Search for "amide group" in Full Text gives 92 result(s) in Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2012, 8, 201–226, doi:10.3762/bjoc.8.22
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Calixarenes and expanded calixarenes: p-tert-Butylcalix[4]arene (1), p-tert-butyldihomooxacalix[4]a...
Figure 2: Conventional nomenclature for oxacalix[n]arenes.
Scheme 1: Synthesis of oxacalix[3]arenes: (i) Formaldehyde (37% aq), NaOH (aq), 1,4-dioxane; glacial acetic a...
Figure 3: p-tert-Butyloctahomotetraoxacalix[4]arene (4a) [16].
Figure 4: X-ray crystal structure of 3a showing phenolic hydrogen bonding (IUCr ID AS0508) [17].
Scheme 2: Stepwise synthesis of asymmetric oxacalix[3]arenes: (i) MOMCl, Adogen®464; (ii) 2,2-dimethoxypropan...
Figure 5: X-ray crystal structure of heptahomotetraoxacalix[3]arene 5 (CCDC ID 166088) [21].
Scheme 3: Oxacalix[3]arene synthesis by reductive coupling: (i) Me3SiOTf, Et3SiH, CH2Cl2; R1, R2 = I, Br, ben...
Scheme 4: Oxacalix[3]naphthalene: (i) HClO4 (aq), wet CHCl3 (R = tert-butyl, 6a, H, 6b) [20].
Figure 6: Conformers of 3a.
Scheme 5: Origin of the 25:75 cone:partial-cone statistical distribution of O-substituted oxacalix[3]arenes (p...
Scheme 6: Synthesis of alkyl ethers 7–10: (i) Alkyl halide, NaH, DMF [24].
Scheme 7: Synthesis of a pyridyl derivative 11a: (i) Picolyl chloride hydrochloride, NaH, DMF [26,27].
Figure 7: X-ray crystal structure of partial-cone 11a (CCDC ID 150580) [26].
Scheme 8: Lower-rim ethyl ester synthesis: (i) Ethyl bromoacetate, NaH, t-BuOK or alkali metal carbonate, THF...
Scheme 9: Forming chiral receptor 13: (i) Ethyl bromoacetate, NaH, THF; (ii) NaOH, H2O/1,4-dioxane; (iii) S-P...
Figure 8: X-ray crystal structure of 16 (IUCr ID PA1110) [32].
Scheme 10: Lower rim N,N-diethylamide 17a: (i) N,N-Diethylchloroacetamide, NaH, t-BuOK or alkali metal carbona...
Scheme 11: Capping the lower rim: (i) N,N-Diethylchloroacetamide, NaH, THF; (ii) NaOH, H2O/1,4-dioxane; (iii) ...
Figure 9: X-ray crystal structure of 18 (CCDC ID 142599) [33].
Scheme 12: Extending the lower rim: (i) Glycine methyl ester, HOBt, dicyclohexycarbodiimide (DCC), CH2Cl2; (ii...
Scheme 13: Synthesis of N-hydroxypyrazinone derivative 23: (i) 1-[3-(Dimethylamino)propyl]-3-ethylcarbodiimide...
Scheme 14: Synthesis of 24: (i) 1-Adamantyl bromomethyl ketone, NaH, THF [39].
Scheme 15: Synthesis of 25 and 26: (i) (Diphenylphosphino)methyl tosylate, NaH, toluene; (ii) phenylsilane, to...
Figure 10: X-ray crystal structure of 27 in the partial-cone conformer (CCDC ID SUP 90399) [41].
Scheme 16: Synthesis of strapped oxacalix[3]arene derivatives 28 and 29: (i) N,N’-Bis(chloroacetyl)-1,2-ethyle...
Figure 11: A chiral oxacalix[3]arene [45].
Figure 12: X-ray crystal structure of asymmetric oxacalix[3]arene 30 incorporating t-Bu, iPr and Et groups (CC...
Scheme 17: Reactions of an oxacalix[3]arene incorporating an upper-rim Br atom with (i) Pd(OAc)2, PPh3, HCO2H,...
Scheme 18: Synthesis of acid 39: (i) NaOH, EtOH/H2O, HCl (aq) [47].
Figure 13: Two forms of dimeric oxacalix[3]arene 40 [47].
Scheme 19: Capping the upper rim: (i) t-BuLi, THF, −78 °C; (ii) NaBH4, THF/EtOH; (iii) 1,3,5-tris(bromomethyl)...
Figure 14: Oxacalix[3]arene capsules 46 and 47 formed through coordination chemistry [52,53].
Figure 15: X-ray crystal structure of the 3b-vanadyl complex (CCDC ID 240185) [57].
Scheme 20: Effect of Ti(IV)/SiO2 on 3a: (i) Ti(OiPr)4, toluene; (ii) triphenylsilanol, toluene; (iii) partiall...
