand, which poisoned the catalyst and shut down the reaction. Other bases (Table 1, entries 12–15), including an inorganic base (Table 1, entry 15), failed to accelerate the desired conversion either. The examination of the solvent effect showed that the solvent is quite important for the reaction (Table 1, entries 16–20). When the reaction was carried out in DMF, the expected product 2a was obtained in excellent yield (Table 1, entry 16). The yield was decreased dramatically in DMSO (Table 1, entry 17). Almost no reaction took place in polar protic solvent (Table 1, entry 18) and moderate results were achieved in less polar solvents (Table 1, entries 19 and 20). With increasing the amount of Togni’s reagent (III) in the suitable solvent, DMF, the product was obtained almost in quantitative yield with excellent stereoselectivity (dr >98:2) determined by 19F NMR (Table 1, entry 21). Decreasing the amount of this reagent resulted in a lower yield (Table 1, entry 22). The absence of catalyst or base led to no reaction or incredibly low yield, which means both of them are crucial for the reaction (Table 1, entries 23–25).

Table 1: Trifluoromethylation of 4-vinylbiphenyl by electrophilic trifluoromethylation reagents.

[Graphic 1]
Entry Cat. Base Solvent “CF3+” Yield (%)a
1 Cu B1 CH3CN I trace
2 CuI B1 CH3CN I 30
3 CuI B1 CH3CN II 56
4 CuI B1 CH3CN III 60
5 CuI B1 CH3CN IV 30
6 CuBr B1 CH3CN III 46
7 CuCl B1 CH3CN III 36
8 CuTc B1 CH3CN III 54
9 CuOAc B1 CH3CN III 41
10 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B1 CH3CN III 75
11 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B2 CH3CN III trace
12 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B3 CH3CN III 10
13 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B4 CH3CN III trace
14 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B5 CH3CN III 10
15 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B6 CH3CN III 7
16 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B1 DMF III 90
17 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B1 DMSO III 57
18 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B1 CH3OH III trace
19 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B1 THF III 67
20 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B1 CHCl3 III 75
21b [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B1 DMF III 98
22c [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 B1 DMF III 58
23 – – DMF III 0
24 – B1 DMF III 0
25 [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6 – DMF III 10

aYields determined by 19 F NMR spectroscopy. b2.5 equiv of III was used. c1.5 equiv of III was used.

With the optimized reaction conditions in hand (Table 1, entry 21), we then explored the substrate scope of the Cu(I)-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes with Togni’s reagent. As shown in Figure 1, the reaction could tolerate various functional groups. It is worth mentioning that all of the products were obtained with excellent stereoselectivity (E/Z >97/3), determined by 19F NMR. Substrates with an electron-donating group were converted smoothly into the desired products in excellent yields (2a–2f). Irrespective of the position of the bromine substituent on the aryl ring, the reaction proceeded very well to afford the desired products in excellent yields (2g–2i). Stronger electron-withdrawing groups showed some negative effect on the reaction, as exemplified by the poor results of substrates with other halides, carbonyl or nitro groups on the benzene ring (2j–2m). Heteroaromatic alkenes were also investigated (2n and 2o). As previously seen, alkene 1n endowed with an electron-rich heteroaromatic group led to a good result (2n) and an electron-deficient substrate resulted in low yield (2o).

[1860-5397-9-299-1]

Figure 1: Cu(I)-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes with Togni’s reagent. Isolated yield are recorded.

With regard to the reaction mechanism, it is reasonable to conceive a pathway involving radical species according to previous reports [47-50]. To gain more insight into the mechanism, further evidence was collected. 2,2,6,6-Tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy (TEMPO), a well-known radical scavenger, was added to the reaction of 4-vinylbiphenyl with Togni’s reagent (III) in the presence of [(MeCN)4Cu]PF6. It was found that the desired trifluoromethylation was completely suppressed, which suggested that the transformation involved a radical process. Based on the above results, we proposed the mechanism as outlined in Scheme 3. Initially, the activation of III by Cu(I) led to the formation of radical intermediate A. Decomposition of this intermediate produces ((2-(2-iodophenyl)propan-2-yl)oxy)copper(II) (C) and a CF3 radical, which is trapped by alkenes to form the trifluoromethylated radical intermediate B. Subsequently, the radical intermediate B is oxidized by Cu(II) (C) to the cation intermediate D with simultaneous release of catalyst Cu(I). In the presence of base, intermediate D readily undergoes hydrogen elimination to give the final product.

[1860-5397-9-299-i3]

Scheme 3: Proposed mechanism for the trifluoromethylation of terminal alkenes.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we have described the copper-catalyzed trifluoromethylation of alkenes with Togni’s reagent under mild conditions. The results presented here provided a versatile approach for the construction of Cvinyl–CF3 bonds without using prefunctionalized substrates. Investigations on the application of the trifluoromethylation method to the synthesis of pharmaceuticals and agrochemicals are currently underway.

