Simulation tool for assessing the release and environmental distribution of nanomaterials

Scholarly Works

• Wohlleben, W.; Bossa, N.; Mitrano, D. M.; Scott, K. Everything falls apart: How solids degrade and release nanomaterials, composite fragments, and microplastics. NanoImpact 2024, 34, 100510. doi:10.1016/j.impact.2024.100510
• Chatzipanagiotou, K.-R.; Petrakli, F.; Steck, J.; Philippot, C.; Artous, S.; Koumoulos, E. Sustainability and Risk at the Nano-Scale: Applicability of Open Access Tools for Nanomaterial Assessment at Early Stages of Development. Elsevier BV 2024. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4768382
• Maniotis, N. Multiphysics Simulation on Nanoparticle Environmental Paths and Recovery. Nanoparticles as Sustainable Environmental Remediation Agents; Royal Society of Chemistry, 2023; pp 238–263. doi:10.1039/bk9781837670215-00238
• MacLeod, M.; Domercq, P.; Harrison, S.; Praetorius, A. Computational models to confront the complex pollution footprint of plastic in the environment. Nature computational science 2023, 3, 486–494. doi:10.1038/s43588-023-00445-y
• Quik, J. T. K.; Meesters, J. A. J.; Koelmans, A. A. A multimedia model to estimate the environmental fate of microplastic particles. The Science of the total environment 2023, 882, 163437. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163437
• Pan, B.; Li, S.; Peng, H.; Ao, C.; Wei, Z.; Xing, B. Advances in understanding the processes and cycling of nanoparticles in the terrestrial environment. Advances in Agronomy; Elsevier, 2023; pp 1–79. doi:10.1016/bs.agron.2023.06.001
• Pandey, G.; Chauhan, R.; Yadav, A. S.; Bajpai, S. doi:10.1002/9783527834143.ch22
• Tsalidis, G. A.; Soeteman-Hernández, L. G.; Noorlander, C. W.; Saedy, S.; van Ommen, J. R.; Vijver, M. G.; Korevaar, G. Safe-and-Sustainable-by-Design Framework Based on a Prospective Life Cycle Assessment: Lessons Learned from a Nano-Titanium Dioxide Case Study. International journal of environmental research and public health 2022, 19, 4241. doi:10.3390/ijerph19074241
• Egbedina, A. O.; Bolade, O. P.; Ewuzie, U.; Lima, E. C. Emerging trends in the application of carbon-based materials: A review. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 2022, 10, 107260. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.107260
• García-Quintero, A.; Palencia, M. A critical analysis of environmental sustainability metrics applied to green synthesis of nanomaterials and the assessment of environmental risks associated with the nanotechnology. The Science of the total environment 2021, 793, 148524. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148524
• Bai, Q.; Yin, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wu, M.; Wang, W.; Tan, Z.; Liu, J.; Moon, M. H.; Xing, B. Flow field-flow fractionation hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: a robust technique for characterization of engineered elemental metal nanoparticles in the environment. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews 2021, 1–22.
• Bai, Q.; Yin, Y.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, H.; Wu, M.; Wang, W.; Tan, Z.; Liu, J.; Moon, M. H.; Xing, B. Flow field-flow fractionation hyphenated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: a robust technique for characterization of engineered elemental metal nanoparticles in the environment. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews 2021, 58, 110–131. doi:10.1080/05704928.2021.1935272
• Wigger, H.; Kägi, R.; Wiesner, M. R.; Nowack, B. Exposure and Possible Risks of Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment—Current Knowledge and Directions for the Future. Reviews of Geophysics 2020, 58. doi:10.1029/2020rg000710
• Suhendra, E.; Chang, C. H.; Hou, W. C.; Hsieh, Y. C. A Review on the Environmental Fate Models for Predicting the Distribution of Engineered Nanomaterials in Surface Waters. International journal of molecular sciences 2020, 21, 4554. doi:10.3390/ijms21124554
• Meesters, J. A.; Peijnenburg, W. J.; Hendriks, A.; van de Meent, D.; Quik, J. T. A model sensitivity analysis to determine the most important physicochemical properties driving environmental fate and exposure of engineered nanoparticles. Environmental Science: Nano 2019, 6, 2049–2060. doi:10.1039/c9en00117d
• Isigonis, P.; Hristozov, D.; Benighaus, C.; Giubilato, E.; Grieger, K.; Pizzol, L.; Semenzin, E.; Linkov, I.; Zabeo, A.; Marcomini, A. Risk Governance of Nanomaterials: Review of Criteria and Tools for Risk Communication, Evaluation, and Mitigation. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) 2019, 9, 696–721. doi:10.3390/nano9050696
• Sørensen, S. N.; Baun, A.; Burkard, M.; Dal Maso, M.; Hansen, S. F.; Harrison, S.; Hjorth, R.; Lofts, S.; Matzke, M.; Nowack, B.; Peijnenburg, W. J.; Poikkimäki, M.; Quik, J. T.; Schirmer, K.; Aj, V.; Wigger, H.; Spurgeon, D. J. Evaluating environmental risk assessment models for nanomaterials according to requirements along the product innovation Stage-Gate process. Environmental Science: Nano 2019, 6, 505–518. doi:10.1039/c8en00933c
• Williams, R. J.; Harrison, S.; Keller, V.; Kuenen, J.; Lofts, S.; Praetorius, A.; Svendsen, C.; Vermeulen, L. C.; van Wijnen, J. Models for assessing engineered nanomaterial fate and behaviour in the aquatic environment. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2019, 36, 105–115. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.11.002
• Lamon, L.; Asturiol, D.; Vilchez, A.; Ruperez-Illescas, R.; Cabellos, J.; Richarz, A.-N.; Worth, A. Computational models for the assessment of manufactured nanomaterials: development of model reporting standards and mapping of the model landscape. Computational toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2019, 9, 143–151. doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2018.12.002
• Mortimer, M.; Holden, P. A. Fate of engineered nanomaterials in natural environments and impacts on ecosystems. Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials in the Environment; Elsevier, 2019; pp 61–103. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-814835-8.00003-0

Explore citations to this article at