Figure 16: X-ray crystal structures of oxacalix[3]arene complexes with rhenium: 3b∙Re(CO)3 (CCDC ID 620981, le...
Figure 17: X-ray crystal structure of the La2·3a2 complex (CSD ID TIXXUT) [60].
Figure 18: X-ray crystal structures of [3a∙UO2]− with a cavity-bound cation (CCDC ID 135575, left) and without...
Figure 19: X-ray crystal structure of a supramolecule comprising two [3g·UO2]− complexes that encapsulate a di...
Figure 20: X-ray crystal structure of oxacalix[3]arene 49 capable of chiral selectivity (CSD ID HIGMUF) [65].
Figure 21: The structure of derivative 50 incorporating a Reichardt dye [66].
Figure 22: Phosphorylated oxacalix[3]arene complexes with transition metals: (Left to right) 26∙Au, 26∙Mo(CO)3...
Figure 23: X-ray crystal structure of [17a·HgCl2]2 (CCDC ID 168653) [69].
Figure 24: X-ray crystal structures of 3f with C60 (CCDC ID 182801, left) [76] and a 1,4-bis(9-fluorenyl) C60 deri...
Figure 25: X-Ray crystal structure of 3i and 6a encapsulating C60 (CCDC ID 102473 and 166077) [23,79].
Figure 26: A C60 complexing cationic oxacalix[3]arene 51 [81].
Figure 27: An oxacalix[3]arene-C60 self-associating system 53 [87].
Scheme 21: Synthesis of fluorescent pyrene derivative 55: (i) Propargyl bromide, acetone; (ii) CuI, 1-azidomet...
Scheme 22: Synthesis of responsive rhodamine derivative 57: (i) DCC, CH2Cl2 [91].
Scheme 23: Synthesis of nitrobenzyl derivative 58: (i) 1-Bromo-4-nitrobenzyl acetate, K2CO3, refluxing acetone...
Figure 28: X-ray crystal structure of [Na2∙17a](PF6)2 (CCDC ID 116656) [97].
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1739–1744, doi:10.3762/bjoc.7.204
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: Retrosynthetic pathways to 3,5-disubstituted indenes bearing two functional groups: Indenylsulfonam...
Scheme 2: Reagents and conditions: (i) (a) EtOAc, LHMDS, THF, −78 °C, (b) H2SO4, H2O, 60 °C [18]; (ii) (a) SOCl2,...
Scheme 3: Reagents and conditions: (i) (a) EtOAc, LHMDS, THF, −78 °C, (b) H2SO4, H2O, 60 °C [18]; (ii) (a) SOCl2,...
Scheme 4: Reagents and conditions: (i) KNO3, H2SO4, −5 °C; (ii) (a) EtOAc, LHMDS, THF, −78 °C, (b) H2SO4, H2O...
Figure 1: Key NMR responses for compounds 17, 19 and 23: 1D NOESY experiments.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1468–1474, doi:10.3762/bjoc.7.170
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: Pd-catalyzed cyclization of N-allyl-pyrrole-2-carboxamides.
Figure 1: Significant relationships among hydrogen and carbon atoms arising from 2D-NMR studies to determine ...
Scheme 2: Proposed mechanism for the formation of the six-membered products.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1205–1214, doi:10.3762/bjoc.7.140
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Anion receptors 1–4 together with their atomic numbering scheme.
Figure 2: 1H NMR spectra of 1 in the absence of anions (a) and upon addition of one equivalent of the followi...
Figure 3: Three representative conformational families of rotamers of 1. Notations refer to the orientations ...
Figure 4: NOE enhancements of 1 in the absence of anions (a) and upon addition of one equivalent of acetate a...
Figure 5: Surface plot of the relative potential energy of 1 as a function of the two constitutive [C6–C7–N7α...
Figure 6: Freely optimized structure at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory and side view showing deviatio...
Figure 7: 1H NMR chemical shift changes, Δδ = δ (in the presence of anions) – δ (in the absence of anions), i...
Figure 8: Freely optimized structures at the B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory and side view showing deviati...
Figure 9: Conformational preferences and proposed binding mode for the 3·AcO− 1:1 complex.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 813–823, doi:10.3762/bjoc.7.93
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Structure of C-lysine conjugates.
Figure 2: Alternative pathways of enediyne photoreactivity: photo-Bergman cyclization (left), C1–C5 cyclizati...
Figure 3: Summary of possible mechanistic alternatives for the observed DNA cleavage by monoacetylene conjuga...
Scheme 1: Proposed mechanism of photocycloaddition of acetylene with 1,4-CHD.
Figure 4: p-, m-, and o-amidyl acetylenes and respective lysine conjugates.
