Search for "fluorescence sensing" in Full Text gives 11 result(s) in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 2380–2389, doi:10.3762/bjoc.15.230
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: The structure (A) of reporter Glyco-DTE and working principle (B) of photochromic glycosheet Glyco-...
Scheme 2: Synthetic route to dithienylethene fluorescence reporters Glyco-DTE and 8o. VcNa: sodium ascorbate.
Figure 1: Absorption spectral changes (A), absorption fatigue resistance (B), emission spectral changes (C) a...
Figure 2: (A) The absorbance spectrum and (B) high resolution TEM image of 2D MnO2 nanosheets (1 × 10−5 g/mL)...
Figure 3: (A) Emission spectral changes of reporter Glyco-DTE (1 × 10−5 mol/L in PBS buffer, 0.25‰ Triton X-1...
Figure 4: (A) Fluorescence imaging of HepG2 cells and HeLa cells after incubated with reporters Glyco-DTE (20...
Figure 5: (A) Fluorescence imaging of HepG2 cells and HeLa cells after incubated with Glyco-DTE@MnO2 photochr...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2019, 15, 1394–1406, doi:10.3762/bjoc.15.139
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: (a) Schematic illustration of IDA. The addition of an analyte competitor leads to switch-on or swit...
Scheme 2: (a) The chemical structure of GC5A and schematic illustration of the binding between the luminescen...
Figure 1: Direct fluorescence titrations (λex = 350 nm) of 2,6-TNS (1.0 μM) (a) and 1,8-ANS (1.0 μM) (c) with...
Figure 2: (a) Direct fluorescence titration (λex = 327 nm) of P-TPE (1.0 μM) with GC5A in HEPES buffer (10 mM...
Figure 3: (a) Direct fluorescence titration (λex = 371 nm) of TPS (1.0 μM) with GC5A in HEPES buffer (10 mM, ...
Figure 4: (a) Direct fluorescence titration (λex = 465 nm) of Ru(dcbpy)3 (1.0 μM) with GC5A. (b) Direct absor...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 1840–1845, doi:10.3762/bjoc.14.157
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: The chemical structures of (a) bisphosphonates (BPs) and (b) guanidinium-modified calix[5]arene (GC...
Scheme 2: Schematic illustration of the binding between BPs and GC5A and the operating IDA principle of fluor...
Scheme 3: The chemical structures of the selected BP drugs.
Figure 1: (a) Fluorescence competitive titration of GC5A·Fl (0.9/1.0 μM) with risedronate (up to 29.6 μM) in ...
Figure 2: The set-up calibration lines of the fluorescence intensities for quantitatively determining the con...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2018, 14, 253–281, doi:10.3762/bjoc.14.17
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: The design of classical DNA molecular beacons.
Figure 2: Structures of DNA and selected PNA systems.
Figure 3: Various binding modes of PNA to double stranded DNA including triplex formation, triplex invasion, ...
Figure 4: The design and working principle of the PNA beacons according to (A) Ortiz et al. [41] and (B) Armitage...
Figure 5: The design of "stemless" PNA beacons.
Figure 6: The applications of PNA openers to facilitate the binding of PNA beacons to double stranded DNA [40,47].
Figure 7: The working principle of snap-to-it probes that employed metal chelation to bring the dyes in close...
Figure 8: Examples of pre-formed dye-labeled PNA monomers and functionalizable PNA monomers.
Figure 9: Dual-labeled PNA beacons with end-stacking or intercalating quencher.
Figure 10: The working principle of hybrid PNA-peptide beacons for detection of (A) proteins [80] and (B) protease...
Figure 11: The working principle of binary probes.
Figure 12: The working principle of nucleic acid templated fluorogenic reactions leading to a (A) ligated prod...
Figure 13: Catalytic cycles in fluorogenic nucleic acid templated reactions [90].
Figure 14: The working principle of strand displacement probes.
Figure 15: (A) Examples of CPP successfully used with labeled PNA probes. (B) The use of single-labeled PNA pr...
Figure 16: The concept of PNA–GO platform for DNA/RNA sensing.
