This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2016, 7, 2116–2131, doi:10.3762/bjnano.7.201
Figure 1: Box plots of slip (A) and fall (B) angles of free climbing tree frogs on different rough surfaces. ...
Figure 2: Single toe pad forces on rough surface replicates. Force per unit area has been calculated for fric...
Figure 3: Force measurements of single toe pads on PDMS rough surfaces. The pads force per (nominal) unit are...
Figure 4: IRM images of the toe pad in contact around a glass bead. Interference fringes indicate the pad slo...
Figure 5: Scatterplot showing correlation between asperity size and pad contact (distance from bead centre to...
Figure 6: Modelling of the contact behaviour of the pad around a spherical asperity. A) Conceptual drawing sh...
Figure 7: Boxplots displaying attachment performance of tree frogs in varying conditions. The angles of slip ...
Figure 8: Simplified diagram predicting toe pad contact on different rough surfaces. Contact on a smooth surf...
Figure 9: Graph of d3/2 against h5/2, where d is the distance from the nearest area of close contact to the b...
Figure 10: Diagram illustrating the topography of the PDMS structured surfaces. Each pillar on the surface has...