Scheme 2: Synthesis of amido-substituted monoacetylenes and lysine conjugates. Reagents and conditions: a. Pd...
Scheme 3: Photochemical reactions of TFP-substituted aryl alkynes with selected π-systems. In short, the reac...
Scheme 4: Photocycloaddition of amido acetylenes with 1,4-CHD.
Scheme 5: Possible mechanism for photochemical hydration of diaryl acetylene moiety catalyzed by the ortho-am...
Figure 5: Stern–Volmer plots of three regioisomers, 3 (blue diamond), 4 (red square), and 5 (green triangle),...
Figure 6: Absorption spectra of three isomers, 3, 4, 5, and Ph-TFP in acetonitrile (10 μM).
Figure 7: Quantified DNA cleavage data for 1 (a), 6 (b) and 7 (c). Blue: Form I (supercoiled) DNA; red: Form ...
Figure 8: Effect of hydroxyl radical/singlet oxygen scavengers (20 mM) on the efficiency of DNA cleavage at p...
Figure 9: Cell proliferation assay using A375 cells (human melanoma) and compound 1 (green square), 6 (red up...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 46–52, doi:10.3762/bjoc.7.8
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: (a) Receptor 1. (b) ORTEP drawing of receptor 1. Thermal ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probabilit...
Figure 2: The absorption spectra of receptor 1 (5 μM) in the absence or presence of a 50 equiv of F−, Cl−, Br−...
Figure 3: The fluorescence spectra of receptor 1 (5 μM) in the absence or presence of a 50 equiv of F−, Cl−, ...
Figure 4: Comparison of fluorescence emission of 1 (5 μM) in CH3CN after the addition of 50 equiv of tetrabut...
Figure 5: UV–vis absorption changes of 1 (5 μM) upon the addition of TBAF in CH3CN.
Figure 6: Fluorescence emission changes of 1 (5 μM) upon the addition of TBAF in CH3CN (excited at 340 nm).
Figure 7: The fit of the experimental data of fluorescence emission of 1 (5 μM) upon the addition of F− at 40...
Figure 8: Fluorescence emission changes of 1 (5 μM) upon the addition of F− and OH− (5 equiv) in CH3CN (excit...
Figure 9: Partial 1H NMR (400 MHz) spectra of receptor 1 in the presence of 0, 0.2, 0.6, 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, 2.0, ...
Figure 10: Anionic form a and b of receptor 1.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, 960–965, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.107
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: Synthesis of R-3 and S-3.
Figure 1: Concentration-dependent 1H NMR spectra of R-3 in chloroform (CDCl3). The red colours indicate the h...
Figure 2: a) R-3 gel in octane (5 mM); b) octane solution containing a mixture of R-3 (2.5 mM) and S-3 (2.5 m...
Figure 3: a) Concentration-dependent 1H NMR spectra of R-3 in cyclohexane-d12 and b) the shift of N–H signal ...
Figure 4: The evolution of ln(ee × 100) for the racemization of R-3 (1 mM) in the presence of 1 equivalent of...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, 859–868, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.101
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Structure of amphiphiles 1–5.
Scheme 1: Synthetic procedure of the amphiphiles.
Figure 2: Variation of the Tgel with concentration of amphiphiles 1 and 2.
Figure 3: (a, b) FESEM images of the dried gels of 1 and 2, respectively at their MGC. (c, d) Two- and three-...
Figure 4: Luminescence spectra of 2 in water (λex = 330 nm) at various concentrations and room temperature.
Figure 5: FTIR spectra of (a) 1 and (b) 2 in CHCl3 solution (dashed line) and in D2O at the gel state (solid ...
Figure 6: 2D-NOESY spectra of 2 (2%, w/v) in DMSO-d6 with 70% water.
Figure 7: XRD diagram of the dried gel of 2.
Figure 8: Schematic representation of the possible arrangement of molecules during hydrogelation of 2.
Figure 9: MTT assay based percent NIH3T3 cell viability as a function of concentration of amphiphile 2.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, No. 78, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.78
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Natural product and natural product-like hybrids.
Figure 2: Structures of thiolactomycin (1), isatin (2), the desired hybrid 3 and tetracycle 4.
Scheme 1: Reagents and conditions: (a) KOH, MeOH, 25 °C, 95–100% (b) 6, DMF, 60 °C, 9–36%.
Scheme 2: Proposed mechanism for the formation of tetracycles 4.
Figure 3: (a) Molecular structure of the tetracycle 4a. (b) Structure of the dimer of 4a showing the atomic n...
Figure 4: Molecular structure of (a) 4b and (b) 4c, with ellipsoidal model of probability level = 35%.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, No. 66, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.66
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Structures of monomers 1–7 and chain transfer agent 8 used in the RAFT polymerizations.