Figure 17: Single-labeled fluorogenic PNA probes.
Figure 18: Examples of environment sensitive fluorescent labels that have been incorporated into PNA probes as...
Figure 19: The mechanism of fluorescence change in TO dye.
Figure 20: Fluorescent nucleobases capable of hydrogen bonding that have been incorporated into PNA probes.
Figure 21: Comparison of the designs of the (A) light-up PNA probe and (B) FIT PNA probe.
Figure 22: The structures of TO and its analogues that have successfully been used in FIT PNA probes.
Figure 23: The working principle of dual-labeled FIT PNA probes [222,223].
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 2457–2461, doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.239
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: N-Tetraalkylation of cyclam (1) and cyclen (2) with alkyl halides in partially miscible aqueous–org...
Figure 1: Ball-and-stick depiction of the crystal structure obtained for [(3)H2](ClO4)2, generated with X-See...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2016, 12, 391–405, doi:10.3762/bjoc.12.42
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: Reaction of trimethylsilyl cyanide with tricarbonyl (η5-cyclohexadienyl)iron(1+) salts. Reproduced ...
Figure 1: (a) Supramolecular pore formers. Reproduced with permission from [6]. Copyright 1990 Elsevier. (b) Uni...
Figure 2: An intelligent liquid crystal to read out saccharide structure as a color-change. Picture provided ...
Scheme 2: Polymeric boronic acid receptor units developed by Wulff. Reproduced from [16]. Copyright 1982 Internat...
Figure 3: Fluorescence photoinduced electron transfer (PET) pH sensor developed by A. P. De Silva.
Figure 4: Fluorescence PET sensor for saccharides.
Figure 5: (a) Glucose selective PET system. (b) Chiral discriminating PET system.
Figure 6: (a) Fluorescence photoinduced electron transfer (PET) cation sensors developed by A. P. De Silva. (...
Figure 7: (a) Pyrene diboronic acids (n = 3–8). (b) Pyrene monoboronic acid. (c) Block chart showing the rela...
Figure 8: Glysure Continuous Intravascular Glucose Monitoring (CIGM) System. Image provided by Nicholas P. Ba...
Figure 9: Chiral discrimination of D- and L-tartaric acid by (R)-8 at pH 5.6. [(R)-8] = 5.0 × 10−6 mol dm−3, ...
Figure 10: Chiral discriminating sensor (relative stereochemistry shown) constructed using a good fluorophore ...
Figure 11: Fluorescence emission intensity-pH profile of: (a) Sensor 15: 1.0 × 10−6 mol dm−3 (λex 370 nm, λem ...
Figure 12: Modular chiral discriminating d-PET systems (relative stereochemistry shown).
Figure 13: With Matthew Davidson and Steven Bull during “World Cup” lecture tour of Japan in 2002. (Left) Priv...
Figure 14: Preparation of chiral boron reagent and use as catalyst for aza-Diels–Alder reactions.
Figure 15: Chiral three component self-assembling system.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2015, 11, 2774–2784, doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.298
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Approximate world maps of sources of fluorescent PET sensors/switches. Only the names of correspond...
Figure 2: OPTITM cassettes sold by Optimedical Inc. (http://www.optimedical.com). Photograph is reprinted fro...
Figure 3: Structural formulae of the molecules discussed in this paper.
Figure 4: Approximate world maps of the sources of molecular logic devices. Only the names of corresponding a...
Figure 5: Fluorescence micrographs (excited at 366 nm) of 0.1 mm polymer beads carrying MCID tags. The beads ...
Figure 6: Photographs of fluorescent images (excited at 366 nm) after writing with 254 nm light through a ‘sq...
Figure 7: Backlit shamrock object and fluorescence image (excited at 366 nm) on paper containing 6, 9 and Na2...
Figure 8: Comparison of how a child, a computer and the molecules 7 and 9 draw the outline of a shamrock obje...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2014, 10, 514–527, doi:10.3762/bjoc.10.47
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: α-Heterolytic cleavage in ion radicals.
Scheme 2: Photochemical reaction pathways of N-alkylphthalimides.