Supporting Information

Supporting Information File 1: Full experimental details, analytical data and spectra of the target compounds.
Format: PDF Size: 1.8 MB Download

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21032006, 21172240), the 973 Program of China (No. 2012CBA01200), the Chinese Academy of Sciences for financial support.

References

  1. Kirsch, P. Modern Fluoroorganic Chemistry Synthesis, Reactivity, Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, 2004. doi:10.1002/352760393X
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  2. Bégué, J.-P.; Bonnet-Delpon, D. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry of Fluorine; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, 2008. doi:10.1002/9780470281895
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  3. Schlosser, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5432–5446. doi:10.1002/anie.200600449
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  4. Müller, K.; Faeh, C.; Diederich, F. Science 2007, 317, 1881–1886. doi:10.1126/science.1131943
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  5. Hagmann, W. K. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4359–4369. doi:10.1021/jm800219f
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  6. Purser, S.; Moore, P. R.; Swallow, S.; Gouverneur, V. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 320–330. doi:10.1039/b610213c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  7. Furuya, T.; Kamlet, A. S.; Ritter, T. Nature 2011, 473, 470–477. doi:10.1038/nature10108
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  8. Zheng, Y.; Ma, J.-A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2745–2750. doi:10.1002/adsc.201000545
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  9. Nie, J.; Guo, H.-C.; Cahard, D.; Ma, J.-A. Chem. Rev. 2010, 111, 455–529. doi:10.1021/cr100166a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  10. Parsons, A. T.; Buchwald, S. L. Nature 2011, 480, 184–185. doi:10.1038/480184a
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  11. Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8950–8958. doi:10.1002/anie.201202624
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  12. Nagib, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Nature 2011, 480, 224–228. doi:10.1038/nature10647
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  13. Pham, P. V.; Nagib, D. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6119–6122. doi:10.1002/anie.201101861
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  14. Prakash, G. K. S.; Jog, P. V.; Batamack, P. T. D.; Olah, G. A. Science 2012, 338, 1324–1327. doi:10.1126/science.1227859
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  15. Pair, E.; Monteiro, N.; Bouyssi, D.; Baudoin, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5346–5349. doi:10.1002/anie.201300782
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  16. Wang, X.; Xu, Y.; Mo, F.; Ji, G.; Qiu, D.; Feng, J.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10330–10333. doi:10.1021/ja4056239
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  17. Lundgren, R. J.; Stradiotto, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9322–9324. doi:10.1002/anie.201004051
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  18. Tomashenko, O. A.; Grushin, V. V. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 4475–4521. doi:10.1021/cr1004293
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  19. Besset, T.; Schneider, C.; Cahard, D. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5048–5050. doi:10.1002/anie.201201012
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  20. Wu, X.-F.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M. Chem.–Asian J. 2012, 7, 1744–1754. doi:10.1002/asia.201200211
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  21. Oishi, M.; Kondo, H.; Amii, H. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1909–1911. doi:10.1039/b823249k
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  22. Cho, E. J.; Senecal, T. D.; Kinzel, T.; Zhang, Y.; Watson, D. A.; Buchwald, S. L. Science 2010, 328, 1679–1681. doi:10.1126/science.1190524
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  23. Wang, X.; Truesdale, L.; Yu, J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 3648–3649. doi:10.1021/ja909522s
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  24. Chu, L.; Qing, F.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1298–1304. doi:10.1021/ja209992w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  25. Zhang, C.-P.; Wang, Z.-L.; Chen, Q.-Y.; Zhang, C.-T.; Gu, Y.-C.; Xiao, J.-C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 1896–1900. doi:10.1002/anie.201006823
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  26. Zhang, X.-G.; Dai, H.-X.; Wasa, M.; Yu, J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11948–11951. doi:10.1021/ja305259n
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  27. Herrmann, A. T.; Smith, L. L.; Zakarian, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6976–6979. doi:10.1021/ja302552e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  28. Liu, T.; Shao, X.; Wu, Y.; Shen, Q. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 540–543. doi:10.1002/anie.201106673
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  29. Ye, Y.; Sanford, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 9034–9037. doi:10.1021/ja301553c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  30. Zeng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Ni, C.; Zhao, J.; Hu, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2955–2958. doi:10.1021/ja312711c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  31. Dai, J.-J.; Fang, C.; Xiao, B.; Yi, J.; Xu, J.; Liu, Z.-J.; Lu, X.; Liu, L.; Fu, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 8436–8439. doi:10.1021/ja404217t