Figure 2: a) Second derivative UV–vis spectra [17-19] observed during a full titration of a stock solution of RAFT c...
Figure 3: Isothermal calorimetric binding curves for selected polymer/protein host–guest pairs. a) Typical bi...
Figure 4: Graphical illustration of the potential binding mode on hemoglobin tetramer (represented as electro...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, No. 32, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.32
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Biologically important amines and quaternary ammonium salts: histamine (1), dopamine (2) and acetyl...
Figure 2: Crown ether 18-crown-6.
Figure 3: Conformations of 18-crown-6 (4) in solvents of different polarity.
Figure 4: Binding topologies of the ammonium ion depending on the crown ring size.
Figure 5: A “pseudorotaxane” structure consisting of 24-crown-8 and a secondary ammonium ion (5); R = Ph.
Figure 6: Typical examples of azacrown ethers, cryptands and related aza macrocycles.
Figure 7: Binding of ammonium to azacrown ethers and cryptands [111-113].
Figure 8: A 19-crown-6-ether with decalino blocking groups (11) and a thiazole-dibenzo-18-crown-6-ether (12).
Figure 9: 1,3-Bis(6-oxopyridazin-1-yl)propane derivatives 13 and 14 by Campayo et al.
Figure 10: Fluorescent azacrown-PET-sensors based on coumarin.
Figure 11: Two different pyridino-cryptands (17 and 18) compared to a pyridino-crown (19); chiral ammonium ion...
Figure 12: Pyridino-18-crown-6 ligand (21), a similar acridino-18-crown-6 ligand (22) and a structurally relat...
Figure 13: Ciral pyridine-azacrown ether receptors 24.
Figure 14: Chiral 15-crown-5 receptors 26 and an analogue 18-crown-6 ligand 27 derived from amino alcohols.
Figure 15: C2-symmetric chiral 18-crown-6 amino alcohol derivatives 28 and related macrocycles.
Figure 16: Macrocycles with diamide-diester groups (30).
Figure 17: C2-symmetric chiral aza-18-crown-6 ethers (31) with phenethylamine residues.
Figure 18: Chiral C-pivot p-methoxy-phenoxy-lariat ethers.
Figure 19: Chiral lariat crown ether 34.
Figure 20: Sucrose-based chiral crown ether receptors 36.
Figure 21: Permethylated fructooligosaccharide 37 showing induced-fit chiral recognition.
Figure 22: Biphenanthryl-18-crown-6 derivative 38.
Figure 23: Chiral lariat crown ethers derived from binol by Fuji et al.
Figure 24: Chiral phenolic crown ether 41 with “aryl chiral barriers” and guest amines.
Figure 25: Chiral bis-crown receptor 43 with a meso-ternaphthalene backbone.
Figure 26: Chromogenic pH-dependent bis-crown chemosensor 44 for diamines.
Figure 27: Triamine guests for binding to receptor 44.
Figure 28: Chiral bis-crown phenolphthalein chemosensors 46.
Figure 29: Crown ether amino acid 47.
Figure 30: Luminescent receptor 48 for bis-alkylammonium guests.
Figure 31: Luminescent CEAA (49a), a bis-CEAA receptor for amino acids (49b) and the structure of lysine bindi...
Figure 32: Luminescent CEAA tripeptide for binding small peptides.
Figure 33: Bis crown ether 51a self assembles co-operatively with C60-ammonium ion 51b.
Figure 34: Triptycene-based macrotricyclic dibenzo-[24]-crown-8 ether host 52 and guests.
Figure 35: Copper imido diacetic acid azacrown receptor 53a and the suggested His-Lys binding motif; a copper ...
Figure 36: Urea (54) and thiourea (55) benzo crown receptor for transport and extraction of amino acids.
Figure 37: Crown pyryliums ion receptors 56 for amino acids.
Figure 38: Ditopic sulfonamide bridged crown ether receptor 57.
Figure 39: Luminescent peptide receptor 58.
Figure 40: Luminescent receptor 59 for the detection of D-glucosamine hydrochloride in water/ethanol and lumin...
Figure 41: Guanidinium azacrown receptor 61 for simple amino acids and ditopic receptor 62 with crown ether an...
Figure 42: Chiral bicyclic guanidinium azacrown receptor 63 and similar receptor 64 for the enantioselective t...
Figure 43: Receptors for zwitterionic species based on luminescent CEAAs.
Figure 44: 1,10-Azacrown ethers with sugar podand arms and the anticancer agent busulfan.
Figure 45: Benzo-18-crown-6 modified β-cyclodextrin 69 and β-cyclodextrin functionalized with diaza-18-crown-6...
Figure 46: Receptors for colorimetric detection of primary and secondary ammonium ions.
Figure 47: Porphyrine-crown-receptors 72.