Scheme 3: Photoreactions of N-methylnaphthalimides 8 and 12 with allylsilane 9.
Scheme 4: Regioselective generation of carbon-centered free radicals through sequential SET-desilylation proc...
Scheme 5: Mechanistic pathway of photochemical reactions of α-silyl n-electron donor-linked imides systems.
Scheme 6: Direct and indirect photochemical approaches for the preparation of lariat-type crown ethers.
Scheme 7: Feasible mechanistic pathways of photochemical reactions of donor atom-linked phthalimides and 2,3-...
Scheme 8: Photoreactions of branched, bis(α-silylether)-terminated phthalimides.
Scheme 9: Photoreactions of the α-silylether-linked bisphthalimide acceptor.
Scheme 10: Photoreactions of branched, silyl- and non-silyl-polyethylenoxy-linked phthalimides.
Scheme 11: Photoreactions of branched, non-silyl ether and silyl-thioether-terminated naphthalimides.
Scheme 12: Photoreactions of phthalimide-containing chiral peptide side chains.
Scheme 13: Photoreactions of bis-donor-linked bisphthalimides.
Scheme 14: Indirect approach to the preparation of lariat-type crown ethers.
Scheme 15: SET-based fluorescence sensing modes according to guest binding.
Scheme 16: Enhancement of the exciplex formation and fluorescence of bis-crown ether 60 with a Mg2+ sandwich-t...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, 992–1001, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.112
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: Structures of 2-phenylethynyltriphenylene derivatives.
Scheme 2: Synthesis of 2-ethynyltriphenylene (4).
Scheme 3: Synthesis of phenylethynyltriphenylene derivatives 1a–g.
Figure 1: Absorption spectra of 1a–g in cyclohexane and acetonitrile (10−5 M).
Figure 2: Fluorescence emission spectra of 1a–g in cyclohexane and DMSO (10−5 M), λex = 335 nm.
Figure 3: Fluorescence emission spectra of 1e and 1g in various solvents (10−5 M). CH – cyclohexane (λex = 33...
Figure 4: Effect of binary solvent system (cyclohexane-isopropyl alcohol) on the fluorescence emission of 1g ...
Figure 5: Lippert–Mataga plot showing Stokes shift as a function of solvent orientation polarizibility (Δf).
Figure 6: Correlation of Stokes shift with ET(30) scale.
Figure 7: HOMO and LUMO surfaces of 1c and 1g according to DFT calculations.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, No. 32, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.32
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Biologically important amines and quaternary ammonium salts: histamine (1), dopamine (2) and acetyl...
Figure 2: Crown ether 18-crown-6.
Figure 3: Conformations of 18-crown-6 (4) in solvents of different polarity.
Figure 4: Binding topologies of the ammonium ion depending on the crown ring size.
Figure 5: A “pseudorotaxane” structure consisting of 24-crown-8 and a secondary ammonium ion (5); R = Ph.
Figure 6: Typical examples of azacrown ethers, cryptands and related aza macrocycles.
Figure 7: Binding of ammonium to azacrown ethers and cryptands [111-113].
Figure 8: A 19-crown-6-ether with decalino blocking groups (11) and a thiazole-dibenzo-18-crown-6-ether (12).
Figure 9: 1,3-Bis(6-oxopyridazin-1-yl)propane derivatives 13 and 14 by Campayo et al.
Figure 10: Fluorescent azacrown-PET-sensors based on coumarin.
Figure 11: Two different pyridino-cryptands (17 and 18) compared to a pyridino-crown (19); chiral ammonium ion...
Figure 12: Pyridino-18-crown-6 ligand (21), a similar acridino-18-crown-6 ligand (22) and a structurally relat...
Figure 13: Ciral pyridine-azacrown ether receptors 24.
Figure 14: Chiral 15-crown-5 receptors 26 and an analogue 18-crown-6 ligand 27 derived from amino alcohols.
Figure 15: C2-symmetric chiral 18-crown-6 amino alcohol derivatives 28 and related macrocycles.
Figure 16: Macrocycles with diamide-diester groups (30).
Figure 17: C2-symmetric chiral aza-18-crown-6 ethers (31) with phenethylamine residues.
