This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2024, 15, 817–829, doi:10.3762/bjnano.15.68
Figure 1: Raman spectroscopy for a) MoS2, b) WS2, and c) MoS2/WS2 composite.
Figure 2: XRD diagrams for a) MoS2, b) WS2, and c) MoS2/WS2 composite.
Figure 3: XPS surveys and element edges a–c) MoS2, d–f) WS2, and g–j) MoS2/WS2 composite.
Figure 4: SEM images of exfoliated samples of a) MoS2, b) WS2, and c) MoS2/WS2 composite.
Figure 5: Low- and high-magnification TEM micrographs of a,b) MoS2; c,d) WS2; and e,f) MoS2/WS2 composite. g–...
Figure 6: PD of MB recorded under solar simulator excitation: MB absorbance variation at various durations us...
Figure 7: Change in concentration ratio during PD experiments for a) MoS2 and c) WS2 photocatalysts and the c...
Figure 8: a) PD efficiencies and PD rate-constant variations obtained under solar simulator excitation for (M...
Figure 9: PD efficiency of MB recorded for (MoS2)0.2/(WS2)0.8 (blue dots) and the relative MB concentration c...
Figure 10: Proposed PD mechanisms of MB by MoS2/WS2 catalysts.
Figure 11: PD stability comparison between WS2, MoS2 and WS2/MoS2 composite samples.
Figure 12: Schematic diagram of the photocatalyst preparation.