Figure 48: Porphyrin-crown ether conjugate 73 and fullerene-ammonium ion guest 74.
Figure 49: Calix[4]arene (75a), homooxocalix[4]arene (75b) and resorcin[4]arene (75c) compared (R = H, alkyl c...
Figure 50: Calix[4]arene and ammonium ion guest (R = H, alkyl, OAcyl etc.), possible binding sites; A: co-ordi...
Figure 51: Typical guests for studies with calixarenes and related molecules.
Figure 52: Lower rim modified p-tert-butylcalix[5]arenes 82.
Figure 53: The first example of a water soluble calixarene.
Figure 54: Sulfonated water soluble calix[n]arenes that bind ammonium ions.
Figure 55: Displacement assay for acetylcholine (3) with a sulfonato-calix[6]arene (84b).
Figure 56: Amino acid inclusion in p-sulfonatocalix[4]arene (84a).
Figure 57: Calixarene receptor family 86 with upper and lower rim functionalization.
Figure 58: Calix[6]arenes 87 with one carboxylic acid functionality.
Figure 59: Sulfonated calix[n]arenes with mono-substitution at the lower rim systematically studied on their r...
Figure 60: Cyclotetrachromotropylene host (91) and its binding to lysine (81c).
Figure 61: Calixarenes 92 and 93 with phosphonic acids groups.
Figure 62: Calix[4]arene tetraphosphonic acid (94a) and a double bridged analogue (94b).
Figure 63: Calix[4]arene tetraphosphonic acid ester (92c) for surface recognition experiments.
Figure 64: Calixarene receptors 95 with α-aminophosphonate groups.
Figure 65: A bridged homocalix[3]arene 95 and a distally bridged homocalix[4]crown 96.
Figure 66: Homocalix[3]arene ammonium ion receptor 97a and the Reichardt’s dye (97b) for colorimetric assays.
Figure 67: Chromogenic diazo-bridged calix[4]arene 98.
Figure 68: Calixarene receptor 99 by Huang et al.
Figure 69: Calixarenes 100 reported by Parisi et al.
Figure 70: Guest molecules for inclusion in calixarenes 100: DAP × 2 HCl (101a), APA (101b) and Lys-OMe × 2 HC...
Figure 71: Different N-linked peptido-calixarenes open and with glycol chain bridges.
Figure 72: (S)-1,1′-Bi-2-naphthol calixarene derivative 104 published by Kubo et al.
Figure 73: A chiral ammonium-ion receptor 105 based on the calix[4]arene skeleton.
Figure 74: R-/S-phenylalaninol functionalized calix[6]arenes 106a and 106b.
Figure 75: Capped homocalix[3]arene ammonium ion receptor 107.
Figure 76: Two C3 symmetric capped calix[6]arenes 108 and 109.
Figure 77: Phosphorous-containing rigidified calix[6]arene 110.
Figure 78: Calix[6]azacryptand 111.
Figure 79: Further substituted calix[6]azacryptands 112.
Figure 80: Resorcin[4]arene (75c) and the cavitands (113).
Figure 81: Tetrasulfonatomethylcalix[4]resorcinarene (114).
Figure 82: Resorcin[4]arenes (115a/b) and pyrogallo[4]arenes (115c, 116).
Figure 83: Displacement assay for acetylcholine (3) with tetracyanoresorcin[4]arene (117).
Figure 84: Tetramethoxy resorcinarene mono-crown-5 (118).
Figure 85: Components of a resorcinarene based displacement assay for ammonium ions.
Figure 86: Chiral basket resorcin[4]arenas 121.
Figure 87: Resorcinarenes with deeper cavitand structure (122).
Figure 88: Resorcinarene with partially open deeper cavitand structure (123).
Figure 89: Water-stabilized deep cavitands with partially structure (124, 125).
Figure 90: Charged cavitands 126 for tetralkylammonium ions.
Figure 91: Ditopic calix[4]arene receptor 127 capped with glycol chains.
Figure 92: A calix[5]arene dimer for diammonium salt recognition.
Figure 93: Calixarene parts 92c and 129 for the formation molecular capsules.
Figure 94: Encapsulation of a quaternary ammonium cation by two resorcin[4]arene molecules (NMe4+@[75c]2 × Cl−...
Figure 95: Encapsulation of a quaternary ammonium cation by six resorcin[4]arene molecules (NMe3D+@[130]6 × Cl−...
Figure 96: Structure and schematic of cucurbit[6]uril (CB[6], 131a).
Figure 97: Cyclohexanocucurbit[6]uril (CB′[6], 132) and the guest molecule spermine (133).
Figure 98: α,α,δ,δ-Tetramethylcucurbit[6]uril (134).
Figure 99: Structure of the cucurbituril-phthalhydrazide analogue 135.