Figure 18: Chiral C-pivot p-methoxy-phenoxy-lariat ethers.
Figure 19: Chiral lariat crown ether 34.
Figure 20: Sucrose-based chiral crown ether receptors 36.
Figure 21: Permethylated fructooligosaccharide 37 showing induced-fit chiral recognition.
Figure 22: Biphenanthryl-18-crown-6 derivative 38.
Figure 23: Chiral lariat crown ethers derived from binol by Fuji et al.
Figure 24: Chiral phenolic crown ether 41 with “aryl chiral barriers” and guest amines.
Figure 25: Chiral bis-crown receptor 43 with a meso-ternaphthalene backbone.
Figure 26: Chromogenic pH-dependent bis-crown chemosensor 44 for diamines.
Figure 27: Triamine guests for binding to receptor 44.
Figure 28: Chiral bis-crown phenolphthalein chemosensors 46.
Figure 29: Crown ether amino acid 47.
Figure 30: Luminescent receptor 48 for bis-alkylammonium guests.
Figure 31: Luminescent CEAA (49a), a bis-CEAA receptor for amino acids (49b) and the structure of lysine bindi...
Figure 32: Luminescent CEAA tripeptide for binding small peptides.
Figure 33: Bis crown ether 51a self assembles co-operatively with C60-ammonium ion 51b.
Figure 34: Triptycene-based macrotricyclic dibenzo-[24]-crown-8 ether host 52 and guests.
Figure 35: Copper imido diacetic acid azacrown receptor 53a and the suggested His-Lys binding motif; a copper ...
Figure 36: Urea (54) and thiourea (55) benzo crown receptor for transport and extraction of amino acids.
Figure 37: Crown pyryliums ion receptors 56 for amino acids.
Figure 38: Ditopic sulfonamide bridged crown ether receptor 57.
Figure 39: Luminescent peptide receptor 58.
Figure 40: Luminescent receptor 59 for the detection of D-glucosamine hydrochloride in water/ethanol and lumin...
Figure 41: Guanidinium azacrown receptor 61 for simple amino acids and ditopic receptor 62 with crown ether an...
Figure 42: Chiral bicyclic guanidinium azacrown receptor 63 and similar receptor 64 for the enantioselective t...
Figure 43: Receptors for zwitterionic species based on luminescent CEAAs.
Figure 44: 1,10-Azacrown ethers with sugar podand arms and the anticancer agent busulfan.
Figure 45: Benzo-18-crown-6 modified β-cyclodextrin 69 and β-cyclodextrin functionalized with diaza-18-crown-6...
Figure 46: Receptors for colorimetric detection of primary and secondary ammonium ions.
Figure 47: Porphyrine-crown-receptors 72.
Figure 48: Porphyrin-crown ether conjugate 73 and fullerene-ammonium ion guest 74.
Figure 49: Calix[4]arene (75a), homooxocalix[4]arene (75b) and resorcin[4]arene (75c) compared (R = H, alkyl c...
Figure 50: Calix[4]arene and ammonium ion guest (R = H, alkyl, OAcyl etc.), possible binding sites; A: co-ordi...
Figure 51: Typical guests for studies with calixarenes and related molecules.
Figure 52: Lower rim modified p-tert-butylcalix[5]arenes 82.
Figure 53: The first example of a water soluble calixarene.
Figure 54: Sulfonated water soluble calix[n]arenes that bind ammonium ions.
Figure 55: Displacement assay for acetylcholine (3) with a sulfonato-calix[6]arene (84b).
Figure 56: Amino acid inclusion in p-sulfonatocalix[4]arene (84a).
Figure 57: Calixarene receptor family 86 with upper and lower rim functionalization.
Figure 58: Calix[6]arenes 87 with one carboxylic acid functionality.
Figure 59: Sulfonated calix[n]arenes with mono-substitution at the lower rim systematically studied on their r...
Figure 60: Cyclotetrachromotropylene host (91) and its binding to lysine (81c).
Figure 61: Calixarenes 92 and 93 with phosphonic acids groups.