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  32. Cho, E. J.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6552–6555. doi:10.1021/ol202885w
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  33. Hafner, A.; Bräse, S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 3044–3048. doi:10.1002/adsc.201100528
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  34. Parsons, A. T.; Senecal, T. D.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 2947–2950. doi:10.1002/anie.201108267
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  35. He, Z.; Luo, T.; Hu, M.; Cao, Y.; Hu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 3944–3947. doi:10.1002/anie.201200140
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  36. Yasu, Y.; Koike, T.; Akita, M. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2037–2039. doi:10.1039/c3cc39235j
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  37. Li, Z.; Cui, Z.; Liu, Z.-Q. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 406–409. doi:10.1021/ol3034059
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  38. Li, Y.; Wu, L.; Neumann, H.; Beller, M. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 2628–2630. doi:10.1039/c2cc36554e
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  39. Iqbal, N.; Choi, S.; Kim, E.; Cho, E. J. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 11383–11387. doi:10.1021/jo3022346
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  40. Janson, P. G.; Ghoneim, I.; Ilchenko, N. O.; Szabó, K. J. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2882–2885. doi:10.1021/ol3011419
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  41. Lin, J.-H.; Xiao, J.-C. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 4536–4539. doi:10.1002/ejoc.201100683
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  42. Lin, J.-H.; Zong, G.; Du, R.-B.; Xiao, J.-C.; Liu, S. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 7738–7740. doi:10.1039/c2cc18064b
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  43. Zhang, C.-P.; Wang, Z.-L.; Chen, Q.-Y.; Zhang, C.-T.; Gu, Y.-C.; Xiao, J.-C. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 6632–6634. doi:10.1039/c1cc11765c
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  44. Zhang, C.-P.; Cai, J.; Zhou, C.-B.; Wang, X.-P.; Zheng, X.; Gu, Y.-C.; Xiao, J.-C. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 9516–9518. doi:10.1039/c1cc13460d
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  45. Wang, X.; Lin, J.; Zhang, C.; Xiao, J.; Zheng, X. Chin. J. Chem. 2013, 31, 915–920. doi:10.1002/cjoc.201300393
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2]
  46. Mu, X.; Wu, T.; Wang, H.-Y.; Guo, Y.-L.; Liu, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 878–881. doi:10.1021/ja210614y
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  47. Parsons, A. T.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 9120–9123. doi:10.1002/anie.201104053
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  48. Wang, X.; Ye, Y.; Zhang, S.; Feng, J.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16410–16413. doi:10.1021/ja207775a
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  49. Xu, J.; Fu, Y.; Luo, D.-F.; Jiang, Y.-Y.; Xiao, B.; Liu, Z.-J.; Gong, T.-J.; Liu, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 15300–15303. doi:10.1021/ja206330m
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  50. Zhu, R.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 12462–12465. doi:10.1021/ja305840g
    Return to citation in text: [1] [2] [3]
  51. Miyake, Y.; Ota, S.-I.; Nishibayashi, Y. Chem.–Eur. J. 2012, 18, 13255–13258. doi:10.1002/chem.201202853
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  52. Yasu, Y.; Koike, T.; Akita, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 9567–9571. doi:10.1002/anie.201205071
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  53. Egami, H.; Shimizu, R.; Kawamura, S.; Sodeoka, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 4000–4003. doi:10.1002/anie.201210250
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  54. Liu, X.; Xiong, F.; Huang, X.; Xu, L.; Li, P.; Wu, X. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 6962–6966. doi:10.1002/anie.201302673
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  55. Wu, X.; Chu, L.; Qing, F.-L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2198–2202. doi:10.1002/anie.201208971
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  56. Mizuta, S.; Verhoog, S.; Engle, K. M.; Khotavivattana, T.; O’Duill, M.; Wheelhouse, K.; Rassias, G.; Médebielle, M.; Gouverneur, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 2505–2508. doi:10.1021/ja401022x
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  57. Yang, J.-J.; Kirchmeier, R. L.; Shreeve, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 2656–2660. doi:10.1021/jo972213l
    See for some references on S-tifluoromethyl sulfonium salt.
    Return to citation in text: [1]
  58. Magnier, E.; Blazejewski, J.-C.; Tordeux, M.; Wakselman, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 1279–1282. doi:10.1002/anie.200503776
    See for some references on S-tifluoromethyl sulfonium salt.
    Return to citation in text: [1]

© 2013 Wang et al; licensee Beilstein-Institut.
This is an Open Access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The license is subject to the Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry terms and conditions: (http://www.beilstein-journals.org/bjoc)

Other Beilstein-Institut Open Science Activities
Journal Logo
Institut Logo
Preprint Logo
Symposia Logo