Figure 100: Organic cavities for the displacement assay for amine differentiation.
Figure 101: Displacement assay methodology for diammonium- and related guests involving cucurbiturils and some ...
Figure 102: Nor-seco-Cucurbituril (±)-bis-ns-CB[6] (140) and guest molecules.
Figure 103: The cucurbit[6]uril based complexes 141 for chiral discrimination.
Figure 104: Cucurbit[7]uril (131c) and its ferrocene guests (142) opposed.
Figure 105: Cucurbit[7]uril (131c) guest inclusion and representative guests.
Figure 106: Cucurbit[7]uril (131c) binding to succinylcholine (145) and different bis-ammonium and bis-phosphon...
Figure 107: Paraquat-cucurbit[8]uril complex 149.
Figure 108: Gluconuril-based ammonium receptors 150.
Figure 109: Examples of clefts (151a), tweezers (151b, 151c, 151d) and clips (151e).
Figure 110: Kemp’s triacid (152a), on example of Rebek’s receptors (152b) and guests.
Figure 111: Amino acid receptor (154) by Rebek et al.
Figure 112: Hexagonal lattice designed hosts by Bell et al.
Figure 113: Bell’s amidinium receptor (156) and the amidinium ion (157).
Figure 114: Aromatic phosphonic acids.
Figure 115: Xylene phosphonates 159 and 160a/b for recognition of amines and amino alcohols.
Figure 116: Bisphosphonate recognition motif 161 for a colorimetric assay with alizarin complexone (163) for ca...
Figure 117: Bisphosphonate/phosphate clip 164 and bisphosphonate cleft 165.
Figure 118: N-Methylpyrazine 166a, N-methylnicotinamide iodide (166b) and NAD+ (166c).
Figure 119: Bisphosphate cavitands.
Figure 120: Bisphosphonate 167 of Schrader and Finocchiaro.
Figure 121: Tweezer 168 for noradrenaline (80b).
Figure 122: Different tripods and heparin (170).
Figure 123: Squaramide based receptors 172.
Figure 124: Cage like NH4+ receptor 173 of Kim et al.
Figure 125: Ammonium receptors 174 of Chin et al.
Figure 126: 2-Oxazolin-based ammonium receptors 175a–d and 176 by Ahn et al.
Figure 127: Racemic guest molecules 177.
Figure 128: Tripods based on a imidazole containing macrocycle (178) and the guest molecules employed in the st...
Figure 129: Ammonium ion receptor 180.
Figure 130: Tetraoxa[3.3.3.3]paracyclophanes 181 and a cyclophanic tetraester (182).
Figure 131: Peptidic bridged paraquat-cyclophane.
Figure 132: Shape-selective noradrenaline host.
Figure 133: Receptor 185 for binding of noradrenaline on surface layers from Schrader et al.
Figure 134: Tetraphosphonate receptor for binding of noradrenaline.
Figure 135: Tetraphosphonate 187 of Schrader and Finocchiaro.
Figure 136: Zinc-Porphyrin ammonium-ion receptors 188 and 189 of Mizutani et al.
Figure 137: Zinc porphyrin receptor 190.
Figure 138: Zinc porphyrin receptors 191 capable of amino acid binding.
Figure 139: Zinc-porphyrins with amino acid side chains for stereoinduction.
Figure 140: Bis-zinc-bis-porphyrin based on Tröger’s base 193.
Figure 141: BINAP-zinc-prophyrin derivative 194 and it’s guests.
Figure 142: Bisaryl-linked-zinc-porphyrin receptors.
Figure 143: Bis-zinc-porphyrin 199 for diamine recognition and guests.
Figure 144: Bis-zinc-porphyrin crown ether 201.
Figure 145: Bis-zinc-porphyrin 202 for stereodiscrimination (L = large substituent; S = small substituent).
Figure 146: Bis-zinc-porphyrin[3]rotaxane and its copper complex and guests.
Figure 147: Dien-bipyridyl ligand 206 for co-ordination of two metal atoms.
Figure 148: The ligand and corresponding tetradentate co-complex 207 serving as enantioselective receptor for a...
Figure 149: Bis(oxazoline)–copper(II) complex 208 for the recognition of amino acids in aqueous solution.
Figure 150: Zinc-salen-complexes 209 for the recognition tertiary amines.
Figure 151: Bis(oxazoline)–copper(II) 211 for the recognition of amino acids in aqueous solution.
Figure 152: Zn(II)-complex of a C2 terpyridine crown ether.
Figure 153: Displacement assay and receptor for aspartate over glutamate.
Figure 154: Chiral complex 214 for a colorimetric displacement assay for amino acids.
Figure 155: Metal complex receptor 215 with tripeptide side arms.