Figure 62: Calix[4]arene tetraphosphonic acid (94a) and a double bridged analogue (94b).
Figure 63: Calix[4]arene tetraphosphonic acid ester (92c) for surface recognition experiments.
Figure 64: Calixarene receptors 95 with α-aminophosphonate groups.
Figure 65: A bridged homocalix[3]arene 95 and a distally bridged homocalix[4]crown 96.
Figure 66: Homocalix[3]arene ammonium ion receptor 97a and the Reichardt’s dye (97b) for colorimetric assays.
Figure 67: Chromogenic diazo-bridged calix[4]arene 98.
Figure 68: Calixarene receptor 99 by Huang et al.
Figure 69: Calixarenes 100 reported by Parisi et al.
Figure 70: Guest molecules for inclusion in calixarenes 100: DAP × 2 HCl (101a), APA (101b) and Lys-OMe × 2 HC...
Figure 71: Different N-linked peptido-calixarenes open and with glycol chain bridges.
Figure 72: (S)-1,1′-Bi-2-naphthol calixarene derivative 104 published by Kubo et al.
Figure 73: A chiral ammonium-ion receptor 105 based on the calix[4]arene skeleton.
Figure 74: R-/S-phenylalaninol functionalized calix[6]arenes 106a and 106b.
Figure 75: Capped homocalix[3]arene ammonium ion receptor 107.
Figure 76: Two C3 symmetric capped calix[6]arenes 108 and 109.
Figure 77: Phosphorous-containing rigidified calix[6]arene 110.
Figure 78: Calix[6]azacryptand 111.
Figure 79: Further substituted calix[6]azacryptands 112.
Figure 80: Resorcin[4]arene (75c) and the cavitands (113).
Figure 81: Tetrasulfonatomethylcalix[4]resorcinarene (114).
Figure 82: Resorcin[4]arenes (115a/b) and pyrogallo[4]arenes (115c, 116).
Figure 83: Displacement assay for acetylcholine (3) with tetracyanoresorcin[4]arene (117).
Figure 84: Tetramethoxy resorcinarene mono-crown-5 (118).
Figure 85: Components of a resorcinarene based displacement assay for ammonium ions.
Figure 86: Chiral basket resorcin[4]arenas 121.
Figure 87: Resorcinarenes with deeper cavitand structure (122).
Figure 88: Resorcinarene with partially open deeper cavitand structure (123).
Figure 89: Water-stabilized deep cavitands with partially structure (124, 125).
Figure 90: Charged cavitands 126 for tetralkylammonium ions.
Figure 91: Ditopic calix[4]arene receptor 127 capped with glycol chains.
Figure 92: A calix[5]arene dimer for diammonium salt recognition.
Figure 93: Calixarene parts 92c and 129 for the formation molecular capsules.
Figure 94: Encapsulation of a quaternary ammonium cation by two resorcin[4]arene molecules (NMe4+@[75c]2 × Cl−...
Figure 95: Encapsulation of a quaternary ammonium cation by six resorcin[4]arene molecules (NMe3D+@[130]6 × Cl−...
Figure 96: Structure and schematic of cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6], 131a).
Figure 97: Cyclohexanocucurbit[6]uril (CB′[6], 132) and the guest molecule spermine (133).
Figure 98: α,α,δ,δ-Tetramethylcucurbit[6]uril (134).
Figure 99: Structure of the cucurbituril-phthalhydrazide analogue 135.
Figure 100: Organic cavities for the displacement assay for amine differentiation.
Figure 101: Displacement assay methodology for diammonium- and related guests involving cucurbiturils and some ...
Figure 102: Nor-seco-Cucurbituril (±)-bis-ns-CB[6] (140) and guest molecules.
Figure 103: The cucurbit[6]uril based complexes 141 for chiral discrimination.
Figure 104: Cucurbit[7]uril (131c) and its ferrocene guests (142) opposed.
Figure 105: Cucurbit[7]uril (131c) guest inclusion and representative guests.
Figure 106: Cucurbit[7]uril (131c) binding to succinylcholine (145) and different bis-ammonium and bis-phosphon...
Figure 107: Paraquat-cucurbit[8]uril complex 149.
Figure 108: Gluconuril-based ammonium receptors 150.
Figure 109: Examples of clefts (151a), tweezers (151b, 151c, 151d) and clips (151e).
Figure 110: Kemp’s triacid (152a), on example of Rebek’s receptors (152b) and guests.
Figure 111: Amino acid receptor (154) by Rebek et al.
Figure 112: Hexagonal lattice designed hosts by Bell et al.
Figure 113: Bell’s amidinium receptor (156) and the amidinium ion (157).
Figure 114: Aromatic phosphonic acids.
Figure 115: Xylene phosphonates 159 and 160a/b for recognition of amines and amino alcohols.
Figure 116: Bisphosphonate recognition motif 161 for a colorimetric assay with alizarin complexone (163) for ca...
Figure 117: Bisphosphonate/phosphate clip 164 and bisphosphonate cleft 165.
Figure 118: N-Methylpyrazine 166a, N-methylnicotinamide iodide (166b) and NAD+ (166c).
Figure 119: Bisphosphate cavitands.
Figure 120: Bisphosphonate 167 of Schrader and Finocchiaro.
Figure 121: Tweezer 168 for noradrenaline (80b).
Figure 122: Different tripods and heparin (170).
Figure 123: Squaramide based receptors 172.
Figure 124: Cage like NH4+ receptor 173 of Kim et al.
Figure 125: Ammonium receptors 174 of Chin et al.
Figure 126: 2-Oxazolin-based ammonium receptors 175a–d and 176 by Ahn et al.
Figure 127: Racemic guest molecules 177.
Figure 128: Tripods based on a imidazole containing macrocycle (178) and the guest molecules employed in the st...
Figure 129: Ammonium ion receptor 180.
Figure 130: Tetraoxa[3.3.3.3]paracyclophanes 181 and a cyclophanic tetraester (182).
Figure 131: Peptidic bridged paraquat-cyclophane.
Figure 132: Shape-selective noradrenaline host.
Figure 133: Receptor 185 for binding of noradrenaline on surface layers from Schrader et al.
Figure 134: Tetraphosphonate receptor for binding of noradrenaline.
Figure 135: Tetraphosphonate 187 of Schrader and Finocchiaro.
Figure 136: Zinc-Porphyrin ammonium-ion receptors 188 and 189 of Mizutani et al.
Figure 137: Zinc porphyrin receptor 190.
Figure 138: Zinc porphyrin receptors 191 capable of amino acid binding.
Figure 139: Zinc-porphyrins with amino acid side chains for stereoinduction.
Figure 140: Bis-zinc-bis-porphyrin based on Tröger’s base 193.
Figure 141: BINAP-zinc-prophyrin derivative 194 and it’s guests.
Figure 142: Bisaryl-linked-zinc-porphyrin receptors.
Figure 143: Bis-zinc-porphyrin 199 for diamine recognition and guests.
Figure 144: Bis-zinc-porphyrin crown ether 201.
Figure 145: Bis-zinc-porphyrin 202 for stereodiscrimination (L = large substituent; S = small substituent).
Figure 146: Bis-zinc-porphyrin[3]rotaxane and its copper complex and guests.
Figure 147: Dien-bipyridyl ligand 206 for co-ordination of two metal atoms.
Figure 148: The ligand and corresponding tetradentate co-complex 207 serving as enantioselective receptor for a...
Figure 149: Bis(oxazoline)–copper(II) complex 208 for the recognition of amino acids in aqueous solution.
Figure 150: Zinc-salen-complexes 209 for the recognition tertiary amines.
Figure 151: Bis(oxazoline)–copper(II) 211 for the recognition of amino acids in aqueous solution.
Figure 152: Zn(II)-complex of a C2 terpyridine crown ether.
Figure 153: Displacement assay and receptor for aspartate over glutamate.
Figure 154: Chiral complex 214 for a colorimetric displacement assay for amino acids.
Figure 155: Metal complex receptor 215 with tripeptide side arms.
Figure 156: A sandwich complex 216 and its displaceable dye 217.