Figure 156: A sandwich complex 216 and its displaceable dye 217.
Figure 157: Lanthanide complexes 218–220 for amino acid recognition.
Figure 158: Nonactin (221), valinomycin (222) and vancomycin (223).
Figure 159: Monesin (224a) and a chiral analogue for enantiodiscrimination of ammonium guests (224b).
Figure 160: Chiral podands (226) compared to pentaglyme-dimethylether (225) and 18-crown-6 (4).
Figure 161: Lasalocid A (228).
Figure 162: Lasalocid derivatives (230) of Sessler et al.
Figure 163: The Coporphyrin I tetraanion (231).
Figure 164: Linear and cyclic peptides for ammonium ion recognition.
Figure 165: Cyclic and bicyclic depsipeptides for ammonium ion recognition.
Figure 166: α-Cyclodextrin (136a) and novocaine (236).
Figure 167: Helical diol receptor 237 by Reetz and Sostmann.
Figure 168: Ammonium binding spherand by Cram et al. (238a) and the cyclic[6]metaphenylacetylene 238b in compar...
Figure 169: Receptor for peptide backbone and ammonium binding (239).
Figure 170: Anion sensor principle with 3-hydroxy-2-naphthanilide of Jiang et al.
Figure 171: 7-bromo-3-hydroxy-N-(2-hydroxyphenyl)naphthalene 2-carboxamide (241) and its amine binding.
Figure 172: Naturally occurring catechins with affinity to quaternary ammonium ions.
Figure 173: Spiropyran (244) and merocyanine form (244a) of the amino acid receptors of Fuji et al.
Figure 174: Coumarin aldehyde (245) and its iminium species with amino acid bound (245a) by Glass et al.
Figure 175: Coumarin aldehyde appended with boronic acid.
Figure 176: Quinolone aldehyde dimers by Glass et al.
Figure 177: Chromogenic ammonium ion receptors with trifluoroacetophenone recognition motifs.
Figure 178: Chromogenic ammonium ion receptor with trifluoroacetophenone recognition motif bound on different m...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, No. 20, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.20
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Schematic representation of sugar aminoacids (SAAs) and (pseudo)amide oligosaccharide mimetics.
Figure 2: Natural SAAs structures and natural nucleosidic antibiotics.
Scheme 1: Synthetic route to the target amide-linked sialooligomers. (a) Fmoc-Cl, NaHCO3, H2O, dioxane, 0 °C....
Figure 3: The general structure of glycoamino acids and their corresponding oligomers.
Figure 4: Conformational analysis of the β(1→2)-amide-linked glucooligomer 9.
Figure 5: Short oligomeric chains of C-glycosyl D-arabino THF amino acid oligomers.
Figure 6: (A) Stereoview of the minimized structure of compound 16 (produced by a 500 ps simulation) that mos...
Figure 7: Structures of linear oxetane-β- and δ-SAA homo-oligomers 19–20.
Figure 8: 10-Membered ring H-bonds in compound 21 consistent with NMR and modelling investigations.
Figure 9: General structure of carbopeptoid-oligonucleotide conjugates.
Figure 10: Protected derivatives of 2,6-diamino-2,6-dideoxy-β-D-glucopyranosyl carboxylic acid 22 and 23.
Figure 11: Cyclic homo-oligomers containing glucopyranoid-SAAs.
Scheme 2: Strategy for solid-phase synthesis of cyclic trimers and tetramers containing pyranoid δ-SAAs.
Figure 12: Cyclic tetramers of L-rhamno- and D-gulo-configured oxetane-SAAs.
Figure 13: Aminoglycosidic antibiotics of the glycocinnamoylspermidine family.
Scheme 3: Synthesis of (thio)trehazoline, via triflate, from β-hydroxy(thio)urea.
Figure 14: Approaches to access pseudoamide-type oligosaccharide mimics.
Figure 15: Calystegine B2 analogues 38 and 39 with urea-linked disaccharide structure.
Figure 16: Rotameric equilibrium shift of 40 by formation of a bidentate hydrogen bond.
Figure 17: Nucleotide analogues with thiourea and S-methylisothiouronium linkers.
Scheme 4: Retrosynthetic approach to synthesize thiourea-linked glycooligomers.
Figure 18: Rotameric equilibria for β-(1→6)-thiourea-linked glucodimer 41.
Figure 19: Schematic representation of (a) cyclodextrin (CDs) and (b) cyclotrehalan (CTs) family members.
Scheme 5: Synthesis of guanidine-linked pseudodisaccharides via carbodiimide.
Figure 20: β(1→6)-Guanidine-linked pseudodi- and pseudotrisaccharides 47 and 48.
Scheme 6: Synthesis of N-benzylguanidine-linked CT2 50.
Figure 21: Structure of RNG and DNG.