Figure 157: Lanthanide complexes 218–220 for amino acid recognition.
Figure 158: Nonactin (221), valinomycin (222) and vancomycin (223).
Figure 159: Monesin (224a) and a chiral analogue for enantiodiscrimination of ammonium guests (224b).
Figure 160: Chiral podands (226) compared to pentaglyme-dimethylether (225) and 18-crown-6 (4).
Figure 161: Lasalocid A (228).
Figure 162: Lasalocid derivatives (230) of Sessler et al.
Figure 163: The Coporphyrin I tetraanion (231).
Figure 164: Linear and cyclic peptides for ammonium ion recognition.
Figure 165: Cyclic and bicyclic depsipeptides for ammonium ion recognition.
Figure 166: α-Cyclodextrin (136a) and novocaine (236).
Figure 167: Helical diol receptor 237 by Reetz and Sostmann.
Figure 168: Ammonium binding spherand by Cram et al. (238a) and the cyclic[6]metaphenylacetylene 238b in compar...
Figure 169: Receptor for peptide backbone and ammonium binding (239).
Figure 170: Anion sensor principle with 3-hydroxy-2-naphthanilide of Jiang et al.
Figure 171: 7-bromo-3-hydroxy-N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)naphthalene 2-carboxamide (241) and its amine binding.
Figure 172: Naturally occurring catechins with affinity to quaternary ammonium ions.
Figure 173: Spiropyran (244) and merocyanine form (244a) of the amino acid receptors of Fuji et al.
Figure 174: Coumarin aldehyde (245) and its iminium species with amino acid bound (245a) by Glass et al.
Figure 175: Coumarin aldehyde appended with boronic acid.
Figure 176: Quinolone aldehyde dimers by Glass et al.
Figure 177: Chromogenic ammonium ion receptors with trifluoroacetophenone recognition motifs.
Figure 178: Chromogenic ammonium ion receptor with trifluoroacetophenone recognition motif bound on different m...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2008, 4, No. 52, doi:10.3762/bjoc.4.52
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Structures of compounds 1 and 2.
Scheme 1: Syntheses of receptors 1 and 2.
Figure 2: UV-vis spectra of 1 (c = 5.05 × 10−5 M) in different solvents.
Figure 3: UV-vis spectra of 2 (c = 5.05 × 10−5 M) in different solvents.
Figure 4: UV spectra of the complex of 1 with citric acid (c = 1.67 × 10−5 M) and its change of absorbance on...
Figure 5: UV spectra of the complex of 1 with D-(−)-tartaric acid (c = 1.67 × 10−5 M) and its change of absor...
Figure 6: UV spectra of the complex of 2 with citric acid (c = 1.67 × 10−5 M) and its change of absorbance on...
Figure 7: UV spectra of the complex of 2 with D-(−)-tartaric acid (c = 1.67 × 10−5 M) and its change of absor...
Figure 8: Fluorescence change of 1 in CHCl3 in the presence of carboxylic acids (λex = 290 nm).
Figure 9: Plot of the ratio of excimer to monomer emission vs concentration of the complex of 1 with citric a...
Figure 10: Fluorescence change of 1 in CHCl3 (c = 1.67 × 10−5 M) upon addition of citric acid dissolved in CHCl...
Figure 11: Fluorescence change of 1 in CHCl3 (c = 1.67 × 10−5 M) upon addition of D-(−)-tartaric acid dissolve...
Figure 12: Fluorescence change of 2 in CHCl3 in the presence of carboxylic acids (λex = 290 nm).
Figure 13: Fluorescence change of 2 in CHCl3 (c = 1.67 × 10−5 M) upon addition citric acid dissolved in CHCl3 ...
Figure 14: 1H NMR (in CDCl3) spectra of receptor 1 (c = 3.57 × 10−3 M; bottom) and the 1:1 complex with citric...
Figure 15: AM1 optimized geometries of the complexes of 1 with (a) citric acid, hydrogen bond distances: a = 2...
Figure 16: AM1 optimized geometry of the complex of 2 with citric acid, hydrogen bond distances: a = 2.12 Å, b...