Figure 22: Preparation of Fmoc-guanidinium derivatives.
Figure 23: Structures of the homo-oligomeric RNG derivatives 51–55.
Figure 24: Phosphoramidite building block 56.
Figure 25: Structures of DNGs 57–65.
Figure 26: Structure of the phosphoramidite building block 66.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, No. 5, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.5
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Schematic representation of the design of a host–guest complex based on antiparallel β-sheet geomet...
Figure 2: Molecular structures of the two designed receptors 1 and 2 having different relative orientations o...
Figure 3: CAChe minimized structures for the “endo” complexes formed between receptors 1 (a) and 2 (b) and th...
Scheme 1: Synthesis of tetraprotected bis(alanyl)benzophenones 3 from L-phenylalanine 7.
Scheme 2: Deprotection reactions of bis(alanyl)benzophenone units 3.
Scheme 3: Synthesis of the linear tetrapeptides 15 and 17 as mixtures of diastereoisomers.
Figure 4: a) Molecular structures of the two major diastereoisomers of the cyclic receptors obtained from the...
Figure 5: Reverse-phase HPLC chromatograms of the purified fraction obtained from macrocyclization reactions ...
Figure 6: Variable-temperature 1H NMR experiments of 1 in chloroform-d solution. The proton signals that appe...
Figure 7: Small fraction of the columnar arrangement observed in solid-state packing of receptor 1. Two adjac...
Figure 8: Molecular structures of the guests used in the binding experiments.
Figure 9: Selected region of the variable-concentration 1H NMR spectra acquired using chloroform-d solutions ...
Figure 10: a) Selected region of a series 1H NMR spectra acquired during titration of receptor 2 with n-C6H13-...
Figure 11: CAChe minimized structures for two possible binding geometries, a) exo and b) endo complexes formed...
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2010, 6, No. 3, doi:10.3762/bjoc.6.3
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Self-assembly of zwitterion 1 to give dimer 1·1 and self-assembly of zwitterion 2 to give dimer 2·2...
Scheme 1: Synthesis of zwitterion 2.
Scheme 2: Synthesis of compound 2·H+.
Figure 2: 1H NMR spectra of zwitterion 2 (bottom) and its protonated form 2·H+ (top).
Figure 3: Part of the 1H NMR spectrum of 2 in [D6]DMSO showing the complexation-induced shifts of the indole ...
Figure 4: Representative binding isotherm of the aromatic proton d (left) and the indole NH proton (right).
Figure 5: Binding isotherm of the guanidinium NH2 protons.
Figure 6: Crystal structure of dimer 2·2 with hydrogen bond distances (Å) and dihedral angles.
Figure 7: Side view of dimer 2·2 in the solid state.
Figure 8: Part of the crystal lattice of zwitterion 2.
Scheme 3: An attractive H-bond in 1 (left) is replaced by a repulsive steric interaction in 2 (right).
Figure 9: Energy-minimized structure for dimer 2·2 with hydrogen bond distances (Å) and dihedral angles.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2009, 5, No. 66, doi:10.3762/bjoc.5.66
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1: Unsubstituted pyrrolo[1,2-b]pyridazine.
Scheme 1: Reagents and conditions: i) p-TSA (0.5 equiv), toluene/cyclohexane (4:15), reflux, 15–18 h; ii) p-T...
Figure 2: Depiction with proprietary numbering of compound 6a.
Scheme 2: Plausible mechanistic pathway.
Scheme 3: Reagents and conditions: i) p-TSA (1.5 equiv), toluene/cyclohexane (1:1), reflux, 10.0 h.
Scheme 4: Reagents and conditions: i) p-TSA (2.0 equiv), toluene (30.0 volumes).
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3, No. 43, doi:10.1186/1860-5397-3-43
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: Reagents and conditions: (a) DMF, POCl3; (b) piperidine, ethanol, triethylamine; (c) malonodinitril...
Scheme 2: Mechanism for the formation of pyrazolinoquinolizines 6.
Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2, No. 13, doi:10.1186/1860-5397-2-13
Graphical Abstract
Scheme 1: Reagents and conditions for synthesis of N-glutaryl-deacetylcolchicine. The reagents used at each s...
Scheme 2: Reagents and conditions for protection of paclitaxel and coupling to N-glutaryl-deacetylcolchicine ...
Figure 1: Microtubule arrangement as visualized by immunofluorescence localization of β-tubulin. Cells were t...
Figure 2: Projections of a VRO showing + ends localized by antibody against EB1 in a control cell. Cell was t...
Figure 3: Projections of a VRO showing + ends localized by antibody against EB1 in colchitaxel-treated cell. ...
Figure 4: Microtubule arrangement as visualized by immunofluorescence localization of β-tubulin. Cells were t...